Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
12 个月 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 14 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 03 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 02 5月, 2009 3 次提交
  7. 04 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 02 5月, 2009 2 次提交
    • T
      ext4: Move the ext4_i.h header file into ext4.h · d444c3c3
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      There is no longer a reason for a separate ext4_i.h header file, so
move it into ext4.h just to make life easier for developers to find
the relevant data structures and typedefs.  Should also speed up
compiles slightly, too.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      d444c3c3
    • T
      ext4: Don't avoid using BLOCK_UNINIT block groups in mballoc · 75507efb
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      By avoiding the use of not-yet-used block groups (i.e., block groups
with the BLOCK_UNINIT flag), mballoc had a tendency to create large
files with large non-contiguous gaps.  In addition avoiding the use of
new block groups had a tendency to push regular file data into the
first block group in a flex_bg group, which slows down the speed of
e2fsck pass 2, since it has a tendency to seek much more.  For
example:

               Before Patch                       After Patch
              Time in seconds                   Time in seconds
            Real /  User/  Sys   MB/s      Real /  User/  Sys    MB/s
Pass 1      8.52 / 2.21 / 0.46  20.43      8.84 / 4.97 / 1.11   19.68
Pass 2     21.16 / 1.02 / 1.86  11.30      6.54 / 1.77 / 1.78   36.39
Pass 3      0.01 / 0.00 / 0.00 139.00      0.01 / 0.01 / 0.00  128.90
Pass 4      0.16 / 0.15 / 0.00   0.00      0.17 / 0.17 / 0.00    0.00
Pass 5      2.52 / 1.99 / 0.09   0.79      2.31 / 1.78 / 0.06    0.86
Total      32.40 / 5.11 / 2.49  12.81     17.99 / 8.75 / 2.98   23.01

This was on a sample 80 gig root filesystem which was approximately
50% full.  Note the improved e2fsck pass 2 performance, by over a
factor of 3, due to a decreased number of seeks.  (The total amount of
I/O in pass 2 was unchanged; the layout of the directory blocks was
simply much better from e2fsck's's perspective.)

Other changes as a result of this patch on this sample filesystem:

                             Before Patch    After Patch
# of non-contig files           762             779
# of non-contig directories     571             570
# of BLOCK_UNINIT bg's          307             293
# of INODE_UNINIT bg's          503             503

Out of 640 block groups, of which 333 were in use, this patch caused
an extra 14 block groups to be utilized.  The number of non-contiguous
files did go up slightly, but when measured against the 99.9% of the
files (603,154) which were contiguously allocated, this is pretty
insignificant.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
      75507efb
  11. 26 4月, 2009 2 次提交
  13. 01 5月, 2009 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: ext4_mark_recovery_complete() doesn't need to use lock_super · a63c9eb2
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      The function ext4_mark_recovery_complete() is called from two call
paths: either (a) while mounting the filesystem, in which case there's
no danger of any other CPU calling write_super() until the mount is
completed, and (b) while remounting the filesystem read-write, in
which case the fs core has already locked the superblock.  This also
allows us to take out a very vile unlock_super()/lock_super() pair in
ext4_remount().
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      a63c9eb2
  15. 26 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  17. 01 5月, 2009 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: Avoid races caused by on-line resizing and SMP memory reordering · 8df9675f
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      Ext4's on-line resizing adds a new block group and then, only at the
last step adjusts s_groups_count.  However, it's possible on SMP
systems that another CPU could see the updated the s_group_count and
not see the newly initialized data structures for the just-added block
group.  For this reason, it's important to insert a SMP read barrier
after reading s_groups_count and before reading any (for example) the
new block group descriptors allowed by the increased value of
s_groups_count.

Unfortunately, we rather blatently violate this locking protocol
documented in fs/ext4/resize.c.  Fortunately, (1) on-line resizes
happen relatively rarely, and (2) it seems rare that the filesystem
code will immediately try to use just-added block group before any
memory ordering issues resolve themselves.  So apparently problems
here are relatively hard to hit, since ext3 has been vulnerable to the
same issue for years with no one apparently complaining.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      8df9675f
  19. 02 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  21. 01 5月, 2009 2 次提交
    • T
      ext4: Fix and simplify s_dirt handling · 7234ab2a
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      The s_dirt flag wasn't completely handled correctly, but it didn't
really matter when journalling was enabled.  It turns out that when
ext4 runs without a journal, we don't clear s_dirt in places where we
should have, with the result that the high-level write_super()
function was writing the superblock when it wasn't necessary.

So we fix this by making ext4_commit_super() clear the s_dirt flag,
and removing many of the other places where s_dirt is manipulated.
When journalling is enabled, the s_dirt flag might be left set more
often, but s_dirt really doesn't matter when journalling is enabled.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      7234ab2a
    • T
      ext4: Simplify ext4_commit_super()'s function signature · e2d67052
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      The ext4_commit_super() function took both a struct super_block * and
a struct ext4_super_block *, but the struct ext4_super_block can be
derived from the struct super_block.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      e2d67052
  23. 25 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  25. 28 4月, 2009 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: Fallback to vmalloc if kmalloc can't allocate s_flex_groups array · c5ca7c76
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      For very large filesystems, the s_flex_groups array can get quite big.
For example, a filesystem that can be resized up to 16TB will have
8192 flex groups (assuming the default flex_bg size of 16), so the
array is 96k, which is *very* marginal for kmalloc().  On the other
hand, a 160GB filesystem without the resize_inode feature will only
require 960 bytes.  So we try to allocate the array first using
kmalloc(), and if that fails, we'll try to use vmalloc() instead.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      c5ca7c76
  27. 13 5月, 2009 2 次提交
    • A
      ext4: Mark the unwritten buffer_head as mapped during write_begin · 29fa89d0
      由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于 
      Setting BH_Unwritten buffer_heads as BH_Mapped avoids multiple
(unnecessary) calls to get_block() during the call to the write(2)
system call.  Setting BH_Unwritten buffer heads as BH_Mapped requires
that the writepages() functions can handle BH_Unwritten buffer_heads.

After this commit, things work as follows:

ext4_ext_get_block() returns unmapped, unwritten, buffer head when
called with create = 0 for prealloc space. This makes sure we handle
the read path and non-delayed allocation case correctly.  Even though
the buffer head is marked unmapped we have valid b_blocknr and b_bdev
values in the buffer_head.

ext4_da_get_block_prep() called for block resrevation will now return
mapped, unwritten, new buffer_head for prealloc space. This avoids
multiple calls to get_block() for write to same offset. By making such
buffers as BH_New, we also assure that sub-block zeroing of buffered
writes happens correctly.
Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      29fa89d0
    • A
      vfs: Add BUG_ON for delayed and unwritten flags in submit_bh() · 8fb0e342
      由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于 
      The BH_Delay and BH_Unwritten flags should never leak out to
submit_bh().  So add some BUG_ON() checks to submit_bh so we can get a
stack trace and determine how and why this might have happened.

(Note that only XFS and ext4 use these buffer head flags, and XFS does
not use submit_bh().  So this patch should only modify behavior for
ext4.)
Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
      8fb0e342
  29. 14 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  31. 03 6月, 2009 6 次提交
  33. 02 6月, 2009 9 次提交
  35. 01 6月, 2009 4 次提交