- 06 12月, 2022 4 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have a bunch of printk helpers that are in ctree.h. These have nothing to do with ctree.c, so move them into their own header. Subsequent patches will cleanup the printk helpers. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
For Btrfs RAID56, we have a caching system for btrfs raid bios (rbio). We call cache_rbio_pages() to mark a qualified rbio ready for cache. The timing happens at: - finish_rmw() At this timing, we have already read all necessary sectors, along with the rbio sectors, we have covered all data stripes. - __raid_recover_end_io() At this timing, we have rebuild the rbio, thus all data sectors involved (either from stripe or bio list) are uptodate now. Thus at the timing of cache_rbio_pages(), we should have all data sectors uptodate. This patch will make it explicit that all data sectors are uptodate at cache_rbio_pages() timing, mostly to prepare for the incoming verification at RMW time. This patch will add: - Extra ASSERT()s in cache_rbio_pages() This is to make sure all data sectors, which are not covered by bio, are already uptodate. - Extra ASSERT()s in steal_rbio() Since only cached rbio can be stolen, thus every data sector should already be uptodate in the source rbio. - Update __raid_recover_end_io() to update recovered sector->uptodate Previously __raid_recover_end_io() will only mark failed sectors uptodate if it's doing an RMW. But this can trigger new ASSERT()s, as for recovery case, a recovered failed sector will not be marked uptodate, and trigger ASSERT() in later cache_rbio_pages() call. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Currently inside alloc_rbio(), we allocate a larger memory to contain the following members: - struct btrfs_raid_rbio itself - stripe_pages array - bio_sectors array - stripe_sectors array - finish_pointers array Then update rbio pointers to point the extra space after the rbio structure itself. Thus it introduced a complex CONSUME_ALLOC() macro to help the thing. This is too hacky, and is going to make later pointers expansion harder. This patch will change it to use regular kcalloc() for each pointer inside btrfs_raid_bio, making the later expansion much easier. And introduce a helper free_raid_bio_pointers() to free up all the pointer members in btrfs_raid_bio, which will be used in both free_raid_bio() and error path of alloc_rbio(). Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The cleanup involves two things: - Remove the "__" prefix There is no naming confliction. - Remove the forward declaration There is no special function call involved. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 24 10月, 2022 2 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Currently if full_stripe_write() failed to allocate the pages for parity, it will call __free_raid_bio() first, then return -ENOMEM. But some caller of full_stripe_write() will also call __free_raid_bio() again, this would cause double freeing. And it's not a logically sound either, normally we should either free the memory at the same level where we allocated it, or let endio to handle everything. So this patch will solve the double freeing by make raid56_parity_write() to handle the error and free the rbio. Just like what we do in raid56_parity_recover(). Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
In raid56_alloc_missing_rbio(), if we can not determine where the missing device is inside the full stripe, we just BUG_ON(). This is not necessary especially the only caller inside scrub.c is already properly checking the return value, and will treat it as a memory allocation failure. Fix the error handling by: - Add an extra warning for the reason Although personally speaking it may be better to be an ASSERT(). - Properly free the allocated rbio Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 26 9月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The parity raid write/recover functionality is currently not very well abstracted from the bio submission and completion handling in volumes.c: - the raid56 code directly completes the original btrfs_bio fed into btrfs_submit_bio instead of dispatching back to volumes.c - the raid56 code consumes the bioc and bio_counter references taken by volumes.c, which also leads to special casing of the calls from the scrub code into the raid56 code To fix this up supply a bi_end_io handler that calls back into the volumes.c machinery, which then puts the bioc, decrements the bio_counter and completes the original bio, and updates the scrub code to also take ownership of the bioc and bio_counter in all cases. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Tested-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 25 7月, 2022 18 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Transfer the bio counter reference acquired by btrfs_submit_bio to raid56_parity_write and raid56_parity_recovery together with the bio that the reference was acquired for instead of acquiring another reference in those helpers and dropping the original one in btrfs_submit_bio. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Always consume the bio and call the end_io handler on error instead of returning an error and letting the caller handle it. This matches what the block layer submission does and avoids any confusion on who needs to handle errors. Also use the proper bool type for the generic_io argument. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Always consume the bio and call the end_io handler on error instead of returning an error and letting the caller handle it. This matches what the block layer submission does and avoids any confusion on who needs to handle errors. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The raid56 code assumes a fixed stripe length BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN but there are functions passing it as arguments, this is not necessary. The fixed value has been used for a long time and though the stripe length should be configurable by super block member stripesize, this hasn't been implemented and would require more changes so we don't need to keep this code around until then. Partially based on a patch from Qu Wenruo. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> [ update changelog ] Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
[BUG] There is a small workload which will always fail with recent kernel: (A simplified version from btrfs/125 test case) mkfs.btrfs -f -m raid5 -d raid5 -b 1G $dev1 $dev2 $dev3 mount $dev1 $mnt xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xee 0 1M" $mnt/file1 sync umount $mnt btrfs dev scan -u $dev3 mount -o degraded $dev1 $mnt xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xff 0 128M" $mnt/file2 umount $mnt btrfs dev scan mount $dev1 $mnt btrfs balance start --full-balance $mnt umount $mnt The failure is always failed to read some tree blocks: BTRFS info (device dm-4): relocating block group 217710592 flags data|raid5 BTRFS error (device dm-4): parent transid verify failed on 38993920 wanted 9 found 7 BTRFS error (device dm-4): parent transid verify failed on 38993920 wanted 9 found 7 ... [CAUSE] With the recently added debug output, we can see all RAID56 operations related to full stripe 38928384: 56.1183: raid56_read_partial: full_stripe=38928384 devid=2 type=DATA1 offset=0 opf=0x0 physical=9502720 len=65536 56.1185: raid56_read_partial: full_stripe=38928384 devid=3 type=DATA2 offset=16384 opf=0x0 physical=9519104 len=16384 56.1185: raid56_read_partial: full_stripe=38928384 devid=3 type=DATA2 offset=49152 opf=0x0 physical=9551872 len=16384 56.1187: raid56_write_stripe: full_stripe=38928384 devid=3 type=DATA2 offset=0 opf=0x1 physical=9502720 len=16384 56.1188: raid56_write_stripe: full_stripe=38928384 devid=3 type=DATA2 offset=32768 opf=0x1 physical=9535488 len=16384 56.1188: raid56_write_stripe: full_stripe=38928384 devid=1 type=PQ1 offset=0 opf=0x1 physical=30474240 len=16384 56.1189: raid56_write_stripe: full_stripe=38928384 devid=1 type=PQ1 offset=32768 opf=0x1 physical=30507008 len=16384 56.1218: raid56_write_stripe: full_stripe=38928384 devid=3 type=DATA2 offset=49152 opf=0x1 physical=9551872 len=16384 56.1219: raid56_write_stripe: full_stripe=38928384 devid=1 type=PQ1 offset=49152 opf=0x1 physical=30523392 len=16384 56.2721: raid56_parity_recover: full stripe=38928384 eb=39010304 mirror=2 56.2723: raid56_parity_recover: full stripe=38928384 eb=39010304 mirror=2 56.2724: raid56_parity_recover: full stripe=38928384 eb=39010304 mirror=2 Before we enter raid56_parity_recover(), we have triggered some metadata write for the full stripe 38928384, this leads to us to read all the sectors from disk. Furthermore, btrfs raid56 write will cache its calculated P/Q sectors to avoid unnecessary read. This means, for that full stripe, after any partial write, we will have stale data, along with P/Q calculated using that stale data. Thankfully due to patch "btrfs: only write the sectors in the vertical stripe which has data stripes" we haven't submitted all the corrupted P/Q to disk. When we really need to recover certain range, aka in raid56_parity_recover(), we will use the cached rbio, along with its cached sectors (the full stripe is all cached). This explains why we have no event raid56_scrub_read_recover() triggered. Since we have the cached P/Q which is calculated using the stale data, the recovered one will just be stale. In our particular test case, it will always return the same incorrect metadata, thus causing the same error message "parent transid verify failed on 39010304 wanted 9 found 7" again and again. [BTRFS DESTRUCTIVE RMW PROBLEM] Test case btrfs/125 (and above workload) always has its trouble with the destructive read-modify-write (RMW) cycle: 0 32K 64K Data1: | Good | Good | Data2: | Bad | Bad | Parity: | Good | Good | In above case, if we trigger any write into Data1, we will use the bad data in Data2 to re-generate parity, killing the only chance to recovery Data2, thus Data2 is lost forever. This destructive RMW cycle is not specific to btrfs RAID56, but there are some btrfs specific behaviors making the case even worse: - Btrfs will cache sectors for unrelated vertical stripes. In above example, if we're only writing into 0~32K range, btrfs will still read data range (32K ~ 64K) of Data1, and (64K~128K) of Data2. This behavior is to cache sectors for later update. Incidentally commit d4e28d9b ("btrfs: raid56: make steal_rbio() subpage compatible") has a bug which makes RAID56 to never trust the cached sectors, thus slightly improve the situation for recovery. Unfortunately, follow up fix "btrfs: update stripe_sectors::uptodate in steal_rbio" will revert the behavior back to the old one. - Btrfs raid56 partial write will update all P/Q sectors and cache them This means, even if data at (64K ~ 96K) of Data2 is free space, and only (96K ~ 128K) of Data2 is really stale data. And we write into that (96K ~ 128K), we will update all the parity sectors for the full stripe. This unnecessary behavior will completely kill the chance of recovery. Thankfully, an unrelated optimization "btrfs: only write the sectors in the vertical stripe which has data stripes" will prevent submitting the write bio for untouched vertical sectors. That optimization will keep the on-disk P/Q untouched for a chance for later recovery. [FIX] Although we have no good way to completely fix the destructive RMW (unless we go full scrub for each partial write), we can still limit the damage. With patch "btrfs: only write the sectors in the vertical stripe which has data stripes" now we won't really submit the P/Q of unrelated vertical stripes, so the on-disk P/Q should still be fine. Now we really need to do is just drop all the cached sectors when doing recovery. By this, we have a chance to read the original P/Q from disk, and have a chance to recover the stale data, while still keep the cache to speed up regular write path. In fact, just dropping all the cache for recovery path is good enough to allow the test case btrfs/125 along with the small script to pass reliably. The lack of metadata write after the degraded mount, and forced metadata COW is saving us this time. So this patch will fix the behavior by not trust any cache in __raid56_parity_recover(), to solve the problem while still keep the cache useful. But please note that this test pass DOES NOT mean we have solved the destructive RMW problem, we just do better damage control a little better. Related patches: - btrfs: only write the sectors in the vertical stripe - d4e28d9b ("btrfs: raid56: make steal_rbio() subpage compatible") - btrfs: update stripe_sectors::uptodate in steal_rbio Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Use the raid table instead of hard coded values and rename the helper as it is exported. This could make later extension on RAID56 based profiles easier. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Originally it's iterating all the sectors which has dbitmap sector for the vertical stripe. It can be easily converted to sector bytenr iteration with an test_bit() call. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
This function doesn't even utilize full stripe skip, just iterate all the data sectors is definitely enough. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The double loop is just checking if the page for the vertical stripe is allocated. We can easily convert it to single loop and get rid of @stripe variable. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The double for loop can be easily converted to single for loop as we're really iterating the sectors in their bytenr order. The only exception is the full stripe skip, however that can also easily be done inside the loop. Add an ASSERT() along with a comment for that specific case. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
We can easily calculate the stripe number and sector number inside the stripe. Thus there is not much need for a double for loop. For the only case we want to skip the whole stripe, we can manually increase @total_sector_nr. This is not a recommended behavior, thus every time the iterator gets modified there will be a comment along with an ASSERT() for it. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
All the bios that index_one_bio operates on are the bios submitted by the upper layer. These are never resubmitted to an actual device by the raid56 code, and thus the iter never changes from the initial state. Thus we can always just use bi_iter directly as it will be the same as the saved copy. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Instead of attaching an extra allocation an indirect call to each low-level bio issued by the RAID code, add a work_struct to struct btrfs_raid_bio and only defer the per-rbio completion action. The per-bio action for all the I/Os are trivial and can be safely done from interrupt context. As a nice side effect this also allows sharing the boilerplate code for the per-bio completions Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Add tracepoint for better insight to how the RAID56 data are submitted. The output looks like this: (trace event header and UUID skipped) raid56_read_partial: full_stripe=389152768 devid=3 type=DATA1 offset=32768 opf=0x0 physical=323059712 len=32768 raid56_read_partial: full_stripe=389152768 devid=1 type=DATA2 offset=0 opf=0x0 physical=67174400 len=65536 raid56_write_stripe: full_stripe=389152768 devid=3 type=DATA1 offset=0 opf=0x1 physical=323026944 len=32768 raid56_write_stripe: full_stripe=389152768 devid=2 type=PQ1 offset=0 opf=0x1 physical=323026944 len=32768 The above debug output is from a 32K data write into an empty RAID56 data chunk. Some explanation on the event output: full_stripe: the logical bytenr of the full stripe devid: btrfs devid type: raid stripe type. DATA1: the first data stripe DATA2: the second data stripe PQ1: the P stripe PQ2: the Q stripe offset: the offset inside the stripe. opf: the bio op type physical: the physical offset the bio is for len: the length of the bio The first two lines are from partial RMW read, which is reading the remaining data stripes from disks. The last two lines are for full stripe RMW write, which is writing the involved two 16K stripes (one for DATA1 stripe, one for P stripe). The stripe for DATA2 doesn't need to be written. There are 5 types of trace events: - raid56_read_partial Read remaining data for regular read/write path. - raid56_write_stripe Write the modified stripes for regular read/write path. - raid56_scrub_read_recover Read remaining data for scrub recovery path. - raid56_scrub_write_stripe Write the modified stripes for scrub path. - raid56_scrub_read Read remaining data for scrub path. Also, since the trace events are included at super.c, we have to export needed structure definitions to 'raid56.h' and include the header in super.c, or we're unable to access those members. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ reformat comments ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
[BUG] With added debugging, it turns out the following write sequence would cause extra read which is unnecessary: # xfs_io -f -s -c "pwrite -b 32k 0 32k" -c "pwrite -b 32k 32k 32k" \ -c "pwrite -b 32k 64k 32k" -c "pwrite -b 32k 96k 32k" \ $mnt/file The debug message looks like this (btrfs header skipped): partial rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x0 devid=3 type=1 offset=32768 physical=323059712 len=32768 partial rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x0 devid=1 type=2 offset=0 physical=67174400 len=65536 full stripe rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x1 devid=3 type=1 offset=0 physical=323026944 len=32768 full stripe rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x1 devid=2 type=-1 offset=0 physical=323026944 len=32768 partial rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x0 devid=1 type=1 offset=32768 physical=22052864 len=32768 partial rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x0 devid=2 type=2 offset=0 physical=277872640 len=65536 full stripe rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x1 devid=1 type=1 offset=0 physical=22020096 len=32768 full stripe rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x1 devid=3 type=-1 offset=0 physical=277872640 len=32768 partial rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x0 devid=3 type=1 offset=0 physical=323026944 len=32768 partial rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x0 devid=1 type=2 offset=0 physical=67174400 len=65536 ^^^^ Still partial read, even 389152768 is already cached by the first. write. full stripe rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x1 devid=3 type=1 offset=32768 physical=323059712 len=32768 full stripe rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x1 devid=2 type=-1 offset=32768 physical=323059712 len=32768 partial rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x0 devid=1 type=1 offset=0 physical=22020096 len=32768 partial rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x0 devid=2 type=2 offset=0 physical=277872640 len=65536 ^^^^ Still partial read for 298844160. full stripe rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x1 devid=1 type=1 offset=32768 physical=22052864 len=32768 full stripe rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x1 devid=3 type=-1 offset=32768 physical=277905408 len=32768 This means every 32K writes, even they are in the same full stripe, still trigger read for previously cached data. This would cause extra RAID56 IO, making the btrfs raid56 cache useless. [CAUSE] Commit d4e28d9b ("btrfs: raid56: make steal_rbio() subpage compatible") tries to make steal_rbio() subpage compatible, but during that conversion, there is one thing missing. We no longer rely on PageUptodate(rbio->stripe_pages[i]), but rbio->stripe_nsectors[i].uptodate to determine if a sector is uptodate. This means, previously if we switch the pointer, everything is done, as the PageUptodate flag is still bound to that page. But now we have to manually mark the involved sectors uptodate, or later raid56_rmw_stripe() will find the stolen sector is not uptodate, and assemble the read bio for it, wasting IO. [FIX] We can easily fix the bug, by also update the rbio->stripe_sectors[].uptodate in steal_rbio(). With this fixed, now the same write pattern no longer leads to the same unnecessary read: partial rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x0 devid=3 type=1 offset=32768 physical=323059712 len=32768 partial rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x0 devid=1 type=2 offset=0 physical=67174400 len=65536 full stripe rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x1 devid=3 type=1 offset=0 physical=323026944 len=32768 full stripe rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x1 devid=2 type=-1 offset=0 physical=323026944 len=32768 partial rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x0 devid=1 type=1 offset=32768 physical=22052864 len=32768 partial rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x0 devid=2 type=2 offset=0 physical=277872640 len=65536 full stripe rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x1 devid=1 type=1 offset=0 physical=22020096 len=32768 full stripe rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x1 devid=3 type=-1 offset=0 physical=277872640 len=32768 ^^^ No more partial read, directly into the write path. full stripe rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x1 devid=3 type=1 offset=32768 physical=323059712 len=32768 full stripe rmw, full stripe=389152768 opf=0x1 devid=2 type=-1 offset=32768 physical=323059712 len=32768 full stripe rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x1 devid=1 type=1 offset=32768 physical=22052864 len=32768 full stripe rmw, full stripe=298844160 opf=0x1 devid=3 type=-1 offset=32768 physical=277905408 len=32768 Fixes: d4e28d9b ("btrfs: raid56: make steal_rbio() subpage compatible") Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
If we have only 8K partial write at the beginning of a full RAID56 stripe, we will write the following contents: 0 8K 32K 64K Disk 1 (data): |XX| | | Disk 2 (data): | | | Disk 3 (parity): |XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX|XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX| |X| means the sector will be written back to disk. Note that, although we won't write any sectors from disk 2, but we will write the full 64KiB of parity to disk. This behavior is fine for now, but not for the future (especially for RAID56J, as we waste quite some space to journal the unused parity stripes). So here we will also utilize the btrfs_raid_bio::dbitmap, anytime we queue a higher level bio into an rbio, we will update rbio::dbitmap to indicate which vertical stripes we need to writeback. And at finish_rmw(), we also check dbitmap to see if we need to write any sector in the vertical stripe. So after the patch, above example will only lead to the following writeback pattern: 0 8K 32K 64K Disk 1 (data): |XX| | | Disk 2 (data): | | | Disk 3 (parity): |XX| | | Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Previsouly we use "unsigned long *" for those two bitmaps. But since we only support fixed stripe length (64KiB, already checked in tree-checker), "unsigned long *" is really a waste of memory, while we can just use "unsigned long". This saves us 8 bytes in total for btrfs_raid_bio. To be extra safe, add an ASSERT() making sure calculated @stripe_nsectors is always smaller than BITS_PER_LONG. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Codespell has found a few typos. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 15 7月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bart Van Assche 提交于
Improve static type checking by using the enum req_op type for variables that represent a request operation and the new blk_opf_t type for variables that represent request flags. Acked-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NBart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220714180729.1065367-51-bvanassche@acm.orgSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
- 16 5月, 2022 14 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
rmw_workers doesn't need ordered execution or thread disabling threshold (as the thresh parameter is less than DFT_THRESHOLD). Just switch to the normal workqueues that use a lot less resources, especially in the work_struct vs btrfs_work structures. Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Now the btrfs RAID56 infrastructure has migrated to use sector_ptr interface, it should be safe to enable subpage support for RAID56. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The non-compatible part is only the bitmap iteration part, now the bitmap size is extended to rbio::stripe_nsectors, not the old rbio::stripe_npages. Since we're here, also slightly improve the function by: - Rename @i to @stripe - Rename @bit to @sectornr - Move @page and @index into the inner loop Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Function steal_rbio() will take all the uptodate pages from the source rbio to destination rbio. With the new stripe_sectors[] array, we also need to do the extra check: - Check sector::flags to make sure the full page is uptodate Now we don't use PageUptodate flag for subpage cases to indicate if the page is uptodate. Instead we need to check all the sectors belong to the page to be sure about whether it's full page uptodate. So here we introduce a new helper, full_page_sectors_uptodate() to do the check. - Update rbio::stripe_sectors[] to use the new page pointer We only need to change the page pointer, no need to change anything else. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Unlike previous code, we can not directly set PageUptodate for stripe pages now. Instead we have to iterate through all the sectors and set SECTOR_UPTODATE flag there. Introduce a new helper find_stripe_sector(), to do the work. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The functionality is completely replaced by the new bio_sectors member, now it's time to remove the old member. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
This requires one extra parameter @pgoff for the function. In the current code base, scrub is still one page per sector, thus the new parameter will always be 0. It needs the extra subpage scrub optimization code to fully take advantage. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
There is only one caller for that helper now, and we're definitely fine to open-code it. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
With this function converted to subpage compatible sector interfaces, the following helper functions can be removed: - rbio_stripe_page() - rbio_pstripe_page() - rbio_qstripe_page() - page_in_rbio() Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
This involves: - Use sector_ptr interface to grab the pointers - Add sector->pgoff to pointers[] - Rebuild data using sectorsize instead of PAGE_SIZE - Use memcpy() to replace copy_page() Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The core is to convert direct page usage into sector_ptr usage, and use memcpy() to replace copy_page(). For pointers usage, we need to convert it to kmap_local_page() + sector->pgoff. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Make rbio_add_io_page() subpage compatible, which involves: - Rename rbio_add_io_page() to rbio_add_io_sector() Although we still rely on PAGE_SIZE == sectorsize, so add a new ASSERT() inside rbio_add_io_sector() to make sure all pgoff is 0. - Introduce rbio_stripe_sector() helper The equivalent of rbio_stripe_page(). This new helper has extra ASSERT()s to validate the stripe and sector number. - Introduce sector_in_rbio() helper The equivalent of page_in_rbio(). - Rename @pagenr variables to @sectornr - Use rbio::stripe_nsectors when iterating the bitmap Please note that, this only changes the interface, the bios are still using full page for IO. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
This new member is going to fully replace bio_pages in the future, but for now let's keep them co-exist, until the full switch is done. Currently cache_rbio_pages() and index_rbio_pages() will also populate the new array. And cache_rbio_pages() need to record which sectors are uptodate, so we also need to introduce sector_ptr::uptodate bit. To avoid extra memory usage, we let the new @uptodate bit to share bits with @pgoff. Now pgoff only has at most 31 bits, which is already more than enough, as even for 256K page size, we only need 18 bits. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The new member is an array of sector_ptr pointers, they will represent all sectors inside a full stripe (including P/Q). They co-operate with btrfs_raid_bio::stripe_pages: stripe_pages: | Page 0, range [0, 64K) | Page 1 ... stripe_sectors: | | | ... | | | | \- sector 15, page 0, pgoff=60K | \- sector 1, page 0, pgoff=4K \---- sector 0, page 0, pfoff=0 With such structure, we can represent subpage sectors without using extra pages. Here we introduce a new helper, index_stripe_sectors(), to update stripe_sectors[] to point to correct page and pgoff. So every time rbio::stripe_pages[] pointer gets updated, the new helper should be called. The following functions have to call the new helper: - steal_rbio() - alloc_rbio_pages() - alloc_rbio_parity_pages() - alloc_rbio_essential_pages() Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-