1. 08 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • C
      f2fs: make posix_acl_create() safer and cleaner · 272e083f
      Chao Yu 提交于
      Our f2fs_acl_create is copied from posix_acl_create in ./fs/posix_acl.c and
      modified to avoid deadlock bug when inline_dentry feature is enabled.
      
      Dan Carpenter rewrites posix_acl_create in commit 2799563b281f
      ("fs/posix_acl.c: make posix_acl_create() safer and cleaner") to make this
      function more safer, so that we can avoid potential bug in its caller,
      especially for ocfs2.
      
      Let's back port the patch to f2fs.
      Signed-off-by: NChao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
      272e083f
  2. 06 5月, 2015 3 次提交
  3. 05 5月, 2015 2 次提交
  4. 03 5月, 2015 3 次提交
    • J
      ext4: fix growing of tiny filesystems · 2c869b26
      Jan Kara 提交于
      The estimate of necessary transaction credits in ext4_flex_group_add()
      is too pessimistic. It reserves credit for sb, resize inode, and resize
      inode dindirect block for each group added in a flex group although they
      are always the same block and thus it is enough to account them only
      once. Also the number of modified GDT block is overestimated since we
      fit EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb) descriptors in one block.
      
      Make the estimation more precise. That reduces number of requested
      credits enough that we can grow 20 MB filesystem (which has 1 MB
      journal, 79 reserved GDT blocks, and flex group size 16 by default).
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      2c869b26
    • D
      ext4: move check under lock scope to close a race. · 280227a7
      Davide Italiano 提交于
      fallocate() checks that the file is extent-based and returns
      EOPNOTSUPP in case is not. Other tasks can convert from and to
      indirect and extent so it's safe to check only after grabbing
      the inode mutex.
      Signed-off-by: NDavide Italiano <dccitaliano@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      280227a7
    • L
      ext4: fix data corruption caused by unwritten and delayed extents · d2dc317d
      Lukas Czerner 提交于
      Currently it is possible to lose whole file system block worth of data
      when we hit the specific interaction with unwritten and delayed extents
      in status extent tree.
      
      The problem is that when we insert delayed extent into extent status
      tree the only way to get rid of it is when we write out delayed buffer.
      However there is a limitation in the extent status tree implementation
      so that when inserting unwritten extent should there be even a single
      delayed block the whole unwritten extent would be marked as delayed.
      
      At this point, there is no way to get rid of the delayed extents,
      because there are no delayed buffers to write out. So when a we write
      into said unwritten extent we will convert it to written, but it still
      remains delayed.
      
      When we try to write into that block later ext4_da_map_blocks() will set
      the buffer new and delayed and map it to invalid block which causes
      the rest of the block to be zeroed loosing already written data.
      
      For now we can fix this by simply not allowing to set delayed status on
      written extent in the extent status tree. Also add WARN_ON() to make
      sure that we notice if this happens in the future.
      
      This problem can be easily reproduced by running the following xfs_io.
      
      xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 4096 2048" \
                -c "falloc 0 131072" \
                -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 65536 2048" \
                -c "fsync" /mnt/test/fff
      
      echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
      xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xdd 67584 2048" /mnt/test/fff
      
      This can be theoretically also reproduced by at random by running fsx,
      but it's not very reliable, though on machines with bigger page size
      (like ppc) this can be seen more often (especially xfstest generic/127)
      Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      d2dc317d
  5. 02 5月, 2015 4 次提交
  6. 30 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 26 4月, 2015 9 次提交
    • Y
      Btrfs: fill ->last_trans for delayed inode in btrfs_fill_inode. · 6e17d30b
      Yang Dongsheng 提交于
      We need to fill inode when we found a node for it in delayed_nodes_tree.
      But we did not fill the ->last_trans currently, it will cause the test
      of xfstest/generic/311 fail. Scenario of the 311 is shown as below:
      
      Problem:
      	(1). test_fd = open(fname, O_RDWR|O_DIRECT)
      	(2). pwrite(test_fd, buf, 4096, 0)
      	(3). close(test_fd)
      	(4). drop_all_caches()	<-------- "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches"
      	(5). test_fd = open(fname, O_RDWR|O_DIRECT)
      	(6). fsync(test_fd);
      				<-------- we did not get the correct log entry for the file
      Reason:
      	When we re-open this file in (5), we would find a node
      in delayed_nodes_tree and fill the inode we are lookup with the
      information. But the ->last_trans is not filled, then the fsync()
      will check the ->last_trans and found it's 0 then say this inode
      is already in our tree which is commited, not recording the extents
      for it.
      
      Fix:
      	This patch fill the ->last_trans properly and set the
      runtime_flags if needed in this situation. Then we can get the
      log entries we expected after (6) and generic/311 passed.
      Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      6e17d30b
    • O
      btrfs: unlock i_mutex after attempting to delete subvolume during send · 909e26dc
      Omar Sandoval 提交于
      Whenever the check for a send in progress introduced in commit
      521e0546 (btrfs: protect snapshots from deleting during send) is
      hit, we return without unlocking inode->i_mutex. This is easy to see
      with lockdep enabled:
      
      [  +0.000059] ================================================
      [  +0.000028] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
      [  +0.000029] 4.0.0-rc5-00096-g3c435c1e #93 Not tainted
      [  +0.000026] ------------------------------------------------
      [  +0.000029] btrfs/211 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
      [  +0.000029] 1 lock held by btrfs/211:
      [  +0.000023]  #0:  (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8135b8df>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy+0x2df/0x7a0
      
      Make sure we unlock it in the error path.
      Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      909e26dc
    • O
      btrfs: check io_ctl_prepare_pages return in __btrfs_write_out_cache · b8605454
      Omar Sandoval 提交于
      If io_ctl_prepare_pages fails, the pages in io_ctl.pages are not valid.
      When we try to access them later, things will blow up in various ways.
      
      Also fix the comment about the return value, which is an errno on error,
      not -1, and update the cases where it was not.
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      b8605454
    • O
      btrfs: fix race on ENOMEM in alloc_extent_buffer · 5ca64f45
      Omar Sandoval 提交于
      Consider the following interleaving of overlapping calls to
      alloc_extent_buffer:
      
      Call 1:
      
      - Successfully allocates a few pages with find_or_create_page
      - find_or_create_page fails, goto free_eb
      - Unlocks the allocated pages
      
      Call 2:
      - Calls find_or_create_page and gets a page in call 1's extent_buffer
      - Finds that the page is already associated with an extent_buffer
      - Grabs a reference to the half-written extent_buffer and calls
        mark_extent_buffer_accessed on it
      
      mark_extent_buffer_accessed will then try to call mark_page_accessed on
      a null page and panic.
      
      The fix is to decrement the reference count on the half-written
      extent_buffer before unlocking the pages so call 2 won't use it. We
      should also set exists = NULL in the case that we don't use exists to
      avoid accidentally returning a freed extent_buffer in an error case.
      Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      5ca64f45
    • O
      btrfs: handle ENOMEM in btrfs_alloc_tree_block · 67b7859e
      Omar Sandoval 提交于
      This is one of the first places to give out when memory is tight. Handle
      it properly rather than with a BUG_ON.
      
      Also fix the comment about the return value, which is an ERR_PTR, not
      NULL, on error.
      Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      67b7859e
    • F
      Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole · 1b984508
      Forrest Liu 提交于
      If device tree has hole, find_free_dev_extent() cannot find available
      address properly.
      
      The problem can be reproduce by following script.
      
          mntpath=/btrfs
          loopdev=/dev/loop0
          filepath=/home/forrest/image
      
          umount $mntpath
          losetup -d $loopdev
          truncate --size 100g $filepath
          losetup $loopdev $filepath
          mkfs.btrfs -f $loopdev
          mount $loopdev $mntpath
      
          # make device tree with one big hole
          for i in `seq 1 1 100`; do
              fallocate -l 1g $mntpath/$i
          done
          sync
          for i in `seq 1 1 95`; do
              rm $mntpath/$i
          done
          sync
      
          # wait cleaner thread remove unused block group
          sleep 300
      
          fallocate -l 1g $mntpath/aaa
      
          # failed to allocate new chunk
          fallocate -l 1g $mntpath/bbb
      
      Above script will make device tree with one big hole, and can only allocate
      just one chunk in a transaction, so failed to allocate new chunk for $mntpath/bbb
      
          item 8 key (1 DEV_EXTENT 2185232384) itemoff 15859 itemsize 48
              dev extent chunk_tree 3
              chunk objectid 256 chunk offset 106292051968 length 1073741824
          item 9 key (1 DEV_EXTENT 104190705664) itemoff 15811 itemsize 48
              dev extent chunk_tree 3
              chunk objectid 256 chunk offset 103108575232 length 1073741824
      Signed-off-by: NForrest Liu <forrestl@synology.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      1b984508
    • C
      Btrfs: don't check for delalloc_bytes in cache_save_setup · e4c88f00
      Chris Mason 提交于
      Now that we're doing free space cache writeback outside the critical
      section in the commit, there is a bigger window for delalloc_bytes to
      be added after a cache has been written.  find_free_extent may do this
      without putting the block group back into the dirty list, and also
      without a transaction running.
      
      Checking for delalloc_bytes in cache_save_setup means we might leave the
      cache marked as written without invalidating it.  Consistency checks
      during mount will toss the cache, but it's better to get rid of the
      check in cache_save_setup and let it get invalidated by the checks
      already done during cache write out.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e4c88f00
    • F
      Btrfs: fix deadlock when starting writeback of bg caches · 24b89d08
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      While starting the writes of the dirty block group caches, if we don't
      find a block group item in the extent tree we were leaving without
      releasing our path, running delayed references and then looping again to
      process any new dirty block groups. However this second iteration of the
      loop could cause a deadlock because it tries to lock some other extent
      tree node/leaf which another task already locked and it's blocked because
      it's waiting for a lock on some node/leaf that is in our path that was not
      released before.
      We could also deadlock when running the delayed references - as we could
      end up trying to lock the same nodes/leafs that we have in our local path
      (with a different lock type).
      
      Got into such case when running xfstests:
      
      [20892.242791] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [20892.243776] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 13299 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]()
      [20892.245874] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
      (...)
      [20892.269378] Call Trace:
      [20892.269915]  [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
      [20892.271097]  [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
      [20892.272173]  [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
      [20892.273386]  [<ffffffffa0509a6d>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
      [20892.274857]  [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
      [20892.275851]  [<ffffffffa0509a6d>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
      [20892.277341]  [<ffffffffa0515e10>] write_one_cache_group+0x68/0xaf [btrfs]
      [20892.278628]  [<ffffffffa052088a>] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x18d/0x29b [btrfs]
      [20892.280191]  [<ffffffffa052f077>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x130/0x9c9 [btrfs]
      (...)
      [20892.291316] ---[ end trace 597f77e664245373 ]---
      [20892.293955] BTRFS: error (device sdg) in write_one_cache_group:3184: errno=-2 No such entry
      [20892.297390] BTRFS info (device sdg): forced readonly
      [20892.298222] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [20892.299190] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 13299 at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2683 btrfs_search_slot+0x7e/0x7d2 [btrfs]()
      (...)
      [20892.326253] Call Trace:
      [20892.326904]  [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
      [20892.329503]  [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
      [20892.330815]  [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
      [20892.332556]  [<ffffffffa0510b73>] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x7e/0x7d2 [btrfs]
      [20892.333955]  [<ffffffff81045f62>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
      [20892.335562]  [<ffffffffa0510b73>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7e/0x7d2 [btrfs]
      [20892.336849]  [<ffffffff8107b024>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
      [20892.338222]  [<ffffffffa051ad52>] ? cache_save_setup+0x43/0x2a5 [btrfs]
      [20892.339823]  [<ffffffffa051ad66>] ? cache_save_setup+0x57/0x2a5 [btrfs]
      [20892.341275]  [<ffffffff814351a4>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x32/0x46
      [20892.342810]  [<ffffffffa0515de7>] write_one_cache_group+0x3f/0xaf [btrfs]
      [20892.344184]  [<ffffffffa052088a>] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x18d/0x29b [btrfs]
      [20892.347162]  [<ffffffffa052f077>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x130/0x9c9 [btrfs]
      (...)
      [20892.361015] ---[ end trace 597f77e664245374 ]---
      [21120.688097] INFO: task kworker/u8:17:29854 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [21120.689881]       Tainted: G        W       4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2
      [21120.691384] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      (...)
      [21120.703696] Call Trace:
      [21120.704310]  [<ffffffff8143107e>] schedule+0x74/0x83
      [21120.705490]  [<ffffffffa055f025>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xd7/0x236 [btrfs]
      [21120.706757]  [<ffffffff81075cd6>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
      [21120.708156]  [<ffffffffa054ac1e>] lock_extent_buffer_for_io+0x3e/0x194 [btrfs]
      [21120.709892]  [<ffffffffa054bb86>] ? btree_write_cache_pages+0x273/0x385 [btrfs]
      [21120.711605]  [<ffffffffa054bc42>] btree_write_cache_pages+0x32f/0x385 [btrfs]
      [21120.723440]  [<ffffffffa0527552>] btree_writepages+0x23/0x5c [btrfs]
      [21120.724943]  [<ffffffff8110c4c8>] do_writepages+0x23/0x2c
      [21120.726008]  [<ffffffff81176dde>] __writeback_single_inode+0x73/0x2fa
      [21120.727230]  [<ffffffff8117714a>] ? writeback_sb_inodes+0xe5/0x38b
      [21120.728526]  [<ffffffff811771fb>] ? writeback_sb_inodes+0x196/0x38b
      [21120.729701]  [<ffffffff8117726a>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x205/0x38b
      (...)
      [21120.747853] INFO: task btrfs:13282 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [21120.749459]       Tainted: G        W       4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2
      [21120.751137] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      (...)
      [21120.768457] Call Trace:
      [21120.769039]  [<ffffffff8143107e>] schedule+0x74/0x83
      [21120.770107]  [<ffffffffa052f25c>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x315/0x9c9 [btrfs]
      [21120.771558]  [<ffffffff81075cd6>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
      [21120.773659]  [<ffffffffa056fd8c>] prepare_to_relocate+0xcb/0xd2 [btrfs]
      [21120.776257]  [<ffffffffa05741da>] relocate_block_group+0x44/0x4a9 [btrfs]
      [21120.777755]  [<ffffffffa05747a0>] ? btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x161/0x288 [btrfs]
      [21120.779459]  [<ffffffffa05747a8>] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x169/0x288 [btrfs]
      [21120.781153]  [<ffffffffa0550403>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.29+0x3e/0xa7 [btrfs]
      [21120.783918]  [<ffffffffa05518fd>] btrfs_balance+0xaa4/0xc52 [btrfs]
      [21120.785436]  [<ffffffff8114306e>] ? cpu_cache_get.isra.39+0xe/0x1f
      [21120.786434]  [<ffffffffa0559252>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x23f/0x2b0 [btrfs]
      (...)
      [21120.889251] INFO: task fsstress:13288 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [21120.890526]       Tainted: G        W       4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2
      [21120.891773] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      (...)
      [21120.899960] Call Trace:
      [21120.900743]  [<ffffffff8143107e>] schedule+0x74/0x83
      [21120.903004]  [<ffffffffa055f025>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xd7/0x236 [btrfs]
      [21120.904383]  [<ffffffff81075cd6>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
      [21120.905608]  [<ffffffffa051125b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x766/0x7d2 [btrfs]
      [21120.906812]  [<ffffffff8114290e>] ? virt_to_head_page+0x9/0x2c
      [21120.907874]  [<ffffffff81144b7f>] ? cache_alloc_debugcheck_after.isra.42+0x16c/0x1cb
      [21120.909551]  [<ffffffffa05124e0>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x5d/0xa8 [btrfs]
      [21120.910914]  [<ffffffffa0512585>] btrfs_insert_item+0x5a/0xa5 [btrfs]
      [21120.912181]  [<ffffffffa0520271>] ? btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x96/0x130 [btrfs]
      [21120.913784]  [<ffffffffa052028a>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0xaf/0x130 [btrfs]
      [21120.915374]  [<ffffffffa052ffc2>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x366 [btrfs]
      [21120.916735]  [<ffffffffa05302b4>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
      [21120.917996]  [<ffffffffa051ab26>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x11f/0x27c [btrfs]
      [21120.919478]  [<ffffffffa051ba25>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x51 [btrfs]
      [21120.921226]  [<ffffffffa05382f2>] btrfs_truncate_page+0x85/0x2c4 [btrfs]
      [21120.923121]  [<ffffffffa0538572>] btrfs_cont_expand+0x41/0x3ef [btrfs]
      [21120.924449]  [<ffffffffa0541091>] ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x19a/0x431 [btrfs]
      [21120.926602]  [<ffffffff8107b024>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
      [21120.927769]  [<ffffffffa0541091>] ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x19a/0x431 [btrfs]
      [21120.929324]  [<ffffffffa05410a0>] ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x1a9/0x431 [btrfs]
      [21120.930723]  [<ffffffffa05410d9>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x1e2/0x431 [btrfs]
      [21120.931897]  [<ffffffff81067d85>] ? get_parent_ip+0xe/0x3e
      [21120.934446]  [<ffffffff811534c3>] new_sync_write+0x7c/0xa0
      [21120.935528]  [<ffffffff81153b58>] vfs_write+0xb2/0x117
      (...)
      
      Fixes: 1bbc621e ("Btrfs: allow block group cache writeout
                            outside critical section in commit")
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      24b89d08
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race between start dirty bg cache writeout and bg deletion · b58d1a9e
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      While running xfstests I ran into the following:
      
      [20892.242791] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [20892.243776] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 13299 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]()
      [20892.245874] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
      [20892.247329] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse$
      [20892.258488] CPU: 0 PID: 13299 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G        W       4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2
      [20892.262011] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
      [20892.264738]  0000000000000009 ffff880427f8bc18 ffffffff8142fa46 ffffffff8108b6a2
      [20892.266244]  ffff880427f8bc68 ffff880427f8bc58 ffffffff81045ea5 ffff880427f8bc48
      [20892.267761]  ffffffffa0509a6d 00000000fffffffe ffff8803545d6f40 ffffffffa05a15a0
      [20892.269378] Call Trace:
      [20892.269915]  [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
      [20892.271097]  [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
      [20892.272173]  [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
      [20892.273386]  [<ffffffffa0509a6d>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
      [20892.274857]  [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
      [20892.275851]  [<ffffffffa0509a6d>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
      [20892.277341]  [<ffffffffa0515e10>] write_one_cache_group+0x68/0xaf [btrfs]
      [20892.278628]  [<ffffffffa052088a>] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x18d/0x29b [btrfs]
      [20892.280191]  [<ffffffffa052f077>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x130/0x9c9 [btrfs]
      [20892.281781]  [<ffffffff8107d33d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
      [20892.282873]  [<ffffffffa054163b>] btrfs_sync_file+0x313/0x387 [btrfs]
      [20892.284111]  [<ffffffff8117acad>] vfs_fsync_range+0x95/0xa4
      [20892.285203]  [<ffffffff810e603f>] ? time_hardirqs_on+0x15/0x28
      [20892.286290]  [<ffffffff8123960b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
      [20892.287469]  [<ffffffff8117acd8>] vfs_fsync+0x1c/0x1e
      [20892.288412]  [<ffffffff8117ae54>] do_fsync+0x34/0x4e
      [20892.289348]  [<ffffffff8117b07c>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x14
      [20892.290255]  [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
      [20892.291316] ---[ end trace 597f77e664245373 ]---
      [20892.293955] BTRFS: error (device sdg) in write_one_cache_group:3184: errno=-2 No such entry
      [20892.297390] BTRFS info (device sdg): forced readonly
      
      This happens because in btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups() we splice the
      transaction's list of dirty block groups into a local list and then we
      keep extracting the first element of the list without holding the
      cache_write_mutex mutex. This means that before we acquire that mutex
      the first block group on the list might be removed by a conurrent task
      running btrfs_remove_block_group(). So make sure we extract the first
      element (and test the list emptyness) while holding that mutex.
      
      Fixes: 1bbc621e ("Btrfs: allow block group cache writeout
                            outside critical section in commit")
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      b58d1a9e
  8. 25 4月, 2015 4 次提交
    • A
      RCU pathwalk breakage when running into a symlink overmounting something · 3cab989a
      Al Viro 提交于
      Calling unlazy_walk() in walk_component() and do_last() when we find
      a symlink that needs to be followed doesn't acquire a reference to vfsmount.
      That's fine when the symlink is on the same vfsmount as the parent directory
      (which is almost always the case), but it's not always true - one _can_
      manage to bind a symlink on top of something.  And in such cases we end up
      with excessive mntput().
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # since 2.6.39
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      3cab989a
    • J
      direct-io: only inc/dec inode->i_dio_count for file systems · fe0f07d0
      Jens Axboe 提交于
      do_blockdev_direct_IO() increments and decrements the inode
      ->i_dio_count for each IO operation. It does this to protect against
      truncate of a file. Block devices don't need this sort of protection.
      
      For a capable multiqueue setup, this atomic int is the only shared
      state between applications accessing the device for O_DIRECT, and it
      presents a scaling wall for that. In my testing, as much as 30% of
      system time is spent incrementing and decrementing this value. A mixed
      read/write workload improved from ~2.5M IOPS to ~9.6M IOPS, with
      better latencies too. Before:
      
      clat percentiles (usec):
       |  1.00th=[   33],  5.00th=[   34], 10.00th=[   34], 20.00th=[   34],
       | 30.00th=[   34], 40.00th=[   34], 50.00th=[   35], 60.00th=[   35],
       | 70.00th=[   35], 80.00th=[   35], 90.00th=[   37], 95.00th=[   80],
       | 99.00th=[   98], 99.50th=[  151], 99.90th=[  155], 99.95th=[  155],
       | 99.99th=[  165]
      
      After:
      
      clat percentiles (usec):
       |  1.00th=[   95],  5.00th=[  108], 10.00th=[  129], 20.00th=[  149],
       | 30.00th=[  155], 40.00th=[  161], 50.00th=[  167], 60.00th=[  171],
       | 70.00th=[  177], 80.00th=[  185], 90.00th=[  201], 95.00th=[  270],
       | 99.00th=[  390], 99.50th=[  398], 99.90th=[  418], 99.95th=[  422],
       | 99.99th=[  438]
      
      In other setups, Robert Elliott reported seeing good performance
      improvements:
      
      https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/557
      
      The more applications accessing the device, the worse it gets.
      
      Add a new direct-io flags, DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT, which tells
      do_blockdev_direct_IO() that it need not worry about incrementing
      or decrementing the inode i_dio_count for this caller.
      
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) <elliott@hp.com>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      fe0f07d0
    • J
      fs/9p: fix readdir() · 8e3c5005
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      Al Viro's IOV changes broke 9p readdir() because the new code
      didn't abort the read when it returned nothing. The original
      code checked if the combined error/length was <= 0 but in the
      new code that accidentally got changed to just an error check.
      
      Add back the return from the function when nothing is read.
      
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Fixes: e1200fe6 ("9p: switch p9_client_read() to passing struct iov_iter *")
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      8e3c5005
    • C
      Btrfs: prevent list corruption during free space cache processing · a3bdccc4
      Chris Mason 提交于
      __btrfs_write_out_cache is holding the ctl->tree_lock while it prepares
      a list of bitmaps to record in the free space cache.  It was dropping
      the lock while it worked on other components, which made a window for
      free_bitmap() to free the bitmap struct without removing it from the
      list.
      
      This changes things to hold the lock the whole time, and also makes sure
      we hold the lock during enospc cleanup.
      Reported-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      a3bdccc4
  9. 24 4月, 2015 13 次提交