- 24 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
- 23 6月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Nazarewicz 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
由 Tiezhu Yang 提交于
In the current Documentation/md.txt, the lower limit value of stripe_cache_size is 16 and the default value is 128, but when I update kernel to the latest mainline version and RAID5 array is created by mdadm, then execute the following commands, it shows an error and a difference respectively. 1) set stripe_cache_size to 16 [root@localhost ~]# echo 16 > /sys/block/md0/md/stripe_cache_size bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument 2) read the default value of stripe_cache_size [root@localhost ~]# cat /sys/block/md0/md/stripe_cache_size 256 I read drivers/md/raid5.c and find the following related code: 1) in function 'raid5_set_cache_size': if (size <= 16 || size > 32768) return -EINVAL; 2) #define NR_STRIPES 256 So the lower limit value of stripe_cache_size should be 17 and the default value should be 256. Signed-off-by: NTiezhu Yang <kernelpatch@126.com> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
由 Eric Wheeler 提交于
Signed-off-by: NEric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net> Cc: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
由 Marc MERLIN 提交于
Bcache documentation updates: - Added new HOWTO/COOKBOOK section - fixed a few typos - /sys/block/bcache0/cache_mode is /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/cache_mode Signed-off-by: NMarc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
While there's slight overlap with the DocBook help now, this can stay intact when the DocBook help goes away. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
The modindex is for python modules. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 10 6月, 2016 12 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Let the user specify file patterns where to look for the EXPORT_SYMBOLs in addition to the file with kernel-doc comments. This is directly based on the -export-file FILE option added to kernel-doc in "kernel-doc: add support for specifying extra files for EXPORT_SYMBOLs", but we extend that with globbing patterns in the Sphinx extension. The file patterns are added as options to the :export: and :internal: arguments of the kernel-doc directive. For example, to extract the documentation of exported functions from include/net/mac80211.h: .. kernel-doc:: include/net/mac80211.h :export: net/mac80211/*.c Without the file pattern, no exported functions would be found, as the EXPORT_SYMBOLs are placed in the various source files under net/mac80211. The matched files are also added as dependencies on the document in Sphinx, as they may affect the output. This is one of the reasons to do the globbing in the Sphinx extension instead of in scripts/kernel-doc. The file pattern remains optional, and is not needed if the kernel-doc comments and EXPORT_SYMBOLs are placed in the source file passed in as the main argument to the kernel-doc directive. This is the most common case across the kernel source tree. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Using the default str.split doesn't return empty strings like the current version does. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Leftover cruft. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Scan all input files for EXPORT_SYMBOLs along with the explicitly specified export files before actually parsing anything. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
If the kernel-doc comments for functions are not in the same file as the EXPORT_SYMBOL statements, the -export and -internal output selections do not work as expected. This is typically the case when the kernel-doc comments are in header files next to the function declarations and the EXPORT_SYMBOL statements are next to the function definitions in the source files. Let the user specify additional source files in which to look for the EXPORT_SYMBOLs using the new -export-file FILE option, which may be given multiple times. The pathological example for this is include/net/mac80211.h, which has all the kernel-doc documentation for the exported functions defined in a plethora of source files net/mac80211/*.c. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Reduce duplication in follow-up work. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Since commit 32217761 Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Date: Sun May 29 09:40:44 2016 +0300 kernel-doc: concatenate contents of colliding sections we started getting (more) errors on duplicate section names, especially on the default section name "Description": include/net/mac80211.h:3174: warning: duplicate section name 'Description' This is usually caused by a slightly unorthodox placement of parameter descriptions, like in the above case, and kernel-doc resetting back to the default section more than once within a kernel-doc comment. Ignore warnings on the duplicate section name automatically assigned by kernel-doc, and only consider explicitly user assigned duplicate section names an issue. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jonathan Corbet 提交于
Lots of kerneldoc entries use "example:" or "note:" as section headers. Until such a time as we can make them use proper markup, make them work as intended. Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
The meaning of "leak" can be both "untracked resource allocation" and "memory content disclosure". This document's use was entirely of the latter meaning, so avoid the confusion by using the Common Weakness Enumeration name for this: Information Exposure (CWE-200). Additionally adds a section on structure randomization. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
由 Jonathan Corbet 提交于
Jani Nikula says: Jon, this is v2 of [1] and [2], with a considerable amount of polish and fixes added. We started dogfooding this within drm-intel, and Daniel has reviewed the lot and contributed a number of fixes, most notably accurate file and line number references from Sphinx build errors/warnings to the kernel-doc comments in source code. We believe this is now in good shape for merging for v4.8. It's all in my sphinx-for-docs-next branch that you've already looked at; pull details below. When this lands in docs-next and we can backmerge to drm, we'll plunge ahead and convert gpu.tmpl to rst, and have that ready for v4.8. We think it's best to contribute that via the drm tree, as it'll involve splitting up the documentation and likely numerous updates to kernel-doc comments. I plan to update Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt for Sphinx and rst, obviously converting it to rst while at it.
-
- 04 6月, 2016 7 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Design is pretty simple: kernel-doc inserts breadcrumbs with line numbers, and sphinx picks them up. At first I went with a sphinx comment, but inserting those at random places seriously upsets the parser, and must be filtered. Hence why this version now uses "#define LINEO " since one of these ever escape into output it's pretty clear there is a bug. It seems to work well, and at least the 2-3 errors where sphinx complained about something that was not correct in kernel-doc text the line numbers matched up perfectly. v2: Instead of noodling around in the parser state machine, create a ViewList and parse it ourselves. This seems to be the recommended way, per Jani's suggestion. v3: - Split out ViewList pach. Splitting the kernel-doc changes from the sphinx ones isn't possible, since emitting the LINENO lines wreaks havoc with the rst formatting. We must filter them. - Improve the regex per Jani's suggestions, and compile it just once for speed. - Now that LINENO lines are eaten, also add them to function parameter descriptions. Much less content and offset than for in-line struct member descriptions, but still nice to know which exact continuation line upsets sphinx. - Simplify/clarify the line +/-1 business a bit. v4: Split out the scripts/kernel-doc changes and make line-numbers opt-in, as suggested by Jani. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Opt-in since this wreaks the rst output and must be removed by consumers again. This is useful to adjust the linenumbers for included kernel-doc snippets in shinx. With that sphinx error message will be accurate when there's issues with the rst-ness of the kernel-doc comments. Especially when transitioning a new docbook .tmpl to .rst this is extremely useful, since you can just use your editors compilation quickfix list to accurately jump from error to error. v2: - Also make sure that we filter the LINENO for purpose/at declaration start so it only shows for selected blocks, not all of them (Jani). While at it make it a notch more accurate. - Avoid undefined $lineno issues. I tried filtering these out at the callsite, but Jani spotted more when linting the entire kernel. Unamed unions and similar things aren't stored consistently and end up with an undefined line number (but also no kernel-doc text, just the parameter type). Simplify things and filter undefined line numbers in print_lineno() to catch them all. v3: Fix LINENO 0 issue for kernel-doc comments without @param: lines or any other special sections that directly jump to the description after the "name - purpose" line. Only really possible for functions without parameters. Noticed by Jani. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Niklas Söderlund 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNiklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
由 Andy Deng 提交于
Chinese version CodingStyle is a little outdate, it should be updated. This patch sync with the latest CodingStyle of all changes, new chapters (chapter 19 and chapter 20) have been translated. Signed-off-by: NAndy Deng <theandy.deng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
由 Brian Norris 提交于
It took me browsing through the source code to determine that I was, indeed, using the wrong delimiter in my command lines. So I might as well document it for the next person. Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
由 Mike Danese 提交于
The compilation emits a warning in function ‘snprintf’, inlined from ‘set_cmdline’ at ../Documentation/mic/mpssd/mpssd.c:1541:9: /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:64:10: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer This was introduced in commit f4a66c20 ("misc: mic: Update MIC host daemon with COSM changes") and is fixed by reverting the changes to the size argument of these snprintf statements. Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMike Danese <mikedanese@google.com> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
由 Javier Martinez Canillas 提交于
There are two sentences in the Sync File documentation where the english is a little off. This patch is an attempt to fix these. Signed-off-by: NJavier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> Reviewed-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
- 03 6月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
state3 = prototype parsing, so name them accordingly. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Instead of just forcefully inserting our kernel-doc input and letting the state machine stumble over it the recommended way is to create ViewList, parse that and then return the list of parsed nodes. Suggested by Jani. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Further up in the state machinery we switch from STATE_NAME to STATE_DOCBLOCK when we match /$doc_block/. Which means this block of code here is entirely unreachable, unless there are multiple DOC: sections within a single kernel-doc comment. Getting a list of all the files with more than one DOC: section using $ git grep -c " * DOC:" | grep -v ":1$" and then doing a full audit of them reveals there are no such comment blocks in the kernel. Supporting multiple DOC: sections in a single kernel-doc comment does not seem like a recommended way of doing things anyway, so nuke the code for simplicity. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> [Jani: amended the commit message] Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 01 6月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
With this error output becomes almost readable. The line numbers are still totally bonghits, but that's a lot harder to pull out of kerneldoc. We'd essentially have to insert some special markers in the kernel-doc output, split the output along these markers and then insert each block separately using state_machine.insert_input(block, source, first_line) Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Reconcile differences between python2 and python3 on dealing with stdout, stderr from Popen. This fixes "name 'unicode' is not defined" errors on python3. We'll need to try to keep the extension working on both python-sphinx and python3-sphinx so we don't need two copies. Reported-and-tested-by: NMarius Vlad <marius.c.vlad@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2016 9 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
If the documentation comment does not have params or sections, the section heading may leak from the previous documentation comment. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
If there are multiple sections with the same section name, the current implementation results in several sections by the same heading, with the content duplicated from the last section to all. Even if there's the error message, a more graceful approach is to combine all the identically named sections into one, with concatenated contents. With the supported sections already limited to select few, there are massively fewer collisions than there used to be, but this is still useful for e.g. when function parameters are documented in the middle of a documentation comment, with description spread out above and below. (This is not a recommended documentation style, but used in the kernel nonetheless.) We can now also demote the error to a warning. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
kernel-doc currently identifies anything matching "section header:" (specifically a string of word characters and spaces followed by a colon) as a new section in the documentation comment, and renders the section header accordingly. Unfortunately, this turns all uses of colon into sections, mostly unintentionally. Considering the output, erroneously creating sections when not intended is always worse than erroneously not creating sections when intended. For example, a line with "http://example.com" turns into a "http" heading followed by "//example.com" in normal text style, which is quite ugly. OTOH, "WARNING: Beware of the Leopard" is just fine even if "WARNING" does not turn into a heading. It is virtually impossible to change all the kernel-doc comments, either way. The compromise is to pick the most commonly used and depended on section headers (with variants) and accept them as section headers. The accepted section headers are, case insensitive: * description: * context: * return: * returns: Additionally, case sensitive: * @return: All of the above are commonly used in the kernel-doc comments, and will result in worse output if not identified as section headers. Also, kernel-doc already has some special handling for all of them, so there's nothing particularly controversial in adding more special treatment for them. While at it, improve the whitespace handling surrounding section names. Do not consider the whitespace as part of the name. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Yes, for our purposes the type should contain typedef. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
The latter isn't special to rst. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
If a param description spans multiple lines, check any leading whitespace in the first continuation line, and remove same amount of whitespace from following lines. This allows indentation in the multi-line parameter descriptions for aesthetical reasons while not causing accidentally significant indentation in the rst output. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Handle whitespace on the first line of param text as if it was the empty string. There is no need to add the newline in this case. This improves the rst output in particular, where blank lines may be problematic in parameter lists. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Move away from field lists, and simply use **strong emphasis** for section headings on lines of their own. Do not use rst section headings, because their nesting depth depends on the surrounding context, which kernel-doc has no knowledge of. Also, they do not need to end up in any table of contexts or indexes. There are two related immediate benefits. Field lists are typically rendered in two columns, while the new style uses the horizontal width better. With no extra indent on the left, there's no need to be as fussy about it. Field lists are more susceptible to indentation problems than the new style. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
The inline member markup allows whitespace lines before the actual documentation starts. Strip the leading blank lines. This improves the rst output. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-