Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 07 2月, 2018 25 次提交
  3. 27 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 24 1月, 2018 3 次提交
  7. 23 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 19 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 17 1月, 2018 1 次提交
    • C
      arm64: kpti: Fix the interaction between ASID switching and software PAN · 6b88a32c
      由 Catalin Marinas 提交于 
      With ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN enabled, the exception entry code checks the
active ASID to decide whether user access was enabled (non-zero ASID)
when the exception was taken. On return from exception, if user access
was previously disabled, it re-instates TTBR0_EL1 from the per-thread
saved value (updated in switch_mm() or efi_set_pgd()).

Commit 7655abb9 ("arm64: mm: Move ASID from TTBR0 to TTBR1") makes a
TTBR0_EL1 + ASID switching non-atomic. Subsequently, commit 27a921e7
("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") changes the
__uaccess_ttbr0_disable() function and asm macro to first write the
reserved TTBR0_EL1 followed by the ASID=0 update in TTBR1_EL1. If an
exception occurs between these two, the exception return code will
re-instate a valid TTBR0_EL1. Similar scenario can happen in
cpu_switch_mm() between setting the reserved TTBR0_EL1 and the ASID
update in cpu_do_switch_mm().

This patch reverts the entry.S check for ASID == 0 to TTBR0_EL1 and
disables the interrupts around the TTBR0_EL1 and ASID switching code in
__uaccess_ttbr0_disable(). It also ensures that, when returning from the
EFI runtime services, efi_set_pgd() doesn't leave a non-zero ASID in
TTBR1_EL1 by using uaccess_ttbr0_{enable,disable}.

The accesses to current_thread_info()->ttbr0 are updated to use
READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE.

As a safety measure, __uaccess_ttbr0_enable() always masks out any
existing non-zero ASID TTBR1_EL1 before writing in the new ASID.

Fixes: 27a921e7 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN")
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reported-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Tested-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Co-developed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      6b88a32c
  13. 16 1月, 2018 8 次提交
    • D
      KVM: arm64: Emulate RAS error registers and set HCR_EL2's TERR & TEA · 558daf69
      由 Dongjiu Geng 提交于 
      ARMv8.2 adds a new bit HCR_EL2.TEA which routes synchronous external
aborts to EL2, and adds a trap control bit HCR_EL2.TERR which traps
all Non-secure EL1&0 error record accesses to EL2.

This patch enables the two bits for the guest OS, guaranteeing that
KVM takes external aborts and traps attempts to access the physical
error registers.

ERRIDR_EL1 advertises the number of error records, we return
zero meaning we can treat all the other registers as RAZ/WI too.
Signed-off-by: NDongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
[removed specific emulation, use trap_raz_wi() directly for everything,
 rephrased parts of the commit message]
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      558daf69
    • J
      KVM: arm64: Handle RAS SErrors from EL2 on guest exit · 0067df41
      由 James Morse 提交于 
      We expect to have firmware-first handling of RAS SErrors, with errors
notified via an APEI method. For systems without firmware-first, add
some minimal handling to KVM.

There are two ways KVM can take an SError due to a guest, either may be a
RAS error: we exit the guest due to an SError routed to EL2 by HCR_EL2.AMO,
or we take an SError from EL2 when we unmask PSTATE.A from __guest_exit.

The current SError from EL2 code unmasks SError and tries to fence any
pending SError into a single instruction window. It then leaves SError
unmasked.

With the v8.2 RAS Extensions we may take an SError for a 'corrected'
error, but KVM is only able to handle SError from EL2 if they occur
during this single instruction window...

The RAS Extensions give us a new instruction to synchronise and
consume SErrors. The RAS Extensions document (ARM DDI0587),
'2.4.1 ESB and Unrecoverable errors' describes ESB as synchronising
SError interrupts generated by 'instructions, translation table walks,
hardware updates to the translation tables, and instruction fetches on
the same PE'. This makes ESB equivalent to KVMs existing
'dsb, mrs-daifclr, isb' sequence.

Use the alternatives to synchronise and consume any SError using ESB
instead of unmasking and taking the SError. Set ARM_EXIT_WITH_SERROR_BIT
in the exit_code so that we can restart the vcpu if it turns out this
SError has no impact on the vcpu.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      0067df41
    • J
      KVM: arm64: Handle RAS SErrors from EL1 on guest exit · 3368bd80
      由 James Morse 提交于 
      We expect to have firmware-first handling of RAS SErrors, with errors
notified via an APEI method. For systems without firmware-first, add
some minimal handling to KVM.

There are two ways KVM can take an SError due to a guest, either may be a
RAS error: we exit the guest due to an SError routed to EL2 by HCR_EL2.AMO,
or we take an SError from EL2 when we unmask PSTATE.A from __guest_exit.

For SError that interrupt a guest and are routed to EL2 the existing
behaviour is to inject an impdef SError into the guest.

Add code to handle RAS SError based on the ESR. For uncontained and
uncategorized errors arm64_is_fatal_ras_serror() will panic(), these
errors compromise the host too. All other error types are contained:
For the fatal errors the vCPU can't make progress, so we inject a virtual
SError. We ignore contained errors where we can make progress as if
we're lucky, we may not hit them again.

If only some of the CPUs support RAS the guest will see the cpufeature
sanitised version of the id registers, but we may still take RAS SError
on this CPU. Move the SError handling out of handle_exit() into a new
handler that runs before we can be preempted. This allows us to use
this_cpu_has_cap(), via arm64_is_ras_serror().
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      3368bd80
    • J
      KVM: arm64: Save ESR_EL2 on guest SError · c60590b5
      由 James Morse 提交于 
      When we exit a guest due to an SError the vcpu fault info isn't updated
with the ESR. Today this is only done for traps.

The v8.2 RAS Extensions define ISS values for SError. Update the vcpu's
fault_info with the ESR on SError so that handle_exit() can determine
if this was a RAS SError and decode its severity.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      c60590b5
    • J
      KVM: arm64: Save/Restore guest DISR_EL1 · c773ae2b
      由 James Morse 提交于 
      If we deliver a virtual SError to the guest, the guest may defer it
with an ESB instruction. The guest reads the deferred value via DISR_EL1,
but the guests view of DISR_EL1 is re-mapped to VDISR_EL2 when HCR_EL2.AMO
is set.

Add the KVM code to save/restore VDISR_EL2, and make it accessible to
userspace as DISR_EL1.
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      c773ae2b
    • J
      KVM: arm64: Set an impdef ESR for Virtual-SError using VSESR_EL2. · 4715c14b
      由 James Morse 提交于 
      Prior to v8.2's RAS Extensions, the HCR_EL2.VSE 'virtual SError' feature
generated an SError with an implementation defined ESR_EL1.ISS, because we
had no mechanism to specify the ESR value.

On Juno this generates an all-zero ESR, the most significant bit 'ISV'
is clear indicating the remainder of the ISS field is invalid.

With the RAS Extensions we have a mechanism to specify this value, and the
most significant bit has a new meaning: 'IDS - Implementation Defined
Syndrome'. An all-zero SError ESR now means: 'RAS error: Uncategorized'
instead of 'no valid ISS'.

Add KVM support for the VSESR_EL2 register to specify an ESR value when
HCR_EL2.VSE generates a virtual SError. Change kvm_inject_vabt() to
specify an implementation-defined value.

We only need to restore the VSESR_EL2 value when HCR_EL2.VSE is set, KVM
save/restores this bit during __{,de}activate_traps() and hardware clears the
bit once the guest has consumed the virtual-SError.

Future patches may add an API (or KVM CAP) to pend a virtual SError with
a specified ESR.

Cc: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      4715c14b
    • J
      KVM: arm/arm64: mask/unmask daif around VHE guests · 4f5abad9
      由 James Morse 提交于 
      Non-VHE systems take an exception to EL2 in order to world-switch into the
guest. When returning from the guest KVM implicitly restores the DAIF
flags when it returns to the kernel at EL1.

With VHE none of this exception-level jumping happens, so KVMs
world-switch code is exposed to the host kernel's DAIF values, and KVM
spills the guest-exit DAIF values back into the host kernel.
On entry to a guest we have Debug and SError exceptions unmasked, KVM
has switched VBAR but isn't prepared to handle these. On guest exit
Debug exceptions are left disabled once we return to the host and will
stay this way until we enter user space.

Add a helper to mask/unmask DAIF around VHE guests. The unmask can only
happen after the hosts VBAR value has been synchronised by the isb in
__vhe_hyp_call (via kvm_call_hyp()). Masking could be as late as
setting KVMs VBAR value, but is kept here for symmetry.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      4f5abad9
    • J
      arm64: kernel: Prepare for a DISR user · 68ddbf09
      由 James Morse 提交于 
      KVM would like to consume any pending SError (or RAS error) after guest
exit. Today it has to unmask SError and use dsb+isb to synchronise the
CPU. With the RAS extensions we can use ESB to synchronise any pending
SError.

Add the necessary macros to allow DISR to be read and converted to an
ESR.

We clear the DISR register when we enable the RAS cpufeature, and the
kernel has not executed any ESB instructions. Any value we find in DISR
must have belonged to firmware. Executing an ESB instruction is the
only way to update DISR, so we can expect firmware to have handled
any deferred SError. By the same logic we clear DISR in the idle path.
Reviewed-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      68ddbf09