- 16 3月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMike Miller <michael.miller@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
For shared SAS configurations, hosts need to poll Smart Arrays periodically in order to be able to detect configuration changes such as logical drives being added or removed from remote hosts. A register on the controller indicates when such events have occurred, and the driver polls the register via a workqueue and kicks off a rescan of devices if such an event is detected. Additionally, changes to logical drive raid offload eligibility are autodetected in this way. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NScott Teel <scott.teel@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
This enables sending i/o's destined for RAID logical drives which can be serviced by a single physical disk down a different, faster i/o path directly to physical drives for certain logical volumes on SSDs bypassing the Smart Array RAID stack for a performance improvement. Signed-off-by: NMatt Gates <matthew.gates@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NScott Teel <scott.teel@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NMike Miller <michael.miller@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NDon Brace <brace@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJoe Handzik <joseph.t.handzik@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
由 Matt Gates 提交于
For certain i/o's to certain devices (unmasked physical disks) we can bypass the RAID stack firmware and do the i/o to the device directly and it will be faster. Signed-off-by: NMatt Gates <matthew.gates@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
- 20 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Much simpler and avoids races starting/stopping the thread. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
- 19 12月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
If a fifo full condition is encountered, i/o requests will stack up in the h->reqQ queue. The only thing which empties this queue is start_io, which only gets called when new i/o requests come in. If none are forthcoming, i/o in h->reqQ will be stalled. To fix this, whenever fifo full condition is encountered, this is recorded, and the interrupt handler examines this to see if a fifo full condition was recently encountered when a command completes and will call start_io to prevent i/o's in h->reqQ from getting stuck. I've only ever seen this problem occur when running specialized test programs that pound on the the CCISS_PASSTHRU ioctl. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Cap CCISS_BIG_PASSTHRU as well. If an attempt is made to exceed this, ioctl() will return -1 with errno == EAGAIN. This is to prevent a userland program from exhausting all of pci_alloc_consistent memory. I've only seen this problem when running a special test program designed to provoke it. 20 concurrent commands via the passthru ioctls (not counting SG_IO) should be more than enough. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
- 26 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tomas Henzl 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com> Acked-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
- 10 5月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Dial back the aggressiveness of the controller lockup detection thread. Currently it will declare the controller to be locked up if it goes for 10 seconds with no interrupts and no change in the heartbeat register. Dial back this to 30 seconds with no heartbeat change, and also snoop the ioctl path and if a firmware flash command is detected, dial it back further to 4 minutes until the firmware flash command completes. The reason for this is that during the firmware flash operation, the controller apparently doesn't update the heartbeat register as frequently as it is supposed to, and we can get a false positive. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
由 Matt Gates 提交于
Use spinlocks with finer granularity in the submission and completion paths to allow concurrent execution for multiple reply queues. In particular, do not hold a spin lock while submitting a request to the device, nor during most of the interrupt handler. Signed-off-by: NMatt Gates <matthew.gates@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
由 Matt Gates 提交于
Smart Arrays can support multiple reply queues onto which command completions may be deposited. It can help performance quite a bit to arrange for command completions to be processed on the same CPU from which they were submitted to increase the likelihood of cache hits. Signed-off-by: NMatt Gates <matthew.gates@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
MSI/MSI-X interrupts can't race the DMA completion they are communicating so no need to read from controller to flush the DMA to the host if MSI or MSI-X interrupts are being used. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
- 19 2月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Sometimes, for testing purposes (e.g. testing rmmod on a system that normally boots using hpsa) it's nice to rename the driver and split it into two drivers and restrict it to certain controllers. This makes that easier. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
[SCSI] hpsa: removed unneeded structure member max_sg_entries and fix badly named constant MAXSGENTRIES We had both h->max_sg_entries and h->maxsgentries in the per controller structure which is terribly confusing. max_sg_entries was really just a constant, 32, which defines how big the "block fetch table" is, which is as large as the max number of SG elements embedded within a command (excluding SG elements in chain blocks). MAXSGENTRIES was the constant used to denote the max number of SG elements embedded within a command, also a poor name. So renamed MAXSGENTREIS to SG_ENTRIES_IN_CMD, and removed h->max_sg_entries and replaced it with SG_ENTRIES_IN_CMD. h->maxsgentries is unchanged, and is the maximum number of sg elements the controller will support in a command, including those in chain blocks, minus 1 for the chain block pointer.. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
- 30 10月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
When controller lockup condition is detected, we should fail all outstanding commands and disable the controller. This will enable multipath solutions to recover gracefully. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
由 Scott Teel 提交于
The currentsd[] array in hpsa_update_scsi_devices had room for 256 devices. The code was iterating over however many physical and logical devices plus an additional number of possible external MSA2XXX controllers, which together could potentially exceed 256. We increased the size of the currentsd array to 1024 + 1024 + 32 + 1 elements to reflect a reasonable maximum possible number of devices which might be encountered. We also don't just walk off the end of the array if the array controller reports more devices than we are prepared to handle, we just ignore the excessive devices. Signed-off-by: NScott Teel <scott.teel@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
由 Scott Teel 提交于
Rename HPSA_MAX_SCSI_DEVS_PER_HBA to HPSA_MAX_DEVICES Signed-off-by: NScott Teel <scott.teel@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
- 27 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Most smartarrays tolerate it, but a few new ones don't. Without this change some newer Smart Arrays will lock up and i/o will grind to a halt. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
-
- 17 5月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
on driver load, if reset_devices is set, and the hard reset attempts fail, try to bring up the controller to the point that a command can be sent, and send it a soft reset command, then after the reset undo whatever driver initialization was done to get it to the point to take a command, and re-do it after the reset. This is to get kdump to work on all the "non-resettable" controllers (except 64xx controllers which can't be reset due to the potentially shared cache module.) Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
This is to avoid the usual two or three messages about the command timing out. We're obviously not waiting long enough. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
This is to ensure the board interrupts are really off when these functions return. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Apparently we've been doin it rong for a decade, but only lately do we run into problems. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
- 19 2月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
It's not enough to simple avoid putting the board into performant mode, as we have to set up the interrupts differently, etc. When I originally tested this module parameter, I tested it incorrectly without realizing it, and the driver was running in performant mode the whole time unbeknownst to me. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Driver's internal queues should be FIFO, not LIFO. This is a port of an almost identical patch from cciss by Jens Axboe. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
- 25 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
After a reset, we should first wait for the board to become "not ready", and then wait for it to become "ready", instead of immediately waiting for it to become "ready", and do this waiting *after* restoring PCI config space registers. Also, only wait 10 secs for board to become "not ready" after a reset (it should quickly become not ready.) Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
- 22 12月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
The firmware may have been updated, in which case, it's the same device, and in that case, we do not want to remove and add the device, we want to let it continue as is. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
- 28 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
- 03 3月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
This uses the scatter-gather chaining feature of Smart Array controllers. 32 scatter-gather elements are embedded in the "command list", and the last element in the list may be marked as a "chain pointer", and point to an additional block of scatter gather elements. The precise number of scatter gather elements supported is dependent on the particular kind of Smart Array, and is determined at runtime by querying the hardware. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
由 Mike Miller 提交于
The intent of the scan thread was to allow a UNIT ATTENTION/LUN DATA CHANGED condition encountered in the interrupt handler to trigger a rescan of devices, which can't be done in interrupt context. However, we weren't able to get this to work, due to multiple such UNIT ATTENTION conditions arriving during the rescan, during updating of the SCSI mid layer, etc. There's no way to tell the devices, "stand still while I scan you!" Since it doesn't work, there's no point in having the thread, as the rescan triggered via ioctl or sysfs can be done without such a thread. Signed-off-by: NMike Miller <mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
- 18 2月, 2010 7 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
use scan_start and scan_finished entry points for scanning and route the CCISS_REGNEWD ioctl and sysfs triggering of same functionality through hpsa_scan_start. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
The p1210m responsds to SCSI report LUNs, unlike traditional Smart Array controllers. This means that the bus, target, and lun assignments done by the driver cannot be arbitrary, but must match what SCSI REPORT LUNS returns. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
由 Don Brace 提交于
This is done by adding support for the so-called "performant mode" (that's really what they called it). Smart Array controllers have a mode which enables multiple command completions to be delivered with a single interrupt, "performant" mode. We want to use that mode, as some newer controllers will be requiring this mode. Signed-off-by: NDon Brace <brace@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NMike Miller <mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-
由 Stephen M. Cameron 提交于
That is, use u64, u32, u16 and u8 rather than __u64, __u32, __u16 and __u8. Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
-