Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 29 11月, 2012 6 次提交
  3. 23 11月, 2012 2 次提交
  5. 22 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 27 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 23 10月, 2012 8 次提交
  11. 20 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  13. 03 10月, 2012 2 次提交
  15. 18 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: fix OOPS in lid_notify · 3b7a89fc
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      This goes back to

commit c1c7af60
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date:   Thu Sep 10 15:28:03 2009 -0700

    drm/i915: force mode set at lid open time

It was used to fix an issue on a i915GM based Thinkpad X41, which
somehow clobbered the modeset state at lid close time. Since then
massive amounts of things changed: Tons of fixes to the modeset
sequence, OpRegion support, better integration with the acpi code.
Especially OpRegion /should/ allow us to control the display hw
cooperatively with the firmware, without the firmware clobbering the
hw state behind our backs.

So it's dubious whether we still need this.

The second issue is that it's unclear who's responsibility it actually
is to restore the mode - Chris Wilson suggests to just emit a hotplug
event and let userspace figure things out.

The real reason I've stumbled over this is that the new modeset code
breaks drm_helper_resume_force_mode - it OOPSes derefing a NULL vfunc
pointer. The reason this wasn't caught in testing earlier is that in

commit c9354c85
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon Nov 2 09:29:55 2009 -0800

    i915: fix intel graphics suspend breakage due to resume/lid event
    confusion

logic was added to _not_ restore the modeset state after a resume. And
since most machines are configured to auto-suspend on lid-close, this
neatly papered over the issue.

Summarizing, this shouldn't be required on any platform supporting
OpRegion. And none of the really old machines I have here seem to
require it either. Hence I'm inclined to just rip it out.

But in case that there are really firmwares out there that clobber the
hw state, replace it with a call to intel_modset_check_state. This
will ensure that we catch any issues as soon as they happen.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      3b7a89fc
  17. 06 9月, 2012 6 次提交
  19. 24 8月, 2012 1 次提交
    • C
      i915: Quirk no_lvds on Gigabyte GA-D525TUD ITX motherboard · a51d4ed0
      由 Calvin Walton 提交于 
      This board is incorrectly detected as having an LVDS connector,
resulting in the VGA output (the only available output on the board)
showing the console only in the top-left 1024x768 pixels, and an extra
LVDS connector appearing in X.

It's a desktop Mini-ITX board using an Atom D525 CPU with an NM10
chipset.

I've had this board for about a year, but this is the first time I
noticed the issue because I've been running it headless for most of its
life.
Signed-off-by: NCalvin Walton <calvin.walton@kepstin.ca>
      a51d4ed0
  21. 26 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: simplify possible_clones computation · 66a9278e
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      Intel hw only has one MUX for encoders, so outputs are either not
cloneable or all in the same group of cloneable outputs. This neatly
simplifies the code and allows us to ditch some ugly if cascades in
the dp and hdmi init code (well, we need these if cascades for other
stuff still, but that can be taken care of in follow-up patches).

Note that this changes two things:
- dvo can now be cloned with sdvo, but dvo is gen2 whereas sdvo is
  gen3+, so no problem. Note that the old code had a bug and didn't
  allow cloning crt with dvo (but only the other way round).
- sdvo-lvds can now be cloned with sdvo-non-tv. Spec says this won't
  work, but the only reason I've found is that you can't use the
  panel-fitter (used for lvds upscaling) with anything else. But we
  don't use the panel fitter for sdvo-lvds. Imo this part of Bspec is
  a) rather confusing b) mostly as a guideline to implementors (i.e.
  explicitly stating what is already implicit from the spec, without
  always going into the details of why). So I think we can ignore this
  - worst case we'll get a bug report from a user with with sdvo-lvds
  and sdvo-tmds and have to add that special case back in.

Because sdvo lvds is a bit special explain in comments why sdvo LVDS
outputs can be cloned, but native LVDS and eDP can't be cloned - we
use the panel fitter for the later, but not for sdvo.

Note that this also uncoditionally initializes the panel_vdd work used
by eDP. Trying to be clever doesn't buy us anything (but strange bugs)
and this way we can kill the is_edp check.

v2: Incorporate review from Paulo
- Add in a missing space.
- Pimp comment message to address his concerns.
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-Off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      66a9278e
  23. 25 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915/lvds: ditch ->prepare special case · 520c41cf
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      LVDS is the first output where dpms on/off and prepare/commit don't
perfectly match. Now the idea behind this special case seems to be
that for simple resolution changes on the LVDS we don't need to stop
the pipe, because (at least on newer chips) we can adjust the panel
fitter on the fly.

There are a few problems with the current code though:
- We still stop and restart the pipe unconditionally, because the crtc
  helper code isn't flexible enough.
- We show some ugly flickering, especially when changing crtcs (this
  the crtc helper would actually take into account, but we don't
  implement the encoder->get_crtc callback required to make this work
  properly).

So it doesn't even work as advertised. I agree that it would be nice
to do resolution changes on LVDS (and also eDP) whithout blacking the
screen where the panel fitter allows to do that. But imo we should
implement this as a special case a few layers up in the mode set code,
akin to how we already detect simple framebuffer changes (and only
update the required registers with ->mode_set_base).

Until this is all in place, make our lives easier and just rip it out.

Also note that this seems to fix actual bugs with enabling the lvds
output, see:

http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2012-July/018614.html

Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Giacomo Comes <comes@naic.edu>
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: NTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-Off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      520c41cf
  25. 20 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  27. 05 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  29. 22 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  31. 13 6月, 2012 3 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: allow pipe A for lvds on gen4 · 0b9f43a0
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      Given the havoc the missing backlight pipe select code might have
caused, let's try to re-enabled pipe A support for lvds on gen4 hw.
Just to see what all blows up ...

Note though that

commit 4add75c4
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Sat Dec 4 17:49:46 2010 +0000

    drm/i915: Allow LVDS to be on pipe A for Ironlake+

claims that this caused tons of spurious wakeups somehow.

More details can be found in the old revert:

commit 12e8ba25
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Tue Sep 7 23:39:28 2010 +0100

    Revert "drm/i915: Allow LVDS on pipe A on gen4+"

    Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307Reviewed-by: NEugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      0b9f43a0
    • D
      drm/i915: properly enable the blc controller on the right pipe · 24ded204
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      On gen4+ we have a bitfield to specify from which pipe the backlight
controller should take it's clock. For PCH split platforms we've
already set these up, but only at initialization time. And without
taking into account the 3rd pipe added with ivb.

For gen4, we've completely ignored these. Although we do restrict lvds
to the 2nd pipe, so this is only a problem on machines where we boot
up with the lvds on the first pipe.

So restructure the code to enable the backlight on the right pipe at
modeset time.

v2: For odd reasons panel_enable_backlight gets called twice in a
modeset, so we can't WARN_ON in there if the backlight controller is
switched on already.

v3: backlight enable can also be called through dpms on, so the check
in there is legit. Update the comment to reflect that.
Tested-By: NKamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954661
Cc: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>
Reviewed-by: NEugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Signed-Off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      24ded204
    • D
      drm/i915: clear up backlight #define confusion on gen4+ · 7cf41601
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      - Regroup definitions for BLC_PWM_CTL so that they're all together and
  and ordered according to the bitfields.

- Add all missing definitions for BLC_PWM_CTL2.

- Use the BLM_ (for backlight modulation) prefix consistently.

- Note that combination mode (i.e. also taking the legacy backlight
  control value from pci config space into account) is gen4 only.

- Move the new registers for PCH-split machines up, they're an almost
  match for the gen4 defitions.  Prefix the special PCH-only bits with
  BLM_PCH_. Also add the pipe C select bit for ivb.

- Rip out the second pair of PCH polarity definitions - they're only
  valid on early (pre-production) ilk silicon.

- Adapt the existing code to use the new definitions. This has the
  nice benefit of killing a magic (1 << 30) left behind be Jesse
  Barnes.

No functional changes in this patch.
Reviewed-by: NEugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      7cf41601
  33. 24 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  35. 03 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  37. 16 4月, 2012 1 次提交