1. 12 4月, 2018 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915/execlists: Set queue priority from secondary port · 15c83c43
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      We can refine our current execlists->queue_priority if we inspect
      ELSP[1] rather than the head of the unsubmitted queue. Currently, we use
      the unsubmitted queue and say that if a subsequent request is more
      important than the current queue, we will rerun the submission tasklet
      to evaluate the need for preemption. However, we only want to preempt if
      we need to jump ahead of a currently executing request in ELSP. The
      second reason for running the submission tasklet is amalgamate requests
      into the active context on ELSP[0] to avoid a stall when ELSP[0] drains.
      (Though repeatedly amalgamating requests into the active context and
      triggering many lite-restore is off question gain, the goal really is to
      put a context into ELSP[1] to cover the interrupt.) So if instead of
      looking at the head of the queue, we look at the context in ELSP[1] we
      can answer both of the questions more accurately -- we don't need to
      rerun the submission tasklet unless our new request is important enough
      to feed into, at least, ELSP[1].
      
      v2: Add some comments from the discussion with Tvrtko.
      v3: More commentary to cross-reference queue_request()
      
      References: f6322edd ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports")
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
      Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
      Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180411103929.27374-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      15c83c43
  2. 11 4月, 2018 4 次提交
  3. 10 4月, 2018 3 次提交
  4. 09 4月, 2018 19 次提交
  5. 08 4月, 2018 1 次提交
    • L
      drm/i915/dp: Send DPCD ON for MST before phy_up · be1c63c8
      Lyude Paul 提交于
      When doing a modeset where the sink is transitioning from D3 to D0 , it
      would sometimes be possible for the initial power_up_phy() to start
      timing out. This would only be observed in the last action before the
      sink went into D3 mode was intel_dp_sink_dpms(DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF). We
      originally thought this might be an issue with us accidentally shutting
      off the aux block when putting the sink into D3, but since the DP spec
      mandates that sinks must wake up within 1ms while we have 100ms to
      respond to an ESI irq, this didn't really add up. Turns out that the
      problem is more subtle then that:
      
      It turns out that the timeout is from us not enabling DPMS on the MST
      hub before actually trying to initiate sideband communications. This
      would cause the first sideband communication (power_up_phy()), to start
      timing out because the sink wasn't ready to respond. Afterwards, we
      would call intel_dp_sink_dpms(DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) in
      intel_ddi_pre_enable_dp(), which would actually result in waking up the
      sink so that sideband requests would work again.
      
      Since DPMS is what lets us actually bring the hub up into a state where
      sideband communications become functional again, we just need to make
      sure to enable DPMS on the display before attempting to perform sideband
      communications.
      
      Changes since v1:
      - Remove comment above if (!intel_dp->is_mst) - vsryjala
      - Move intel_dp_sink_dpms() for MST into intel_dp_post_disable_mst() to
        keep enable/disable paths symmetrical
      - Improve commit message - dhnkrn
      Changes since v2:
      - Only send DPMS off when we're disabling the last sink, and only send
        DPMS on when we're enabling the first sink - dhnkrn
      Changes since v3:
      - Check against is_mst, not intel_dp->is_mst - dhnkrn/vsyrjala
      Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Tested-by: NLaura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Fixes: ad260ab3 ("drm/i915/dp: Write to SET_POWER dpcd to enable MST hub.")
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180407011053.22437-1-lyude@redhat.com
      be1c63c8
  6. 07 4月, 2018 3 次提交
  7. 06 4月, 2018 9 次提交