- 13 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
Fix an incorrect function name so the driver builds. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
-
- 05 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
When I added the buslock/unlock mechanism to the pmic code in order to get rid of the horrible work queue stuff, stupid me missed to add the new callbacks to the irq_chip. In consequence Andrew removed the unused functions, but I missed that. Add them back and hook them up proper. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
-
- 29 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Scripted with coccinelle. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 22 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
There is no need to install a chained handler for this hardware. This is a plain x86 IOAPIC interrupt which is handled by the core code perfectly fine. There is nothing special about demultiplexing these gpio interrupts which justifies a custom hack. Replace it by a plain old interrupt handler installed with request_irq. That makes the code agnostic about the underlying primary interrupt hardware. The overhead for this is minimal, but it gives us the advantage of accounting, balancing and to detect interrupt storms. gpio interrupts are not really that performance critical. Patch fixups from akpm Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 08 2月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The set_type function of the pmic irq chip is a horrible hack. It schedules work because it cannot access the scu chip from the set_type function. That breaks the assumption, that the type is set after set_type has returned. irq_chips provide buslock functions to avoid the above. Convert the driver to use the proper model. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Old functions will go away soon. Remove the stray semicolons while at it. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
commit 456dc301([PATCH] intel_pmic_gpio: modify EOI handling following change of kernel irq subsystem) changes - desc->chip->eoi(irq); + + if (desc->chip->irq_eoi) + desc->chip->irq_eoi(irq_get_irq_data(irq)); + else + dev_warn(pg->chip.dev, "missing EOI handler for irq %d\n", irq); With the following explanation: "Latest kernel has many changes in IRQ subsystem and its interfaces, like adding irq_eoi" for struct irq_chip, this patch will make it support both the new and old interface." This is completely bogus. #1) The changelog does not match the patch at all #2) This driver relies on the assumption that it sits behind an eoi capable interrupt line. If the implementation of the underlying chip changes from eoi to irq_eoi then this driver has to follow that change and not add a total bogosity. Remove the sillyness and retrieve the interrupt data from irq_desc directly. No need to got through circles to look it up. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
-
- 08 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Feng Tang 提交于
Latest kernel has many changes in IRQ subsystem and its interfaces, like adding "irq_eoi" for struct irq_chip, this patch will make it support both the new and old interface. Cc: Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NFeng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
-
- 28 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zimny Lech 提交于
Signed-off-by: NZimny Lech <napohybelskurwysynom2010@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 21 10月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Axel Lin 提交于
In pmic_irq_type(), we use gpio as array index for trigger, thus the valid value range for gpio should be 0 .. NUM_GPIO - 1. Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
-
由 Alek Du 提交于
The intel_scu_ipc_update_register 2nd paramter should the bits and 3rd paramter should be the mask. This typo was introduced during IPC function changing... Reported-by: NRyan Zhou <ryan.zhou@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAlek Du <alek.du@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
-
- 03 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alek Du 提交于
Moorestown has PMIC chip which contains GPIO blocks. The PMIC chip is connected to Langwell by SPI interface. So this GPIO driver will be regarded as SPI GPIO expander though the actual GPIO access is through IPC and SRAM. The SPI master contoller will probe this device driver by parsing SPIB table. Cleaned up for new IPC, GPE removed and some printk and other tidying by Alan Cox. Fixes for points noted by Matthew Garrett Signed-off-by: NAlek Du <alek.du@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
-