Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 25 7月, 2020 11 次提交
  3. 22 7月, 2020 1 次提交
  5. 20 7月, 2020 8 次提交
  7. 18 7月, 2020 4 次提交
  9. 14 7月, 2020 1 次提交
  11. 08 7月, 2020 1 次提交
    • D
      ipv6: Fix use of anycast address with loopback · aea23c32
      由 David Ahern 提交于 
      Thomas reported a regression with IPv6 and anycast using the following
reproducer:

    echo 1 >  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding
    ip -6 a add fc12::1/16 dev lo
    sleep 2
    echo "pinging lo"
    ping6 -c 2 fc12::

The conversion of addrconf_f6i_alloc to use ip6_route_info_create missed
the use of fib6_is_reject which checks addresses added to the loopback
interface and sets the REJECT flag as needed. Update fib6_is_reject for
loopback checks to handle RTF_ANYCAST addresses.

Fixes: c7a1ce39 ("ipv6: Change addrconf_f6i_alloc to use ip6_route_info_create")
Reported-by: thomas.gambier@nexedi.com
Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      aea23c32
  13. 07 7月, 2020 2 次提交
    • D
      ipv6: fib6_select_path can not use out path for nexthop objects · 34fe5a1c
      由 David Ahern 提交于 
      Brian reported a crash in IPv6 code when using rpfilter with a setup
running FRR and external nexthop objects. The root cause of the crash
is fib6_select_path setting fib6_nh in the result to NULL because of
an improper check for nexthop objects.

More specifically, rpfilter invokes ip6_route_lookup with flowi6_oif
set causing fib6_select_path to be called with have_oif_match set.
fib6_select_path has early check on have_oif_match and jumps to the
out label which presumes a builtin fib6_nh. This path is invalid for
nexthop objects; for external nexthops fib6_select_path needs to just
return if the fib6_nh has already been set in the result otherwise it
returns after the call to nexthop_path_fib6_result. Update the check
on have_oif_match to not bail on external nexthops.

Update selftests for this problem.

Fixes: f88d8ea6 ("ipv6: Plumb support for nexthop object in a fib6_info")
Reported-by: NBrian Rak <brak@choopa.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      34fe5a1c
    • A
      Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones: IPv* · 7a6498eb
      由 Alexander A. Klimov 提交于 
      Rationale:
Reduces attack surface on kernel devs opening the links for MITM
as HTTPS traffic is much harder to manipulate.

Deterministic algorithm:
For each file:
  If not .svg:
    For each line:
      If doesn't contain `\bxmlns\b`:
        For each link, `\bhttp://[^# \t\r\n]*(?:\w|/)`:
          If both the HTTP and HTTPS versions
          return 200 OK and serve the same content:
            Replace HTTP with HTTPS.
Signed-off-by: NAlexander A. Klimov <grandmaster@al2klimov.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7a6498eb
  15. 04 7月, 2020 1 次提交
  17. 02 7月, 2020 1 次提交
    • W
      ip: Fix SO_MARK in RST, ACK and ICMP packets · 0da7536f
      由 Willem de Bruijn 提交于 
      When no full socket is available, skbs are sent over a per-netns
control socket. Its sk_mark is temporarily adjusted to match that
of the real (request or timewait) socket or to reflect an incoming
skb, so that the outgoing skb inherits this in __ip_make_skb.

Introduction of the socket cookie mark field broke this. Now the
skb is set through the cookie and cork:

<caller>		# init sockc.mark from sk_mark or cmsg
ip_append_data
  ip_setup_cork		# convert sockc.mark to cork mark
ip_push_pending_frames
  ip_finish_skb
    __ip_make_skb	# set skb->mark to cork mark

But I missed these special control sockets. Update all callers of
__ip(6)_make_skb that were originally missed.

For IPv6, the same two icmp(v6) paths are affected. The third
case is not, as commit 92e55f41 ("tcp: don't annotate
mark on control socket from tcp_v6_send_response()") replaced
the ctl_sk->sk_mark with passing the mark field directly as a
function argument. That commit predates the commit that
introduced the bug.

Fixes: c6af0c22 ("ip: support SO_MARK cmsg")
Signed-off-by: NWillem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Reported-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      0da7536f
  19. 01 7月, 2020 4 次提交
  21. 25 6月, 2020 3 次提交
  23. 24 6月, 2020 3 次提交
    • G
      net: ipv6: Use struct_size() helper and kcalloc() · 6f393457
      由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于 
      Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version
in order to avoid any potential type mistakes. Also, remove unnecessary
function ipv6_rpl_srh_alloc_size() and replace kzalloc() with kcalloc(),
which has a 2-factor argument form for multiplication.

This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle and, audited and
fixed manually.
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6f393457
    • E
      udp: move gro declarations to net/udp.h · 6db69328
      由 Eric Dumazet 提交于 
      This removes following warnings :
  CC      net/ipv4/udp_offload.o
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c:504:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'udp4_gro_receive' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
  504 | struct sk_buff *udp4_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb)
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c:584:29: warning: no previous prototype for 'udp4_gro_complete' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
  584 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int udp4_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff)
      |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  CHECK   net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:115:16: warning: symbol 'udp6_gro_receive' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:148:29: warning: symbol 'udp6_gro_complete' was not declared. Should it be static?
  CC      net/ipv6/udp_offload.o
net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:115:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'udp6_gro_receive' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
  115 | struct sk_buff *udp6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb)
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:148:29: warning: no previous prototype for 'udp6_gro_complete' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
  148 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int udp6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff)
      |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6db69328
    • E
      net: move tcp gro declarations to net/tcp.h · 5521d95e
      由 Eric Dumazet 提交于 
      This patch removes following (C=1 W=1) warnings for CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y :

net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c:306:16: warning: symbol 'tcp4_gro_receive' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c:306:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'tcp4_gro_receive' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c:319:29: warning: symbol 'tcp4_gro_complete' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c:319:29: warning: no previous prototype for 'tcp4_gro_complete' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
  CHECK   net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c
net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c:16:16: warning: symbol 'tcp6_gro_receive' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c:29:29: warning: symbol 'tcp6_gro_complete' was not declared. Should it be static?
  CC      net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.o
net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c:16:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'tcp6_gro_receive' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   16 | struct sk_buff *tcp6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb)
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c:29:29: warning: no previous prototype for 'tcp6_gro_complete' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   29 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int tcp6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int thoff)
      |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5521d95e