No need to dance with intel_uc_supports_huc(uc) as we
can directly use intel_huc_is_supported(huc)
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190804195052.31140-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

No need to use intel_uc_supports_guc_submission(uc) as we
can directly use intel_guc_is_submission_supported(guc)
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190804195052.31140-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

The shrinker cannot touch objects used by the contexts (logical state
and ring). Currently we mark those as "pin_global" to let the shrinker
skip over them, however, if we remove them from the shrinker lists
entirely, we don't event have to include them in our shrink accounting.

By keeping the unshrinkable objects in our shrinker tracking, we report
a large number of objects available to be shrunk, and leave the shrinker
deeply unsatisfied when we fail to reclaim those. The shrinker will
persist in trying to reclaim the unavailable objects, forcing the system
into a livelock (not even hitting the dread oomkiller).

v2: Extend unshrinkable protection for perma-pinned scratch and guc
allocations (Tvrtko)
v3: Notice that we should be pinned when marking unshrinkable and so the
link cannot be empty; merge duplicate paths.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802212137.22207-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We don't have to immediately fail on WOPCM partitioning, we can wait
until we will start programming WOPCM registers. This should give us
more options if we decide to restore fallback in case of GuC failures.

v3: rebased
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802184055.31988-7-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Inject probe errors into intel_uc_init_hw to make sure we
correctly handle any uC initialization failure.

To avoid complains from CI about injected errors use
i915_probe_error to lower message level.

v4: rebased after moving hot fixes moved to separate patches
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802184055.31988-6-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

When we fail to load GuC and want to abort probe, we hit:

<7> [229.915779] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_uc_init_hw [i915]] GuC initialization failed -6
<7> [229.915813] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:i915_gem_init_hw [i915]] Enabling uc failed (-6)
<4> [229.953354] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<4> [229.953355] WARN_ON(dev_priv->mm.shrink_count)
<4> [229.953406] WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 3287 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1684 i915_gem_cleanup_early+0xfc/0x110 [i915]
<4> [229.953464] Call Trace:
<4> [229.953489]  i915_driver_late_release+0x19/0x60 [i915]
<4> [229.953514]  i915_driver_probe+0xb82/0x18a0 [i915]
<4> [229.953519]  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80
<4> [229.953545]  i915_pci_probe+0x43/0x1b0 [i915]
...
<4> [229.962951] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<4> [229.962956] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock)
<4> [229.962959] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 2395 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:912 __mutex_lock+0x750/0x9b0
<4> [229.963091] Call Trace:
<4> [229.963129]  ? i915_vma_destroy+0x86/0x350 [i915]
<4> [229.963166]  ? i915_vma_destroy+0x86/0x350 [i915]
<4> [229.963201]  i915_vma_destroy+0x86/0x350 [i915]
<4> [229.963236]  __i915_gem_free_objects+0xb8/0x510 [i915]
<4> [229.963270]  __i915_gem_free_work+0x5a/0x90 [i915]
<4> [229.963275]  process_one_work+0x245/0x610

as since commit 6f76098f ("drm/i915/uc: Move uC early functions
inside the GT ones") we cleanup uc after gem.

Move captured GuC load error log to uc struct and release it
in intel_uc_fini() instead of intel_uc_driver_late_release()

Note that intel_uc_driver_late_release() is now empty, but
we can leave it as a placeholder for future code.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802184055.31988-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

On Gen9 when we try to reload HuC due to GuC upload error, we hit:

<7> [232.025927] [drm:intel_uc_init_hw [i915]] GuC fw load failed: -8; will reset and retry 2 more time(s)
<7> [232.026004] [drm:intel_uc_fw_upload [i915]] HuC fw load i915/kbl_huc_ver02_00_1810.bin
<7> [232.026686] [drm:intel_uc_fw_upload [i915]] HuC fw xfer completed
<6> [232.026688] [drm] HuC: Loaded firmware i915/kbl_huc_ver02_00_1810.bin (version 2.0)
<3> [232.026703] intel_uc_fw_copy_rsa:541 GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_uc_fw_is_available(uc_fw))

as firmware that previously failed to load was wrongly treated as
unavailable since its status code was not matching status check logic.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802184055.31988-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

On Gen9 when we try to reload HuC due to GuC upload error, we hit:

<7> [229.656688] [drm:intel_uc_init_hw [i915]] GuC fw load failed: -8; will reset and retry 2 more time(s)
<7> [229.656739] [drm:intel_uc_fw_upload [i915]] HuC fw load i915/kbl_huc_ver02_00_1810.bin
<3> [229.656740] intel_uc_fw_upload:425 GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uc_fw_is_loaded(uc_fw))

as we performed only pure reset and didn't sanitized HuC fw status.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802184055.31988-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

As we already track GuC/HuC uses by other means than modparam
there is no point in sanitizing it. Just scan modparam for
major discrepancies between what was requested vs actual.

v2: rebased, reworded info messages
v3: oops
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190801132840.33176-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Instead of relying on enable_guc modparam to represent actual
GuC submission mode, use dedicated flag and look at modparam
only to check if submission was explicitly disabled by the user.

v2: rebased, simplified condition (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190731223321.36436-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

We can use value of enable_guc modparam during firmware path selection
and start using firmware status to see if GuC/HuC is being used.
This is first step to make enable_guc modparam read-only.

v2: rebased, don't care about <0 (Chris)
v3: oops
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190731223321.36436-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Rename intel_uc_is_using* into intel_uc_supports* to make clear
distinction from actual state (compare intel_uc_fw_is_running)
Suggested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190731223321.36436-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

uC is a subcomponent of GT, so initialize/clean it as part of it. The
wopcm_init_early doesn't have to be happen before the uC one, but since
in other parts of the code we consider WOPCM first do the same for
consistency.

v2: s/cleanup_early/late_release to match the caller
v3: s/late_release/driver_late_release/ (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> #v1
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190801005709.34092-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

The register we write are not WOPCM regs but uC ones related to how
GuC and HuC are going to use the WOPCM, so it makes logical sense
for them to be programmed as part of uc_init_hw. The WOPCM map on the
other side is not uC-specific (although that is our main use-case), so
keep that separate.

v2: move write_and_verify to uncore, fix log, re-use err_out tag,
    add intel_wopcm_guc_base, fix log
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730230743.19542-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

When coming out of S3/S4 we sanitize and re-init the HW, which includes
enabling communication during uc_init_hw. We therefore don't want to do
that again in uc_resume and can just tell GuC to reload its state.

v2: split uc_resume and uc_runtime_resume to match the suspend
    functions and to better differentiate the expected state in the 2
    scenarios (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730230743.19542-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

Throw out our local hacks of header tests now that the more generic
kbuild versions are upstream.

At least for now, continue to keep the header tests behind
CONFIG_DRM_I915_WERROR=y knob.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190729140847.18557-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

HuC is usually not a critical component, so we can safely ignore
firmware load or authentication failures unless HuC was explicitly
requested by the user.

v2: add convenient way to disable loading (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190729112612.37476-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c:194: warning: Function parameter or member 'i915' not described in 'intel_uc_fw_fetch'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c:194: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev_priv' description in 'intel_uc_fw_fetch'

Fixes: 97dee74b ("drm/i915/uc: Reorder params in intel_uc_fw_fetch")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190727101055.5300-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

According to Firmware layout definition, RSA signature is located
after CSS header and uCode so actual RSA offset in the blob can be
easily calculated when needed (and we need it only once).
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190726184212.1836-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

According to Firmware layout definition, uCode is located right
after CSS header, so ucode offset is always same as header size.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190726184212.1836-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

According to Firmware layout definition, CSS header is located
in front of the firmware blob, so header offset is always 0.
Similarly, size of the CSS header is constant and currently
used version is exactly 128.

While here, move type/status enums up and keep them together.

v2: use sizeof consistently (Daniele), update commit message
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190726184212.1836-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

We are already storing runtime value of log level in private
field, so there is no need to modify modparam.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725205106.36148-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

guc->stage_desc_pool is required as part of the init parameters and
there is no reason we have to init them after HuC. This fixes a NULL
ptr dereference due to guc->stage_desc_pool not being set (no fixes
tag since GuC submission can't be enabled yet).
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725174655.24382-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

All intel_uc_fw_* functions are taking uc_fw as first param
except intel_uc_fw_fetch() which is taking i915. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725210314.21188-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Generic uc firmware layout definitions are unlikely to change and
are separate to other GuC specific definitions.

v2: reordered
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725141308.24660-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Sphinx was rendering firmware layout as html table, but since
we want to add sizes relations switch to plain text graphics.

v2: also update text and do it before move (Daniele)
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725141308.24660-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

The way we load the firmwares is the same for both GuC and HuC, the only
difference is in the wopcm destination address and the dma flags, so we
easily can move the logic to a common function and pass in offset and
flags. The only other difference in the uplaod path are some the extra
steps that guc does before and after the xfer, but those don't require
the guc fw to be pinned in ggtt and can safely be performed before
calling the uc_upload function.

Note that this patch re-introduces the dma xfer wait for guc loading that
was removed with "drm/i915/guc: Propagate the fw xfer timeout". This is
not going to slow us down on a successful load (the dma has to complete
before fw init can start), but could slightly increase the timeout in case
of a fw init error.

v2: use _fw variants for uncore accesses (Chris), fix guc_fw status on
    failed wait.

v3: use dev_err and print DMA_CTRL (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

The gt is our new central structure for uc-related code, so we can use
that instead of jumping back to i915 via the fw object. Since we have it
in the upload function it is easy to pass it through the lower levels of
the xfer process instead of continuosly jumping via uc_fw->uc->gt, which
will also make things a bit cleaner for the next patch.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

The binary is perma-pinned and the rsa is not going to change, so copy
it only once and not on every load.

v2: onion unwind (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Fernando Pacheco <fernando.pacheco@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

The way we copy the RSA is the same for GuC and HuC, so we can move the
logic in a common function. this will also make any update needed for
local memory easier.

v2: return the number of copied bytes and check it (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

We currently track fetch and load status separately, but the 2 are
actually sequential in the uc lifetime (fetch must complete before we
can attempt the load!). Unifying the 2 variables we can better follow
the sequential states and improve our trackng of the uC state.

Also, sprinkle some GEM_BUG_ON to make sure we transition correctly
between states.

v2: rename states, add the running state (Michal), drop some logs in
    the fetch path (Michal, Chris)

v3: re-rename states, extend early status check to all helpers (Michal)
Suggested-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

Instead of having 2 identical functions for GuC and HuC firmware
selection, we can unify the selection logic and just use different lists
based on FW type.

Note that the revid is not relevant for current blobs, but the upcoming
CML will be identified as CFL rev 5, so by considering the revid we're
ready for that.

v2: rework blob list defs (Michal), add order check (Chris), fuse GuC
    and HuC lists into one.

v3: remove difference between no uC HW and no uC FW, simplify related
    selection code, check the whole fw list (Michal)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v2
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

There are 2 issues around handling of missing uC support:

- We treat lack of uC HW and lack of uC FW definition as 2 different
  cases, but both of them mean that we don't support the uC on the
  platform we're running on.

- We rely on the modparam to decide if we can take uC paths or not, but
  we don't sanitize it if it is set incorrectly on platform with no uC
  support.

To fix both of them, unify the 2 cases in a single one and sanitize the
modparam on invalid configuration (after printing an error message).
The log has been adapted as well, since the user doesn't care why we
don't support GuC/HuC (no HW or no FW), just that we do not. Developers
can easily find the answer based on the platform, so we can simplify the
log.

Correcting the modparam has been preferred over failing the load since
this is what we usually do for non-supported feature (e.g. the now gone
enable_ppgtt would fall back to the highest supported PPGTT mode if the
selected one was not available).

Note that this patch purposely doesn't change the behavior for platforms
that do have uC support, in which case we will still fail if enable_guc
is set and the firmware is not available on the system.
Suggested-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

We have several HAS_* checks for GuC and HuC but we mostly use HAS_GUC
and HAS_HUC, with only 1 exception. Since our HW always has either
both uC or neither of them, just replace all the checks with a unified
HAS_UC.

v2: use HAS_GT_UC (Michal)
v3: fix comment (Michal)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

All the GuC objects are perma-pinned, so their offset can't change at
runtime. We can therefore set (and log!) the parameters only once during
boot.
Suggested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190724085849.18047-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Fix botched refactoring of the code that uncorrectly split a check on a
bool, treating it as a u32.
Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Fixes: 84b1ca2f ("drm/i915/uc: prefer intel_gt over i915 in GuC/HuC paths")
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190723153733.19401-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

This was the last place in gt/uc that was still using I915_READ
with the global dev_priv.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190723091404.6449-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Get rid of them to avoid more users being added while the guc code
transitions to use gt more than i915.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

With our HW interface logic moving from i915 to gt and with GuC and HuC
being part of the gt HW, it makes sense to use the intel_gt structure
instead of i915 as our reference object in GuC/HuC paths.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

All the intel_uc_* can now be moved to work on the intel_uc structure
for better encapsulation of uc-related actions.

Note: I've introduced uc_to_gt instead of uc_to_i915 because the aim is
to move everything to be gt-focused in the medium term, so we would've
had to replace it soon anyway.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>