Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 06 8月, 2006 5 次提交
    • E
      [PATCH] ufs: ufs_get_locked_page() race fix · 1fb32b7b
      由 Evgeniy Dushistov 提交于 
      As discussed earlier:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/28/136
this patch fixes such issue:

`ufs_get_locked_page' takes page from cache
after that `vmtruncate' takes page and deletes it from cache
`ufs_get_locked_page' locks page, and reports about EIO error.

Also because of find_lock_page always return valid page or NULL, we have no
need to check it if page not NULL.
Signed-off-by: NEvgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      1fb32b7b
    • C
      [PATCH] bug in futex unqueue_me · e91467ec
      由 Christian Borntraeger 提交于 
      This patch adds a barrier() in futex unqueue_me to avoid aliasing of two
pointers.

On my s390x system I saw the following oops:

Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address
0000000000000000
Oops: 0004 [#1]
CPU:    0    Not tainted
Process mytool (pid: 13613, task: 000000003ecb6ac0, ksp: 00000000366bdbd8)
Krnl PSW : 0704d00180000000 00000000003c9ac2 (_spin_lock+0xe/0x30)
Krnl GPRS: 00000000ffffffff 000000003ecb6ac0 0000000000000000 0700000000000000
           0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000001fe00002028 00000000000c091f
           000001fe00002054 000001fe00002054 0000000000000000 00000000366bddc0
           00000000005ef8c0 00000000003d00e8 0000000000144f91 00000000366bdcb8
Krnl Code: ba 4e 20 00 12 44 b9 16 00 3e a7 84 00 08 e3 e0 f0 88 00 04
Call Trace:
([<0000000000144f90>] unqueue_me+0x40/0xe4)
 [<0000000000145a0c>] do_futex+0x33c/0xc40
 [<000000000014643e>] sys_futex+0x12e/0x144
 [<000000000010bb00>] sysc_noemu+0x10/0x16
 [<000002000003741c>] 0x2000003741c

The code in question is:

static int unqueue_me(struct futex_q *q)
{
        int ret = 0;
        spinlock_t *lock_ptr;

        /* In the common case we don't take the spinlock, which is nice. */
 retry:
        lock_ptr = q->lock_ptr;
        if (lock_ptr != 0) {
                spin_lock(lock_ptr);
		/*
                 * q->lock_ptr can change between reading it and
                 * spin_lock(), causing us to take the wrong lock.  This
                 * corrects the race condition.
[...]

and my compiler (gcc 4.1.0) makes the following out of it:

00000000000003c8 <unqueue_me>:
     3c8:       eb bf f0 70 00 24       stmg    %r11,%r15,112(%r15)
     3ce:       c0 d0 00 00 00 00       larl    %r13,3ce <unqueue_me+0x6>
                        3d0: R_390_PC32DBL      .rodata+0x2a
     3d4:       a7 f1 1e 00             tml     %r15,7680
     3d8:       a7 84 00 01             je      3da <unqueue_me+0x12>
     3dc:       b9 04 00 ef             lgr     %r14,%r15
     3e0:       a7 fb ff d0             aghi    %r15,-48
     3e4:       b9 04 00 b2             lgr     %r11,%r2
     3e8:       e3 e0 f0 98 00 24       stg     %r14,152(%r15)
     3ee:       e3 c0 b0 28 00 04       lg      %r12,40(%r11)
		/* write q->lock_ptr in r12 */
     3f4:       b9 02 00 cc             ltgr    %r12,%r12
     3f8:       a7 84 00 4b             je      48e <unqueue_me+0xc6>
		/* if r12 is zero then jump over the code.... */
     3fc:       e3 20 b0 28 00 04       lg      %r2,40(%r11)
		/* write q->lock_ptr in r2 */
     402:       c0 e5 00 00 00 00       brasl   %r14,402 <unqueue_me+0x3a>
                        404: R_390_PC32DBL      _spin_lock+0x2
		/* use r2 as parameter for spin_lock */

So the code becomes more or less:
if (q->lock_ptr != 0) spin_lock(q->lock_ptr)
instead of
if (lock_ptr != 0) spin_lock(lock_ptr)

Which caused the oops from above.
After adding a barrier gcc creates code without this problem:
[...] (the same)
     3ee:       e3 c0 b0 28 00 04       lg      %r12,40(%r11)
     3f4:       b9 02 00 cc             ltgr    %r12,%r12
     3f8:       b9 04 00 2c             lgr     %r2,%r12
     3fc:       a7 84 00 48             je      48c <unqueue_me+0xc4>
     400:       c0 e5 00 00 00 00       brasl   %r14,400 <unqueue_me+0x38>
                        402: R_390_PC32DBL      _spin_lock+0x2

As a general note, this code of unqueue_me seems a bit fishy. The retry logic
of unqueue_me only works if we can guarantee, that the original value of
q->lock_ptr is always a spinlock (Otherwise we overwrite kernel memory). We
know that q->lock_ptr can change. I dont know what happens with the original
spinlock, as I am not an expert with the futex code.

Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@timesys.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntrae@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      e91467ec
    • A
      [PATCH] disable debugging version of write_lock() · 72f0b4e2
      由 Andrew Morton 提交于 
      We've confirmed that the debug version of write_lock() can get stuck for long
enough to cause NMI watchdog timeouts and hence a crash.

We don't know why, yet.   Disable it for now.

Also disable the similar read_lock() code.  Just in case.

Thanks to Dave Olson <olson@unixfolk.com> for reporting and testing.
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      72f0b4e2
    • A
      [PATCH] drivers/edac/edac_mc.h must #include <linux/platform_device.h> · 927cbe8a
      由 Adrian Bunk 提交于 
      With CONFIG_PCI=n:

  CC      drivers/edac/edac_mc.o
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c: In function ‘add_mc_to_global_list’:
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c:1362: error: implicit declaration of function ‘to_platform_device’
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c:1362: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c: In function ‘edac_mc_add_mc’:
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c:1467: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c: In function ‘edac_mc_del_mc’:
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c:1504: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      927cbe8a
    • R
      [PATCH] Make suspend possible with a traced process at a breakpoint · a7ef7878
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      It should be possible to suspend, either to RAM or to disk, if there's a
traced process that has just reached a breakpoint.  However, this is a
special case, because its parent process might have been frozen already and
then we are unable to deliver the "freeze" signal to the traced process.
If this happens, it's better to cancel the freezing of the traced process.

Ref. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6787Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      a7ef7878
  3. 05 8月, 2006 4 次提交
  5. 04 8月, 2006 31 次提交