1. 11 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  2. 10 5月, 2010 1 次提交
    • P
      netfilter: nf_conntrack_proto: fix warning with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU · 3b254c54
      Patrick McHardy 提交于
      ===================================================
      [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
      ---------------------------------------------------
      include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto.h:92 invoked rcu_dereference_check()
      without protection!
      
      other info that might help us debug this:
      
      rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
      2 locks held by iptables/3197:
       #0:  (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8149bd8c>]
      ip_setsockopt+0x7c/0xa0
       #1:  (&xt[i].mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8148a5fe>]
      xt_find_table_lock+0x3e/0x110
      
      stack backtrace:
      Pid: 3197, comm: iptables Not tainted 2.6.34-rc4 #2
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffff8105e2e8>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xb8/0xc0
       [<ffffffff8147fb3b>] nf_ct_l3proto_module_put+0x6b/0x70
       [<ffffffff8148d891>] state_mt_destroy+0x11/0x20
       [<ffffffff814d3baf>] cleanup_match+0x2f/0x50
       [<ffffffff814d3c63>] cleanup_entry+0x33/0x90
       [<ffffffff814d5653>] ? __do_replace+0x1a3/0x210
       [<ffffffff814d564c>] __do_replace+0x19c/0x210
       [<ffffffff814d651a>] do_ipt_set_ctl+0x16a/0x1b0
       [<ffffffff8147a610>] nf_sockopt+0x60/0xa0
      ...
      
      The __nf_ct_l3proto_find() call doesn't actually need rcu read side
      protection since the caller holds a reference to the protocol. Use
      rcu_read_lock() anyways to avoid the warning.
      
      Kernel bugzilla #15781: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15781Reported-by: NChristian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
      Signed-off-by: NPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
      3b254c54
  3. 08 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  4. 07 5月, 2010 15 次提交
  5. 06 5月, 2010 22 次提交