Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 28 6月, 2008 4 次提交
    • N
      Don't try to make md arrays dirty if that is not meaningful. · 1a0fd497
      由 Neil Brown 提交于 
      Arrays personalities such as 'raid0' and 'linear' have no redundancy,
and so marking them as 'clean' or 'dirty' is not meaningful.
So always allow write requests without requiring a superblock update.

Such arrays types are detected by ->sync_request being NULL.  If it is
not possible to send a sync request we don't need a 'dirty' flag because
all a dirty flag does is trigger some sync_requests.
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      1a0fd497
    • N
      Close race in md_probe · f48ed538
      由 Neil Brown 提交于 
      There is a possible race in md_probe.  If two threads call md_probe
for the same device, then one could exit (having checked that
->gendisk exists) before the other has called kobject_init_and_add,
thus returning an incomplete kobj which will cause problems when
we try to add children to it.

So extend the range of protection of disks_mutex slightly to
avoid this possibility.
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      f48ed538
    • N
      Allow setting start point for requested check/repair · 5e96ee65
      由 Neil Brown 提交于 
      This makes it possible to just resync a small part of an array.
e.g. if a drive reports that it has questionable sectors,
a 'repair' of just the region covering those sectors will
cause them to be read and, if there is an error, re-written
with correct data.
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      5e96ee65
    • N
      Fix error paths if md_probe fails. · 9bbbca3a
      由 Neil Brown 提交于 
      md_probe can fail (e.g. alloc_disk could fail) without
returning an error (as it alway returns NULL).
So when we call mddev_find immediately afterwards, we need
to check that md_probe actually succeeded.  This means checking
that mdev->gendisk is non-NULL.

cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      9bbbca3a
  3. 07 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 25 5月, 2008 5 次提交
    • N
      md: restart recovery cleanly after device failure. · dfc70645
      由 NeilBrown 提交于 
      When we get any IO error during a recovery (rebuilding a spare), we abort
the recovery and restart it.

For RAID6 (and multi-drive RAID1) it may not be best to restart at the
beginning: when multiple failures can be tolerated, the recovery may be
able to continue and re-doing all that has already been done doesn't make
sense.

We already have the infrastructure to record where a recovery is up to
and restart from there, but it is not being used properly.
This is because:
  - We sometimes abort with MD_RECOVERY_ERR rather than just MD_RECOVERY_INTR,
    which causes the recovery not be be checkpointed.
  - We remove spares and then re-added them which loses important state
    information.

The distinction between MD_RECOVERY_ERR and MD_RECOVERY_INTR really isn't
needed.  If there is an error, the relevant drive will be marked as
Faulty, and that is enough to ensure correct handling of the error.  So we
first remove MD_RECOVERY_ERR, changing some of the uses of it to
MD_RECOVERY_INTR.

Then we cause the attempt to remove a non-faulty device from an array to
fail (unless recovery is impossible as the array is too degraded).  Then
when remove_and_add_spares attempts to remove the devices on which
recovery can continue, it will fail, they will remain in place, and
recovery will continue on them as desired.

Issue:  If we are halfway through rebuilding a spare and another drive
fails, and a new spare is immediately available,  do we want to:
 1/ complete the current rebuild, then go back and rebuild the new spare or
 2/ restart the rebuild from the start and rebuild both devices in
    parallel.

Both options can be argued for.  The code currently takes option 2 as
  a/ this requires least code change
  b/ this results in a minimally-degraded array in minimal time.

Cc: "Eivind Sarto" <ivan@kasenna.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      dfc70645
    • B
      md: allow parallel resync of md-devices. · 90b08710
      由 Bernd Schubert 提交于 
      In some configurations, a raid6 resync can be limited by CPU speed
(Calculating P and Q and moving data) rather than by device speed.  In
these cases there is nothing to be gained byt serialising resync of arrays
that share a device, and doing the resync in parallel can provide benefit.
 So add a sysfs tunable to flag an array as being allowed to resync in
parallel with other arrays that use (a different part of) the same device.
Signed-off-by: NBernd Schubert <bs@q-leap.de>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      90b08710
    • D
      md: notify userspace on 'stop' events · 4f54b0e9
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      This additional notification to 'array_state' is needed to allow the
monitor application to learn about stop events via sysfs.  The
sysfs_notify("sync_action") call that comes at the end of do_md_stop()
(via md_new_event) is insufficient since the 'sync_action' attribute has
been removed by this point.

(Seems like a sysfs-notify-on-removal patch is a better fix.  Currently
removal updates the event count but does not wake up waiters)
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      4f54b0e9
    • N
      md: notify userspace on 'write-pending' changes to array_state · 09a44cc1
      由 NeilBrown 提交于 
      When an array enters write pending, 'array_state' changes, so we must be
sure to sysfs_notify.

Also, when waiting for user-space to acknowledge 'write-pending' by
marking the metadata as dirty, we don't want to wait for MD_CHANGE_DEVS to
be cleared as that might not happen.  So explicity test for the bits that
we are really interested in.
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      09a44cc1
    • C
      md: kill file_path wrapper · 6bcfd601
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Kill the trivial and rather pointless file_path wrapper around d_path.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6bcfd601
  7. 30 4月, 2008 8 次提交
  9. 29 4月, 2008 2 次提交
  11. 28 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 22 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 20 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 11 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 05 3月, 2008 4 次提交
  21. 15 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  23. 07 2月, 2008 11 次提交