1. 28 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  2. 27 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 22 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  4. 21 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  5. 20 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  6. 19 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  7. 16 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  8. 13 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  9. 10 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  10. 09 8月, 2019 3 次提交
  11. 07 8月, 2019 2 次提交
  12. 04 8月, 2019 2 次提交
  13. 02 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  14. 30 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  15. 13 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  16. 26 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  17. 21 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  18. 17 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  19. 11 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  20. 06 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  21. 28 5月, 2019 4 次提交
  22. 22 5月, 2019 2 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Allow specification of parallel execbuf · a88b6e4c
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      There is a desire to split a task onto two engines and have them run at
      the same time, e.g. scanline interleaving to spread the workload evenly.
      Through the use of the out-fence from the first execbuf, we can
      coordinate secondary execbuf to only become ready simultaneously with
      the first, so that with all things idle the second execbufs are executed
      in parallel with the first. The key difference here between the new
      EXEC_FENCE_SUBMIT and the existing EXEC_FENCE_IN is that the in-fence
      waits for the completion of the first request (so that all of its
      rendering results are visible to the second execbuf, the more common
      userspace fence requirement).
      
      Since we only have a single input fence slot, userspace cannot mix an
      in-fence and a submit-fence. It has to use one or the other! This is not
      such a harsh requirement, since by virtue of the submit-fence, the
      secondary execbuf inherit all of the dependencies from the first
      request, and for the application the dependencies should be common
      between the primary and secondary execbuf.
      Suggested-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Testcase: igt/gem_exec_fence/parallel
      Link: https://github.com/intel/media-driver/pull/546Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190521211134.16117-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      a88b6e4c
    • C
      drm/i915: Allow a context to define its set of engines · 976b55f0
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      Over the last few years, we have debated how to extend the user API to
      support an increase in the number of engines, that may be sparse and
      even be heterogeneous within a class (not all video decoders created
      equal). We settled on using (class, instance) tuples to identify a
      specific engine, with an API for the user to construct a map of engines
      to capabilities. Into this picture, we then add a challenge of virtual
      engines; one user engine that maps behind the scenes to any number of
      physical engines. To keep it general, we want the user to have full
      control over that mapping. To that end, we allow the user to constrain a
      context to define the set of engines that it can access, order fully
      controlled by the user via (class, instance). With such precise control
      in context setup, we can continue to use the existing execbuf uABI of
      specifying a single index; only now it doesn't automagically map onto
      the engines, it uses the user defined engine map from the context.
      
      v2: Fixup freeing of local on success of get_engines()
      v3: Allow empty engines[]
      v4: s/nengine/num_engines/
      v5: Replace 64 limit on num_engines with a note that execbuf is
      currently limited to only using the first 64 engines.
      v6: Actually use the engines_mutex to guard the ctx->engines.
      
      Testcase: igt/gem_ctx_engines
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190521211134.16117-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      976b55f0
  23. 27 4月, 2019 2 次提交
  24. 25 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  25. 03 4月, 2019 1 次提交
    • P
      i915, uaccess: Fix redundant CLAC · 8f4faed0
      Peter Zijlstra 提交于
      New tooling noticed this:
      
       drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x3c: redundant UACCESS disable
       drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x66: redundant UACCESS disable
      
      You don't need user_access_end() if user_access_begin() fails.
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      8f4faed0
  26. 22 3月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Flush pages on acquisition · a679f58d
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      When we return pages to the system, we ensure that they are marked as
      being in the CPU domain since any external access is uncontrolled and we
      must assume the worst. This means that we need to always flush the pages
      on acquisition if we need to use them on the GPU, and from the beginning
      have used set-domain. Set-domain is overkill for the purpose as it is a
      general synchronisation barrier, but our intent is to only flush the
      pages being swapped in. If we move that flush into the pages acquisition
      phase, we know then that when we have obj->mm.pages, they are coherent
      with the GPU and need only maintain that status without resorting to
      heavy handed use of set-domain.
      
      The principle knock-on effect for userspace is through mmap-gtt
      pagefaulting. Our uAPI has always implied that the GTT mmap was async
      (especially as when any pagefault occurs is unpredicatable to userspace)
      and so userspace had to apply explicit domain control itself
      (set-domain). However, swapping is transparent to the kernel, and so on
      first fault we need to acquire the pages and make them coherent for
      access through the GTT. Our use of set-domain here leaks into the uABI
      that the first pagefault was synchronous. This is unintentional and
      baring a few igt should be unoticed, nevertheless we bump the uABI
      version for mmap-gtt to reflect the change in behaviour.
      
      Another implication of the change is that gem_create() is presumed to
      create an object that is coherent with the CPU and is in the CPU write
      domain, so a set-domain(CPU) following a gem_create() would be a minor
      operation that merely checked whether we could allocate all pages for
      the object. On applying this change, a set-domain(CPU) causes a clflush
      as we acquire the pages. This will have a small impact on mesa as we move
      the clflush here on !llc from execbuf time to create, but that should
      have minimal performance impact as the same clflush exists but is now
      done early and because of the clflush issue, userspace recycles bo and
      so should resist allocating fresh objects.
      
      Internally, the presumption that objects are created in the CPU
      write-domain and remain so through writes to obj->mm.mapping is more
      prevalent than I expected; but easy enough to catch and apply a manual
      flush.
      
      For the future, we should push the page flush from the central
      set_pages() into the callers so that we can more finely control when it
      is applied, but for now doing it one location is easier to validate, at
      the cost of sometimes flushing when there is no need.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
      Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
      Cc: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>
      Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190321161908.8007-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      a679f58d
  27. 08 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  28. 06 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  29. 02 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  30. 28 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  31. 22 2月, 2019 1 次提交