Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 4月, 2022 1 次提交
  3. 05 4月, 2022 2 次提交
    • P
      objtool: Fix SLS validation for kcov tail-call replacement · 7a53f408
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Since not all compilers have a function attribute to disable KCOV
instrumentation, objtool can rewrite KCOV instrumentation in noinstr
functions as per commit:

  f56dae88 ("objtool: Handle __sanitize_cov*() tail calls")

However, this has subtle interaction with the SLS validation from
commit:

  1cc1e4c8 ("objtool: Add straight-line-speculation validation")

In that when a tail-call instrucion is replaced with a RET an
additional INT3 instruction is also written, but is not represented in
the decoded instruction stream.

This then leads to false positive missing INT3 objtool warnings in
noinstr code.

Instead of adding additional struct instruction objects, mark the RET
instruction with retpoline_safe to suppress the warning (since we know
there really is an INT3).

Fixes: 1cc1e4c8 ("objtool: Add straight-line-speculation validation")
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220323230712.GA8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
      7a53f408
    • P
      objtool: Fix IBT tail-call detection · d139bca4
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Objtool reports:

  arch/x86/crypto/poly1305-x86_64.o: warning: objtool: poly1305_blocks_avx() falls through to next function poly1305_blocks_x86_64()
  arch/x86/crypto/poly1305-x86_64.o: warning: objtool: poly1305_emit_avx() falls through to next function poly1305_emit_x86_64()
  arch/x86/crypto/poly1305-x86_64.o: warning: objtool: poly1305_blocks_avx2() falls through to next function poly1305_blocks_x86_64()

Which reads like:

0000000000000040 <poly1305_blocks_x86_64>:
	 40:       f3 0f 1e fa             endbr64
	...

0000000000000400 <poly1305_blocks_avx>:
	400:       f3 0f 1e fa             endbr64
	404:       44 8b 47 14             mov    0x14(%rdi),%r8d
	408:       48 81 fa 80 00 00 00    cmp    $0x80,%rdx
	40f:       73 09                   jae    41a <poly1305_blocks_avx+0x1a>
	411:       45 85 c0                test   %r8d,%r8d
	414:       0f 84 2a fc ff ff       je     44 <poly1305_blocks_x86_64+0x4>
	...

These are simple conditional tail-calls and *should* be recognised as
such by objtool, however due to a mistake in commit 08f87a93
("objtool: Validate IBT assumptions") this is failing.

Specifically, the jump_dest is +4, this means the instruction pointed
at will not be ENDBR and as such it will fail the second clause of
is_first_func_insn() that was supposed to capture this exact case.

Instead, have is_first_func_insn() look at the previous instruction.

Fixes: 08f87a93 ("objtool: Validate IBT assumptions")
Reported-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220322115125.811582125@infradead.org
      d139bca4
  5. 15 3月, 2022 14 次提交
  7. 15 2月, 2022 2 次提交
  9. 25 1月, 2022 1 次提交
  11. 16 12月, 2021 1 次提交
  13. 14 12月, 2021 4 次提交
    • E
      exit: Rename complete_and_exit to kthread_complete_and_exit · cead1855
      由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于 
      Update complete_and_exit to call kthread_exit instead of do_exit.

Change the name to reflect this change in functionality.  All of the
users of complete_and_exit are causing the current kthread to exit so
this change makes it clear what is happening.

Move the implementation of kthread_complete_and_exit from
kernel/exit.c to to kernel/kthread.c.  As this function is kthread
specific it makes most sense to live with the kthread functions.

There are no functional change.
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      cead1855
    • E
      exit: Rename module_put_and_exit to module_put_and_kthread_exit · ca3574bd
      由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于 
      Update module_put_and_exit to call kthread_exit instead of do_exit.

Change the name to reflect this change in functionality.  All of the
users of module_put_and_exit are causing the current kthread to exit
so this change makes it clear what is happening.  There is no
functional change.
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      ca3574bd
    • E
      exit: Implement kthread_exit · bbda86e9
      由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于 
      The way the per task_struct exit_code is used by kernel threads is not
quite compatible how it is used by userspace applications.  The low
byte of the userspace exit_code value encodes the exit signal.  While
kthreads just use the value as an int holding ordinary kernel function
exit status like -EPERM.

Add kthread_exit to clearly separate the two kinds of uses.
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      bbda86e9
    • E
      exit: Add and use make_task_dead. · 0e25498f
      由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于 
      There are two big uses of do_exit.  The first is it's design use to be
the guts of the exit(2) system call.  The second use is to terminate
a task after something catastrophic has happened like a NULL pointer
in kernel code.

Add a function make_task_dead that is initialy exactly the same as
do_exit to cover the cases where do_exit is called to handle
catastrophic failure.  In time this can probably be reduced to just a
light wrapper around do_task_dead. For now keep it exactly the same so
that there will be no behavioral differences introducing this new
concept.

Replace all of the uses of do_exit that use it for catastraphic
task cleanup with make_task_dead to make it clear what the code
is doing.

As part of this rename rewind_stack_do_exit
rewind_stack_and_make_dead.
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      0e25498f
  15. 11 12月, 2021 1 次提交
  17. 10 12月, 2021 2 次提交
  19. 09 12月, 2021 1 次提交
  21. 03 12月, 2021 1 次提交
  23. 11 11月, 2021 1 次提交
  25. 29 10月, 2021 4 次提交
  27. 07 10月, 2021 2 次提交
  29. 06 10月, 2021 3 次提交