- 14 9月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We're only using those flags to choose lock or open stateid's at this point. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Move most of this into helper functions. Also move the non-CONFIRM case into caller, providing a helper function for that purpose. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Minor cleanup. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 07 9月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We'll use this elsewhere. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The stateowner has some fields that only make sense for openowners, and some that only make sense for lockowners, and I find it a lot clearer if those are separated out. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Move the CLOSE_STATE case into the unique caller that cares about it rather than putting it in preprocess_seqid_op. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 03 9月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
I don't see the point of having this check in nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op() when it's only needed by the one caller. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Sometimes the single-exit style is good, sometimes it's unnecessarily convoluted.... Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 01 9月, 2011 12 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
This is used only as a local variable. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Maybe we'll bring it back some day, but we don't have much real use for it now. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
If open fails with any error other than nfserr_replay_me, then the main nfsd4_proc_compound() loop continues unconditionally to nfsd4_encode_operation(), which will always call encode_seqid_op_tail. Thus the condition we check for here does not occur. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
There are currently a couple races in the seqid replay code: a retransmission could come while we're still encoding the original reply, or a new seqid-mutating call could come as we're encoding a replay. So, extend the state lock over the encoding (both encoding of a replayed reply and caching of the original encoded reply). I really hate doing this, and previously added the stateowner reference-counting code to avoid it (which was insufficient)--but I don't see a less complicated alternative at the moment. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Now that the replay owner is in the cstate we can remove it from a lot of other individual operations and further simplify nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op(). Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Set the stateowner associated with a replay in one spot in nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op() and keep it in cstate. This allows removing a few lines of boilerplate from all the nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op() callers. Also turn ENCODE_SEQID_OP_TAIL into a function while we're here. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Thanks to Casey for reminding me that 5661 gives a special meaning to a value of 0 in the stateid's seqid field, so all stateid's should start out with si_generation 1. We were doing that in the open and lock cases for minorversion 1, but not for the delegation stateid, and not for openstateid's with v4.0. It doesn't *really* matter much for v4.0 or for delegation stateid's (which never get the seqid field incremented), but we may as well do the same for all of them. Reported-by: NCasey Bodley <cbodley@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Follow the recommendation from rfc3530bis for stateid generation number wraparound, simplify some code, and fix or remove incorrect comments. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
There's no reason to have two separate hash tables for open and lock stateid's. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The trick free_stateid is using is a little cheesy, and we'll have more uses for this field later. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Wow, I wonder how long that typo's been there. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The values here represent highest slotid numbers. Since slotid's are numbered starting from zero, the highest should be one less than the number of slots. Reported-by: NRick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 31 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We don't need this any more. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 28 8月, 2011 13 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
When called with OPEN_STATE, preprocess_seqid_op only returns an open stateid, hence only an open owner. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We've got some lock-specific code here in nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op which is only used by nfsd4_lock(). Move it to the caller. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Note that the special handling for the lock stateid case is already done by nfs4_check_openmode() (as of 02921914 "nfsd4: fix openmode checking on IO using lock stateid") so we no longer need these two cases in the caller. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
This flag doesn't really buy us anything. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Share some common code, stop doing silly things like initializing a list head immediately before adding it to a list, etc. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
These appear to be generic (for both open and lock owners), but they're actually just for open owners. This has confused me more than once. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
For all the usual reasons. (Type safety, readability.) Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The server is returning nfserr_resource for both permanent errors and for errors (like allocation failures) that might be resolved by retrying later. Save nfserr_resource for the former and use delay/jukebox for the latter. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于
Even if we fail to write a recovery record, we should still mark the client as having acquired its first state. Otherwise we leave 4.1 clients with indefinite ERR_GRACE returns. However, an inability to write stable storage records may cause failures of reboot recovery, and the problem should still be brought to the server administrator's attention. So, make sure the error is logged. These errors shouldn't normally be triggered on a corectly functioning server--this isn't a case where a misconfigured client could spam the logs. Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Move around some of this code, simplify a bit. Reviewed-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Acked-by: NJim Rees <rees@umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
A client that wants to execute a file must be able to read it. Read opens over nfs are therefore implicitly allowed for executable files even when those files are not readable. NFSv2/v3 get this right by using a passed-in NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE on read requests, but NFSv4 has gotten this wrong ever since dc730e17 "nfsd4: fix owner-override on open", when we realized that the file owner shouldn't override permissions on non-reclaim NFSv4 opens. So we can't use NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE to tell nfsd_permission to allow reads of executable files. So, do the same thing we do whenever we encounter another weird NFS permission nit: define yet another NFSD_MAY_* flag. The industry's future standardization on 128-bit processors will be motivated primarily by the need for integers with enough bits for all the NFSD_MAY_* flags. Reported-by: NLeonardo Borda <leonardoborda@gmail.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 27 8月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Userspace shouldn't have a use for these constants. Nothing here is used outside fs/nfsd. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
At least one of these is actually wrong anyway. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The nfsd4 code has a bunch of special exceptions for error returns which map nfserr_symlink to other errors. In fact, the spec makes it clear that nfserr_symlink is to be preferred over less specific errors where possible. The patch that introduced it back in 2.6.4 is "kNFSd: correct symlink related error returns.", which claims that these special exceptions are represent an NFSv4 break from v2/v3 tradition--when in fact the symlink error was introduced with v4. I suspect what happened was pynfs tests were written that were overly faithful to the (known-incomplete) rfc3530 error return lists, and then code was fixed up mindlessly to make the tests pass. Delete these unnecessary exceptions. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Zero means "I don't care what kind of file this is". And that's probably what we want--acls are also settable at least on directories, and if the filesystem doesn't want them on other objects, leave it to it to complain. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-