Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 03 3月, 2019 1 次提交
    • B
      bpf: Sample HBM BPF program to limit egress bw · 187d0738
      由 brakmo 提交于 
      A cgroup skb BPF program to limit cgroup output bandwidth.
It uses a modified virtual token bucket queue to limit average
egress bandwidth. The implementation uses credits instead of tokens.
Negative credits imply that queueing would have happened (this is
a virtual queue, so no queueing is done by it. However, queueing may
occur at the actual qdisc (which is not used for rate limiting).

This implementation uses 3 thresholds, one to start marking packets and
the other two to drop packets:
                                 CREDIT
       - <--------------------------|------------------------> +
             |    |          |      0
             |  Large pkt    |
             |  drop thresh  |
  Small pkt drop             Mark threshold
      thresh

The effect of marking depends on the type of packet:
a) If the packet is ECN enabled, then the packet is ECN ce marked.
   The current mark threshold is tuned for DCTCP.
c) Else, it is dropped if it is a large packet.

If the credit is below the drop threshold, the packet is dropped.
Note that dropping a packet through the BPF program does not trigger CWR
(Congestion Window Reduction) in TCP packets. A future patch will add
support for triggering CWR.

This BPF program actually uses 2 drop thresholds, one threshold
for larger packets (>= 120 bytes) and another for smaller packets. This
protects smaller packets such as SYNs, ACKs, etc.

The default bandwidth limit is set at 1Gbps but this can be changed by
a user program through a shared BPF map. In addition, by default this BPF
program does not limit connections using loopback. This behavior can be
overwritten by the user program. There is also an option to calculate
some statistics, such as percent of packets marked or dropped, which
the user program can access.

A latter patch provides such a program (hbm.c)
Signed-off-by: NLawrence Brakmo <brakmo@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      187d0738
  3. 02 3月, 2019 1 次提交
    • Y
      samples/bpf: silence compiler warning for xdpsock_user.c · b74e21ab
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      Compiling xdpsock_user.c with 4.8.5, I hit the following
compilation warning:
    HOSTCC  samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.o
  /data/users/yhs/work/net-next/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c: In function ‘main’:
  /data/users/yhs/work/net-next/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c:449:6: warning: ‘idx_cq’ may be used unini
  tialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
    u32 idx_cq, idx_fq;
        ^
  /data/users/yhs/work/net-next/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c:606:7: warning: ‘idx_rx’ may be used unini
  tialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
     u32 idx_rx, idx_tx = 0;
         ^
  /data/users/yhs/work/net-next/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c:506:6: warning: ‘idx_rx’ may be used unini
  tialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
    u32 idx_rx, idx_fq = 0;

As an example, the code pattern looks like:
    u32 idx_cq;
    ...
    ret = xsk_ring_prod__reserve(&xsk->umem->fq, rcvd, &idx_fq);
    if (ret) {
      ...
    }
    ... idx_fq ...
The compiler warns since it does not know whether &idx_fq is assigned
or not inside the library function xsk_ring_prod__reserve().

Let us assign an initial value 0 to such auto variables to silence
compiler warning.

Fixes: 248c7f9c ("samples/bpf: convert xdpsock to use libbpf for AF_XDP access")
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: NJonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      b74e21ab
  5. 01 3月, 2019 3 次提交
  7. 28 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  9. 26 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  11. 22 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  13. 02 2月, 2019 5 次提交
  15. 30 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  17. 27 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  19. 16 1月, 2019 1 次提交
    • Y
      samples/bpf: workaround clang asm goto compilation errors · 6bf3bbe1
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      x86 compilation has required asm goto support since 4.17.
Since clang does not support asm goto, at 4.17,
Commit b1ae32db ("x86/cpufeature: Guard asm_volatile_goto usage
for BPF compilation") worked around the issue by permitting an
alternative implementation without asm goto for clang.

At 5.0, more asm goto usages appeared.
  [yhs@148 x86]$ egrep -r asm_volatile_goto
  include/asm/cpufeature.h:     asm_volatile_goto("1: jmp 6f\n"
  include/asm/jump_label.h:     asm_volatile_goto("1:"
  include/asm/jump_label.h:     asm_volatile_goto("1:"
  include/asm/rmwcc.h:  asm_volatile_goto (fullop "; j" #cc " %l[cc_label]"     \
  include/asm/uaccess.h:        asm_volatile_goto("\n"                          \
  include/asm/uaccess.h:        asm_volatile_goto("\n"                          \
  [yhs@148 x86]$

Compiling samples/bpf directories, most bpf programs failed
compilation with error messages like:
  In file included from /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/samples/bpf/xdp_sample_pkts_kern.c:2:
  In file included from /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/include/linux/ptrace.h:6:
  In file included from /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/include/linux/sched.h:15:
  In file included from /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/include/linux/sem.h:5:
  In file included from /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/include/uapi/linux/sem.h:5:
  In file included from /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/include/linux/ipc.h:9:
  In file included from /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/include/linux/refcount.h:72:
  /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h:70:9: error: 'asm goto' constructs are not supported yet
        return GEN_BINARY_SUFFIXED_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "subl",
               ^
  /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/arch/x86/include/asm/rmwcc.h:67:2: note: expanded from macro 'GEN_BINARY_SUFFIXED_RMWcc'
        __GEN_RMWcc(op " %[val], %[var]\n\t" suffix, var, cc,           \
        ^
  /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/arch/x86/include/asm/rmwcc.h:21:2: note: expanded from macro '__GEN_RMWcc'
        asm_volatile_goto (fullop "; j" #cc " %l[cc_label]"             \
        ^
  /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/include/linux/compiler_types.h:188:37: note: expanded from macro 'asm_volatile_goto'
  #define asm_volatile_goto(x...) asm goto(x)

Most implementation does not even provide an alternative
implementation. And it is also not practical to make changes
for each call site.

This patch workarounded the asm goto issue by redefining the macro like below:
  #define asm_volatile_goto(x...) asm volatile("invalid use of asm_volatile_goto")

If asm_volatile_goto is not used by bpf programs, which is typically the case, nothing bad
will happen. If asm_volatile_goto is used by bpf programs, which is incorrect, the compiler
will issue an error since "invalid use of asm_volatile_goto" is not valid assembly codes.

With this patch, all bpf programs under samples/bpf can pass compilation.

Note that bpf programs under tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ compiled fine as
they do not access kernel internal headers.

Fixes: e769742d ("Revert "x86/jump-labels: Macrofy inline assembly code to work around GCC inlining bugs"")
Fixes: 18fe5822 ("x86, asm: change the GEN_*_RMWcc() macros to not quote the condition")
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      6bf3bbe1
  21. 10 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  23. 08 1月, 2019 2 次提交
  25. 23 12月, 2018 2 次提交
  27. 18 12月, 2018 2 次提交
  29. 12 12月, 2018 1 次提交
    • T
      samples: add an example of seccomp user trap · fec7b669
      由 Tycho Andersen 提交于 
      The idea here is just to give a demonstration of how one could safely use
the SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF feature to do mount policies. This particular
policy is (as noted in the comment) not very interesting, but it serves to
illustrate how one might apply a policy dodging the various TOCTOU issues.
Signed-off-by: NTycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
CC: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
CC: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
CC: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
CC: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
CC: Akihiro Suda <suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      fec7b669
  31. 04 12月, 2018 2 次提交
  33. 01 12月, 2018 3 次提交
  35. 24 11月, 2018 1 次提交
    • D
      samples: bpf: fix: error handling regarding kprobe_events · 5a863813
      由 Daniel T. Lee 提交于 
      Currently, kprobe_events failure won't be handled properly.
Due to calling system() indirectly to write to kprobe_events,
it can't be identified whether an error is derived from kprobe or system.

    // buf = "echo '%c:%s %s' >> /s/k/d/t/kprobe_events"
    err = system(buf);
    if (err < 0) {
        printf("failed to create kprobe ..");
        return -1;
    }

For example, running ./tracex7 sample in ext4 partition,
"echo p:open_ctree open_ctree >> /s/k/d/t/kprobe_events"
gets 256 error code system() failure.
=> The error comes from kprobe, but it's not handled correctly.

According to man of system(3), it's return value
just passes the termination status of the child shell
rather than treating the error as -1. (don't care success)

Which means, currently it's not working as desired.
(According to the upper code snippet)

    ex) running ./tracex7 with ext4 env.
    # Current Output
    sh: echo: I/O error
    failed to open event open_ctree

    # Desired Output
    failed to create kprobe 'open_ctree' error 'No such file or directory'

The problem is, error can't be verified whether from child ps
or system. But using write() directly can verify the command
failure, and it will treat all error as -1. So I suggest using
write() directly to 'kprobe_events' rather than calling system().
Signed-off-by: NDaniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      5a863813
  37. 21 11月, 2018 2 次提交
  39. 08 11月, 2018 1 次提交
  41. 12 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  43. 11 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  45. 04 10月, 2018 1 次提交
    • B
      bpf, tracex3_user: erase "ARRAY_SIZE" redefined · 20cdeb54
      由 Bo YU 提交于 
      There is a warning when compiling bpf sample programs in sample/bpf:

  make -C /home/foo/bpf/samples/bpf/../../tools/lib/bpf/ RM='rm -rf' LDFLAGS= srctree=/home/foo/bpf/samples/bpf/../../ O=
    HOSTCC  /home/foo/bpf/samples/bpf/tracex3_user.o
  /home/foo/bpf/samples/bpf/tracex3_user.c:20:0: warning: "ARRAY_SIZE" redefined
   #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof(*(x)))

  In file included from /home/foo/bpf/samples/bpf/tracex3_user.c:18:0:
  ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h:48:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
   # define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0]))
Signed-off-by: NBo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      20cdeb54
  47. 03 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  49. 01 10月, 2018 1 次提交
    • R
      samples/bpf: extend test_cgrp2_attach2 test to use per-cpu cgroup storage · 5fcbd29b
      由 Roman Gushchin 提交于 
      This commit extends the test_cgrp2_attach2 test to cover per-cpu
cgroup storage. Bpf program will use shared and per-cpu cgroup
storages simultaneously, so a better coverage of corresponding
core code will be achieved.

Expected output:
  $ ./test_cgrp2_attach2
  Attached DROP prog. This ping in cgroup /foo should fail...
  ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
  Attached DROP prog. This ping in cgroup /foo/bar should fail...
  ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
  Attached PASS prog. This ping in cgroup /foo/bar should pass...
  Detached PASS from /foo/bar while DROP is attached to /foo.
  This ping in cgroup /foo/bar should fail...
  ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
  Attached PASS from /foo/bar and detached DROP from /foo.
  This ping in cgroup /foo/bar should pass...
  ### override:PASS
  ### multi:PASS
Signed-off-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      5fcbd29b
  51. 22 9月, 2018 1 次提交
    • P
      samples/bpf: fix compilation failure · 32c00979
      由 Prashant Bhole 提交于 
      following commit:
commit d58e468b ("flow_dissector: implements flow dissector BPF hook")
added struct bpf_flow_keys which conflicts with the struct with
same name in sockex2_kern.c and sockex3_kern.c

similar to commit:
commit 534e0e52 ("samples/bpf: fix a compilation failure")
we tried the rename it "flow_keys" but it also conflicted with struct
having same name in include/net/flow_dissector.h. Hence renaming the
struct to "flow_key_record". Also, this commit doesn't fix the
compilation error completely because the similar struct is present in
sockex3_kern.c. Hence renaming it in both files sockex3_user.c and
sockex3_kern.c
Signed-off-by: NPrashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Acked-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      32c00979
  53. 18 9月, 2018 1 次提交
    • Y
      samples/bpf: fix a compilation failure · 534e0e52
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      samples/bpf build failed with the following errors:

  $ make samples/bpf/
  ...
  HOSTCC  samples/bpf/sockex3_user.o
  /data/users/yhs/work/net-next/samples/bpf/sockex3_user.c:16:8: error: redefinition of ‘struct bpf_flow_keys’
   struct bpf_flow_keys {
          ^
  In file included from /data/users/yhs/work/net-next/samples/bpf/sockex3_user.c:4:0:
  ./usr/include/linux/bpf.h:2338:9: note: originally defined here
    struct bpf_flow_keys *flow_keys;
           ^
  make[3]: *** [samples/bpf/sockex3_user.o] Error 1

Commit d58e468b ("flow_dissector: implements flow dissector BPF hook")
introduced struct bpf_flow_keys in include/uapi/linux/bpf.h and hence
caused the naming conflict with samples/bpf/sockex3_user.c.

The fix is to rename struct bpf_flow_keys in samples/bpf/sockex3_user.c
to flow_keys to avoid the conflict.
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      534e0e52