- 26 1月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Realized that the GuC multi-lrc fini breadcrumb emit code is very delicate as the math this code does relies on functions it calls to emit a certain number of DWs. Add a few GEM_BUG_ONs to assert the math is correct. v2: - Rebase + resend for CI (Checkpatch) - Fix blank line warning Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220119210639.33053-1-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
- 22 1月, 2022 2 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Now that the error capture is fully decoupled from fence signalling (request retirement to free memory, which in turn depends on resets) we can safely flush the G2H handler during a GT reset. This eliminates corner cases where GuC generated G2H (e.g. engine resets) race with a GT reset. v2: (John Harrison) - Fix typo in commit message (s/is/in) Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220121043118.24886-4-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
The G2H handler needs to be flushed during a GT reset but a G2H indicating engine reset failure can trigger a GT reset. Add a worker to trigger the GT rest when an engine reset failure is received to break this circular dependency. v2: (John Harrison) - Store engine reset mask - Fix typo in commit message v3: (John Harrison) - Fix another typo in commit message - s/reset_*/reset_fail_*/ Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220121043118.24886-3-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
- 19 1月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
In the i915 there are several hacks in place to make request cancellation work with an old version of the GuC which delivered the G2H indicating schedule disable is done before G2H indicating a context reset. Version 69 fixes this, so we can remove these hacks. v2: (Checkpatch) - s/cancelation/cancellation Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220113181351.21296-3-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
- 12 1月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Update to the latest GuC release. The latest GuC firmware introduces a number of interface changes: GuC may return NO_RESPONSE_RETRY message for requests sent over CTB. Add support for this reply and try resending the request again as a new CTB message. A KLV (key-length-value) mechanism is now used for passing configuration data such as CTB management. With the new KLV scheme, the old CTB management actions are no longer used and are removed. Register capture on hang is now supported by GuC. Full i915 support for this will be added by a later patch. A minimum support of providing capture memory and register lists is required though, so add that in. The device id of the current platform needs to be provided at init time. The 'poll CS' w/a (Wa_22012773006) was blanket enabled by previous versions of GuC. It must now be explicitly requested by the KMD. So, add in the code to turn it on when relevant. The GuC log entry format has changed. This requires adding a new field to the log header structure to mark the wrap point at the end of the buffer (as the buffer size is no longer a multiple of the log entry size). New CTB notification messages are now sent for some things that were previously only sent via MMIO notifications. Of these, the crash dump notification was not really being handled by i915. It called the log flush code but that only flushed the regular debug log and then only if relay logging was enabled. So just report an error message instead. The 'exception' notification was just being ignored completely. So add an error message for that as well. Note that in either the crash dump or the exception case, the GuC is basically dead. The KMD will detect this via the heartbeat and trigger both an error log (which will include the crash dump as part of the GuC log) and a GT reset. So no other processing is really required. Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220107000622.292081-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
-
- 24 12月, 2021 3 次提交
-
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
A fault injection probe test hit a BUG_ON in a GuC error path. It showed that the GuC code could potentially attempt to do many things when the device is actually wedged. So, add a check in to prevent that. v2: Use intel_gt_is_wedged instead of testing bits directly in the GuC submission code (review feedback from Tvrtko). Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211221210212.1438670-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
A weak implementation of parallel submission (multi-bb execbuf IOCTL) for execlists. Doing as little as possible to support this interface for execlists - basically just passing submit fences between each request generated and virtual engines are not allowed. This is on par with what is there for the existing (hopefully soon deprecated) bonding interface. We perma-pin these execlists contexts to align with GuC implementation. v2: (John Harrison) - Drop siblings array as num_siblings must be 1 v3: (John Harrison) - Drop single submission v4: (John Harrison) - Actually drop single submission - Use IS_ERR check on return value from intel_context_create - Set last request to NULL on unpin Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211222223532.28698-1-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Don't silently drop reset notifications from the GuC. It might not be safe to do an error capture but we still want some kind of report that the reset happened. Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211223013128.1739792-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
-
- 21 12月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
If GuC encounters an error during engine reset, the i915 driver promotes to full GT reset. This includes an info message about why the reset is happening. However, that is not treated as a failure by any of the CI systems because resets are an expected occurrance during testing. This kind of failure is a major problem and should never happen. So, complain more loudly and make sure CI notices. Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211211065859.2248188-4-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
-
- 16 12月, 2021 5 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Testing the stealing of guc ids is hard from user space as we have 64k guc_ids. Add a selftest, which artificially reduces the number of guc ids, and forces a steal. The test creates a spinner which is used to block all subsequent submissions until it completes. Next, a loop creates a context and a NOP request each iteration until the guc_ids are exhausted (request creation returns -EAGAIN). The spinner is ended, unblocking all requests created in the loop. At this point all guc_ids are exhausted but are available to steal. Try to create another request which should successfully steal a guc_id. Wait on last request to complete, idle GPU, verify a guc_id was stolen via a counter, and exit the test. Test also artificially reduces the number of guc_ids so the test runs in a timely manner. v2: (John Harrison) - s/stole/stolen - Fix some wording in test description - Rework indexing into context array - Add test description to commit message - Fix typo in commit message (Checkpatch) - s/guc/(guc) in NUMBER_MULTI_LRC_GUC_ID v3: (John Harrison) - Set array value to NULL after extracting error - Fix a few typos in comments / error messages - Delete redundant comment in commit message Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211214170500.28569-8-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
While attempting to debug a CT deadlock issue in various CI failures (most easily reproduced with gem_ctx_create/basic-files), I was seeing CPU deadlock errors being reported. This were because the context destroy loop was blocking waiting on H2G space from inside an IRQ spinlock. There no was deadlock as such, it's just that the H2G queue was full of context destroy commands and GuC was taking a long time to process them. However, the kernel was seeing the large amount of time spent inside the IRQ lock as a dead CPU. Various Bad Things(tm) would then happen (heartbeat failures, CT deadlock errors, outstanding H2G WARNs, etc.). Re-working the loop to only acquire the spinlock around the list management (which is all it is meant to protect) rather than the entire destroy operation seems to fix all the above issues. v2: (John Harrison) - Fix typo in comment message Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211214170500.28569-5-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
A full GT reset can race with the last context put resulting in the context ref count being zero but the destroyed bit not yet being set. Remove GEM_BUG_ON in scrub_guc_desc_for_outstanding_g2h that asserts the destroyed bit must be set in ref count is zero. Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211214170500.28569-4-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Previously assigned whole guc_id structure (list, spin lock) which is incorrect, only assign the guc_id.id. Fixes: 0f797650 ("drm/i915/guc: Rework and simplify locking") Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211214170500.28569-3-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
s/ce/cn/ when grabbing guc_state.lock before calling clr_context_registered. Fixes: 0f797650 ("drm/i915/guc: Rework and simplify locking") Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211214170500.28569-2-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
- 10 12月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa 提交于
GuC PMU busyness gets gt wakeref if awake, but fails to release the wakeref if a reset is in progress. Release the wakeref if it was acquried successfully. v2: Simplify the fix (Ashutosh) Fixes: 2a67b18e ("drm/i915/pmu: Fix synchronization of PMU callback with reset") Signed-off-by: NUmesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAshutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211207020239.43402-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
-
- 01 12月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa 提交于
Since the PMU callback runs in irq context, it synchronizes with gt reset using the reset count. We could run into a case where the PMU callback could read the reset count before it is updated. This has a potential of corrupting the busyness stats. In addition to the reset count, check if the reset bit is set before capturing busyness. In addition save the previous stats only if you intend to update them. v2: - The 2 reset counts captured in the PMU callback can end up being the same if they were captured right after the count is incremented in the reset flow. This can lead to a bad busyness state. Ensure that reset is not in progress when the initial reset count is captured. Signed-off-by: NUmesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211108211057.68783-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
-
- 22 11月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa 提交于
When guc timestamp ping worker runs it takes the spinlock and calls with_intel_runtime_pm. Since with_intel_runtime_pm may sleep, move the spinlock inside __update_guc_busyness_stats. Signed-off-by: NUmesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211120014201.26480-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
-
- 17 11月, 2021 3 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
The intel_engine_create_virtual() function does not return NULL. It returns error pointers. Fixes: e5e32171 ("drm/i915/guc: Connect UAPI to GuC multi-lrc interface") Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211116114916.GB11936@kili
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
The intel_engine_create_virtual() function does not return NULL. It returns error pointers. Fixes: e5e32171 ("drm/i915/guc: Connect UAPI to GuC multi-lrc interface") Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211116114916.GB11936@kili (cherry picked from commit fc12b70d) Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
The intel_engine_create_virtual() function does not return NULL. It returns error pointers. Fixes: e5e32171 ("drm/i915/guc: Connect UAPI to GuC multi-lrc interface") Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211116114916.GB11936@kili
-
- 10 11月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
When i915 receives a context reset notification from GuC, it triggers an error capture before resetting any outstanding requsts of that context. Unfortunately, the error capture is not a time bound operation. In certain situations it can take a long time, particularly when multiple large LMEM buffers must be read back and eoncoded. If this delay is longer than other timeouts (heartbeat, test recovery, etc.) then a full GT reset can be triggered in the middle. That can result in the context being reset by GuC actually being destroyed before the error capture completes and the GuC submission code resumes. Thus, the GuC side can start dereferencing stale pointers and Bad Things ensue. So add a refcount get of the context during the entire reset operation. That way, the context can't be destroyed part way through no matter what other resets or user interactions occur. v2: (Matthew Brost) - Update patch to work with async error capture v3: (Matthew Brost) - Drop async capture support as that hasn't landed yet Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211108164054.23588-1-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
- 29 10月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa 提交于
With GuC handling scheduling, i915 is not aware of the time that a context is scheduled in and out of the engine. Since i915 pmu relies on this info to provide engine busyness to the user, GuC shares this info with i915 for all engines using shared memory. For each engine, this info contains: - total busyness: total time that the context was running (total) - id: id of the running context (id) - start timestamp: timestamp when the context started running (start) At the time (now) of sampling the engine busyness, if the id is valid (!= ~0), and start is non-zero, then the context is considered to be active and the engine busyness is calculated using the below equation engine busyness = total + (now - start) All times are obtained from the gt clock base. For inactive contexts, engine busyness is just equal to the total. The start and total values provided by GuC are 32 bits and wrap around in a few minutes. Since perf pmu provides busyness as 64 bit monotonically increasing values, there is a need for this implementation to account for overflows and extend the time to 64 bits before returning busyness to the user. In order to do that, a worker runs periodically at frequency = 1/8th the time it takes for the timestamp to wrap. As an example, that would be once in 27 seconds for a gt clock frequency of 19.2 MHz. Note: There might be an over-accounting of busyness due to the fact that GuC may be updating the total and start values while kmd is reading them. (i.e kmd may read the updated total and the stale start). In such a case, user may see higher busyness value followed by smaller ones which would eventually catch up to the higher value. v2: (Tvrtko) - Include details in commit message - Move intel engine busyness function into execlist code - Use union inside engine->stats - Use natural type for ping delay jiffies - Drop active_work condition checks - Use for_each_engine if iterating all engines - Drop seq locking, use spinlock at GuC level to update engine stats - Document worker specific details v3: (Tvrtko/Umesh) - Demarcate GuC and execlist stat objects with comments - Document known over-accounting issue in commit - Provide a consistent view of GuC state - Add hooks to gt park/unpark for GuC busyness - Stop/start worker in gt park/unpark path - Drop inline - Move spinlock and worker inits to GuC initialization - Drop helpers that are called only once v4: (Tvrtko/Matt/Umesh) - Drop addressed opens from commit message - Get runtime pm in ping, remove from the park path - Use cancel_delayed_work_sync in disable_submission path - Update stats during reset prepare - Skip ping if reset in progress - Explicitly name execlists and GuC stats objects - Since disable_submission is called from many places, move resetting stats to intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare v5: (Tvrtko) - Add a trylock helper that does not sleep and synchronize PMU event callbacks and worker with gt reset v6: (CI BAT failures) - DUTs using execlist submission failed to boot since __gt_unpark is called during i915 load. This ends up calling the GuC busyness unpark hook and results in kick-starting an uninitialized worker. Let park/unpark hooks check if GuC submission has been initialized. - drop cant_sleep() from trylock helper since rcu_read_lock takes care of that. v7: (CI) Fix igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_engines - For GuC mode of submission the engine busyness is derived from gt time domain. Use gt time elapsed as reference in the selftest. - Increase busyness calculation to 10ms duration to ensure batch runs longer and falls within the busyness tolerances in selftest. v8: - Use ktime_get in selftest as before - intel_reset_trylock_no_wait results in a lockdep splat that is not trivial to fix since the PMU callback runs in irq context and the reset paths are tightly knit into the driver. The test that uncovers this is igt@perf_pmu@faulting-read. Drop intel_reset_trylock_no_wait, instead use the reset_count to synchronize with gt reset during pmu callback. For the ping, continue to use intel_reset_trylock since ping is not run in irq context. - GuC PM timestamp does not tick when GuC is idle. This can potentially result in wrong busyness values when a context is active on the engine, but GuC is idle. Use the RING TIMESTAMP as GPU timestamp to process the GuC busyness stats. This works since both GuC timestamp and RING timestamp are synced with the same clock. - The busyness stats may get updated after the batch starts running. This delay causes the busyness reported for 100us duration to fall below 95% in the selftest. The only option at this time is to wait for GuC busyness to change from idle to active before we sample busyness over a 100us period. Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NUmesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> Acked-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211027004821.66097-2-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
-
- 27 10月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Use __release_guc_id (lock held) rather than release_guc_id (acquires lock), add lockdep annotations. 213.280129] i915: Running i915_perf_live_selftests/live_noa_gpr [ 213.283459] ============================================ [ 213.283462] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected {{[ 213.283466] 5.15.0-rc6+ #18 Tainted: G U W }} [ 213.283470] -------------------------------------------- [ 213.283472] kworker/u24:0/8 is trying to acquire lock: [ 213.283475] ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915] {{[ 213.283618] }} {{ but task is already holding lock:}} [ 213.283621] ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x4f/0x350 [i915] {{[ 213.283720] }} {{ other info that might help us debug this:}} [ 213.283724] Possible unsafe locking scenario:[ 213.283727] CPU0 [ 213.283728] ---- [ 213.283730] lock(&guc->submission_state.lock); [ 213.283734] lock(&guc->submission_state.lock); {{[ 213.283737] }} {{ *** DEADLOCK ***}}[ 213.283740] May be due to missing lock nesting notation[ 213.283744] 3 locks held by kworker/u24:0/8: [ 213.283747] #0: ffff8ffb80059d38 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){..}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f3/0x550 [ 213.283757] #1: ffffb509000e3e78 ((work_completion)(&guc->submission_state.destroyed_worker)){..}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f3/0x550 [ 213.283766] #2: ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x4f/0x350 [i915] {{[ 213.283860] }} {{ stack backtrace:}} [ 213.283863] CPU: 8 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Tainted: G U W 5.15.0-rc6+ #18 [ 213.283868] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021 [ 213.283873] Workqueue: events_unbound destroyed_worker_func [i915] [ 213.283957] Call Trace: [ 213.283960] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 [ 213.283966] __lock_acquire.cold+0x191/0x2d3 [ 213.283972] lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 [ 213.283978] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915] [ 213.284059] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2d7/0x350 [i915] [ 213.284139] ? lock_release+0xb9/0x280 [ 213.284143] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x60 [ 213.284148] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915] [ 213.284226] destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915] [ 213.284310] process_one_work+0x270/0x550 [ 213.284315] worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0 [ 213.284319] ? process_one_work+0x550/0x550 [ 213.284322] kthread+0x135/0x160 [ 213.284326] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [ 213.284331] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 and a bit later in the trace: {{ 227.499864] do_raw_spin_lock+0x94/0xa0}} [ 227.499868] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x60 [ 227.499871] ? guc_flush_destroyed_contexts+0x4f/0xf0 [i915] [ 227.499995] guc_flush_destroyed_contexts+0x4f/0xf0 [i915] [ 227.500104] intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare+0x99/0x4b0 [i915] [ 227.500209] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 [ 227.500212] intel_uc_reset_prepare+0x46/0x50 [i915] [ 227.500320] reset_prepare+0x78/0x90 [i915] [ 227.500412] __intel_gt_set_wedged.part.0+0x13/0xe0 [i915] [ 227.500485] intel_gt_set_wedged.part.0+0x54/0x100 [i915] [ 227.500556] intel_gt_set_wedged_on_fini+0x1a/0x30 [i915] [ 227.500622] intel_gt_driver_unregister+0x1e/0x60 [i915] [ 227.500694] i915_driver_remove+0x4a/0xf0 [i915] [ 227.500767] i915_pci_probe+0x84/0x170 [i915] [ 227.500838] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80 [ 227.500842] pci_device_probe+0xd9/0x190 [ 227.500844] really_probe+0x1f2/0x3f0 [ 227.500847] __driver_probe_device+0xfe/0x180 [ 227.500848] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 [ 227.500850] __driver_attach+0xc4/0x1d0 [ 227.500851] ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0 [ 227.500853] ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0 [ 227.500854] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0x90 [ 227.500856] bus_add_driver+0x12e/0x1f0 [ 227.500857] driver_register+0x8f/0xe0 [ 227.500859] i915_init+0x1d/0x8f [i915] [ 227.500934] ? 0xffffffffc144a000 [ 227.500936] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2d0 [ 227.500938] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 227.500940] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x238/0x2d0 [ 227.500944] do_init_module+0x5c/0x270 [ 227.500946] __do_sys_finit_module+0x95/0xe0 [ 227.500949] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 227.500951] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 227.500953] RIP: 0033:0x7ffa59d2ae0d [ 227.500954] Code: c8 0c 00 0f 05 eb a9 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 3b 80 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 227.500955] RSP: 002b:00007fff320bbf48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [ 227.500956] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000022ea710 RCX: 00007ffa59d2ae0d [ 227.500957] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000022e1d90 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 227.500958] RBP: 0000000000000020 R08: 00007ffa59df3a60 R09: 0000000000000070 [ 227.500958] R10: 00000000022e1d90 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000022e1d90 [ 227.500959] R13: 00000000022e58e0 R14: 0000000000000043 R15: 00000000022e42c0 v2: (CI build) - Fix build error Fixes: 1a52faed ("drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context") Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211020192147.8048-1-matthew.brost@intel.com (cherry picked from commit 12a9917e) Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
- 23 10月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Use __release_guc_id (lock held) rather than release_guc_id (acquires lock), add lockdep annotations. 213.280129] i915: Running i915_perf_live_selftests/live_noa_gpr [ 213.283459] ============================================ [ 213.283462] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected {{[ 213.283466] 5.15.0-rc6+ #18 Tainted: G U W }} [ 213.283470] -------------------------------------------- [ 213.283472] kworker/u24:0/8 is trying to acquire lock: [ 213.283475] ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915] {{[ 213.283618] }} {{ but task is already holding lock:}} [ 213.283621] ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x4f/0x350 [i915] {{[ 213.283720] }} {{ other info that might help us debug this:}} [ 213.283724] Possible unsafe locking scenario:[ 213.283727] CPU0 [ 213.283728] ---- [ 213.283730] lock(&guc->submission_state.lock); [ 213.283734] lock(&guc->submission_state.lock); {{[ 213.283737] }} {{ *** DEADLOCK ***}}[ 213.283740] May be due to missing lock nesting notation[ 213.283744] 3 locks held by kworker/u24:0/8: [ 213.283747] #0: ffff8ffb80059d38 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){..}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f3/0x550 [ 213.283757] #1: ffffb509000e3e78 ((work_completion)(&guc->submission_state.destroyed_worker)){..}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f3/0x550 [ 213.283766] #2: ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x4f/0x350 [i915] {{[ 213.283860] }} {{ stack backtrace:}} [ 213.283863] CPU: 8 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Tainted: G U W 5.15.0-rc6+ #18 [ 213.283868] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021 [ 213.283873] Workqueue: events_unbound destroyed_worker_func [i915] [ 213.283957] Call Trace: [ 213.283960] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 [ 213.283966] __lock_acquire.cold+0x191/0x2d3 [ 213.283972] lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 [ 213.283978] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915] [ 213.284059] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2d7/0x350 [i915] [ 213.284139] ? lock_release+0xb9/0x280 [ 213.284143] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x60 [ 213.284148] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915] [ 213.284226] destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915] [ 213.284310] process_one_work+0x270/0x550 [ 213.284315] worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0 [ 213.284319] ? process_one_work+0x550/0x550 [ 213.284322] kthread+0x135/0x160 [ 213.284326] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [ 213.284331] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 and a bit later in the trace: {{ 227.499864] do_raw_spin_lock+0x94/0xa0}} [ 227.499868] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x60 [ 227.499871] ? guc_flush_destroyed_contexts+0x4f/0xf0 [i915] [ 227.499995] guc_flush_destroyed_contexts+0x4f/0xf0 [i915] [ 227.500104] intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare+0x99/0x4b0 [i915] [ 227.500209] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 [ 227.500212] intel_uc_reset_prepare+0x46/0x50 [i915] [ 227.500320] reset_prepare+0x78/0x90 [i915] [ 227.500412] __intel_gt_set_wedged.part.0+0x13/0xe0 [i915] [ 227.500485] intel_gt_set_wedged.part.0+0x54/0x100 [i915] [ 227.500556] intel_gt_set_wedged_on_fini+0x1a/0x30 [i915] [ 227.500622] intel_gt_driver_unregister+0x1e/0x60 [i915] [ 227.500694] i915_driver_remove+0x4a/0xf0 [i915] [ 227.500767] i915_pci_probe+0x84/0x170 [i915] [ 227.500838] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80 [ 227.500842] pci_device_probe+0xd9/0x190 [ 227.500844] really_probe+0x1f2/0x3f0 [ 227.500847] __driver_probe_device+0xfe/0x180 [ 227.500848] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 [ 227.500850] __driver_attach+0xc4/0x1d0 [ 227.500851] ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0 [ 227.500853] ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0 [ 227.500854] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0x90 [ 227.500856] bus_add_driver+0x12e/0x1f0 [ 227.500857] driver_register+0x8f/0xe0 [ 227.500859] i915_init+0x1d/0x8f [i915] [ 227.500934] ? 0xffffffffc144a000 [ 227.500936] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2d0 [ 227.500938] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 227.500940] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x238/0x2d0 [ 227.500944] do_init_module+0x5c/0x270 [ 227.500946] __do_sys_finit_module+0x95/0xe0 [ 227.500949] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 227.500951] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 227.500953] RIP: 0033:0x7ffa59d2ae0d [ 227.500954] Code: c8 0c 00 0f 05 eb a9 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 3b 80 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 227.500955] RSP: 002b:00007fff320bbf48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [ 227.500956] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000022ea710 RCX: 00007ffa59d2ae0d [ 227.500957] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000022e1d90 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 227.500958] RBP: 0000000000000020 R08: 00007ffa59df3a60 R09: 0000000000000070 [ 227.500958] R10: 00000000022e1d90 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000022e1d90 [ 227.500959] R13: 00000000022e58e0 R14: 0000000000000043 R15: 00000000022e42c0 v2: (CI build) - Fix build error Fixes: 1a52faed ("drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context") Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211020192147.8048-1-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
- 16 10月, 2021 16 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
If an error occurs in the front end when multi-lrc requests are getting generated we need to skip these in the backend but we still need to emit the breadcrumbs seqno. An issues arises because with multi-lrc breadcrumbs there is a handshake between the parent and children to make forward progress. If all the requests are not present this handshake doesn't work. To work around this, if multi-lrc request has an error we skip the handshake but still emit the breadcrumbs seqno. v2: (John Harrison) - Add comment explaining the skipping of the handshake logic - Fix typos in the commit message v3: (John Harrison) - Fix up some comments about the math to NOP the ring Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-22-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Allow multiple batch buffers to be submitted in a single execbuf IOCTL after a context has been configured with the 'set_parallel' extension. The number batches is implicit based on the contexts configuration. This is implemented with a series of loops. First a loop is used to find all the batches, a loop to pin all the HW contexts, a loop to create all the requests, a loop to submit (emit BB start, etc...) all the requests, a loop to tie the requests to the VMAs they touch, and finally a loop to commit the requests to the backend. A composite fence is also created for the generated requests to return to the user and to stick in dma resv slots. No behavior from the existing IOCTL should be changed aside from when throttling because the ring for a context is full. In this situation, i915 will now wait while holding the object locks. This change was done because the code is much simpler to wait while holding the locks and we believe there isn't a huge benefit of dropping these locks. If this proves false we can restructure the code to drop the locks during the wait. IGT: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/447008/?series=93071&rev=1 media UMD: https://github.com/intel/media-driver/pull/1252 v2: (Matthew Brost) - Return proper error value if i915_request_create fails v3: (John Harrison) - Add comment explaining create / add order loops + locking - Update commit message explaining different in IOCTL behavior - Line wrap some comments - eb_add_request returns void - Return -EINVAL rather triggering BUG_ON if cmd parser used (Checkpatch) - Check eb->batch_len[*current_batch] v4: (CI) - Set batch len if passed if via execbuf args - Call __i915_request_skip after __i915_request_commit (Kernel test robot) - Initialize rq to NULL in eb_pin_timeline v5: (John Harrison) - Fix typo in comments near bb order loops Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-21-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
For some users of multi-lrc, e.g. split frame, it isn't safe to preempt mid BB. To safely enable preemption at the BB boundary, a handshake between parent and child is needed, syncing the set of BBs at the beginning and end of each batch. This is implemented via custom emit_bb_start & emit_fini_breadcrumb functions and enabled by default if a context is configured by set parallel extension. Lastly, this patch updates the process descriptor to the correct size as the memory used in the handshake is directly after the process descriptor. v2: (John Harrison) - Fix a few comments wording - Add struture for parent page layout v3: (John Harrison) - A structure for sync semaphore - Use offsetof to calc address - Update commit message v4: (John Harrison) - Fix typos in comment explaining memory map of scratch page Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-20-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Add very basic (single submission) multi-lrc selftest. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-19-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Introduce 'set parallel submit' extension to connect UAPI to GuC multi-lrc interface. Kernel doc in new uAPI should explain it all. IGT: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/447008/?series=93071&rev=1 media UMD: https://github.com/intel/media-driver/pull/1252 v2: (Daniel Vetter) - Add IGT link and placeholder for media UMD link v3: (Kernel test robot) - Fix warning in unpin engines call (John Harrison) - Reword a bunch of the kernel doc v4: (John Harrison) - Add comment why perma-pin is done after setting gem context - Update some comments / docs for proto contexts v5: (John Harrison) - Rework perma-pin comment - Add BUG_IN if context is pinned when setting gem context Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-17-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Display the workqueue status in debugfs for GuC contexts that are in parent-child relationship. v2: (John Harrison) - Output number children in debugfs Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-16-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Update context and full GPU reset to work with multi-lrc. The idea is parent context tracks all the active requests inflight for itself and its children. The parent context owns the reset replaying / canceling requests as needed. v2: (John Harrison) - Simply loop in find active request - Add comments to find ative request / reset loop v3: (John Harrison) - s/its'/its/g - Fix comment when searching for active request - Reorder if state in __guc_reset_context v4: (Kernel test robot) - Delete unused is_multi_lrc function Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-15-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
The GuC must receive requests in the order submitted for contexts in a parent-child relationship to function correctly. To ensure this, insert a submit fence between the current request and last request submitted for requests / contexts in a parent child relationship. This is conceptually similar to a single timeline. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-14-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Implement multi-lrc submission via a single workqueue entry and single H2G. The workqueue entry contains an updated tail value for each request, of all the contexts in the multi-lrc submission, and updates these values simultaneously. As such, the tasklet and bypass path have been updated to coalesce requests into a single submission. v2: (John Harrison) - s/wqe/wqi - Use FIELD_PREP macros - Add GEM_BUG_ONs ensures length fits within field - Add comment / white space to intel_guc_write_barrier (Kernel test robot) - Make need_tasklet a static function v3: (Docs) - A comment for submission_stall_reason v4: (Kernel test robot) - Initialize return value in bypass tasklt submit function (John Harrison) - Add comment near work queue defs - Add BUILD_BUG_ON to ensure WQ_SIZE is a power of 2 - Update write_barrier comment to talk about work queue v5: (John Harrison) - Fix typo in work queue comment Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-13-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Parallel contexts are perma-pinned by the upper layers which makes the backend implementation rather simple. The parent pins the guc_id and children increment the parent's pin count on pin to ensure all the contexts are unpinned before we disable scheduling with the GuC / or deregister the context. v2: (Daniel Vetter) - Perma-pin parallel contexts Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-12-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Assign contexts in parent-child relationship consecutive guc_ids. This is accomplished by partitioning guc_id space between ones that need to be consecutive (1/16 available guc_ids) and ones that do not (15/16 of available guc_ids). The consecutive search is implemented via the bitmap API. This is a precursor to the full GuC multi-lrc implementation but aligns to how GuC mutli-lrc interface is defined - guc_ids must be consecutive when using the GuC multi-lrc interface. v2: (Daniel Vetter) - Explicitly state why we assign consecutive guc_ids v3: (John Harrison) - Bring back in spin lock Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-11-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
In GuC parent-child contexts the parent context controls the scheduling, ensure only the parent does the scheduling operations. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-10-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Add multi-lrc context registration H2G. In addition a workqueue and process descriptor are setup during multi-lrc context registration as these data structures are needed for multi-lrc submission. v2: (John Harrison) - Move GuC specific fields into sub-struct - Clean up WQ defines - Add comment explaining math to derive WQ / PD address v3: (John Harrison) - Add PARENT_SCRATCH_SIZE define - Update comment explaining multi-lrc register v4: (John Harrison) - Move PARENT_SCRATCH_SIZE to common file Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-9-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Add logical engine mapping. This is required for split-frame, as workloads need to be placed on engines in a logically contiguous manner. v2: (Daniel Vetter) - Add kernel doc for new fields v3: (Tvrtko) - Update comment for new logical_mask field v4: (John Harrison) - Update comment for new logical_mask field Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-6-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Taking a PM reference to prevent intel_gt_wait_for_idle from short circuiting while any user context has scheduling enabled. Returning GT idle when it is not can cause all sorts of issues throughout the stack. v2: (Daniel Vetter) - Add might_lock annotations to pin / unpin function v3: (CI) - Drop intel_engine_pm_might_put from unpin path as an async put is used v4: (John Harrison) - Make intel_engine_pm_might_get/put work with GuC virtual engines - Update commit message v5: - Update commit message again Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-4-matthew.brost@intel.com
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
Taking a PM reference to prevent intel_gt_wait_for_idle from short circuiting while a deregister context H2G is in flight. To do this must issue the deregister H2G from a worker as context can be destroyed from an atomic context and taking GT PM ref blows up. Previously we took a runtime PM from this atomic context which worked but will stop working once runtime pm autosuspend in enabled. So this patch is two fold, stop intel_gt_wait_for_idle from short circuting and fix runtime pm autosuspend. v2: (John Harrison) - Split structure changes out in different patch (Tvrtko) - Don't drop lock in deregister_destroyed_contexts v3: (John Harrison) - Flush destroyed contexts before destroying context reg pool Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-3-matthew.brost@intel.com
-