Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 08 11月, 2019 19 次提交
  3. 07 11月, 2019 11 次提交
  5. 06 11月, 2019 3 次提交
    • D
      drm/ttm: remove ttm_bo_wait_unreserved · 6b1ce0a2
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      With nouveau fixed all ttm-using drives have the correct nesting of
mmap_sem vs dma_resv, and we can just lock the buffer.

Assuming I didn't screw up anything with my audit of course.

v2:
- Dont forget wu_mutex (Christian König)
- Keep the mmap_sem-less wait optimization (Thomas)
- Use _lock_interruptible to be good citizens (Thomas)

v3: Rebase over fault handler helperification.

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> (v2)
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thellstrom@vmware.com> (v2)
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: "VMware Graphics" <linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191104173801.2972-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
      6b1ce0a2
    • D
      drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl · 03e0d26f
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      We can't copy_*_user while holding reservations, that will (soon even
for nouveau) lead to deadlocks. And it breaks the cross-driver
contract around dma_resv.

Fix this by adding a slowpath for when we need relocations, and by
pushing the writeback of the new presumed offsets to the very end.

Aside from "it compiles" entirely untested unfortunately.

Cc: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191104173801.2972-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
      03e0d26f
    • D
      dma_resv: prime lockdep annotations · b2a8116e
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      Full audit of everyone:

- i915, radeon, amdgpu should be clean per their maintainers.

- vram helpers should be fine, they don't do command submission, so
  really no business holding struct_mutex while doing copy_*_user. But
  I haven't checked them all.

- panfrost seems to dma_resv_lock only in panfrost_job_push, which
  looks clean.

- v3d holds dma_resv locks in the tail of its v3d_submit_cl_ioctl(),
  copying from/to userspace happens all in v3d_lookup_bos which is
  outside of the critical section.

- vmwgfx has a bunch of ioctls that do their own copy_*_user:
  - vmw_execbuf_process: First this does some copies in
    vmw_execbuf_cmdbuf() and also in the vmw_execbuf_process() itself.
    Then comes the usual ttm reserve/validate sequence, then actual
    submission/fencing, then unreserving, and finally some more
    copy_to_user in vmw_execbuf_copy_fence_user. Glossing over tons of
    details, but looks all safe.
  - vmw_fence_event_ioctl: No ttm_reserve/dma_resv_lock anywhere to be
    seen, seems to only create a fence and copy it out.
  - a pile of smaller ioctl in vmwgfx_ioctl.c, no reservations to be
    found there.
  Summary: vmwgfx seems to be fine too.

- virtio: There's virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl, which does all the
  copying from userspace before even looking up objects through their
  handles, so safe. Plus the getparam/getcaps ioctl, also both safe.

- qxl only has qxl_execbuffer_ioctl, which calls into
  qxl_process_single_command. There's a lovely comment before the
  __copy_from_user_inatomic that the slowpath should be copied from
  i915, but I guess that never happened. Try not to be unlucky and get
  your CS data evicted between when it's written and the kernel tries
  to read it. The only other copy_from_user is for relocs, but those
  are done before qxl_release_reserve_list(), which seems to be the
  only thing reserving buffers (in the ttm/dma_resv sense) in that
  code. So looks safe.

- A debugfs file in nouveau_debugfs_pstate_set() and the usif ioctl in
  usif_ioctl() look safe. nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf() otoh breaks this
  everywhere and needs to be fixed up.

v2: Thomas pointed at that vmwgfx calls dma_resv_init while it holds a
dma_resv lock of a different object already. Christian mentioned that
ttm core does this too for ghost objects. intel-gfx-ci highlighted
that i915 has similar issues.

Unfortunately we can't do this in the usual module init functions,
because kernel threads don't have an ->mm - we have to wait around for
some user thread to do this.

Solution is to spawn a worker (but only once). It's horrible, but it
works.

v3: We can allocate mm! (Chris). Horrible worker hack out, clean
initcall solution in.

v4: Annotate with __init (Rob Herring)

Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: "VMware Graphics" <linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191104173801.2972-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
      b2a8116e
  7. 05 11月, 2019 6 次提交
  9. 04 11月, 2019 1 次提交