1. 06 2月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: do not merge logged extents if we've removed them from the tree · 222c81dc
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      You can run into this problem where if somebody is fsyncing and writing out
      the existing extents you will have removed the extent map from the em tree,
      but it's still valid for the current fsync so we go ahead and write it.  The
      problem is we unconditionally try to merge it back into the em tree, but if
      we've removed it from the em tree that will cause use after free problems.
      Fix this to only merge if we are still a part of the tree.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      222c81dc
  2. 25 1月, 2013 8 次提交
  3. 22 1月, 2013 5 次提交
  4. 20 1月, 2013 5 次提交
  5. 15 1月, 2013 14 次提交
  6. 19 12月, 2012 2 次提交
  7. 18 12月, 2012 2 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: fix a bug of per-file nocow · 213490b3
      Liu Bo 提交于
      Users report a bug, the reproducer is:
      $ mkfs.btrfs /dev/loop0
      $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs/
      $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/dir
      $ chattr +C /mnt/btrfs/dir/
      $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/dir/foo bs=4K count=10;
      $ lsattr /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo
      ---------------C- /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo
      $ filefrag /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo
      /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo: 1 extent found    ---> an extent
      $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/dir/foo bs=4K count=1 seek=5 conv=notrunc,nocreat; sync
      $ filefrag /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo
      /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo: 3 extents found   ---> with nocow, btrfs breaks the extent into three parts
      
      The new created file should not only inherit the NODATACOW flag, but also
      honor NODATASUM flag, because we must do COW on a file extent with checksum.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      213490b3
    • C
      Btrfs: fix hash overflow handling · 9c52057c
      Chris Mason 提交于
      The handling for directory crc hash overflows was fairly obscure,
      split_leaf returns EOVERFLOW when we try to extend the item and that is
      supposed to bubble up to userland.  For a while it did so, but along the
      way we added better handling of errors and forced the FS readonly if we
      hit IO errors during the directory insertion.
      
      Along the way, we started testing only for EEXIST and the EOVERFLOW case
      was dropped.  The end result is that we may force the FS readonly if we
      catch a directory hash bucket overflow.
      
      This fixes a few problem spots.  First I add tests for EOVERFLOW in the
      places where we can safely just return the error up the chain.
      
      btrfs_rename is harder though, because it tries to insert the new
      directory item only after it has already unlinked anything the rename
      was going to overwrite.  Rather than adding very complex logic, I added
      a helper to test for the hash overflow case early while it is still safe
      to bail out.
      
      Snapshot and subvolume creation had a similar problem, so they are using
      the new helper now too.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      Reported-by: NPascal Junod <pascal@junod.info>
      9c52057c
  8. 17 12月, 2012 3 次提交