- 27 12月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Now that the networking stack takes care of only notifying the routes of interest, we do not need to maintain a list of identical routes. Remove the check that tests if the route is the first route in the FIB node. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 25 12月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Now that mlxsw is converted to use the new FIB notifications it is possible to delete the old ones and use the new replace / append / delete notifications. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
With the new notifications mlxsw does not need to handle identical routes itself, as this is taken care of by the core IPv6 code. Instead, mlxsw only needs to take care of inserting and removing routes from the device. Convert mlxsw to use the new IPv6 route notifications and simplify the code. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 12月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Unlike mlxsw, the other listeners to the FIB notification chain do not require any special modifications as they never considered multiple identical routes. This patch removes the old route notifications and converts all the listeners to use the new replace / delete notifications. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
With the new notifications mlxsw does not need to handle identical routes itself, as this is taken care of by the core IPv4 code. Instead, mlxsw only needs to take care of inserting and removing routes from the device. Convert mlxsw to use the new IPv4 route notifications and simplify the code. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 10 12月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In case the driver vetoes the addition of an IPv6 multipath route, the IPv6 stack will emit delete notifications for the sibling routes that were already added to the FIB trie. Since these siblings are not present in hardware, a warning will be generated. Have the driver ignore notifications for routes it does not have. Fixes: ebee3cad ("ipv6: Add IPv6 multipath notifications for add / replace") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 25 11月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Amit Cohen 提交于
When mlxsw_sp_adj_discard_write() is called for the first time, the value stored in 'mlxsw_sp->router->adj_discard_index' is invalid, as indicated by 'mlxsw_sp->router->adj_discard_index_valid' being set to 'false'. In this case, we should not use the value initially stored in 'mlxsw_sp->router->adj_discard_index' (0) and instead use the value allocated later in the function. Fixes: 983db619 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Allocate discard adjacency entry when needed") Signed-off-by: NAmit Cohen <amitc@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
When a GRE tunnel is bound to an underlay netdevice and that netdevice is moved to a different VRF, that could cause two tunnels to have the same underlay local address in the same VRF. Linux in this situation dispatches the traffic according to the tunnel key (or lack thereof), but that cannot be offloaded to Spectrum devices. Detect this situation and unoffload the two impacted tunnels when it happens. Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
-
- 19 11月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
The helper mlxsw_sp_ipip_dev_ul_tb_id() determines the underlay VRF of a GRE tunnel. For a tunnel without a bound device, it uses the same VRF that the tunnel is in. However in Linux, a GRE tunnel without a bound device uses the main VRF as the underlay. Fix the function accordingly. mlxsw further assumed that moving a tunnel to a different VRF could cause conflict in local tunnel endpoint address, which cannot be offloaded. However, the only way that an underlay could be changed by moving the tunnel device itself is if the tunnel device does not have a bound device. But in that case the underlay is always the main VRF, so there is no opportunity to introduce a conflict by moving such device. Thus this check constitutes a dead code, and can be removed, which do. Fixes: 6ddb7426 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Introduce loopback RIFs") Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 11月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Commit 0c3cbbf9 ("mlxsw: Add specific trap for packets routed via invalid nexthops") allocated an adjacency entry during driver initialization whose purpose is to discard packets hitting the route pointing to it. These adjacency entries are allocated from a resource called KVD linear (KVDL). There are situations in which the user can decide to set the size of this resource (via devlink-resource) to 0, in which case the driver will not be able to load. Therefore, instead of pre-allocating this adjacency entry, simply allocate it only when needed. A variable indicating the validity of the entry is added and is used to ensure it is only allocated and written once and that it is freed after all the routes were flushed. Fixes: 0c3cbbf9 ("mlxsw: Add specific trap for packets routed via invalid nexthops") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 11月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Amit Cohen 提交于
Currently, mlxsw does not differentiate between these two cases of routes with invalid nexthops: 1. Nexthops whose nexthop device is a mlxsw upper (has a RIF), but whose neighbour could not be resolved 2. Nexthops whose nexthop device is not a mlxsw upper (e.g., management interface) Up until now this did not matter and mlxsw trapped packets for both cases using the same trap ID. However, packets that should have been routed in hardware (case 1), but incurred a problem are considered exceptions and should be reported to the user. The two cases should therefore be split between two different trap IDs. Allocate a new adjacency entry during initialization and upon the insertion of the first route with an invalid mlxsw nexthop, program this entry to discard packets. Packets hitting this entry will be reported using new trap ID - "DISCARD_ROUTER3". In the future, the entry could be written during initialization, but currently firmware requires a valid RIF, which is not available at this stage. Signed-off-by: NAmit Cohen <amitc@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Amit Cohen 提交于
Currently, packets that cannot be routed in hardware (e.g., nexthop device is not upper of mlxsw), are trapped to the kernel for forwarding. Such packets are trapped using "RTR_INGRESS0" trap. This trap also traps packets that hit reject routes (e.g., "unreachable") so that the kernel will generate the appropriate ICMP error message for them. Subsequent patch will need to only report to devlink packets that hit a reject route, which is impossible as long as "RTR_INGRESS0" is overloaded like that. Solve this by using "RTR_INGRESS1" trap for packets that hit reject routes. Signed-off-by: NAmit Cohen <amitc@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 10月, 2019 5 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
During the devlink reaload the extack is present, so propagate it all the way down to register_fib_notifier() call in spectrum_router.c. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Follow-up patch is going to allow to reload devlink instance into different network namespace, so use devlink_net() helper instead of init_net. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Since errors are propagated all the way up to the caller, propagate possible extack of the caller all the way down to the notifier block callback. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Currently if info->extack is NULL, mlxsw assumes that the event came down from dump. Originally, the dump did not propagate the return value back to the original caller (fib_notifier_register()). However, that is now happening. So benefit from this and push the error up if it happened. Remove rule cases in work handlers that are now dead code. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Currently all users of FIB notifier only cares about events in init_net. Later in this patchset, users get interested in other namespaces too. However, for every registered block user is interested only about one namespace. Make the FIB notifier registration per-netns and avoid unnecessary calls of notifier block for other namespaces. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Unlike IPv4, the kernel does not consolidate IPv6 nexthop groups. To avoid exhausting the device's adjacency table - where nexthops are stored - the driver does this consolidation instead. Each nexthop group is hashed by XOR-ing the interface indexes of all the member nexthop devices. However, the ifindex itself is not hashed, which can result in identical keys used for different groups and finally an -EBUSY error from rhashtable due to too long objects list. Improve the situation by hashing the ifindex itself. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 19 6月, 2019 9 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Both listeners - mlxsw and netdevsim - of IPv6 FIB notifications are now ready to handle IPv6 multipath notifications. Therefore, stop ignoring such notifications in both drivers and stop sending notification for each added / deleted nexthop. v2: * Remove 'multipath_rt' from 'struct fib6_entry_notifier_info' Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Allow the driver to create an IPv6 multipath route in one go by passing an array of sibling routes and iterating over them. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Currently, the functions that take care of populating IPv6 nexthop groups only add / delete a single nexthop. Prepare them to handle multiple routes in one notification by passing an array of routes and adding / deleting all of them. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Prepare the driver to handle multiple routes in a single notification by passing an array of routes to the functions that actually add / delete a route. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Previously, IPv6 replace notifications were only sent from fib6_add_rt2node(). The function only emitted such notifications if a route actually replaced another route. A previous patch added another call site in ip6_route_multipath_add() from which such notification can be emitted even if a route was merely added and did not replace another route. Adjust the driver to take this into account and potentially set the 'replace' flag to 'false' if the notified route did not replace an existing route. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Prepare the driver to process IPv6 multipath notifications by passing an array of 'struct fib6_info' instead of just one route. A reference is taken on each sibling route in order to prevent them from being freed until they are processed by the workqueue. v2: * Remove 'multipath_rt' usage Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The function mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_event() takes care of preparing the needed information for the work item that actually inserts the route into the device. When processing an IPv6 multipath route, the function will need to allocate an array to store pointers to all the sibling routes. Change the function's signature to return an error code and adjust the single call site. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
No such notifications are sent by the IPv6 code, so remove them. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
IPv6 multipath notifications are about to be sent, but mlxsw is not ready to process them, so ignore them. The limitation will be lifted by a subsequent patch which will also stop the kernel from sending a notification for each nexthop. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The driver tries to periodically refresh neighbours that are used to reach nexthops. This is done by periodically calling neigh_event_send(). However, if the neighbour becomes dead, there is nothing we can do to return it to a connected state and the above function call is basically a NOP. This results in the nexthop never being written to the device's adjacency table and therefore never used to forward packets. Fix this by dropping our reference from the dead neighbour and associating the nexthop with a new neigbhour which we will try to refresh. Fixes: a7ff87ac ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Implement next-hop routing") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reported-by: NAlex Veber <alexve@mellanox.com> Tested-by: NAlex Veber <alexve@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 6月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Fail attempts to use nexthop objects with routes until support can be properly added. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Use helpers to access fib_nh and fib_nhs fields of a fib_info. Drop the fib_dev macro which is an alias for the first nexthop. Replacements: fi->fib_dev --> fib_info_nh(fi, 0)->fib_nh_dev fi->fib_nh --> fib_info_nh(fi, 0) fi->fib_nh[i] --> fib_info_nh(fi, i) fi->fib_nhs --> fib_info_num_path(fi) where fib_info_nh(fi, i) returns fi->fib_nh[nhsel] and fib_info_num_path returns fi->fib_nhs. Move the existing fib_info_nhc to nexthop.h and define the new ones there. A later patch adds a check if a fib_info uses a nexthop object, and defining the helpers in nexthop.h avoid circular header dependencies. After this all remaining open coded references to fi->fib_nhs and fi->fib_nh are in: - fib_create_info and helpers used to lookup an existing fib_info entry, and - the netdev event functions fib_sync_down_dev and fib_sync_up. The latter two will not be reused for nexthops, and the fib_create_info will be updated to handle a nexthop in a fib_info. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 25 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Move fib6_nh to the end of fib6_info and make it an array of size 0. Pass a flag to fib6_info_alloc indicating if the allocation needs to add space for a fib6_nh. The current code path always has a fib6_nh allocated with a fib6_info; with nexthop objects they will be separate. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
mlxsw currently does not support v6 gateways with v4 routes. Commit 19a9d136 ("ipv4: Flag fib_info with a fib_nh using IPv6 gateway") prevents a route from being added, but nothing stops the replace or append. Add a catch for them too. $ ip ro add 172.16.2.0/24 via 10.99.1.2 $ ip ro replace 172.16.2.0/24 via inet6 fe80::202:ff:fe00:b dev swp1s0 Error: mlxsw_spectrum: IPv6 gateway with IPv4 route is not supported. $ ip ro append 172.16.2.0/24 via inet6 fe80::202:ff:fe00:b dev swp1s0 Error: mlxsw_spectrum: IPv6 gateway with IPv4 route is not supported. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 4月, 2019 4 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
The RTF_ADDRCONF flag filters out routes added by RA's in determining which routes can be appended to an existing one to create a multipath route. Restore the flag check and add a comment to document the RA piece. Fixes: 4e54507a ("ipv6: Simplify rt6_qualify_for_ecmp") Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
After commit c7a1ce39 ("ipv6: Change addrconf_f6i_alloc to use ip6_route_info_create"), the gateway is no longer filled in for fib6_nh structs in a prefix route. Accordingly, the RTF_ADDRCONF flag check can be dropped from the 'rt6_qualify_for_ecmp'. Further, RTF_DYNAMIC is only set in rt6_info instances, so it can be removed from the check as well. This reduces rt6_qualify_for_ecmp and the mlxsw version to just checking if the nexthop has a gateway which is the real indication of whether entries can be coalesced into a multipath route. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Currently, mlxsw does not support policy-based routing (PBR) and therefore forbids the installation of non-default FIB rules except for the l3mdev rule which is used for VRFs. Relax the check to allow the installation of FIB rules that would never match packets received by the device. Specifically, if the iif is that of the loopback netdev. This is useful for users that need to redirect locally generated packets based on FIB rules. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Tested-by: NAlexander Petrovskiy <alexpe@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In order to get a consistent behavior of traffic flows across reboots / module unload, we need to use the same ECMP/LAG seed. Calculate the seed by hashing the base MAC of the device. This results in a seed that is both unique (to avoid polarization) and consistent. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 4月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In a similar fashion to routes and FDB entries, the neighbour table is reflected to the device. Set an offload indication on the neighbour in case it was programmed to the device. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Next patch will add offload indication to neighbours, but the indication should only be altered in case the neighbour was successfully added to / deleted from the device. Propagate neighbour update errors, so that they could be taken into account by the next patch. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Commit 74bc9939 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Veto unsupported RIF MAC addresses") enabled the driver to veto router interface (RIF) MAC addresses that it cannot support. This check should only be performed for interfaces for which the driver actually configures a RIF. A VRF upper is not one of them, so ignore it. Without this patch it is not possible to set an IP address on the VRF device and use it as a loopback. Fixes: 74bc9939 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Veto unsupported RIF MAC addresses") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reported-by: NAlexander Petrovskiy <alexpe@mellanox.com> Tested-by: NAlexander Petrovskiy <alexpe@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Ahern 提交于
Until support is added to the offload drivers, they need to be able to reject routes with an IPv6 gateway. To that end add a flag to fib_info that indicates if any fib_nh has a v6 gateway. The flag allows the drivers to efficiently know the use of a v6 gateway without walking all fib_nh tied to a fib_info each time a route is added. Update mlxsw and rocker to reject the routes with extack message as to why. Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-