- 18 4月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Alway use the alphabetical names in debug/error messages for planes, pipes and ports, instead of using decimal numbers occasionally. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
For a bunch of reason we need to more accurately track this: - hw pipe state readout for Haswell needs the cpu transcoder. - We need to know the right cpu transcoder in a bunch of places in ->disable and other modeset callbacks. In the future we need to add hw state readout&check support, too. But to avoid ugly merge conflicts do the rote sed job now without any functional changes. v2: Preserve the cpu_transcoder value when overwriting crtc->config. Reported by Paulo. Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1) [danvet: Removed rough whitespace that Chris spotted.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 03 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
If we couldn't find a pipe we shouldn't return true. This might be even better as a WARN though, since it should be impossible to have the port enabled without a pipe selected. Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 28 3月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
The procedure has now 3 steps: 1. Compute the bpp that the plane will output, this is done in pipe_config_set_bpp and stored into pipe_config->pipe_bpp. Also, this function clamps the pipe_bpp to whatever limit the EDID of any connected output specifies. 2. Adjust the pipe_bpp in the encoder and crtc functions, according to whatever constraints there are. 3. Decide whether to use dither by comparing the stored plane bpp with computed pipe_bpp. There are a few slight functional changes in this patch: - LVDS connector are now also going through the EDID clamping. But in a 2nd change we now unconditionally force the lvds bpc value - this shouldn't matter in reality when the panel setup is consistent, but better safe than sorry. - HDMI now forces the pipe_bpp to the selected value - I think that's what we actually want, since otherwise at least the pixelclock computations are wrong (I'm not sure whether the port would accept e.g. 10 bpc when in 12bpc mode). Contrary to the old code, we pick the next higher bpc value, since otherwise there's no way to make use of the 12 bpc mode (since the next patch will remove the 12bpc plane format, it doesn't exist). Both of these changes are due to the removal of the pipe_bpp = min(display_bpp, plane_bpp); statement. Another slight change is the reworking of the dp bpc code: - For the mode_valid callback it's sufficient to only check whether the mode would fit at the lowest bpc. - The bandwidth computation code is a bit restructured: It now walks all available bpp values in an outer loop and the codeblock that computes derived values (once a good configuration is found) has been moved out of the for loop maze. This is prep work to allow us to successively fall back on bpc values, and also correctly support bpc values != 8 or 6. v2: Rebased on top of Paulo Zanoni's little refactoring to use more drm dp helper functions. v3: Rebased on top of Jani's eDP bpp fix and Ville's limited color range work. v4: Remove the INTEL_MODE_DP_FORCE_6BPC #define, no longer needed. v5: Remove intel_crtc->bpp, too, and fix up the 12bpc check in the hdmi code. Also fixup the bpp check in intel_dp.c, it'll get reworked in a later patch though again. v6: Fix spelling in a comment. v7: Debug output improvements for the bpp computation. v8: Fixup 6bpc lvds check - dual-link and 8bpc mode are different things! v9: Reinstate the fix to properly ignore the firmware edp bpp ... this was lost in a rebase. v10: Both g4x and vlv lack 12bpc pipes, so don't enforce that we have that. Still unsure whether this is the way to go, but at least 6bpc for a 8bpc hdmi output seems to work. v11: And g4x/vlv also lack 12bpc hdmi support, so only support high depth on DP. Adjust the code. v12: Rebased. v13: Split out the introduction of pipe_config->dither|pipe_bpp, as requested from Jesse Barnes. v14: Split out the special 6BPC handling for DP, as requested by Jesse Barnes. Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
We want to compute this earlier. To avoid a big complicated patch, this patch here just does the big search&replace and still calls the old functions at the same places. Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
This is used way too often in the enable/disable paths. And will be even more useful in the future. Note that correct semantics of this change highly depend upon correct updating of intel_crtc->config: Like with all other modeset state, we need to call ->disable with the old config, but ->mode_set and ->enable with the new config. v2: Do not yet use the flag in the ->disable callbacks - atm we don't yet have support for the information stored in the pipe_config in the hw state readout code, so this will be wrong at boot-up/resume. v3: Rebased on top of the hdmi/dp ddi encoder merging. v4: Fixup stupid rebase error which lead to a NULL vfunc deref. v5: On haswell the VGA port is on the PCH! v6: s/IS_HASWELL/HAS_DDI/, spotted by Paulo Zanoni. Also add a missing parameter name in a function declaration. v7: Don't forget to git add ... Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 26 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
If TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL has been wrongly programmed with an incorrect port, we are currently trying to read PORT_CLK_SEL(port) with an uninitialized value. Handle that case by returning PORT_CLK_SEL_NONE and warning about it. v2: Move the warning inside intel_ddi_get_crtc_pll (Paulo Zanoni) Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 23 3月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
We are really talking about the transcoder function here and the disable version uses trancoder in its name already, so let's try to be consistent. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Our static analysis tool noticed that 'reg' could be used uninitialized if we are trying to get a PLL to drive VGA and SPLL is already in use (plls->spll_refcoung != 0). In the (error) case above, let's return false to the caller and emit an error. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 18 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Our mode set sequence documentation says audio must be disabled first. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> [danvet: Resolve conflict since the first patch in this series isn't applied yet. Also bikeshed commit message as suggested by Ben.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 04 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Syam Sidhardhan 提交于
Need to initialize the variable wait to false. Signed-off-by: NSyam Sidhardhan <s.syam@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 20 2月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Some (but not all) of the HDMI registers can be used to control sDVO, so those registers have two names. IMHO, when we're talking about HDMI, we really should call the HDMI control register "hdmi_reg" instead of "sdvox_reg", otherwise we'll just confuse people reading our code (we now have platforms with HDMI but without SDVO). So now "struct intel_hdmi" has a member called "hdmi_reg" instead of "sdvox_reg". Also, don't worry: "struct intel_sdvo" still has a member called "sdvo_reg". v2: Rebase (v1 was sent in May 2012). Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Similarly to: commit 6a0d1df3d3a0d2370541164eb0595fe35dcd6de3 Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Date: Tue Dec 11 15:18:28 2012 +0000 drm/i915: Preserve the FDI line reversal override bit on CPT DDI port support lane reversal to easy the PCB layouting work. Let's preserve the bit configured by the BIOS (until we find how to correctly retrieve the information from the VBT, but this does sound more fragile then just relying on the BIOS that has, hopefully, been validated already. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
The FDI link has supported link reversal to make the PCB layout engineer's life easier for quite a while and we have always presered this bit as we programmed FDI_RX_CTL with a read/modify/write sequence. We're trying to take a bit more control over what the BIOS leaves in various register and with the introduction of DDI, started to program FDI_RX_CTL fully. There's a fused bit to indicate DMI link reversal and FDI defaults to mirroring that configuration. We have a bit to override that behaviour that we need to preserve from the BIOS. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 14 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Now that the driver is in control of whether it needs to disable everything at take-over or not, we can rip this all out. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 31 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
We can disable (almost) all the display hw if we only use pipe A, with the integrated edp transcoder on port A. Because we don't set the cpu transcoder that early (yet), we need to help us with a trick to simply check for any edp encoders. v2: Paulo Zanoni pointed out that we also need to configure the eDP cpu transcoder correctly. v3: Made by Paulo Zanoni - Rebase patch to be on top of "fix intel_init_power_wells" patch - Fix typos - Fix a small bug by adding a "connectors_active" check - Restore the initial code that unconditionally enables the power well when taking over from the BIOS v4: Made by Paulo Zanoni - One more typo spotted by Jani Nikula v5: Made by Paulo Zanoni - Rebase Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 23 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wang Xingchao 提交于
ELD info should be updated dynamically according to hot plug event. For haswell chip, clear/set the eld valid bit and output enable bit from callback intel_disable/eanble_ddi(). Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NWang Xingchao <xingchao.wang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 10 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
If we fail to set the bit when needed we get some nice FDI link training failures (AKA "black screen on VGA output"). While we don't really know how to properly choose whether we need to set the bit or not (VBT?), just read the initial value set by the BIOS and store it for later usage. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 08 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
We were previously doing exactly what the "mode set sequence for CRT" document mandates, but whenever we failed to train the link in the first tentative, all the other subsequent retries always failed. In one of my monitors that has 47 modes, I was usually getting around 3 failures when running "testdisplay -a". After this patch, even if we fail in the first tentative, we can succeed in the next ones. So now when running "testdisplay -a" I see around 3 times the message "FDI link training done on step 1" and no failures. Notice that now the "retry" code looks a lot like the DP retry code. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 04 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
- __iomem where there is none (I love how we mix these things up). - Use gfp_t instead of an other plain type. - Unconfuse one place about enum pipe vs enum transcoder - for the pch transcoder we actually use the pipe enum. Fixup the other cases where we assign the pipe to the cpu transcoder with explicit casts. - Declare the mch_lock properly in a header. There is still a decent mess in intel_bios.c about __iomem, but heck, this is x86 and we're allowed to do that. Makes-sparse-happy: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> [danvet: Use a space after the cast consistently and fix up the newly-added cast in i915_irq.c to properly use __iomem.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 29 11月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Do an early return in case we don't have DDI instead of having the whole function inside an "if" statement. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
And use it whenever we call code that uses the DDIs. We already have intel_ddi.c and prefix every function with intel_ddi_something instead of haswell_something, so I think replacing the checks with HAS_DDI makes more sense. Just a cosmetical change, yes I know, but I have this OCD... Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
It's not even declared on header files. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 22 11月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
For now, this code is just used by the eDP AUX channel frequency. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Takashi Iwai 提交于
This patch adds the missing code to send ELD for Haswell DisplayPort, based on Xingchao's original patch. A test was performed with HSW-D machine and NEC EA232Wmi DP monitor. Cc: Xingchao Wang <xingchao.wang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 12 11月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
This covers the "Disable FDI" section from the CRT mode set sequence. This disables the FDI receiver and also the FDI pll. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
This commit makes hsw_fdi_link_train responsible for implementing everything described in the "Enable and train FDI" section from the Hawell CRT mode set sequence documentation. We completely rewrite hsw_fdi_link_train to match the documentation and we also call it in the right place. This patch was initially sent as a series of tiny patches fixing every little problem of the function, but since there were too many patches fixing the same function it got a little difficult to get the "big picture" of how the function would be in the end, so here we amended all the patches into a single big patch fixing the whole function. Problems we fixed: 1 - Train Haswell FDI at the right time. We need to train the FDI before enabling the pipes and planes, so we're moving the call from lpt_pch_enable to haswell_crtc_enable directly. We are also removing ironlake_fdi_pll_enable since the PLL enablement on Haswell is completely different and is also done during the link training steps. 2 - Use the right FDI_RX_CTL register on Haswell There is only one PCH transcoder, so it's always _FDI_RXA_CTL. Using "pipe" here is wrong. 3 - Don't rely on DDI_BUF_CTL previous values Just set the bits we want, everything else is zero. Also POSTING_READ the register before sleeping. 4 - Program the FDI RX TUSIZE register on hsw_fdi_link_train According to the mode set sequence documentation, this is the right place. According to the FDI_RX_TUSIZE register description, this is the value we should set. Also remove the code that sets this register from the old location: lpt_pch_enable. 5 - Properly program FDI_RX_MISC pwrdn lane values on HSW 6 - Wait only 35us for the FDI link training First we wait 30us for the FDI receiver lane calibration, then we wait 5us for the FDI auto training time. 7 - Remove an useless indentation level on hsw_fdi_link_train We already "break" when the link training succeeds. 8 - Disable FDI_RX_ENABLE, not FDI_RX_PLL_ENABLE When we fail the training. 9 - Change Haswell FDI link training error messages We shouldn't call DRM_ERROR when still looping through voltage levels since this is expected and not really a failure. So in this commit we adjust the error path to only DRM_ERROR when we really fail after trying everything. While at it, replace DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER with DRM_DEBUG_KMS since it's what we use everywhere. 10 - Try each voltage twice at hsw_fdi_link_train Now with Daniel Vetter's suggestion to use "/2" instead of ">>1". Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> [danvet: Applied tiny bikesheds: - mention in comment that we test each voltage/emphasis level twice - realing arguments of the only untouched reg write, it spilled over the 80 char limit ...] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
We had 2 places using X2 and one place using X1. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Now intel_ddi_init is just like intel_hdmi_init and intel_dp_init: it inits the encoder and then calls the proper init_connector functions. Notice that for non-eDP ports we call both HDMI and DP connector init, so we have 2 connectors attached to each DDI encoder. After this change, intel_hdmi_init and intel_dp_init are only called by Ivy Bridge and earlier, while hardware containing DDI outputs should call intel_ddi_init. Also added/removed quite a few "static" keywords due to the fact that some function pointers were moved from intel_dp.c and intel_hdmi.c to intel_ddi.c. DP finally works on Haswell now! \o/ Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
We need this since now on DDI we will have 2 connectors on each encoder. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Both "intel_dp" and "intel_hdmi" structs had a "port" field, which always had the same value. It makes more sense to move this to intel_digital_port, so we can know the port independently of the connector type. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 26 10月, 2012 8 次提交
-
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Now that all the eDP enablement bits are there, we can actually try to use the eDP. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
It's an important step :) Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
The cdclk frequency is not always the same, so the value here should be adjusted to match it. Version 2: call intel_ddi_get_cdclk_freq instead of reading CDCLK_FREQ, because the register is just for earlier HW steppings. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Same as the other registers. This one also appeared on Haswell for the first time, so that's why we are renaming it. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Because there's one instance of the register per CPU transcoder and not per CPU pipe. This is another register that appeared for the first time on Haswell, and even though its Haswell name is PIPE_DDI_FUNC_CTL, it will be renamed to TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL, so let's just use the new naming scheme before it confuses more people. Notice that there's a big improvement on intel_ddi_get_hw_state due to the new TRANSCODER_EDP. V2: Also rename the register to TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL as suggested by Damien Lespiau. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
This register appeared in Haswell. It does not have an EDP version because the EDP transcoder is always tied to the DDIA clock. Notice that if we call PIPE_CLK_SEL(pipe) when pipe is PIPE_A and transcoder is TRANSCODER_EDP we might introduce a bug, that's why this is a transcoder register even though it does not have an EDP version. Even though Haswell names this register PIPE_CLK_SEL, it will be renamed to TRANS_CLK_SEL in the future, so let's just start using the real name that makes more sense and avoids misusage. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 19 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Previous patch "drm/i915: add basic Haswell DP link train bits" implemented the basic structure to set the voltage levels and training patterns. This patch adds the higher-level bits that are part of the mode set sequence and hot plug. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-