1. 21 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 17 6月, 2013 3 次提交
  3. 21 5月, 2013 2 次提交
  4. 08 1月, 2013 3 次提交
  5. 14 12月, 2012 2 次提交
  6. 20 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • H
      s390/comments: unify copyright messages and remove file names · a53c8fab
      Heiko Carstens 提交于
      Remove the file name from the comment at top of many files. In most
      cases the file name was wrong anyway, so it's rather pointless.
      
      Also unify the IBM copyright statement. We did have a lot of sightly
      different statements and wanted to change them one after another
      whenever a file gets touched. However that never happened. Instead
      people start to take the old/"wrong" statements to use as a template
      for new files.
      So unify all of them in one go.
      Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      a53c8fab
  7. 01 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  8. 08 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 05 3月, 2012 3 次提交
  10. 17 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  11. 30 10月, 2011 2 次提交
  12. 24 7月, 2011 4 次提交
  13. 01 8月, 2010 2 次提交
  14. 11 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 10 9月, 2009 3 次提交
  16. 28 6月, 2009 1 次提交
    • C
      KVM: s390: Allow stfle instruction in the guest · ef50f7ac
      Christian Borntraeger 提交于
      2.6.31-rc introduced an architecture level set checker based on facility
      bits. e.g. if the kernel is compiled to run only on z9, several facility
      bits are checked very early and the kernel refuses to boot if a z9 specific
      facility is missing.
      Until now kvm on s390 did not implement the store facility extended (STFLE)
      instruction. A 2.6.31-rc kernel that was compiled for z9 or higher did not
      boot in kvm. This patch implements stfle.
      
      This patch should go in before 2.6.31.
      Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      ef50f7ac
  17. 10 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  18. 14 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 24 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  20. 02 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  21. 27 7月, 2008 2 次提交
  22. 20 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  23. 07 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • C
      [S390] s390-kvm: leave sie context on work. Removes preemption requirement · 0eaeafa1
      Christian Borntraeger 提交于
      From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      
      This patch fixes a bug with cpu bound guest on kvm-s390. Sometimes it
      was impossible to deliver a signal to a spinning guest. We used
      preemption as a circumvention. The preemption notifiers called
      vcpu_load, which checked for pending signals and triggered a host
      intercept. But even with preemption, a sigkill was not delivered
      immediately.
      
      This patch changes the low level host interrupt handler to check for the
      SIE  instruction, if TIF_WORK is set. In that case we change the
      instruction pointer of the return PSW to rerun the vcpu_run loop. The kvm
      code sees an intercept reason 0 if that happens. This patch adds accounting
      for these types of intercept as well.
      
      The advantages:
      - works with and without preemption
      - signals are delivered immediately
      - much better host latencies without preemption
      Acked-by: NCarsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      0eaeafa1