- 02 5月, 2013 12 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request uses either pages or a bio list for its data. Use a union to record information about the two, and add a data type tag to select between them. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Pull the fields in an osd request structure that define the data for the request out into a separate structure. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Currently ceph_osdc_new_request() assigns an osd request's r_num_pages and r_alignment fields. The only thing it does after that is call ceph_osdc_build_request(), and that doesn't need those fields to be assigned. Move the assignment of those fields out of ceph_osdc_new_request() and into its caller. As a result, the page_align parameter is no longer used, so get rid of it. Note that in ceph_sync_write(), the value for req->r_num_pages had already been calculated earlier (as num_pages, and fortunately it was computed the same way). So don't bother recomputing it, but because it's not needed earlier, move that calculation after the call to ceph_osdc_new_request(). Hold off making the assignment to r_alignment, doing it instead r_pages and r_num_pages are getting set. Similarly, in start_read(), nr_pages already holds the number of pages in the array (and is calculated the same way), so there's no need to recompute it. Move the assignment of the page alignment down with the others there as well. This and the next few patches are preparation work for: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4127Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The purpose of ceph_calc_object_layout() is to fill in the pool number and seed for a ceph_pg structure provided, based on a given osd map and target object id. Currently that function takes a file layout parameter, but the only thing used out of that is its pool number. Change the function so it takes a pool number rather than the full file layout structure. Only update the ceph_pg if the pool is found in the osd map. Get rid of few useless lines of code from the function while there. Since the function now very clearly just fills in the ceph_pg structure it's provided, rename it ceph_calc_ceph_pg(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The new cases added to osd_req_encode_op() caused a new sparse error, which highlighted an existing problem that had been overlooked since it was originally checked in. When an unsupported opcode is found the destination rather than the source opcode was being used in the error message. The two differ in their byte order, and we want to be using the one in the source. Fix the problem in both spots. Reported-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request marked to linger will be re-submitted in the event a connection to the target osd gets dropped. Currently, if there is a callback function associated with a request it will be called each time a request is submitted--which for lingering requests can be more than once. Change it so a request--including lingering ones--will get completed (from the perspective of the user of the osd client) exactly once. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3967Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The page alignment field for a request is currently set in ceph_osdc_build_request(). It's not needed at that point nor do either of its callers need that value assigned at any point before they call ceph_osdc_start_request(). So move that assignment into ceph_osdc_start_request(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Use distinct fields for tracking the number of pages in a message's page array and in a message's page list. Currently only one or the other is used at a time, but that will be changing soon. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The only remaining reason to pass the osd request to calc_layout() is to fill in its r_num_pages and r_page_alignment fields. Once it fills those in, it doesn't do anything more with them. We can therefore move those assignments into the caller, and get rid of the "req" parameter entirely. Note, however, that the only caller is ceph_osdc_new_request(), and that immediately overwrites those fields with values based on its passed-in page offset. So the assignment inside calc_layout() was redundant anyway. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4262Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Move the formatting of the object name (oid) to use for an object request into the caller of calc_layout(). This makes the "vino" parameter no longer necessary, so get rid of it. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Have calc_layout() pass the computed object number back to its caller. (This is a small step to simplify review.) Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
If an invalid layout is provided to ceph_osdc_new_request(), its call to calc_layout() might return an error. At that point in the function we've already allocated an osd request structure, so we need to free it (drop a reference) in the event such an error occurs. The only other value calc_layout() will return is 0, so make that explicit in the successful case. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4240Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
- 27 2月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Use the new version of the encoding for osd requests and replies. In the process, update the way we are tracking request ops and reply lengths and results in the struct ceph_osd_request. Update the rbd and fs/ceph users appropriately. The main changes are: - we keep pointers into the request memory for fields we need to update each time the request is sent out over the wire - we keep information about the result in an array in the request struct where the users can easily get at it. Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Instead of using the old ceph_object_layout struct, update our internal ceph_calc_object_layout method to use the ceph_pg type. This allows us to pass the full 32-bit precision of the pgid.seed to the callers. It also allows some callers to avoid reaching into the request structures for the struct ceph_object_layout fields. Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Always decode data into our cpu-native ceph_pg type that has the correct field widths. Limit any remaining uses of ceph_pg_v1 to dealing with the legacy protocol. Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Rename the old version this type to distinguish it from the new version. Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
- 20 2月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Add support for CEPH_OSD_OP_STAT operations in the osd client and in rbd. This operation sends no data to the osd; everything required is encoded in identity of the target object. The result will be ENOENT if the object doesn't exist. If it does exist and no other error occurs the server returns the size and last modification time of the target object as output data (in little endian format). The size is a 64 bit unsigned and the time is ceph_timespec structure (two unsigned 32-bit integers, representing a seconds and nanoseconds value). This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4007Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Simplify the way the data length recorded in a message header is calculated in ceph_osdc_build_request(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
- 19 2月, 2013 11 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In osd_req_encode_op() there are a few cases that handle osd opcodes that are never used in the kernel. The presence of this code gives the impression it's correct (which really can't be assumed), and may impose some unnecessary restrictions on some upcoming refactoring of this code. So delete this effectively dead code, and report uses of the previously handled cases as unsupported. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
If osd_req_encode_op() is given any opcode it doesn't recognize it reports an error. This patch fleshes out that routine to distinguish between well-defined but unsupported values and values that are simply bogus. This and the next commit are related to: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4126Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There are no actual users of ceph_osdc_wait_event(). This would have been one-shot events, but we no longer support those so just get rid of this function. Since this leaves nothing else that waits for the completion of an event, we can get rid of the completion in a struct ceph_osd_event. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There is only one caller of ceph_osdc_create_event(), and it provides 0 as its "one_shot" argument. Get rid of that argument and just use 0 in its place. Replace the code in handle_watch_notify() that executes if one_shot is nonzero in the event with a BUG_ON() call. While modifying "osd_client.c", give handle_watch_notify() static scope. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There is no caller of ceph_calc_raw_layout() outside of libceph, so there's no need to export from the module. Furthermore, there is only one caller, in calc_layout(), and it is not much more than a simple wrapper for that function. So get rid of ceph_calc_raw_layout() and embed it instead within calc_layout(). While touching "osd_client.c", get rid of the unnecessary forward declaration of __send_request(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The only callers of ceph_osdc_init() and ceph_osdc_stop() ceph_create_client() and ceph_destroy_client() (respectively) and they are in the same kernel module as those two functions. There's therefore no need to export those interfaces, so don't. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Two of the three callers of the osd client's send_queued() function already hold the osd client mutex and drop it before the call. Change send_queued() so it assumes the caller holds the mutex, and update all callers accordingly. Rename it __send_queued() to match the convention used elsewhere in the file with respect to the lock. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The "num_reply" parameter to ceph_osdc_new_request() is never used inside that function, so get rid of it. Note that ceph_sync_write() passes 2 for that argument, while all other callers pass 1. It doesn't matter, but perhaps someone should verify this doesn't indicate a problem. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There is only one caller of ceph_osdc_writepages(), and it always passes 0 as its "flags" argument. Get rid of that argument and replace its use in ceph_osdc_writepages() with 0. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There is only one caller of ceph_osdc_writepages(), and it always passes 0 as its "dosync" argument. Get rid of that argument and replace its use in ceph_osdc_writepages() with 0. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There is only one caller of ceph_osdc_writepages(), and it always passes the value true as its "nofail" argument. Get rid of that argument and replace its use in ceph_osdc_writepages() with the constant value true. This and a number of cleanup patches that follow resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4126Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
- 14 2月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There is a check in the completion path for osd requests that ensures the number of pages allocated is enough to hold the amount of incoming data expected. For bio requests coming from rbd the "number of pages" is not really meaningful (although total length would be). So stop requiring that nr_pages be supplied for bio requests. This is done by checking whether the pages pointer is null before checking the value of nr_pages. Note that this value is passed on to the messenger, but there it's only used for debugging--it's never used for validation. While here, change another spot that used r_pages in a debug message inappropriately, and also invalidate the r_con_filling_msg pointer after dropping a reference to it. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3875Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Currently, if the OSD client finds an osd request has had a bio list attached to it, it drops a reference to it (or rather, to the first entry on that list) when the request is released. The code that added that reference (i.e., the rbd client) is therefore required to take an extra reference to that first bio structure. The osd client doesn't really do anything with the bio pointer other than transfer it from the osd request structure to outgoing (for writes) and ingoing (for reads) messages. So it really isn't the right place to be taking or dropping references. Furthermore, the rbd client already holds references to all bio structures it passes to the osd client, and holds them until the request is completed. So there's no need for this extra reference whatsoever. So remove the bio_put() call in ceph_osdc_release_request(), as well as its matching bio_get() call in rbd_osd_req_create(). This change could lead to a crash if old libceph.ko was used with new rbd.ko. Add a compatibility check at rbd initialization time to avoid this possibilty. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3798 and http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3799Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
- 18 1月, 2013 9 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Both ceph_osdc_alloc_request() and ceph_osdc_build_request() are provided an array of ceph osd request operations. Rather than just passing the number of operations in the array, the caller is required append an additional zeroed operation structure to signal the end of the array. All callers know the number of operations at the time these functions are called, so drop the silly zero entry and supply that number directly. As a result, get_num_ops() is no longer needed. This also means that ceph_osdc_alloc_request() never uses its ops argument, so that can be dropped. Also rbd_create_rw_ops() no longer needs to add one to reserve room for the additional op. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Only one of the two callers of ceph_osdc_alloc_request() provides page or bio data for its payload. And essentially all that function was doing with those arguments was assigning them to fields in the osd request structure. Simplify ceph_osdc_alloc_request() by having the caller take care of making those assignments Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The only thing ceph_osdc_alloc_request() really does with the flags value it is passed is assign it to the newly-created osd request structure. Do that in the caller instead. Both callers subsequently call ceph_osdc_build_request(), so have that function (instead of ceph_osdc_alloc_request()) issue a warning if a request comes through with neither the read nor write flags set. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The osdc parameter to ceph_calc_raw_layout() is not used, so get rid of it. Consequently, the corresponding parameter in calc_layout() becomes unused, so get rid of that as well. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
A snapshot id must be provided to ceph_calc_raw_layout() even though it is not needed at all for calculating the layout. Where the snapshot id *is* needed is when building the request message for an osd operation. Drop the snapid parameter from ceph_calc_raw_layout() and pass that value instead in ceph_osdc_build_request(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() takes (among other things) a "file" offset and length, and based on the layout, determines the object number ("bno") backing the affected portion of the file's data and the offset into that object where the desired range begins. It also computes the size that should be used for the request--either the amount requested or something less if that would exceed the end of the object. This patch changes the input length parameter in this function so it is used only for input. That is, the argument will be passed by value rather than by address, so the value provided won't get updated by the function. The value would only get updated if the length would surpass the current object, and in that case the value it got updated to would be exactly that returned in *oxlen. Only one of the two callers is affected by this change. Update ceph_calc_raw_layout() so it records any updated value. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The len argument to ceph_osdc_build_request() is set up to be passed by address, but that function never updates its value so there's no need to do this. Tighten up the interface by passing the length directly. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Since every osd message is now prepared to include trailing data, there's no need to check ahead of time whether any operations will make use of the trail portion of the message. We can drop the second argument to get_num_ops(), and as a result we can also get rid of op_needs_trail() which is no longer used. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request structure contains an optional trail portion, which if present will contain data to be passed in the payload portion of the message containing the request. The trail field is a ceph_pagelist pointer, and if null it indicates there is no trail. A ceph_pagelist structure contains a length field, and it can legitimately hold value 0. Make use of this to change the interpretation of the "trail" of an osd request so that every osd request has trailing data, it just might have length 0. This means we change the r_trail field in a ceph_osd_request structure from a pointer to a structure that is always initialized. Note that in ceph_osdc_start_request(), the trail pointer (or now address of that structure) is assigned to a ceph message's trail field. Here's why that's still OK (looking at net/ceph/messenger.c): - What would have resulted in a null pointer previously will now refer to a 0-length page list. That message trail pointer is used in two functions, write_partial_msg_pages() and out_msg_pos_next(). - In write_partial_msg_pages(), a null page list pointer is handled the same as a message with 0-length trail, and both result in a "in_trail" variable set to false. The trail pointer is only used if in_trail is true. - The only other place the message trail pointer is used is out_msg_pos_next(). That function is only called by write_partial_msg_pages() and only touches the trail pointer if the in_trail value it is passed is true. Therefore a null ceph_msg->trail pointer is equivalent to a non-null pointer referring to a 0-length page list structure. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-