- 27 12月, 2011 11 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kiszka 提交于
This was probably copy&pasted from the cr0 case, but it's unneeded here. Signed-off-by: NJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
INSB : 6C INSW/INSD : 6D OUTSB : 6E OUTSW/OUTSD: 6F The I/O port address is read from the DX register when we decode the operand because we see the SrcDX/DstDX flag is set. Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
BSF: 0F BC BSR: 0F BD Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
CMPXCHG: 0F B0, 0F B1 Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
WRMSR: 0F 30 RDMSR: 0F 32 Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
MOV: 0F 22 (move to control registers) MOV: 0F 23 (move to debug registers) Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
CALL: E8 Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
BT : 0F A3 BTS: 0F AB BTR: 0F B3 BTC: 0F BB Group 8: 0F BA Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
IN : E4, E5, EC, ED OUT: E6, E7, EE, EF Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Xiao Guangrong 提交于
If the emulation is caused by #PF and it is non-page_table writing instruction, it means the VM-EXIT is caused by shadow page protected, we can zap the shadow page and retry this instruction directly The idea is from Avi Signed-off-by: NXiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Xiao Guangrong 提交于
The idea is from Avi: | tag instructions that are typically used to modify the page tables, and | drop shadow if any other instruction is used. | The list would include, I'd guess, and, or, bts, btc, mov, xchg, cmpxchg, | and cmpxchg8b. This patch is used to tag the instructions and in the later path, shadow page is dropped if it is written by other instructions Signed-off-by: NXiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
- 26 9月, 2011 25 次提交
-
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
The opcodes push %seg pop %seg l%seg, %mem, %reg (e.g. lds/les/lss/lfs/lgs) all have an segment register encoded in the instruction. To allow reuse, decode the segment number into src2 during the decode stage instead of the execution stage. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Use the same technique as the other OpMem variants, and goto mem_common. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
OpReg decoding has a hack that inhibits byte registers for movsx and movzx instructions. It should be replaced by something better, but meanwhile, qualify that the hack is only active for the destination operand. Note these instructions only use OpReg for the destination, but better to be explicit about it. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Similar to SrcImmUByte. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Op fields are going to grow by a bit, we need two free bits. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Unifiying the operands means not taking advantage of the fact that some operand types can only go into certain operands (for example, DI can only be used by the destination), so we need more bits to hold the operand type. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Instead of decoding each operand using its own code, use a generic function. Start with the destination operand. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Simplifies further generalization of decode. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
The TEST instruction doesn't write its destination operand. This could cause problems if an MMIO register was accessed using the TEST instruction. Recently Windows XP was observed to use TEST against the APIC ICR; this can cause spurious IPIs. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
emulate_1op_rax_rdx() is always called with the same parameters. Simplify by passing just the emulation context. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
We have two emulate-with-extended-accumulator implementations: once which expect traps (_ex) and one which doesn't (plain). Drop the plain implementation and always use the one which expects traps; it will simply return 0 in the _ex argument and we can happily ignore it. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
emulate_1op() is always called with the same parameters. Simplify by passing just the emulation context. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
emulate_2op_cl() is always called with the same parameters. Simplify by passing just the emulation context. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
emulate_2op_cl() is always called with the same parameters. Simplify by passing just the emulation context. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
emulate_2op_SrcV(), and its siblings, emulate_2op_SrcV_nobyte() and emulate_2op_SrcB(), all use the same calling conventions and all get passed exactly the same parameters. Simplify them by passing just the emulation context. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
Return EMULATION_OK/FAILED consistently. Also treat instruction fetch errors, not restricted to X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE, as EMULATION_FAILED; although this cannot happen in practice, the current logic will continue the emulation even if the decoder fails to fetch the instruction. Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
Fetching the instruction which was to be executed by the guest cannot fail normally. So compiler should always predict that it will succeed. Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
_type is enough to know the size. Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
Instead of passing ctxt->_eip from insn_fetch() call sites, get it from ctxt in do_insn_fetch_byte(). This is done by replacing the argument _eip of insn_fetch() with _ctxt, which should be better than letting the macro use ctxt silently in its body. Though this changes the place where ctxt->_eip is incremented from insn_fetch() to do_insn_fetch_byte(), this does not have any real effect. Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Src2CL decode (used for double width shifts) erronously decodes only bit 3 of %rcx, instead of bits 7:0. Fix by decoding %cl in its entirety. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
- 12 7月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
This saves a lot of pointless casts x86_emulate_ctxt and decode_cache. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
The name eip conflicts with a field of the same name in x86_emulate_ctxt, which we plan to fold decode_cache into. The name _eip is unfortunate, but what's really needed is a refactoring here, not a better name. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
LOOP/LOOPcc : E0-E2 JCXZ/JECXZ/JRCXZ : E3 Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-