There is almost no difference between 32 & 64 bit glue code.
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

This is the x86-64 version of the Salsa20 stream cipher algorithm. The
original assembly code came from
<http://cr.yp.to/snuffle/salsa20/amd64-3/salsa20.s>. It has been
reformatted for clarity.
Signed-off-by: NTan Swee Heng <thesweeheng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

This patch contains the salsa20-i586 implementation. The original
assembly code came from
<http://cr.yp.to/snuffle/salsa20/x86-pm/salsa20.s>. I have reformatted
it (added indents) so that it matches the other algorithms in
arch/x86/crypto.
Signed-off-by: NTan Swee Heng <thesweeheng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

32 bit and 64 bit glue code is using (now) the same
piece code. This patch unifies them.
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

The patch passed the trycpt tests and automated filesystem tests.
This rewrite resulted in some nice perfomance increase over my last patch.

Short summary of the tcrypt benchmarks:

Twofish Assembler vs. Twofish C (256bit 8kb block CBC)
encrypt: -33% Cycles
decrypt: -45% Cycles

Twofish Assembler vs. AES Assembler (128bit 8kb block CBC)
encrypt: +3%  Cycles
decrypt: -22% Cycles

Twofish Assembler vs. AES Assembler (256bit 8kb block CBC)
encrypt: -20% Cycles
decrypt: -36% Cycles

Full Output:
http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~fritschi/twofish/tcrypt-speed-twofish-asm-i586.txt
http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~fritschi/twofish/tcrypt-speed-twofish-c-i586.txt
http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~fritschi/twofish/tcrypt-speed-aes-asm-i586.txt


Here is another bonnie++ benchmark with encrypted filesystems. All runs with
the twofish assembler modules max out the drivespeed. It should give some
idea what the module can do for encrypted filesystem performance even though
you can't see the full numbers.

http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~fritschi/twofish/output_20060611_205432_x86.htmlSigned-off-by: NJoachim Fritschi <jfritschi@freenet.de>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!