Fix a potential race with CB_LAYOUTRECALL in which the server recalls the
remaining layout segments while our LAYOUTRETURN is still in transit.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

We may want to process and transmit layout stat information for the
layout segments that are being returned, so we should defer freeing
them until after the layoutreturn has completed.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

If holding a delegation, we do not need to ask the server to return
close-to-open cache consistency attributes as part of the CLOSE
compound.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

We don't need to ask for the change attribute when returning a delegation
or recovering from a server reboot, and it could actually cause us to
obtain an incorrect value if we're using a pNFS flavour that requires
LAYOUTCOMMIT.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

If we're reclaiming state after a reboot, or as part of returning a
delegation, we don't need to check access modes again.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

While walking the list of lock_states, keep a reference on each
nfs4_lock_state to be checked, otherwise the lock state could be removed
while the check performs TEST_STATEID and possible FREE_STATEID.
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Ensure we test to see if the open stateid is actually set, before we
send a CLOSE.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If the reply to a successful CLOSE call races with an OPEN to the same
file, we can end up scribbling over the stateid that represents the
new open state.
The race looks like:

  Client				Server
  ======				======

  CLOSE stateid A on file "foo"
					CLOSE stateid A, return stateid C
  OPEN file "foo"
					OPEN "foo", return stateid B
  Receive reply to OPEN
  Reset open state for "foo"
  Associate stateid B to "foo"

  Receive CLOSE for A
  Reset open state for "foo"
  Replace stateid B with C

The fix is to examine the argument of the CLOSE, and check for a match
with the current stateid "other" field. If the two do not match, then
the above race occurred, and we should just ignore the CLOSE.
Reported-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

We don't want to call nfs4_free_revoked_stateid() in the case where
the delegreturn was successful.
Reported-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

A bugfix introduced a harmless warning for update_open_stateid:

fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:1548:2: error: missing braces around initializer [-Werror=missing-braces]

Removing the zero in the initializer will do the right thing here
and initialize the entire structure to zero.

Fixes: 1393d961 ("NFSv4: Fix a race when updating an open_stateid")
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

These inode operations are no longer used; remove them.
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

boot_time is represented as a struct timespec.
struct timespec and CURRENT_TIME are not y2038 safe.
Overall, the plan is to use timespec64 and ktime_t for
all internal kernel representation of timestamps.
CURRENT_TIME will also be removed.

boot_time is used to construct the nfs client boot verifier.

Use ktime_t to represent boot_time and ktime_get_real() for
the boot_time value.

Following Trond's request https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/9/22 ,
use ktime_t instead of converting to struct timespec64.

Use higher and lower 32 bit parts of ktime_t for the boot
verifier.

Use the lower 32 bit part of ktime_t for the authsys_parms
stamp field.
Signed-off-by: NDeepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If an operation got interrupted, then since we don't know if the
server processed it on not, we keep the seq#. Upon reuse of slot
and seq# if we get reply from the cache (ie EREMOTEIO) then we
need to retry the operation after bumping the seq#
Signed-off-by: NOlga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Fix the code so that we always mark the atime as invalid in nfs4_read_done().
Currently, the expectation appears to be that the pNFS drivers should always
do this, with the result that most of them don't.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

TEST_STATEID only tells you that you have a valid open stateid. It doesn't
tell the client anything about whether or not it holds the required share
locks.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
[Anna: Wrap nfs_open_stateid_recover_openmode in CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 checks]
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

_nfs41_free_stateid() needs to be cached by the session, but
nfs41_test_stateid() may return NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP (in which
case we should just retry).
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

We need to test the NFS_OPEN_STATE flag for whether or not the
open_stateid is valid.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If we're not yet sure that all state has expired or been revoked, we
should try to do a minimal recovery on just the one stateid.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If we're replacing an old stateid which has a different 'other' field,
then we probably need to free the old stateid.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

The actual stateid used in the READ or WRITE can represent a delegation,
a lock or a stateid, so it is useful to pass it as an argument to the
exception handler when an expired/revoked response is received from the
server. It also ensures that we don't re-label the state as needing
recovery if that has already occurred.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Handle revoked open/lock/delegation stateids when LAYOUTGET tells us
the state was revoked.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If the server tells us our stateid has expired, then handle that as if
it was revoked.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If the server tells us our stateid has expired, then handle that as if
it was revoked.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If a server returns NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED, NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED
or NFS4ERR_EXPIRED on a call to close, open_downgrade, delegreturn, or
locku, we should call FREE_STATEID before attempting to recover.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Nothing should need to be serialised with FREE_STATEID on the client,
so let's make the RPC call always asynchronous. Also constify the
stateid argument.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Right now, we're only running TEST/FREE_STATEID on the locks if
the open stateid recovery succeeds. The protocol requires us to
always do so.
The fix would be to move the call to TEST/FREE_STATEID and do it
before we attempt open recovery.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

In some cases (e.g. when the SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_ALL_STATE_REVOKED sequence
flag is set) we may already know that the stateid was revoked and that the
only valid operation we can call is FREE_STATEID. In those cases, allow
the stateid to carry the information in the type field, so that we skip
the redundant call to TEST_STATEID.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Ensure we don't spam the server with test_stateid() calls for
delegations that have already been checked.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

According to RFC5661, if any of the SEQUENCE status bits
SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_ALL_STATE_REVOKED,
SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_SOME_STATE_REVOKED, SEQ4_STATUS_ADMIN_STATE_REVOKED,
or SEQ4_STATUS_RECALLABLE_STATE_REVOKED are set, then we need to use
TEST_STATEID to figure out which stateids have been revoked, so we
can acknowledge the loss of state using FREE_STATEID.

While we already do this for open and lock state, we have not been doing
so for all the delegations.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Allow the callers of nfs_remove_bad_delegation() to specify the stateid
that needs to be marked as bad.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

In NFSv4.1 and newer, if the server decides to revoke some or all of
the protocol state, the client is required to iterate through all the
stateids that it holds and call TEST_STATEID to determine which stateids
still correspond to valid state, and then call FREE_STATEID on the
others.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If the server crashes while we're testing stateids for validity, then
we want to initiate session recovery. Usually, we will be calling from
a state manager thread, though, so we don't really want to wait.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If the delegation has been marked as revoked, we don't have to test
it, because we should already have called FREE_STATEID on it.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOlek Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

As described in RFC5661, section 18.46, some of the status flags exist
in order to tell the client when it needs to acknowledge the existence of
revoked state on the server and/or to recover state.
Those flags will then remain set until the recovery procedure is done.

In order to avoid looping, the client therefore needs to ignore
those particular flags while recovering.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Generated patch:

sed -i "s/\.rename2\t/\.rename\t\t/" `git grep -wl rename2`
sed -i "s/\brename2\b/rename/g" `git grep -wl rename2`
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>

This is trivial to do:

 - add flags argument to foo_rename()
 - check if flags is zero
 - assign foo_rename() to .rename2 instead of .rename

This doesn't mean it's impossible to support RENAME_NOREPLACE for these
filesystems, but it is not trivial, like for local filesystems.
RENAME_NOREPLACE must guarantee atomicity (i.e. it shouldn't be possible
for a file to be created on one host while it is overwritten by rename on
another host).

Filesystems converted:

9p, afs, ceph, coda, ecryptfs, kernfs, lustre, ncpfs, nfs, ocfs2, orangefs.

After this, we can get rid of the duplicate interfaces for rename.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> [AFS]
Acked-by: NMike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>

Add a waitqueue head to the client structure. Have clients set a wait
on that queue prior to requesting a lock from the server. If the lock
is blocked, then we can use that to wait for wakeups.

Note that we do need to do this "manually" since we need to set the
wait on the waitqueue prior to requesting the lock, but requesting a
lock can involve activities that can block.

However, only do that for NFSv4.1 locks, either by compiling out
all of the waitqueue handling when CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 is disabled, or
skipping all of it at runtime if we're dealing with v4.0, or v4.1
servers that don't send lock callbacks.

Note too that even when we expect to get a lock callback, RFC5661
section 20.11.4 is pretty clear that we still need to poll for them,
so we do still sleep on a timeout. We do however always poll at the
longest interval in that case.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
[Anna: nfs4_retry_setlk() "status" should default to -ERESTARTSYS]
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

This also consolidates the waiting logic into a single function,
instead of having it spread across two like it is now.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

We need to have this info set up before adding the waiter to the
waitqueue, so move this out of the _nfs4_proc_setlk and into the
caller. That's more efficient anyway since we don't need to do
this more than once if we end up waiting on the lock.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>