- 18 6月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ricardo Labiaga 提交于
Adds rpc_run_bc_task() which is called by the NFS callback service to process backchannel requests. It performs similar work to rpc_run_task() though "schedules" the backchannel task to be executed starting at the call_trasmit state in the RPC state machine. It also introduces some miscellaneous updates to the argument validation, call_transmit, and transport cleanup functions to take into account that there are now forechannel and backchannel tasks. Backchannel requests do not carry an RPC message structure, since the payload has already been XDR encoded using the existing NFSv4 callback mechanism. Introduce a new transmit state for the client to reply on to backchannel requests. This new state simply reserves the transport and issues the reply. In case of a connection related error, disconnects the transport and drops the reply. It requires the forechannel to re-establish the connection and the server to retransmit the request, as stated in NFSv4.1 section 2.9.2 "Client and Server Transport Behavior". Note: There is no need to loop attempting to reserve the transport. If EAGAIN is returned by xprt_prepare_transmit(), return with tk_status == 0, setting tk_action to call_bc_transmit. rpc_execute() will invoke it again after the task is taken off the sleep queue. [nfs41: rpc_run_bc_task() need not be exported outside RPC module] [nfs41: New call_bc_transmit RPC state] Signed-off-by: NRicardo Labiaga <Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> [nfs41: Backchannel: No need to loop in call_bc_transmit()] Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NRicardo Labiaga <Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> [rpc_count_iostats incorrectly exits early] Signed-off-by: NRicardo Labiaga <Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> [Convert rpc_reply_expected() to inline function] [Remove unnecessary BUG_ON()] [Rename variable] Signed-off-by: NRicardo Labiaga <Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson<andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 10 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 \\\"J. Bruce Fields\\\ 提交于
Try to make the comment here a little more clear and concise. Also, this macro definition seems unnecessary. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 29 2月, 2008 5 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Now that we've tightened up the locking rules for RPC queue wakeups, we can remove the RCU-safe kfree calls... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This is designed to replace the timeout timer in the individual rpc_tasks. By putting the timer function in the wait queue, we will eventually be able to reduce the total number of timers in use by the RPC subsystem. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 26 2月, 2008 4 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
An audit of the current RPC timeout functions shows that they don't really ever need to run in the softirq context. As long as the softirq is able to signal that the wakeup is due to a timeout (which it can do by setting task->tk_status to -ETIMEDOUT) then the callback functions can just run as standard task->tk_callback functions (in the rpciod/process context). The only possible border-line case would be xprt_timer() for the case of UDP, when the callback is used to reduce the size of the transport congestion window. In testing, however, the effect of moving that update to a callback would appear to be minor. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In all cases where we currently use rpc_wake_up_task(), we almost always know on which waitqueue the rpc_task is actually sleeping. This will allows us to simplify the queue locking in a future patch. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
A lot of the work done by the rpc_release() callback is inappropriate for rpciod as it will often involve things like starting a new rpc call in order to clean up state after an interrupted NFSv4 open() call, or calls to mntput(), etc. This patch allows the caller of rpc_run_task() to specify that the rpc_release callback should run on a different workqueue than the default rpciod_workqueue. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 30 1月, 2008 6 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Now that we've killed off all the users. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We want the default scheduling priority (priority == 0) to remain RPC_PRIORITY_NORMAL. Also ensure that the priority wait queue scheduling is per process id instead of sometimes being per thread, and sometimes being per inode. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Make it use the new task initialiser structure instead of acting as a wrapper. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
By using the TASK_KILLABLE infrastructure, we can get rid of the 'intr' mount option. We have to use _killable everywhere instead of _interruptible as we get rid of rpc_clnt_sigmask/sigunmask. Signed-off-by: NLiam R. Howlett <howlett@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
-
- 11 7月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We should almost always be deferencing the rpc_auth struct by means of the credential's cr_auth field instead of the rpc_clnt->cl_auth anyway. Fix up that historical mistake, and remove the macro that propagated it. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 01 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Currently rpc_malloc sets req->rq_buffer internally. Make this a more generic interface: return a pointer to the new buffer (or NULL) and make the caller set req->rq_buffer and req->rq_bufsize. This looks much more like kmalloc and eliminates the side effects. To fix a potential deadlock, this patch also replaces GFP_NOFS with GFP_NOWAIT in rpc_malloc. This prevents async RPCs from sleeping outside the RPC's task scheduler while allocating their buffer. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 21 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
If one of clear_bit, change_bit or set_bit is defined as a do { } while (0) function usage of these functions in parenthesis like (foo_bit(23, &var)) while be expaned to something like (do { ... } while (0)}). resulting in a build error. This patch removes the useless parenthesis. Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 04 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The error values are already propagated through task->tk_status, and none of the callers check one without checking the other, so we can drop the return value. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix the Oops in http://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138 We shouldn't be calling rpc_release_task() for tasks that are not active. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 08 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Name some of the remaning 'old_style_spin_init' locks Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 06 12月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Use RCU to ensure that we can safely call rpc_finish_wakeup after we've called __rpc_do_wake_up_task. If not, there is a theoretical race, in which the rpc_task finishes executing, and gets freed first. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 23 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The previous patches removed the last user of RPC child tasks, so we can remove support for child tasks from net/sunrpc/sched.c now. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 21 3月, 2006 4 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean-up: replace rpc_call() helper with direct call to rpc_call_sync. This makes NFSv2 and NFSv3 synchronous calls more computationally efficient, and reduces stack consumption in functions that used to invoke rpc_call more than once. Test plan: Compile kernel with CONFIG_NFS enabled. Connectathon on NFS version 2, version 3, and version 4 mount points. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Account for various things that occur while an RPC task is executed. Separate timers for RPC round trip and RPC execution time show how long RPC requests wait in queue before being sent. Eventually these will be accumulated at xprt_release time in one place where they can be viewed from userland. Test plan: Compile kernel with CONFIG_NFS enabled. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
RPC wait queue length will eventually be exported to userland via the RPC iostats interface. Test plan: Compile kernel with CONFIG_NFS enabled. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2006 5 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Add RPC client transport switch support for replacing buffer management on a per-transport basis. In the current IPv4 socket transport implementation, RPC buffers are allocated as needed for each RPC message that is sent. Some transport implementations may choose to use pre-allocated buffers for encoding, sending, receiving, and unmarshalling RPC messages, however. For transports capable of direct data placement, the buffers can be carved out of a pre-registered area of memory rather than from a slab cache. Test-plan: Millions of fsx operations. Performance characterization with "sio" and "iozone". Use oprofile and other tools to look for significant regression in CPU utilization. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The NFSv4 model requires us to complete all RPC calls that might establish state on the server whether or not the user wants to interrupt it. We may also need to schedule new work (including new RPC calls) in order to cancel the new state. The asynchronous RPC model will allow us to ensure that RPC calls always complete, but in order to allow for "synchronous" RPC, we want to add the ability to wait for completion. The waits are, of course, interruptible. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Shrink the RPC task structure. Instead of storing separate pointers for task->tk_exit and task->tk_release, put them in a structure. Also pass the user data pointer as a parameter instead of passing it via task->tk_calldata. This enables us to nest callbacks. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 23 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-