1. 09 3月, 2006 2 次提交
    • P
      [PATCH] udf: fix uid/gid options and add uid/gid=ignore and forget options · 4d6660eb
      Phillip Susi 提交于
      Fix a bug in udf where it would write uid/gid = 0 to the disk for files
      owned by the id given with the uid=/gid= mount options.  It also adds 4 new
      mount options: uid/gid=forget and uid/gid=ignore.  Without any options the
      id in core and on disk always match.  Giving uid/gid=nnn specifies a
      default ID to be used in core when the on disk ID is -1.  uid/gid=ignore
      forces the in core ID to allways be used no matter what the on disk ID is.
      uid/gid=forget forces the on disk ID to always be written out as -1.
      
      The use of these options allows you to override ownerships on a disk or
      disable ownwership information from being written, allowing the media to be
      used portably between different computers and possibly different users
      without permissions issues that would require root to correct.
      Signed-off-by: NPhillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
      Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      4d6660eb
    • L
      Mark the pipe file operations static · a19cbd4b
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      They aren't used (nor even really usable) outside of pipe.c anyway
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      a19cbd4b
  2. 08 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  3. 07 3月, 2006 4 次提交
  4. 05 3月, 2006 1 次提交
    • S
      [CIFS] Always match oplock break (cache notification) to the right tcp · e77e6f3b
      Steve French 提交于
      session when multiply mounted.
      
      Fixes slow response when cifs client is mounted to shares on multiple
      servers and oplock break occurs (usually due to attempt to multiply open a
      file).  When treeids on mutiple mounted shares match and we find the wrong
      match first, we searched for the wrong cached files to send oplock break
      response for which usually meant that no matching file was found and thus
      the server would have to timeout the notification.  Oplock break timeout is
      about 20 seconds on some servers so this could cause significantly slower
      performance on file open calls in a few cases (in particular when multiple
      shares are mounted from multiple servers, tree ids match, and we have a
      cached file which is later opened multiple times).  This was the most
      important of the bugs that was found and fixed at Connectathon
      (interoperability testing event) this week.
      
      Acked-by:  Shaggy (shaggy@austin.ibm.com)
      Signed-off-by: Steve French (sfrench@us.ibm.com)
      e77e6f3b
  5. 03 3月, 2006 5 次提交
  6. 02 3月, 2006 10 次提交
  7. 01 3月, 2006 2 次提交
  8. 28 2月, 2006 3 次提交
  9. 27 2月, 2006 2 次提交
  10. 25 2月, 2006 2 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] ramfs: update dir mtime and ctime · 8dde0509
      Andrew Morton 提交于
      Phil Marek <philipp.marek@bmlv.gv.at> points out that ramfs forgets to update
      a directory's mtime and ctime when it is modified.
      
      Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      8dde0509
    • U
      [PATCH] flags parameter for linkat · c04030e1
      Ulrich Drepper 提交于
      I'm currently at the POSIX meeting and one thing covered was the
      incompatibility of Linux's link() with the POSIX definition.  The name.
      Linux does not follow symlinks, POSIX requires it does.
      
      Even if somebody thinks this is a good default behavior we cannot change this
      because it would break the ABI.  But the fact remains that some application
      might want this behavior.
      
      We have one chance to help implementing this without breaking the behavior.
       For this we could use the new linkat interface which would need a new
      flags parameter.  If the new parameter is AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW the new
      behavior could be invoked.
      
      I do not want to introduce such a patch now.  But we could add the
      parameter now, just don't use it.  The patch below would do this.  Can we
      get this late patch applied before the release more or less fixes the
      syscall API?
      Signed-off-by: NUlrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
      Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      c04030e1
  11. 24 2月, 2006 3 次提交
  12. 23 2月, 2006 2 次提交
  13. 21 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  14. 19 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  15. 18 2月, 2006 1 次提交