Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 21 4月, 2020 4 次提交
  3. 16 4月, 2020 5 次提交
  5. 07 4月, 2020 1 次提交
  7. 31 3月, 2020 2 次提交
  9. 18 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  11. 17 3月, 2020 14 次提交
  13. 14 3月, 2020 1 次提交
    • V
      KVM: nVMX: avoid NULL pointer dereference with incorrect EVMCS GPAs · 95fa1010
      由 Vitaly Kuznetsov 提交于 
      When an EVMCS enabled L1 guest on KVM will tries doing enlightened VMEnter
with EVMCS GPA = 0 the host crashes because the

evmcs_gpa != vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr

condition in nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld() will evaluate to
false (as nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr is zeroed after init). The crash will
happen on vmx->nested.hv_evmcs pointer dereference.

Another problematic EVMCS ptr value is '-1' but it only causes host crash
after nested_release_evmcs() invocation. The problem is exactly the same as
with '0', we mistakenly think that the EVMCS pointer hasn't changed and
thus nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr is valid.

Resolve the issue by adding an additional !vmx->nested.hv_evmcs
check to nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld(), this way we will
always be trying kvm_vcpu_map() when nested.hv_evmcs is NULL
and this is supposed to catch all invalid EVMCS GPAs.

Also, initialize hv_evmcs_vmptr to '0' in nested_release_evmcs()
to be consistent with initialization where we don't currently
set hv_evmcs_vmptr to '-1'.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NVitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      95fa1010
  15. 23 2月, 2020 3 次提交
  17. 22 2月, 2020 1 次提交
    • V
      KVM: nVMX: clear PIN_BASED_POSTED_INTR from nested pinbased_ctls only when... · a4443267
      由 Vitaly Kuznetsov 提交于 
      KVM: nVMX: clear PIN_BASED_POSTED_INTR from nested pinbased_ctls only when apicv is globally disabled

When apicv is disabled on a vCPU (e.g. by enabling KVM_CAP_HYPERV_SYNIC*),
nothing happens to VMX MSRs on the already existing vCPUs, however, all new
ones are created with PIN_BASED_POSTED_INTR filtered out. This is very
confusing and results in the following picture inside the guest:

$ rdmsr -ax 0x48d
ff00000016
7f00000016
7f00000016
7f00000016

This is observed with QEMU and 4-vCPU guest: QEMU creates vCPU0, does
KVM_CAP_HYPERV_SYNIC2 and then creates the remaining three.

L1 hypervisor may only check CPU0's controls to find out what features
are available and it will be very confused later. Switch to setting
PIN_BASED_POSTED_INTR control based on global 'enable_apicv' setting.
Signed-off-by: NVitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      a4443267
  19. 17 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  21. 13 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  23. 12 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  25. 05 2月, 2020 3 次提交
  27. 28 1月, 2020 2 次提交
    • K
      KVM: nVMX: Check GUEST_DR7 on vmentry of nested guests · b91991bf
      由 Krish Sadhukhan 提交于 
      According to section "Checks on Guest Control Registers, Debug Registers, and
and MSRs" in Intel SDM vol 3C, the following checks are performed on vmentry
of nested guests:

    If the "load debug controls" VM-entry control is 1, bits 63:32 in the DR7
    field must be 0.

In KVM, GUEST_DR7 is set prior to the vmcs02 VM-entry by kvm_set_dr() and the
latter synthesizes a #GP if any bit in the high dword in the former is set.
Hence this field needs to be checked in software.
Signed-off-by: NKrish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NKarl Heubaum <karl.heubaum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      b91991bf
    • S
      KVM: x86: Perform non-canonical checks in 32-bit KVM · de761ea7
      由 Sean Christopherson 提交于 
      Remove the CONFIG_X86_64 condition from the low level non-canonical
helpers to effectively enable non-canonical checks on 32-bit KVM.
Non-canonical checks are performed by hardware if the CPU *supports*
64-bit mode, whether or not the CPU is actually in 64-bit mode is
irrelevant.

For the most part, skipping non-canonical checks on 32-bit KVM is ok-ish
because 32-bit KVM always (hopefully) drops bits 63:32 of whatever value
it's checking before propagating it to hardware, and architecturally,
the expected behavior for the guest is a bit of a grey area since the
vCPU itself doesn't support 64-bit mode.  I.e. a 32-bit KVM guest can
observe the missed checks in several paths, e.g. INVVPID and VM-Enter,
but it's debatable whether or not the missed checks constitute a bug
because technically the vCPU doesn't support 64-bit mode.

The primary motivation for enabling the non-canonical checks is defense
in depth.  As mentioned above, a guest can trigger a missed check via
INVVPID or VM-Enter.  INVVPID is straightforward as it takes a 64-bit
virtual address as part of its 128-bit INVVPID descriptor and fails if
the address is non-canonical, even if INVVPID is executed in 32-bit PM.
Nested VM-Enter is a bit more convoluted as it requires the guest to
write natural width VMCS fields via memory accesses and then VMPTRLD the
VMCS, but it's still possible.  In both cases, KVM is saved from a true
bug only because its flows that propagate values to hardware (correctly)
take "unsigned long" parameters and so drop bits 63:32 of the bad value.

Explicitly performing the non-canonical checks makes it less likely that
a bad value will be propagated to hardware, e.g. in the INVVPID case,
if __invvpid() didn't implicitly drop bits 63:32 then KVM would BUG() on
the resulting unexpected INVVPID failure due to hardware rejecting the
non-canonical address.

The only downside to enabling the non-canonical checks is that it adds a
relatively small amount of overhead, but the affected flows are not hot
paths, i.e. the overhead is negligible.

Note, KVM technically could gate the non-canonical checks on 32-bit KVM
with static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_LM), but on bare metal that's an even
bigger waste of code for everyone except the 0.00000000000001% of the
population running on Yonah, and nested 32-bit on 64-bit already fudges
things with respect to 64-bit CPU behavior.
Signed-off-by: NSean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
[Also do so in nested_vmx_check_host_state as reported by Krish. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      de761ea7