Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 29 10月, 2021 7 次提交
  3. 27 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  5. 24 9月, 2021 2 次提交
  7. 22 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  9. 06 9月, 2021 3 次提交
  11. 30 8月, 2021 2 次提交
  13. 09 8月, 2021 1 次提交
    • L
      devlink: Set device as early as possible · 919d13a7
      由 Leon Romanovsky 提交于 
      All kernel devlink implementations call to devlink_alloc() during
initialization routine for specific device which is used later as
a parent device for devlink_register().

Such late device assignment causes to the situation which requires us to
call to device_register() before setting other parameters, but that call
opens devlink to the world and makes accessible for the netlink users.

Any attempt to move devlink_register() to be the last call generates the
following error due to access to the devlink->dev pointer.

[    8.758862]  devlink_nl_param_fill+0x2e8/0xe50
[    8.760305]  devlink_param_notify+0x6d/0x180
[    8.760435]  __devlink_params_register+0x2f1/0x670
[    8.760558]  devlink_params_register+0x1e/0x20

The simple change of API to set devlink device in the devlink_alloc()
instead of devlink_register() fixes all this above and ensures that
prior to call to devlink_register() everything already set.
Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      919d13a7
  15. 12 2月, 2021 1 次提交
  17. 26 1月, 2021 1 次提交
  19. 20 11月, 2020 2 次提交
    • J
      devlink: move flash end and begin to core devlink · 52cc5f3a
      由 Jacob Keller 提交于 
      When performing a flash update via devlink, device drivers may inform
user space of status updates via
devlink_flash_update_(begin|end|timeout|status)_notify functions.

It is expected that drivers do not send any status notifications unless
they send a begin and end message. If a driver sends a status
notification without sending the appropriate end notification upon
finishing (regardless of success or failure), the current implementation
of the devlink userspace program can get stuck endlessly waiting for the
end notification that will never come.

The current ice driver implementation may send such a status message
without the appropriate end notification in rare cases.

Fixing the ice driver is relatively simple: we just need to send the
begin_notify at the start of the function and always send an end_notify
no matter how the function exits.

Rather than assuming driver authors will always get this right in the
future, lets just fix the API so that it is not possible to get wrong.
Make devlink_flash_update_begin_notify and
devlink_flash_update_end_notify static, and call them in devlink.c core
code. Always send the begin_notify just before calling the driver's
flash_update routine. Always send the end_notify just after the routine
returns regardless of success or failure.

Doing this makes the status notification easier to use from the driver,
as it no longer needs to worry about catching failures and cleaning up
by calling devlink_flash_update_end_notify. It is now no longer possible
to do the wrong thing in this regard. We also save a couple of lines of
code in each driver.
Signed-off-by: NJacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Acked-by: NVasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      52cc5f3a
    • J
      devlink: move request_firmware out of driver · b44cfd4f
      由 Jacob Keller 提交于 
      All drivers which implement the devlink flash update support, with the
exception of netdevsim, use either request_firmware or
request_firmware_direct to locate the firmware file. Rather than having
each driver do this separately as part of its .flash_update
implementation, perform the request_firmware within net/core/devlink.c

Replace the file_name parameter in the struct devlink_flash_update_params
with a pointer to the fw object.

Use request_firmware rather than request_firmware_direct. Although most
Linux distributions today do not have the fallback mechanism
implemented, only about half the drivers used the _direct request, as
compared to the generic request_firmware. In the event that
a distribution does support the fallback mechanism, the devlink flash
update ought to be able to use it to provide the firmware contents. For
distributions which do not support the fallback userspace mechanism,
there should be essentially no difference between request_firmware and
request_firmware_direct.
Signed-off-by: NJacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Acked-by: NShannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Acked-by: NVasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      b44cfd4f
  21. 13 10月, 2020 2 次提交
  23. 26 9月, 2020 2 次提交
    • J
      devlink: convert flash_update to use params structure · bc75c054
      由 Jacob Keller 提交于 
      The devlink core recently gained support for checking whether the driver
supports a flash_update parameter, via `supported_flash_update_params`.
However, parameters are specified as function arguments. Adding a new
parameter still requires modifying the signature of the .flash_update
callback in all drivers.

Convert the .flash_update function to take a new `struct
devlink_flash_update_params` instead. By using this structure, and the
`supported_flash_update_params` bit field, a new parameter to
flash_update can be added without requiring modification to existing
drivers.

As before, all parameters except file_name will require driver opt-in.
Because file_name is a necessary field to for the flash_update to make
sense, no "SUPPORTED" bitflag is provided and it is always considered
valid. All future additional parameters will require a new bit in the
supported_flash_update_params bitfield.
Signed-off-by: NJacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: Bin Luo <luobin9@huawei.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Cc: Danielle Ratson <danieller@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      bc75c054
    • J
      devlink: check flash_update parameter support in net core · 22ec3d23
      由 Jacob Keller 提交于 
      When implementing .flash_update, drivers which do not support
per-component update are manually checking the component parameter to
verify that it is NULL. Without this check, the driver might accept an
update request with a component specified even though it will not honor
such a request.

Instead of having each driver check this, move the logic into
net/core/devlink.c, and use a new `supported_flash_update_params` field
in the devlink_ops. Drivers which will support per-component update must
now specify this by setting DEVLINK_SUPPORT_FLASH_UPDATE_COMPONENT in
the supported_flash_update_params in their devlink_ops.

This helps ensure that drivers do not forget to check for a NULL
component if they do not support per-component update. This also enables
a slightly better error message by enabling the core stack to set the
netlink bad attribute message to indicate precisely the unsupported
attribute in the message.

Going forward, any new additional parameter to flash update will require
a bit in the supported_flash_update_params bitfield.
Signed-off-by: NJacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: Bin Luo <luobin9@huawei.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Cc: Danielle Ratson <danieller@mellanox.com>
Cc: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      22ec3d23
  25. 10 7月, 2020 1 次提交
  27. 23 6月, 2020 1 次提交
  29. 31 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  31. 28 3月, 2020 3 次提交
  33. 27 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  35. 27 1月, 2020 6 次提交
  37. 09 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  39. 11 12月, 2019 1 次提交