radeon and intel use the exact same definition.
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

I want to move some dp link training helpers into this place, so in
the future this won't be just about i2c any longer.
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Move the cached EDID from intel_dp and intel_lvds_connector to
intel_connector. Unify cached EDID handling for LVDS and eDP, in
preparation for adding more generic EDID caching later.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The caller, not intel_connector_update_modes(), should free the edid. This
improves the reusability of intel_connector_update_modes().
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Pave the way for sharing some logic between eDP and LVDS.

Based on earlier work by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Create a generic struct intel_panel for sharing a data structure and code
between eDP and LVDS panels. Add the new struct to intel_connector so that
later on we can have generic EDID and mode reading functions with EDID
caching that transparently fallback to fixed mode when EDID is not
available.

Add intel_panel as a dummy first, and move data (such as the mentioned
fixed mode) to it in later patches.

Based on earlier work by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Fixup tiny conflict in intel_dp_destroy.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Since we do EDID caching in intel_dp_init, we can do the fixed mode
initialization there too. This should not change the functionality apart
from initializing fixed mode earlier. Particularly retain the behaviour of
only falling back to VBT if EDID is not available to not regress

commit 47f0eb22
Author: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Date:   Mon Sep 19 14:33:26 2011 -0700

    drm/i915: Only use VBT panel mode on eDP if no EDID is found
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

As there is 1:1 mapping between encoder and connector for the LVDS, the
goal is to simply reduce the amount of noise within the connector
functions, i.e. we split the encoder/connector for LVDS as best we can and
try to only operate on the LVDS connector from the connector funcs and the
LVDS encoder form the encoder funcs.

Based on earlier work by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Get rid of saved int_lvds_connector and int_edp_connector in
drm_i915_private.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Based on earlier work by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Introduce a local structure to move LVDS specific information away from the
drm_i915_private and onto the LVDS connector.

Based on earlier work by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

In preparation for introducing intel_lvds_connector to move some of the
LVDS specific storage away from drm_i915_private, first rename the encoder
to avoid potential confusion.

Based on earlier work by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We were programming register 0x42020 twice on those platforms. Once
should be enough.
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

With the consolidated registers, it appears that we're setting the same
bis several times. Let's just collect the bits we want to set and program
it once.

v2: More cleanup. Also program 0x42004 and 0x45000 for FBC on non
    mobile platforms (Paulo Zanoni)
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Undo the functional change as discussed on irc.]
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Register 0x42020 was defined twice under the names PCH_DSPCLK_GATE_D and
ILK_DSPCLK_GATE. This patch consolidate the 2 sets of defines in one.

The transforms done are:

PCH_DSPCLK_GATE_D    -> ILK_DSPCLK_GATE_D
ILK_DSPCLK_GATE      -> ILK_DSPCLK_GATE_D

DPARBUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPARBUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_DPARB_CLK_GATE           -> ILK_DPARBUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE

DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_DPFD_CLK_GATE           -> ILK_DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_CLK_FBC                 -> ILK_DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE

DPFCRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPFCRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_DPFC_DIS1                -> ILK_DPFCRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE

DPFCUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPFCUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_DPFC_DIS2               -> ILK_DPFCUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE

We have a VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE define for the pre-ILK DSPCLK_GATE_D.
Even if the same bit is used in ILK_DSPCLK_GATE_D, other bits in the
register change, so I went with re-defining it, well more precisely rename
IVB_VRHUNIT_CLK_GATE, which is not specific to IVB+. So:

IVB_VRHUNIT_CLK_GATE       -> ILK_VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE (ILK+ code)

This commit is only a renaming commit, further commits will clean up the
logic.

v2: Rename bit 5 and 7 to _ENABLE as setting them to 1 enables clock
    gating on their respective units, contrary to all of the other bits
    (Paulo Zanoni)
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Single-threaded forcewake was only used on some early pre-production
ivybridge machines, all the latest ones should use mt forcewake. And
we already assume this in other places of the code (e.g. DERRMR
support in the ddx, or the latest intel_gt_reset patch to reset any
lingering forcewake references left behind by the bios), so don't
bother here, too.
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This is the final remaining piece of Haswell DP enablement. After this
patch, just calling intel_dp_init on any port will make DP work. We
still do not do this because we're currently initializing HDMI on all
the ports, so if we replace intel_hdmi_init with intel_dp_init, we
will break HDMI, and we can't call both because they share the same
registers.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Previous patch "drm/i915: add basic Haswell DP link train bits"
implemented the basic structure to set the voltage levels and training
patterns. This patch adds the higher-level bits that are part of the
mode set sequence and hot plug.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We have to write the correct values inside intel_dp_set_m_n and then
prevent these values from being overwritten later.

V2: Unconfuse double negation.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Just a missing register. There is no problem to run this code when the
output is HDMI.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We should only write the DDI_BUF_CTL at this point for HDMI/DVI. For
DP we need to do this earlier, and the values written to the register
are also different.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The old rule that the AUX registers are just an offset (+4 and +10)
from output_reg is not true anymore, since output_reg in on the CPU
and some AUX regs are on the PCH.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
[danvet: use the existing #defines as spotted by Damien Lespiau.]
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Some BIOSes may forcibly suspend RC6 during their operation which
trigger a warning as we find the hardware in a perplexing state upon
first use. So far that appears to be the worst symptom as fortuituously
we use the same values as the BIOS for programming the FORCEWAKE register.
Reported-by: NOleksij Rempel <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We now no longer rely on this.

This is step 1 on a long journey to rid us of the save/restore
madness, which tends to lightly paper over many issues, and cause
tons of bad things itself ...
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
[danvet: satisfy Paulo's ocd and drop the needless braces.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

... instead of relying on the register save/restore madness to do this.

To extract a bit of code call drm_mode_config_reset both on resume
and boot-up and move the hw state frobbing from the crt_init to the
->reset callback. The crt connector is the only one with a ->reset
callback, hence we can easily do this.
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

... since they don't apply to pre-pch platforms and could actually be
harmful.
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We already do that as part of the ringbuffer re-setup at resume time.
Furthermore the register offset has moved on gen6+ around quite a bit,
and on ilk/gm45 we also need to restore the HWS reg for the bsd ring,
not just the render ring.

So again in kms mode this is only confusing a best, hence don't
bother.

v2: Fixup logic, noticed by Paulo Zanoni.
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We already call drm_irq_install/uninstall at the right time, which
will set up the irq registers with the correct values (through the
preinstall hooks).

For kms this is at best harmless, in the worst case we get an
interrupt when we don't really expect it.

v2: Fixup the logic, noticed by Paulo Zanoni.
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We completely compute these anew in each modeset, hence we don't rely
on them containing anything valid after resume.

To avoid breaking any ums setup due to reordering of the reads/writes
simply don't reorder anything, but bracket the reads/writes into if
(!kms) conditionals. More churn, but safer.

v2: Fixup the logic, noticed by Paulo Zanoni.
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Much simpler and looks more like the M/N code inside intel_display.c.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Previously, the DP register was used for everything. On Haswell, it
was split into DDI_BUF_CTL (which is the new intel_dp->DP register)
and DP_TP_CTL.

The logic behind this patch is based on a patch written by Shobhit
Kumar, but the way the code was written is very different.

Credits-to: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
[danvet: Fixup the logic error spotted by Jani Nikula.]
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

In theory, all the DDI pipe settings should be set here, including
timing and M/N registers. For now, let's just set the DP MSA
attributes.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
[danvet: fixed up the unused typo in a #define, spotted by Jani
Nikula.]
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

No functional change, but reserves 0x2 for use by userspace.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

With the introduction of per-process GTT space, the hardware designers
thought it wise to also limit the ability to write to MMIO space to only
a "secure" batch buffer. The ability to rewrite registers is the only
way to program the hardware to perform certain operations like scanline
waits (required for tear-free windowed updates). So we either have a
choice of adding an interface to perform those synchronized updates
inside the kernel, or we permit certain processes the ability to write
to the "safe" registers from within its command stream. This patch
exposes the ability to submit a SECURE batch buffer to
DRM_ROOT_ONLY|DRM_MASTER processes.

v2: Haswell split up bit8 into a ppgtt bit (still bit8) and a security
bit (bit 13, accidentally not set). Also add a comment explaining why
secure batches need a global gtt binding.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1)
[danvet: added hsw fixup.]
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>