Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 01 3月, 2016 1 次提交
    • M
      drm/i915: Add two-stage ILK-style watermark programming (v11) · ed4a6a7c
      由 Matt Roper 提交于 
      In addition to calculating final watermarks, let's also pre-calculate a
set of intermediate watermark values at atomic check time.  These
intermediate watermarks are a combination of the watermarks for the old
state and the new state; they should satisfy the requirements of both
states which means they can be programmed immediately when we commit the
atomic state (without waiting for a vblank).  Once the vblank does
happen, we can then re-program watermarks to the more optimal final
value.

v2: Significant rebasing/rewriting.

v3:
 - Move 'need_postvbl_update' flag to CRTC state (Daniel)
 - Don't forget to check intermediate watermark values for validity
   (Maarten)
 - Don't due async watermark optimization; just do it at the end of the
   atomic transaction, after waiting for vblanks.  We do want it to be
   async eventually, but adding that now will cause more trouble for
   Maarten's in-progress work.  (Maarten)
 - Don't allocate space in crtc_state for intermediate watermarks on
   platforms that don't need it (gen9+).
 - Move WaCxSRDisabledForSpriteScaling:ivb into intel_begin_crtc_commit
   now that ilk_update_wm is gone.

v4:
 - Add a wm_mutex to cover updates to intel_crtc->active and the
   need_postvbl_update flag.  Since we don't have async yet it isn't
   terribly important yet, but might as well add it now.
 - Change interface to program watermarks.  Platforms will now expose
   .initial_watermarks() and .optimize_watermarks() functions to do
   watermark programming.  These should lock wm_mutex, copy the
   appropriate state values into intel_crtc->active, and then call
   the internal program watermarks function.

v5:
 - Skip intermediate watermark calculation/check during initial hardware
   readout since we don't trust the existing HW values (and don't have
   valid values of our own yet).
 - Don't try to call .optimize_watermarks() on platforms that don't have
   atomic watermarks yet.  (Maarten)

v6:
 - Rebase

v7:
 - Further rebase

v8:
 - A few minor indentation and line length fixes

v9:
 - Yet another rebase since Maarten's patches reworked a bunch of the
   code (wm_pre, wm_post, etc.) that this was previously based on.

v10:
 - Move wm_mutex to dev_priv to protect against racing commits against
   disjoint CRTC sets. (Maarten)
 - Drop unnecessary clearing of cstate->wm.need_postvbl_update (Maarten)

v11:
 - Now that we've moved to atomic watermark updates, make sure we call
   the proper function to program watermarks in
   {ironlake,haswell}_crtc_enable(); the failure to do so on the
   previous patch iteration led to us not actually programming the
   watermarks before turning on the CRTC, which was the cause of the
   underruns that the CI system was seeing.
 - Fix inverted logic for determining when to optimize watermarks.  We
   were needlessly optimizing when the intermediate/optimal values were
   the same (harmless), but not actually optimizing when they differed
   (also harmless, but wasteful from a power/bandwidth perspective).

Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1456276813-5689-1-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
      ed4a6a7c
  3. 25 2月, 2016 2 次提交
  5. 23 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 22 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 18 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 17 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • I
      drm/i915: Add helper to get a display power ref if it was already enabled · 09731280
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      We have many places in the code where we check if a given display power
domain is enabled and if so access registers backed by this power
domain. We assumed that some modeset lock will prevent the power
reference from vanishing in the middle of the HW access, but this
assumption doesn't always hold. In such cases we get either the wakeref
not held, or an unclaimed register access error message. To fix this in
a future-proof way that's independent of other locks wrap any such
access with a get_ref_if_enabled()/put_ref() pair.

Kudos to Ville and Joonas for the ideas of this new interface.

v2:
- init the power_domains ptr when declaring it everywhere (Joonas)
v3:
- don't report the device to be powered if runtime PM is disabled

CC: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
CC: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
CC: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455711462-7442-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
      09731280
  13. 13 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  15. 08 2月, 2016 3 次提交
  17. 06 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • S
      drm/i915/bxt: Check BIOS RC6 setup before enabling RC6 · 274008e8
      由 Sagar Arun Kamble 提交于 
      RC6 setup is shared between BIOS and Driver. BIOS sets up subset of RC6
setup registers. If those are not setup Driver should not enable RC6.
For implementing this, driver can check RC_CTRL0 and RC_CTRL1 values
to know if BIOS has enabled HW/SW RC6.
This will also enable user to control RC6 using BIOS settings alone.
RC6 related instability can be avoided by disabling via BIOS settings
till driver fixes it.

v2: Had placed logic in gen8 function by mistake. Fixed it.
Ensuring RPM is not enabled in case BIOS disabled RC6.

v3: Need to disable RPM if RC6 is disabled due to BIOS settings. (Daniel)
Runtime PM enabling happens before gen9_enable_rc6.
Moved the updation of enable_rc6 parameter in intel_uncore_sanitize.

v4: Added elaborate check for BIOS RC6 setup. Prepared check_pctx for bxt.
    (Imre)

v5: Caching reserved stolen base and size in the driver private data.
    Reorganized RC6 setup check. Moved from gen9_enable_rc6 to
    intel_uncore_sanitize. (Imre)

v6: Rebasing on the patch submitted by Imre that moves gem_init_stolen
    earlier in the load.

v7: Removed PWRCTX_MAXCNT_VCSUNIT1 check as it applies to SKL. (Imre)

v8: Fixed formatting and checkpatch issues. Fixed functional issue where
    RC6 ctx size check was missing. (Imre)

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NSagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454697809-22113-1-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com
      274008e8
  19. 30 1月, 2016 5 次提交
  21. 29 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  23. 20 1月, 2016 2 次提交
  25. 14 1月, 2016 4 次提交
  27. 13 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  29. 12 1月, 2016 2 次提交
  31. 07 1月, 2016 3 次提交
  33. 06 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  35. 22 12月, 2015 3 次提交
  37. 17 12月, 2015 3 次提交
    • I
      drm/i915: add support for checking RPM atomic sections · 2b19efeb
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      In some cases we want to check whether we hold an RPM wakelock reference
for the whole duration of a sequence. To achieve this add a new RPM
atomic sequence counter that we increment any time the wakelock refcount
drops to zero.  Check whether the sequence number stays the same during
the atomic section and that we hold the wakelock at the beginning of the
section.

Motivated by Chris.

v2-v3:
- unchanged
v4:
- swap the order of atomic_read() and assert_rpm_wakelock_held() in
  assert_rpm_atomic_begin() to avoid race
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v3)
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1450203038-5150-10-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
      2b19efeb
    • I
      drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference · 1f814dac
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      Atm, we assert that the device is not suspended until the point when the
device is truly put to a suspended state. This is fine, but we can catch
more problems if we check that RPM refcount is non-zero. After that one
drops to zero we shouldn't access the device any more, even if the actual
device suspend may be delayed. Change assert_rpm_wakelock_held()
accordingly to check for a non-zero RPM refcount in addition to the
current device-not-suspended check.

For the new asserts to work we need to annotate every place explicitly in
the code where we expect that the device is powered. The places where we
only assume this, but may not hold an RPM reference:
- driver load
  We assume the device to be powered until we enable RPM. Make this
  explicit by taking an RPM reference around the load function.
- system and runtime sudpend/resume handlers
  These handlers are called when the RPM reference becomes 0 and know the
  exact point after which the device can get powered off. Disable the
  RPM-reference-held check for their duration.
- the IRQ, hangcheck and RPS work handlers
  These handlers are flushed in the system/runtime suspend handler
  before the device is powered off, so it's guaranteed that they won't
  run while the device is powered off even though they don't hold any
  RPM reference. Disable the RPM-reference-held check for their duration.

In all these cases we still check that the device is not suspended.
These explicit annotations also have the positive side effect of
documenting our assumptions better.

This caught additional WARNs from the atomic modeset path, those should
be fixed separately.

v2:
- remove the redundant HAS_RUNTIME_PM check (moved to patch 1) (Ville)
v3:
- use a new dedicated RPM wakelock refcount to also catch cases where
  our own RPM get/put functions were not called (Chris)
- assert also that the new RPM wakelock refcount is 0 in the RPM
  suspend handler (Chris)
- change the assert error message to be more meaningful (Chris)
- prevent false assert errors and check that the RPM wakelock is 0 in
  the RPM resume handler too
- prevent false assert errors in the hangcheck work too
- add a device not suspended assert check to the hangcheck work
v4:
- rename disable/enable_rpm_asserts to disable/enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts
  and wakelock_count to wakeref_count
- disable the wakeref asserts in the IRQ handlers and RPS work too
- update/clarify commit message
v5:
- mark places we plan to change to use proper RPM refcounting with
  separate DISABLE/ENABLE_RPM_WAKEREF_ASSERTS aliases (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1450227139-13471-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
      1f814dac
    • I
      drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper · da5827c3
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      As a preparation for follow-up patches add a new helper that checks
whether we hold an RPM reference, since this is what we want most of
the cases. Atm this helper will only check for the HW suspended state, a
follow-up patch will do the actual change to check the refcount instead.
One exception is the forcewake release timer function, where it's
guaranteed that the HW is on even though the RPM refcount drops to zero.
This guarantee is provided by flushing the timer in the runtime suspend
handler. So leave the assert_device_not_suspended check in place there.

Also rename assert_device_suspended for consistency and export these
helpers as a preparation for the follow-up patches.

No functional change.

v3:
- change the assert warning message to be more meaningful (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1450203038-5150-6-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
      da5827c3
  39. 15 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  41. 10 12月, 2015 2 次提交