Userspace should always be in charge of how to online memory and if memory
should be onlined automatically in the kernel.  Let's drop the parameter
to overwrite this - XEN passes memhp_auto_online, just like add_memory(),
so we can directly use that instead internally.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181123123740.27652-1-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: NJuergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Per-cpu numa_node provides a default node for each possible cpu.  The
association gets initialized during the boot when the architecture
specific code explores cpu->NUMA affinity.  When the whole NUMA node is
removed though we are clearing this association

try_offline_node
  check_and_unmap_cpu_on_node
    unmap_cpu_on_node
      numa_clear_node
        numa_set_node(cpu, NUMA_NO_NODE)

This means that whoever calls cpu_to_node for a cpu associated with such a
node will get NUMA_NO_NODE.  This is problematic for two reasons.  First
it is fragile because __alloc_pages_node would simply blow up on an
out-of-bound access.  We have encountered this when loading kvm module

  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00000000000021c0
  IP: __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x93/0xb70
  PGD 800000ffe853e067 PUD 7336bbc067 PMD 0
  Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
  [...]
  CPU: 88 PID: 1223749 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G        W          4.4.156-94.64-default #1
  RIP: __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x93/0xb70
  RSP: 0018:ffff887354493b40  EFLAGS: 00010202
  RAX: 00000000000021c0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 00000000014000c0
  RBP: 00000000014000c0 R08: ffffffffffffffff R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: ffff88fffc89e790 R11: 0000000000014000 R12: 0000000000000101
  R13: ffffffffa0772cd4 R14: ffffffffa0769ac0 R15: 0000000000000000
  FS:  00007fdf2f2f1700(0000) GS:ffff88fffc880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00000000000021c0 CR3: 00000077205ee000 CR4: 0000000000360670
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  Call Trace:
    alloc_vmcs_cpu+0x3d/0x90 [kvm_intel]
    hardware_setup+0x781/0x849 [kvm_intel]
    kvm_arch_hardware_setup+0x28/0x190 [kvm]
    kvm_init+0x7c/0x2d0 [kvm]
    vmx_init+0x1e/0x32c [kvm_intel]
    do_one_initcall+0xca/0x1f0
    do_init_module+0x5a/0x1d7
    load_module+0x1393/0x1c90
    SYSC_finit_module+0x70/0xa0
    entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0xb7
  DWARF2 unwinder stuck at entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0xb7

on an older kernel but the code is basically the same in the current Linus
tree as well.  alloc_vmcs_cpu could use alloc_pages_nodemask which would
recognize NUMA_NO_NODE and use alloc_pages_node which would translate it
to numa_mem_id but that is wrong as well because it would use a cpu
affinity of the local CPU which might be quite far from the original node.
It is also reasonable to expect that cpu_to_node will provide a sane
value and there might be many more callers like that.

The second problem is that __register_one_node relies on cpu_to_node to
properly associate cpus back to the node when it is onlined.  We do not
want to lose that link as there is no arch independent way to get it from
the early boot time AFAICS.

Drop the whole check_and_unmap_cpu_on_node machinery and keep the
association to fix both issues.  The NODE_DATA(nid) is not deallocated so
it will stay in place and if anybody wants to allocate from that node then
a fallback node will be used.

Thanks to Vlastimil Babka for his live system debugging skills that helped
debugging the issue.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181108100413.966-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Fixes: e13fe869 ("cpu-hotplug,memory-hotplug: clear cpu_to_node() when offlining the node")
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Debugged-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reported-by: NMiroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NAnshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Heiko has complained that his log is swamped by warnings from
has_unmovable_pages

[   20.536664] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages
[   20.536792] page:000003d081ff4080 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:000000008ff88600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
[   20.536794] flags: 0x3fffe0000010200(slab|head)
[   20.536795] raw: 03fffe0000010200 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 000000008ff88600
[   20.536796] raw: 0000000000000000 0020004100000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000
[   20.536797] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages
[   20.536814] page:000003d0823b0000 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0
[   20.536815] flags: 0x7fffe0000000000()
[   20.536817] raw: 07fffe0000000000 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 0000000000000000
[   20.536818] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000

which are not triggered by the memory hotplug but rather CMA allocator.
The original idea behind dumping the page state for all call paths was
that these messages will be helpful debugging failures.  From the above it
seems that this is not the case for the CMA path because we are lacking
much more context.  E.g the second reported page might be a CMA allocated
page.  It is still interesting to see a slab page in the CMA area but it
is hard to tell whether this is bug from the above output alone.

Address this issue by dumping the page state only on request.  Both
start_isolate_page_range and has_unmovable_pages already have an argument
to ignore hwpoison pages so make this argument more generic and turn it
into flags and allow callers to combine non-default modes into a mask.
While we are at it, has_unmovable_pages call from
is_pageblock_removable_nolock (sysfs removable file) is questionable to
report the failure so drop it from there as well.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181218092802.31429-1-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reported-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There is only very limited information printed when the memory offlining
fails:

[ 1984.506184] rac1 kernel: memory offlining [mem 0x82600000000-0x8267fffffff] failed due to signal backoff

This tells us that the failure is triggered by the userspace intervention
but it doesn't tell us much more about the underlying reason.  It might be
that the page migration failes repeatedly and the userspace timeout
expires and send a signal or it might be some of the earlier steps
(isolation, memory notifier) takes too long.

If the migration failes then it would be really helpful to see which page
that and its state.  The same applies to the isolation phase.  If we fail
to isolate a page from the allocator then knowing the state of the page
would be helpful as well.

Dump the page state that fails to get isolated or migrated.  This will
tell us more about the failure and what to focus on during debugging.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: add missing printk arg]
[mhocko@suse.com: tweak dump_page() `reason' text]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181116083020.20260-6-mhocko@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107101830.17405-6-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The memory offlining failure reporting is inconsistent and insufficient.
Some error paths simply do not report the failure to the log at all.  When
we do report there are no details about the reason of the failure and
there are several of them which makes memory offlining failures hard to
debug.

Make sure that the
	memory offlining [mem %#010llx-%#010llx] failed
message is printed for all failures and also provide a short textual
reason for the failure e.g.

[ 1984.506184] rac1 kernel: memory offlining [mem 0x82600000000-0x8267fffffff] failed due to signal backoff

this tells us that the offlining has failed because of a signal pending
aka user intervention.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak messages a bit]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107101830.17405-5-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This function is never called from a context which would provide
misaligned pfn range so drop the pointless check.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107101830.17405-4-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

We have received a bug report that unbinding a large pmem (>1TB) can
result in a soft lockup:

  NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#9 stuck for 23s! [ndctl:4365]
  [...]
  Supported: Yes
  CPU: 9 PID: 4365 Comm: ndctl Not tainted 4.12.14-94.40-default #1 SLE12-SP4
  Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFD/S2600WFD, BIOS SE5C620.86B.01.00.0833.051120182255 05/11/2018
  task: ffff9cce7d4410c0 task.stack: ffffbe9eb1bc4000
  RIP: 0010:__put_page+0x62/0x80
  Call Trace:
   devm_memremap_pages_release+0x152/0x260
   release_nodes+0x18d/0x1d0
   device_release_driver_internal+0x160/0x210
   unbind_store+0xb3/0xe0
   kernfs_fop_write+0x102/0x180
   __vfs_write+0x26/0x150
   vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0
   SyS_write+0x42/0x90
   do_syscall_64+0x74/0x150
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
  RIP: 0033:0x7fd13166b3d0

It has been reported on an older (4.12) kernel but the current upstream
code doesn't cond_resched in the hot remove code at all and the given
range to remove might be really large.  Fix the issue by calling
cond_resched once per memory section.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181031125840.23982-1-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There seem to be some problems as result of 30467e0b ("mm, hotplug:
fix concurrent memory hot-add deadlock"), which tried to fix a possible
lock inversion reported and discussed in [1] due to the two locks
	a) device_lock()
	b) mem_hotplug_lock

While add_memory() first takes b), followed by a) during
bus_probe_device(), onlining of memory from user space first took a),
followed by b), exposing a possible deadlock.

In [1], and it was decided to not make use of device_hotplug_lock, but
rather to enforce a locking order.

The problems I spotted related to this:

1. Memory block device attributes: While .state first calls
   mem_hotplug_begin() and the calls device_online() - which takes
   device_lock() - .online does no longer call mem_hotplug_begin(), so
   effectively calls online_pages() without mem_hotplug_lock.

2. device_online() should be called under device_hotplug_lock, however
   onlining memory during add_memory() does not take care of that.

In addition, I think there is also something wrong about the locking in

3. arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c calls offline_pages()
   without locks. This was introduced after 30467e0b. And skimming over
   the code, I assume it could need some more care in regards to locking
   (e.g. device_online() called without device_hotplug_lock. This will
   be addressed in the following patches.

Now that we hold the device_hotplug_lock when
- adding memory (e.g. via add_memory()/add_memory_resource())
- removing memory (e.g. via remove_memory())
- device_online()/device_offline()

We can move mem_hotplug_lock usage back into
online_pages()/offline_pages().

Why is mem_hotplug_lock still needed? Essentially to make
get_online_mems()/put_online_mems() be very fast (relying on
device_hotplug_lock would be very slow), and to serialize against
addition of memory that does not create memory block devices (hmm).

[1] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/ driverdev-devel/
    2015-February/065324.html

This patch is partly based on a patch by Vitaly Kuznetsov.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-4-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: NRashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

add_memory() currently does not take the device_hotplug_lock, however
is aleady called under the lock from
	arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
	drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
to synchronize against CPU hot-remove and similar.

In general, we should hold the device_hotplug_lock when adding memory to
synchronize against online/offline request (e.g.  from user space) - which
already resulted in lock inversions due to device_lock() and
mem_hotplug_lock - see 30467e0b ("mm, hotplug: fix concurrent memory
hot-add deadlock").  add_memory()/add_memory_resource() will create memory
block devices, so this really feels like the right thing to do.

Holding the device_hotplug_lock makes sure that a memory block device
can really only be accessed (e.g. via .online/.state) from user space,
once the memory has been fully added to the system.

The lock is not held yet in
	drivers/xen/balloon.c
	arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c
	drivers/s390/char/sclp_cmd.c
	drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
So, let's either use the locked variants or take the lock.

Don't export add_memory_resource(), as it once was exported to be used by
XEN, which is never built as a module.  If somebody requires it, we also
have to export a locked variant (as device_hotplug_lock is never
exported).

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-3-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "mm: online/offline_pages called w.o. mem_hotplug_lock", v3.

Reading through the code and studying how mem_hotplug_lock is to be used,
I noticed that there are two places where we can end up calling
device_online()/device_offline() - online_pages()/offline_pages() without
the mem_hotplug_lock.  And there are other places where we call
device_online()/device_offline() without the device_hotplug_lock.

While e.g.
	echo "online" > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/state
is fine, e.g.
	echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/online
Will not take the mem_hotplug_lock. However the device_lock() and
device_hotplug_lock.

E.g.  via memory_probe_store(), we can end up calling
add_memory()->online_pages() without the device_hotplug_lock.  So we can
have concurrent callers in online_pages().  We e.g.  touch in
online_pages() basically unprotected zone->present_pages then.

Looks like there is a longer history to that (see Patch #2 for details),
and fixing it to work the way it was intended is not really possible.  We
would e.g.  have to take the mem_hotplug_lock in device/base/core.c, which
sounds wrong.

Summary: We had a lock inversion on mem_hotplug_lock and device_lock().
More details can be found in patch 3 and patch 6.

I propose the general rules (documentation added in patch 6):

1. add_memory/add_memory_resource() must only be called with
   device_hotplug_lock.
2. remove_memory() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. This is
   already documented and holds for all callers.
3. device_online()/device_offline() must only be called with
   device_hotplug_lock. This is already documented and true for now in core
   code. Other callers (related to memory hotplug) have to be fixed up.
4. mem_hotplug_lock is taken inside of add_memory/remove_memory/
   online_pages/offline_pages.

To me, this looks way cleaner than what we have right now (and easier to
verify).  And looking at the documentation of remove_memory, using
lock_device_hotplug also for add_memory() feels natural.

This patch (of 6):

remove_memory() is exported right now but requires the
device_hotplug_lock, which is not exported.  So let's provide a variant
that takes the lock and only export that one.

The lock is already held in
	arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
	drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
	arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c

Apart from that, there are not other users in the tree.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-2-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Move remaining definitions and declarations from include/linux/bootmem.h
into include/linux/memblock.h and remove the redundant header.

The includes were replaced with the semantic patch below and then
semi-automated removal of duplicated '#include <linux/memblock.h>

@@
@@
- #include <linux/bootmem.h>
+ #include <linux/memblock.h>

[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: dma-direct: fix up for the removal of linux/bootmem.h]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181002185342.133d1680@canb.auug.org.au
[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: powerpc: fix up for removal of linux/bootmem.h]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181005161406.73ef8727@canb.auug.org.au
[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: x86/kaslr, ACPI/NUMA: fix for linux/bootmem.h removal]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181008190341.5e396491@canb.auug.org.au
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1536927045-23536-30-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Cc: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This patch, as the previous one, gets rid of the wrong if statements.
While at it, I realized that the comments are sometimes very confusing,
to say the least, and wrong.
For example:

___
zone_last = ZONE_MOVABLE;

/*
 * check whether node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY] will be changed
 * If we try to offline the last present @nr_pages from the node,
 * we can determind we will need to clear the node from
 * node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY].
 */

for (; zt <= zone_last; zt++)
        present_pages += pgdat->node_zones[zt].present_pages;
if (nr_pages >= present_pages)
        arg->status_change_nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
else
        arg->status_change_nid = -1;
___

In case the node gets empry, it must be removed from N_MEMORY.  We already
check N_HIGH_MEMORY a bit above within the CONFIG_HIGHMEM ifdef code.  Not
to say that status_change_nid is for N_MEMORY, and not for N_HIGH_MEMORY.

So I re-wrote some of the comments to what I think is better.

[osalvador@suse.de: address feedback from Pavel]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180921132634.10103-5-osalvador@techadventures.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180919100819.25518-6-osalvador@techadventures.netSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

While looking at node_states_check_changes_online, I stumbled upon some
confusing things.

Right after entering the function, we find this:

if (N_MEMORY == N_NORMAL_MEMORY)
        zone_last = ZONE_MOVABLE;

This is wrong.
N_MEMORY cannot really be equal to N_NORMAL_MEMORY.
My guess is that this wanted to be something like:

if (N_NORMAL_MEMORY == N_HIGH_MEMORY)

to check if we have CONFIG_HIGHMEM.

Later on, in the CONFIG_HIGHMEM block, we have:

if (N_MEMORY == N_HIGH_MEMORY)
        zone_last = ZONE_MOVABLE;

Again, this is wrong, and will never be evaluated to true.

Besides removing these wrong if statements, I simplified the function a
bit.

[osalvador@suse.de: address feedback from Pavel]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180921132634.10103-4-osalvador@techadventures.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180919100819.25518-5-osalvador@techadventures.netSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

node_states_clear has the following if statements:

if ((N_MEMORY != N_NORMAL_MEMORY) &&
    (arg->status_change_nid_high >= 0))
        ...

if ((N_MEMORY != N_HIGH_MEMORY) &&
    (arg->status_change_nid >= 0))
        ...

N_MEMORY can never be equal to neither N_NORMAL_MEMORY nor
N_HIGH_MEMORY.

Similar problem was found in [1].
Since this is wrong, let us get rid of it.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10579155/

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180919100819.25518-4-osalvador@techadventures.netSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

In node_states_check_changes_online, we check if the node will have to be
set for any of the N_*_MEMORY states after the pages have been onlined.

Later on, we perform the activation in node_states_set_node.  Currently,
in node_states_set_node we set the node to N_MEMORY unconditionally.

This means that we call node_set_state for N_MEMORY every time pages go
online, but we only need to do it if the node has not yet been set for
N_MEMORY.

Fix this by checking status_change_nid.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180919100819.25518-2-osalvador@techadventures.netSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

When scanning for movable pages, filter out Hugetlb pages if hugepage
migration is not supported.  Without this we hit infinte loop in
__offline_pages() where we do

	pfn = scan_movable_pages(start_pfn, end_pfn);
	if (pfn) { /* We have movable pages */
		ret = do_migrate_range(pfn, end_pfn);
		goto repeat;
	}

Fix this by checking hugepage_migration_supported both in
has_unmovable_pages which is the primary backoff mechanism for page
offlining and for consistency reasons also into scan_movable_pages
because it doesn't make any sense to return a pfn to non-migrateable
huge page.

This issue was revealed by, but not caused by 72b39cfc ("mm,
memory_hotplug: do not fail offlining too early").

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180824063314.21981-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Fixes: 72b39cfc ("mm, memory_hotplug: do not fail offlining too early")
Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: NHaren Myneni <haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Currently, whenever a new node is created/re-used from the memhotplug
path, we call free_area_init_node()->free_area_init_core().  But there is
some code that we do not really need to run when we are coming from such
path.

free_area_init_core() performs the following actions:

1) Initializes pgdat internals, such as spinlock, waitqueues and more.
2) Account # nr_all_pages and # nr_kernel_pages. These values are used later on
   when creating hash tables.
3) Account number of managed_pages per zone, substracting dma_reserved and
   memmap pages.
4) Initializes some fields of the zone structure data
5) Calls init_currently_empty_zone to initialize all the freelists
6) Calls memmap_init to initialize all pages belonging to certain zone

When called from memhotplug path, free_area_init_core() only performs
actions #1 and #4.

Action #2 is pointless as the zones do not have any pages since either the
node was freed, or we are re-using it, eitherway all zones belonging to
this node should have 0 pages.  For the same reason, action #3 results
always in manages_pages being 0.

Action #5 and #6 are performed later on when onlining the pages:
 online_pages()->move_pfn_range_to_zone()->init_currently_empty_zone()
 online_pages()->move_pfn_range_to_zone()->memmap_init_zone()

This patch does two things:

First, moves the node/zone initializtion to their own function, so it
allows us to create a small version of free_area_init_core, where we only
perform:

1) Initialization of pgdat internals, such as spinlock, waitqueues and more
4) Initialization of some fields of the zone structure data

These two functions are: pgdat_init_internals() and zone_init_internals().

The second thing this patch does, is to introduce
free_area_init_core_hotplug(), the memhotplug version of
free_area_init_core():

Currently, we call free_area_init_node() from the memhotplug path.  In
there, we set some pgdat's fields, and call calculate_node_totalpages().
calculate_node_totalpages() calculates the # of pages the node has.

Since the node is either new, or we are re-using it, the zones belonging
to this node should not have any pages, so there is no point to calculate
this now.

Actually, we re-set these values to 0 later on with the calls to:

reset_node_managed_pages()
reset_node_present_pages()

The # of pages per node and the # of pages per zone will be calculated when
onlining the pages:

online_pages()->move_pfn_range()->move_pfn_range_to_zone()->resize_zone_range()
online_pages()->move_pfn_range()->move_pfn_range_to_zone()->resize_pgdat_range()

Also, since free_area_init_core/free_area_init_node will now only get called during early init, let us replace
__paginginit with __init, so their code gets freed up.

[osalvador@techadventures.net: fix section usage]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180731101752.GA473@techadventures.net
[osalvador@suse.de: v6]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180801122348.21588-6-osalvador@techadventures.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180730101757.28058-5-osalvador@techadventures.netSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

link_mem_sections() and walk_memory_range() share most of the code, so
we can use convert link_mem_sections() into a dummy function that calls
walk_memory_range() with a callback to register_mem_sect_under_node().

This patch converts register_mem_sect_under_node() in order to match a
walk_memory_range's callback, getting rid of the check_nid argument and
checking instead if the system is still boothing, since we only have to
check for the nid if the system is in such state.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180622111839.10071-4-osalvador@techadventures.netSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Suggested-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Tested-by: NReza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: NJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

When hotplugging memory, it is possible that two calls are being made to
register_mem_sect_under_node().

One comes from __add_section()->hotplug_memory_register() and the other
from add_memory_resource()->link_mem_sections() if we had to register a
new node.

In case we had to register a new node, hotplug_memory_register() will
only handle/allocate the memory_block's since
register_mem_sect_under_node() will return right away because the node
it is not online yet.

I think it is better if we leave hotplug_memory_register() to
handle/allocate only memory_block's and make link_mem_sections() to call
register_mem_sect_under_node().

So this patch removes the call to register_mem_sect_under_node() from
hotplug_memory_register(), and moves the call to link_mem_sections() out
of the condition, so it will always be called.  In this way we only have
one place where the memory sections are registered.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180622111839.10071-3-osalvador@techadventures.netSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Tested-by: NReza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: NJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This is a small cleanup for the memhotplug code.  A lot more could be
done, but it is better to start somewhere.  I tried to unify/remove
duplicated code.

The following is what this patchset does:

1) add_memory_resource() has code to allocate a node in case it was
   offline.  Since try_online_node has some code for that as well, I just
   made add_memory_resource() to use that so we can remove duplicated
   code..  This is better explained in patch 1/4.

2) register_mem_sect_under_node() will be called only from
   link_mem_sections()

3) Make register_mem_sect_under_node() a callback of
   walk_memory_range()

4) Drop unnecessary checks from register_mem_sect_under_node()

I have done some tests and I could not see anything broken because of
this patchset.

add_memory_resource() contains code to allocate a new node in case it is
necessary.  Since try_online_node() also has some code for this purpose,
let us make use of that and remove duplicate code.

This introduces __try_online_node(), which is called by
add_memory_resource() and try_online_node().  __try_online_node() has
two new parameters, start_addr of the node, and if the node should be
onlined and registered right away.  This is always wanted if we are
calling from do_cpu_up(), but not when we are calling from memhotplug
code.  Nothing changes from the point of view of the users of
try_online_node(), since try_online_node passes start_addr=0 and
online_node=true to __try_online_node().

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180622111839.10071-2-osalvador@techadventures.netSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Tested-by: NReza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: NJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

is_pageblock_removable_nolock() is not used outside of
mm/memory_hotplug.c.  Move it next to unique caller
is_mem_section_removable() and make it static.

Remove prototype in <linux/memory_hotplug.h> to silence gcc warning (W=1):

  mm/page_alloc.c:7704:6: warning: no previous prototype for `is_pageblock_removable_nolock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509190001.24789-1-malat@debian.orgSigned-off-by: NMathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Suggested-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The case of a new numa node got missed in avoiding using the node info
from page_struct during hotplug.  In this path we have a call to
register_mem_sect_under_node (which allows us to specify it is hotplug
so don't change the node), via link_mem_sections which unfortunately
does not.

Fix is to pass check_nid through link_mem_sections as well and disable
it in the new numa node path.

Note the bug only 'sometimes' manifests depending on what happens to be
in the struct page structures - there are lots of them and it only needs
to match one of them.

The result of the bug is that (with a new memory only node) we never
successfully call register_mem_sect_under_node so don't get the memory
associated with the node in sysfs and meminfo for the node doesn't
report it.

It came up whilst testing some arm64 hotplug patches, but appears to be
universal.  Whilst I'm triggering it by removing then reinserting memory
to a node with no other elements (thus making the node disappear then
appear again), it appears it would happen on hotplugging memory where
there was none before and it doesn't seem to be related the arm64
patches.

These patches call __add_pages (where most of the issue was fixed by
Pavel's patch).  If there is a node at the time of the __add_pages call
then all is well as it calls register_mem_sect_under_node from there
with check_nid set to false.  Without a node that function returns
having not done the sysfs related stuff as there is no node to use.
This is expected but it is the resulting path that fails...

Exact path to the problem is as follows:

 mm/memory_hotplug.c: add_memory_resource()

   The node is not online so we enter the 'if (new_node)' twice, on the
   second such block there is a call to link_mem_sections which calls
   into

  drivers/node.c: link_mem_sections() which calls

  drivers/node.c: register_mem_sect_under_node() which calls
     get_nid_for_pfn and keeps trying until the output of that matches
     the expected node (passed all the way down from
     add_memory_resource)

It is effectively the same fix as the one referred to in the fixes tag
just in the code path for a new node where the comments point out we
have to rerun the link creation because it will have failed in
register_new_memory (as there was no node at the time).  (actually that
comment is wrong now as we don't have register_new_memory any more it
got renamed to hotplug_memory_register in Pavel's patch).

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180504085311.1240-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Fixes: fc44f7f9 ("mm/memory_hotplug: don't read nid from struct page during hotplug")
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

THP migration is hacked into the generic migration with rather
surprising semantic.  The migration allocation callback is supposed to
check whether the THP can be migrated at once and if that is not the
case then it allocates a simple page to migrate.  unmap_and_move then
fixes that up by spliting the THP into small pages while moving the head
page to the newly allocated order-0 page.  Remaning pages are moved to
the LRU list by split_huge_page.  The same happens if the THP allocation
fails.  This is really ugly and error prone [1].

I also believe that split_huge_page to the LRU lists is inherently wrong
because all tail pages are not migrated.  Some callers will just work
around that by retrying (e.g.  memory hotplug).  There are other pfn
walkers which are simply broken though.  e.g. madvise_inject_error will
migrate head and then advances next pfn by the huge page size.
do_move_page_to_node_array, queue_pages_range (migrate_pages, mbind),
will simply split the THP before migration if the THP migration is not
supported then falls back to single page migration but it doesn't handle
tail pages if the THP migration path is not able to allocate a fresh THP
so we end up with ENOMEM and fail the whole migration which is a
questionable behavior.  Page compaction doesn't try to migrate large
pages so it should be immune.

This patch tries to unclutter the situation by moving the special THP
handling up to the migrate_pages layer where it actually belongs.  We
simply split the THP page into the existing list if unmap_and_move fails
with ENOMEM and retry.  So we will _always_ migrate all THP subpages and
specific migrate_pages users do not have to deal with this case in a
special way.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171121021855.50525-1-zi.yan@sent.com

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180103082555.14592-4-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NZi Yan <zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu>
Cc: Andrea Reale <ar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

No allocation callback is using this argument anymore.  new_page_node
used to use this parameter to convey node_id resp.  migration error up
to move_pages code (do_move_page_to_node_array).  The error status never
made it into the final status field and we have a better way to
communicate node id to the status field now.  All other allocation
callbacks simply ignored the argument so we can drop it finally.

[mhocko@suse.com: fix migration callback]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180105085259.GH2801@dhcp22.suse.cz
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix alloc_misplaced_dst_page()]
[mhocko@kernel.org: fix build]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180103091134.GB11319@dhcp22.suse.cz
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180103082555.14592-3-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NZi Yan <zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu>
Cc: Andrea Reale <ar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519585191-10180-4-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

During memory hotplugging we traverse struct pages three times:

1. memset(0) in sparse_add_one_section()
2. loop in __add_section() to set do: set_page_node(page, nid); and
   SetPageReserved(page);
3. loop in memmap_init_zone() to call __init_single_pfn()

This patch removes the first two loops, and leaves only loop 3.  All
struct pages are initialized in one place, the same as it is done during
boot.

The benefits:

 - We improve memory hotplug performance because we are not evicting the
   cache several times and also reduce loop branching overhead.

 - Remove condition from hotpath in __init_single_pfn(), that was added
   in order to fix the problem that was reported by Bharata in the above
   email thread, thus also improve performance during normal boot.

 - Make memory hotplug more similar to the boot memory initialization
   path because we zero and initialize struct pages only in one
   function.

 - Simplifies memory hotplug struct page initialization code, and thus
   enables future improvements, such as multi-threading the
   initialization of struct pages in order to improve hotplug
   performance even further on larger machines.

[pasha.tatashin@oracle.com: v5]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228030308.1116-7-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180215165920.8570-7-pasha.tatashin@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

During memory hotplugging the probe routine will leave struct pages
uninitialized, the same as it is currently done during boot.  Therefore,
we do not want to access the inside of struct pages before
__init_single_page() is called during onlining.

Because during hotplug we know that pages in one memory block belong to
the same numa node, we can skip the checking.  We should keep checking
for the boot case.

[pasha.tatashin@oracle.com: s/register_new_memory()/hotplug_memory_register()]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228030308.1116-6-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180215165920.8570-6-pasha.tatashin@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "optimize memory hotplug", v3.

This patchset:

 - Improves hotplug performance by eliminating a number of struct page
   traverses during memory hotplug.

 - Fixes some issues with hotplugging, where boundaries were not
   properly checked. And on x86 block size was not properly aligned with
   end of memory

 - Also, potentially improves boot performance by eliminating condition
   from __init_single_page().

 - Adds robustness by verifying that that struct pages are correctly
   poisoned when flags are accessed.

The following experiments were performed on Xeon(R) CPU E7-8895 v3 @
2.60GHz with 1T RAM:

booting in qemu with 960G of memory, time to initialize struct pages:

no-kvm:
	TRY1		TRY2
BEFORE:	39.433668	39.39705
AFTER:	36.903781	36.989329

with-kvm:
BEFORE:	10.977447	11.103164
AFTER:	10.929072	10.751885

Hotplug 896G memory:
no-kvm:
	TRY1		TRY2
BEFORE: 848.740000	846.910000
AFTER:  783.070000	786.560000

with-kvm:
	TRY1		TRY2
BEFORE: 34.410000	33.57
AFTER:	29.810000	29.580000

This patch (of 6):

Start qemu with the following arguments:

  -m 64G,slots=2,maxmem=66G -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=2G

Which: boots machine with 64G, and adds a device mem1 with 2G which can
be hotplugged later.

Also make sure that config has the following turned on:
  CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
  CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEFAULT_ONLINE
  CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY

Using the qemu monitor hotplug the memory (make sure config has (qemu)
device_add pc-dimm,id=dimm1,memdev=mem1

The operation will fail with the following trace:

    WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 91 at drivers/base/memory.c:205
    pages_correctly_reserved+0xe6/0x110
    Modules linked in:
    CPU: 0 PID: 91 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 4.16.0-rc1_pt_master #29
    Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
    BIOS rel-1.11.0-0-g63451fca13-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
    RIP: 0010:pages_correctly_reserved+0xe6/0x110
    Call Trace:
     memory_subsys_online+0x44/0xa0
     device_online+0x51/0x80
     store_mem_state+0x5e/0xe0
     kernfs_fop_write+0xfa/0x170
     __vfs_write+0x2e/0x150
     vfs_write+0xa8/0x1a0
     SyS_write+0x4d/0xb0
     do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x110
     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x21/0x86
    ---[ end trace 6203bc4f1a5d30e8 ]---

The problem is detected in: drivers/base/memory.c

   static bool pages_correctly_reserved(unsigned long start_pfn)
   205                 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pfn_valid(pfn)))

This function loops through every section in the newly added memory
block and verifies that the first pfn is valid, meaning section exists,
has mapping (struct page array), and is online.

The block size on x86 is usually 128M, but when machine is booted with
more than 64G of memory, the block size is changed to 2G: $ cat
/sys/devices/system/memory/block_size_bytes 80000000

or

   $ dmesg | grep "block size"
   [    0.086469] x86/mm: Memory block size: 2048MB

During memory hotplug, and hotremove we verify that the range is section
size aligned, but we actually must verify that it is block size aligned,
because that is the proper unit for hotplug operations.  See:
Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt

So, when the start_pfn of newly added memory is not block size aligned,
we can get a memory block that has only part of it with properly
populated sections.

In our case the start_pfn starts from the last_pfn (end of physical
memory).

   $ dmesg | grep last_pfn
   [    0.000000] e820: last_pfn = 0x1040000 max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000

0x1040000 == 65G, and so is not 2G aligned!

The fix is to enforce that memory that is hotplugged and hotremoved is
block size aligned.

With this fix, running the above sequence yield to the following result:

   (qemu) device_add pc-dimm,id=dimm1,memdev=mem1
   Block size [0x80000000] unaligned hotplug range: start 0x1040000000,
   							size 0x80000000
   acpi PNP0C80:00: add_memory failed
   acpi PNP0C80:00: acpi_memory_enable_device() error
   acpi PNP0C80:00: Enumeration failure

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180213193159.14606-2-pasha.tatashin@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

In register_page_bootmem_info_section() we call __nr_to_section() in
order to get the mem_section struct at the beginning of the function.
Since we already got it, there is no need for a second call to
__nr_to_section().

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171207102914.GA12396@techadventures.netSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@techadventures.net>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

When we call register_page_bootmem_info_section() having
CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP enabled, we check if the pfn is valid.

This check is redundant as we already checked this in
register_page_bootmem_info_node() before calling
register_page_bootmem_info_section(), so let's get rid of it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171205143422.GA31458@techadventures.netSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@techadventures.net>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Pulling cpu hotplug locks inside the mm core function like
lru_add_drain_all just asks for problems and the recent lockdep splat
[1] just proves this.  While the usage in that particular case might be
wrong we should avoid the locking as lru_add_drain_all() is used in many
places.  It seems that this is not all that hard to achieve actually.

We have done the same thing for drain_all_pages which is analogous by
commit a459eeb7 ("mm, page_alloc: do not depend on cpu hotplug locks
inside the allocator").  All we have to care about is to handle

      - the work item might be executed on a different cpu in worker from
        unbound pool so it doesn't run on pinned on the cpu

      - we have to make sure that we do not race with page_alloc_cpu_dead
        calling lru_add_drain_cpu

the first part is already handled because the worker calls lru_add_drain
which disables preemption when calling lru_add_drain_cpu on the local
cpu it is draining.  The later is true because page_alloc_cpu_dead is
called on the controlling CPU after the hotplugged CPU vanished
completely.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/089e0825eec8955c1f055c83d476@google.com

[add a cpu hotplug locking interaction as per tglx]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171116120535.23765-1-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Pass the vmem_altmap two levels down instead of needing a lookup.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

We can just pass this on instead of having to do a radix tree lookup
without proper locking a few levels into the callchain.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

We can just pass this on instead of having to do a radix tree lookup
without proper locking 2 levels into the callchain.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

We can just pass this on instead of having to do a radix tree lookup
without proper locking a few levels into the callchain.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

We can just pass this on instead of having to do a radix tree lookup
without proper locking 2 levels into the callchain.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

This function isn't used by any modules, and is only to be called
from core MM code.  This includes the calls for the add_pages wrapper
that might be inlined.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

Here, pfn_to_node should be page_to_nid.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1510735205-22540-1-git-send-email-fan.du@intel.comSigned-off-by: NFan Du <fan.du@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

We have a hardcoded 120s timeout after which the memory offline fails
basically since the hot remove has been introduced.  This is essentially
a policy implemented in the kernel.  Moreover there is no way to adjust
the timeout and so we are sometimes facing memory offline failures if
the system is under a heavy memory pressure or very intensive CPU
workload on large machines.

It is not very clear what purpose the timeout actually serves.  The
offline operation is interruptible by a signal so if userspace wants
some timeout based termination this can be done trivially by sending a
signal.

If there is a strong usecase to do this from the kernel then we should
do it properly and have a it tunable from the userspace with the timeout
disabled by default along with the explanation who uses it and for what
purporse.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170918070834.13083-3-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Cc: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "mm, memory_hotplug: redefine memory offline retry logic", v2.

While testing memory hotplug on a large 4TB machine we have noticed that
memory offlining is just too eager to fail.  The primary reason is that
the retry logic is just too easy to give up.  We have 4 ways out of the
offline

	- we have a permanent failure (isolation or memory notifiers fail,
	  or hugetlb pages cannot be dropped)
	- userspace sends a signal
	- a hardcoded 120s timeout expires
	- page migration fails 5 times

This is way too convoluted and it doesn't scale very well.  We have seen
both temporary migration failures as well as 120s being triggered.
After removing those restrictions we were able to pass stress testing
during memory hot remove without any other negative side effects
observed.  Therefore I suggest dropping both hard coded policies.  I
couldn't have found any specific reason for them in the changelog.  I
neither didn't get any response [1] from Kamezawa.  If we need some
upper bound - e.g.  timeout based - then we should have a proper and
user defined policy for that.  In any case there should be a clear use
case when introducing it.

This patch (of 2):

Memory offlining can fail too eagerly under heavy memory pressure.

  page:ffffea22a646bd00 count:255 mapcount:252 mapping:ffff88ff926c9f38 index:0x3
  flags: 0x9855fe40010048(uptodate|active|mappedtodisk)
  page dumped because: isolation failed
  page->mem_cgroup:ffff8801cd662000
  memory offlining [mem 0x18b580000000-0x18b5ffffffff] failed

Isolation has failed here because the page is not on LRU.  Most probably
because it was on the pcp LRU cache or it has been removed from the LRU
already but it hasn't been freed yet.  In both cases the page doesn't
look non-migrable so retrying more makes sense.

__offline_pages seems rather cluttered when it comes to the retry logic.
We have 5 retries at maximum and a timeout.  We could argue whether the
timeout makes sense but failing just because of a race when somebody
isoltes a page from LRU or puts it on a pcp LRU lists is just wrong.  It
only takes it to race with a process which unmaps some pages and remove
them from the LRU list and we can fail the whole offline because of
something that is a temporary condition and actually not harmful for the
offline.

Please note that unmovable pages should be already excluded during
start_isolate_page_range.  We could argue that has_unmovable_pages is
racy and MIGRATE_MOVABLE check doesn't provide any hard guarantee either
but kernel zones (aka < ZONE_MOVABLE) will very likely detect unmovable
pages in most cases and movable zone shouldn't contain unmovable pages
at all.  Some of those pages might be pinned but not for ever because
that would be a bug on its own.  In any case the context is still
interruptible and so the userspace can easily bail out when the
operation takes too long.  This is certainly better behavior than a
hardcoded retry loop which is racy.

Fix this by removing the max retry count and only rely on the timeout
resp. interruption by a signal from the userspace.  Also retry rather
than fail when check_pages_isolated sees some !free pages because those
could be a result of the race as well.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170918070834.13083-2-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Cc: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>