- 16 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
that's the bulk of filesystem drivers dealing with inodes of their own Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 12 4月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... returning -E... upon error and amount of data left in iter after (possible) truncation upon success. Note, that normal case gives a non-zero (positive) return value, so any tests for != 0 _must_ be updated. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Conflicts: fs/ext4/file.c
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
all remaining callers are passing 0; some just obscure that fact. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
Now that no one is using rw, remove it completely. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 21 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Disseldorp 提交于
Under intermittent network outages, find_writable_file() is susceptible to the following race condition, which results in a user-after-free in the cifs_writepages code-path: Thread 1 Thread 2 ======== ======== inv_file = NULL refind = 0 spin_lock(&cifs_file_list_lock) // invalidHandle found on openFileList inv_file = open_file // inv_file->count currently 1 cifsFileInfo_get(inv_file) // inv_file->count = 2 spin_unlock(&cifs_file_list_lock); cifs_reopen_file() cifs_close() // fails (rc != 0) ->cifsFileInfo_put() spin_lock(&cifs_file_list_lock) // inv_file->count = 1 spin_unlock(&cifs_file_list_lock) spin_lock(&cifs_file_list_lock); list_move_tail(&inv_file->flist, &cifs_inode->openFileList); spin_unlock(&cifs_file_list_lock); cifsFileInfo_put(inv_file); ->spin_lock(&cifs_file_list_lock) // inv_file->count = 0 list_del(&cifs_file->flist); // cleanup!! kfree(cifs_file); spin_unlock(&cifs_file_list_lock); spin_lock(&cifs_file_list_lock); ++refind; // refind = 1 goto refind_writable; At this point we loop back through with an invalid inv_file pointer and a refind value of 1. On second pass, inv_file is not overwritten on openFileList traversal, and is subsequently dereferenced. Signed-off-by: NDavid Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
- 17 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
This reverts commit 9bd0f45b. Linus rightly pointed out that I failed to initialize the counters when adding them, so they don't work as expected. Just revert this patch for now. Reported-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
-
- 11 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
Nobody uses it anymore. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix filemap_xip.c] Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 20 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sachin Prabhu 提交于
Commit c11f1df5 requires writers to wait for any pending oplock break handler to complete before proceeding to write. This is done by waiting on bit CIFS_INODE_PENDING_OPLOCK_BREAK in cifsFileInfo->flags. This bit is cleared by the oplock break handler job queued on the workqueue once it has completed handling the oplock break allowing writers to proceed with writing to the file. While testing, it was noticed that the filehandle could be closed while there is a pending oplock break which results in the oplock break handler on the cifsiod workqueue being cancelled before it has had a chance to execute and clear the CIFS_INODE_PENDING_OPLOCK_BREAK bit. Any subsequent attempt to write to this file hangs waiting for the CIFS_INODE_PENDING_OPLOCK_BREAK bit to be cleared. We fix this by ensuring that we also clear the bit CIFS_INODE_PENDING_OPLOCK_BREAK when we remove the oplock break handler from the workqueue. The bug was found by Red Hat QA while testing using ltp's fsstress command. Signed-off-by: NSachin Prabhu <sprabhu@redhat.com> Acked-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NSteve French <steve.french@primarydata.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
This makes things a bit more efficient in the cifs and ceph lock pushing code. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
- 11 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Fabian Frederick 提交于
kcalloc manages count*sizeof overflow. Signed-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 20 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 17 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steve French 提交于
The "sfu" mount option did not work on SMB2/SMB3 mounts. With these changes when the "sfu" mount option is passed in on an smb2/smb2.1/smb3 mount the client can emulate (and recognize) fifo and device (character and device files). In addition the "sfu" mount option should not conflict with "mfsymlinks" (symlink emulation) as we will never create "sfu" style symlinks, but using "sfu" mount option will allow us to recognize existing symlinks, created with Microsoft "Services for Unix" (SFU and SUA). To enable the "sfu" mount option for SMB2/SMB3 the calling syntax of the generic cifs/smb2/smb3 sync_read and sync_write protocol dependent function needed to be changed (we don't have a file struct in all cases), but this actually ended up simplifying the code a little. Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
- 09 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 03 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If we got a reconnect error from async readv we re-add pages back to page_list and continue loop. That is wrong because these pages have been already added to the pagecache but page_list has pages that have not been added to the pagecache yet. This ends up with a general protection fault in put_pages after readpages. Fix it by not retrying the read of these pages and falling back to readpage instead. Fixes debian bug 762306 Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com> Tested-by: NArthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>
-
- 22 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Namjae Jeon 提交于
Currently cifs have all or nothing approach for directIO operations. cache=strict mode does not allow directIO while cache=none mode performs all the operations as directIO even when user does not specify O_DIRECT flag. This patch enables strict cache mode to honour directIO semantics. Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
- 17 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
SMB2 servers indicates the end of a directory search with STATUS_NO_MORE_FILE error code that is not processed now. This causes generic/257 xfstest to fail. Fix this by triggering the end of search by this error code in SMB2_query_directory. Also when negotiating CIFS protocol we tell the server to close the search automatically at the end and there is no need to do it itself. In the case of SMB2 protocol, we need to close it explicitly - separate close directory checks for different protocols. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
- 02 8月, 2014 20 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
by marking pages with a data from a partially received response up-to-date. This is suitable for non-signed connections. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
by filling the output buffer with a data got from a partially received response and requesting the remaining data from the server. This is suitable for non-signed connections. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If there was a short read in the middle of the rdata list, we can end up with a corrupt output buffer. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
that let us know how many bytes we have already got before reconnect. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
and don't mix it with the number of bytes that was requested. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
that let us not mix it with EAGAIN. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If we negotiate SMB 2.1 and higher version of the protocol and a server supports large read buffer size, we need to consume 1 credit per 65536 bytes. So, we need to know how many credits we have and obtain the required number of them before constructing a readdata structure in readpages and user read. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If a server changes maximum buffer size for read requests (rsize) on reconnect we can fail on repeating with a big size buffer on -EAGAIN error in cifs_read. Fix this by checking rsize all the time before repeating requests. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If a server changes maximum buffer size for read (rsize) requests on reconnect we can fail on repeating with a big size buffer on -EAGAIN error in user read. Fix this by checking rsize all the time before repeating requests. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If a server changes maximum buffer size for read (rsize) requests on reconnect we can fail on repeating with a big size buffer on -EAGAIN error in readpages. Fix this by checking rsize all the time before repeating requests. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If we negotiate SMB 2.1 and higher version of the protocol and a server supports large write buffer size, we need to consume 1 credit per 65536 bytes. So, we need to know how many credits we have and obtain the required number of them before constructing a writedata structure in writepages and iovec write. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If a server change maximum buffer size for write (wsize) requests on reconnect we can fail on repeating with a big size buffer on -EAGAIN error in iovec write. Fix this by checking wsize all the time before repeating request in iovec write. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If a server change maximum buffer size for write (wsize) requests on reconnect we can fail on repeating with a big size buffer on -EAGAIN error in writepages. Fix this by checking wsize all the time before repeating request in writepages. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-