Clean up: When converting xprtrdma to use the new CQ API, I missed a
spot. The naming convention elsewhere is:

  {svc_rdma,rpcrdma}_wc_{operation}
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Tie frwr debugging messages together by always reporting the address
of the frwr.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

The Version One default inline threshold is still 1KB. But allow
testing with thresholds up to 64KB.

This maximum is somewhat arbitrary. There's no fundamental
architectural limit I'm aware of, but it's good to keep the size of
Receive buffers reasonable. Now that Send can use a s/g list, a
Send buffer is only as large as each RPC requires. Receive buffers
are always the size of the inline threshold, however.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

An RPC Call message that is sent inline but that has a data payload
(ie, one or more items in rq_snd_buf's page list) must be "pulled
up:"

- call_allocate has to reserve enough RPC Call buffer space to
accommodate the data payload

- call_transmit has to memcopy the rq_snd_buf's page list and tail
into its head iovec before it is sent

As the inline threshold is increased beyond its current 1KB default,
however, this means data payloads of more than a few KB are copied
by the host CPU. For example, if the inline threshold is increased
just to 4KB, then NFS WRITE requests up to 4KB would involve a
memcpy of the NFS WRITE's payload data into the RPC Call buffer.
This is an undesirable amount of participation by the host CPU.

The inline threshold may be much larger than 4KB in the future,
after negotiation with a peer server.

Instead of copying the components of rq_snd_buf into its head iovec,
construct a gather list of these components, and send them all in
place. The same approach is already used in the Linux server's
RPC-over-RDMA reply path.

This mechanism also eliminates the need for rpcrdma_tail_pullup,
which is used to manage the XDR pad and trailing inline content when
a Read list is present.

This requires that the pages in rq_snd_buf's page list be DMA-mapped
during marshaling, and unmapped when a data-bearing RPC is
completed. This is slightly less efficient for very small I/O
payloads, but significantly more efficient as data payload size and
inline threshold increase past a kilobyte.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Have frwr's ro_unmap_sync recognize an invalidated rkey that appears
as part of a Receive completion. Local invalidation can be skipped
for that rkey.

Use an out-of-band signaling mechanism to indicate to the server
that the client is prepared to receive RDMA Send With Invalidate.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Send an RDMA-CM private message on connect, and look for one during
a connection-established event.

Both sides can communicate their various implementation limits.
Implementations that don't support this sideband protocol ignore it.

Once the client knows the server's inline threshold maxima, it can
adjust the use of Reply chunks, and eliminate most use of Position
Zero Read chunks. Moderately-sized I/O can be done using a pure
inline RDMA Send instead of RDMA operations that require memory
registration.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Introduce data structure used by both client and server to exchange
implementation details during RDMA/CM connection establishment.

This is an experimental out-of-band exchange between Linux
RPC-over-RDMA Version One implementations, replacing the deprecated
CCP (see RFC 5666bis). The purpose of this extension is to enable
prototyping of features that might be introduced in a subsequent
version of RPC-over-RDMA.

Suggested by Christoph Hellwig and Devesh Sharma.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Clean up: The fields in the recv_wr do not vary. There is no need to
initialize them before each ib_post_recv(). This removes a large-ish
data structure from the stack.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Clean up: Most of the fields in each send_wr do not vary. There is
no need to initialize them before each ib_post_send(). This removes
a large-ish data structure from the stack.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Clean up.

Since commit fc664485 ("xprtrdma: Split the completion queue"),
rpcrdma_ep_post_recv() no longer uses the "ep" argument.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Clean up. The "ia" argument is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Currently, each regbuf is allocated and DMA mapped at the same time.
This is done during transport creation.

When a device driver is unloaded, every DMA-mapped buffer in use by
a transport has to be unmapped, and then remapped to the new
device if the driver is loaded again. Remapping will have to be done
_after_ the connect worker has set up the new device.

But there's an ordering problem:

call_allocate, which invokes xprt_rdma_allocate which calls
rpcrdma_alloc_regbuf to allocate Send buffers, happens _before_
the connect worker can run to set up the new device.

Instead, at transport creation, allocate each buffer, but leave it
unmapped. Once the RPC carries these buffers into ->send_request, by
which time a transport connection should have been established,
check to see that the RPC's buffers have been DMA mapped. If not,
map them there.

When device driver unplug support is added, it will simply unmap all
the transport's regbufs, but it doesn't have to deallocate the
underlying memory.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

The use of DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL is discouraged by DMA-API.txt.
Fortunately, xprtrdma now knows which direction I/O is going as
soon as it allocates each regbuf.

The RPC Call and Reply buffers are no longer the same regbuf. They
can each be labeled correctly now. The RPC Reply buffer is never
part of either a Send or Receive WR, but it can be part of Reply
chunk, which is mapped and registered via ->ro_map . So it is not
DMA mapped when it is allocated (DMA_NONE), to avoid a double-
mapping.

Since Receive buffers are no longer DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL and their
contents are never modified by the host CPU, DMA-API-HOWTO.txt
suggests that a DMA sync before posting each buffer should be
unnecessary. (See my_card_interrupt_handler).
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Commit 94931746 ("xprtrdma: Limit number of RDMA segments in
RPC-over-RDMA headers") capped the number of chunks that may appear
in RPC-over-RDMA headers. The maximum header size can be estimated
and fixed to avoid allocating buffer space that is never used.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

RPC-over-RDMA needs to separate its RPC call and reply buffers.

 o When an RPC Call is sent, rq_snd_buf is DMA mapped for an RDMA
   Send operation using DMA_TO_DEVICE

 o If the client expects a large RPC reply, it DMA maps rq_rcv_buf
   as part of a Reply chunk using DMA_FROM_DEVICE

The two mappings are for data movement in opposite directions.

DMA-API.txt suggests that if these mappings share a DMA cacheline,
bad things can happen. This could occur in the final bytes of
rq_snd_buf and the first bytes of rq_rcv_buf if the two buffers
happen to share a DMA cacheline.

On x86_64 the cacheline size is typically 8 bytes, and RPC call
messages are usually much smaller than the send buffer, so this
hasn't been a noticeable problem. But the DMA cacheline size can be
larger on other platforms.

Also, often rq_rcv_buf starts most of the way into a page, thus
an additional RDMA segment is needed to map and register the end of
that buffer. Try to avoid that scenario to reduce the cost of
registering and invalidating Reply chunks.

Instead of carrying a single regbuf that covers both rq_snd_buf and
rq_rcv_buf, each struct rpcrdma_req now carries one regbuf for
rq_snd_buf and one regbuf for rq_rcv_buf.

Some incidental changes worth noting:

- To clear out some spaghetti, refactor xprt_rdma_allocate.
- The value stored in rg_size is the same as the value stored in
  the iov.length field, so eliminate rg_size
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Currently there's a hidden and indirect mechanism for finding the
rpcrdma_req that goes with an rpc_rqst. It depends on getting from
the rq_buffer pointer in struct rpc_rqst to the struct
rpcrdma_regbuf that controls that buffer, and then to the struct
rpcrdma_req it goes with.

This was done back in the day to avoid the need to add a per-rqst
pointer or to alter the buf_free API when support for RPC-over-RDMA
was introduced.

I'm about to change the way regbuf's work to support larger inline
thresholds. Now is a good time to replace this indirect mechanism
with something that is more straightforward. I guess this should be
considered a clean up.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

For xprtrdma, the RPC Call and Reply buffers are involved in real
I/O operations.

To start with, the DMA direction of the I/O for a Call is opposite
that of a Reply.

In the current arrangement, the Reply buffer address is on a
four-byte alignment just past the call buffer. Would be friendlier
on some platforms if that was at a DMA cache alignment instead.

Because the current arrangement allocates a single memory region
which contains both buffers, the RPC Reply buffer often contains a
page boundary in it when the Call buffer is large enough (which is
frequent).

It would be a little nicer for setting up DMA operations (and
possible registration of the Reply buffer) if the two buffers were
separated, well-aligned, and contained as few page boundaries as
possible.

Now, I could just pad out the single memory region used for the pair
of buffers. But frequently that would mean a lot of unused space to
ensure the Reply buffer did not have a page boundary.

Add a separate pointer to rpc_rqst that points right to the RPC
Reply buffer. This makes no difference to xprtsock, but it will help
xprtrdma in subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

xprtrdma needs to allocate the Call and Reply buffers separately.
TBH, the reliance on using a single buffer for the pair of XDR
buffers is transport implementation-specific.

Instead of passing just the rq_buffer into the buf_free method, pass
the task structure and let buf_free take care of freeing both
XDR buffers at once.

There's a micro-optimization here. In the common case, both
xprt_release and the transport's buf_free method were checking if
rq_buffer was NULL. Now the check is done only once per RPC.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

xprtrdma needs to allocate the Call and Reply buffers separately.
TBH, the reliance on using a single buffer for the pair of XDR
buffers is transport implementation-specific.

Transports that want to allocate separate Call and Reply buffers
will ignore the "size" argument anyway.  Don't bother passing it.

The buf_alloc method can't return two pointers. Instead, make the
method's return value an error code, and set the rq_buffer pointer
in the method itself.

This gives call_allocate an opportunity to terminate an RPC instead
of looping forever when a permanent problem occurs. If a request is
just bogus, or the transport is in a state where it can't allocate
resources for any request, there needs to be a way to kill the RPC
right there and not loop.

This immediately fixes a rare problem in the backchannel send path,
which loops if the server happens to send a CB request whose
call+reply size is larger than a page (which it shouldn't do yet).

One more issue: looks like xprt_inject_disconnect was incorrectly
placed in the failure path in call_allocate. It needs to be in the
success path, as it is for other call-sites.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Clean up: there is some XDR initialization logic that is common
to the forward channel and backchannel. Move it to an XDR header
so it can be shared.

rpc_rqst::rq_buffer points to a buffer containing big-endian data.
Update its annotation as part of the clean up.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Clean up: r_xprt is already available everywhere these macros are
invoked, so just dereference that directly.

RPCRDMA_INLINE_PAD_VALUE is no longer used, so it can simply be
removed.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Try all multipath addresses for a data server. The first address that
successfully connects and creates a session is the DS mount address.
All subsequent addresses are tested for session trunking and
added as aliases.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Use an async exchange id call to test for session trunking

To conform with RFC 5661 section 18.35.4, the Non-Update on
Existing Clientid case, save the exchange id verifier in
cl_confirm and use it for the session trunking exhange id test.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Use a setup function to call into the NFS layer to test an rpc_xprt
for session trunking so as to not leak the rpc_xprt_switch into
the nfs layer.

Search for the address in the rpc_xprt_switch first so as not to
put an unnecessary EXCHANGE_ID on the wire.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Give the NFS layer access to the rpc_xprt_switch_add_xprt function
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Give the NFS layer access to the xprt_switch_put function
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

rpc_task_set_client is only called from rpc_run_task after
rpc_new_task and rpc_task_release_client is not needed as the
task is new.

When called from rpc_new_task, rpc_task_set_client also removed the
assigned rpc_xprt which is not desired.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

For session trunking, to compare nfs41_exchange_id_res with
existing nfs_client
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

For session trunking, to compare nfs41_exchange_id_res with
exiting nfs_client.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Testing an rpc_xprt for session trunking should not delay application
progress over already established transports.
Setup exchange_id to be able to be an async call to test an rpc_xprt
for session trunking use.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Add support for the kernel parameter nfs.callback_nr_threads to set
the number of threads that will be assigned to the callback channel.

Add support for the kernel parameter nfs.nfs.max_session_cb_slots
to set the maximum size of the callback channel slot table.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

This will allow us to bump the number of callback threads at will.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Ensure that the nfs_callback_info[] array correctly tracks the
struct svc_serv.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Clean up.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

In order to manage the threads using svc_set_num_threads, we need to
fill in a few extra fields.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Current NFSv4.1/pNFS client assumes that MDS supports only one layout
type. While it's true for most existing servers, nevertheless, this can
be change in the near future.

For now, this patch just plumbs in the ability to track a list of
layouts in the fsinfo structure. The existing behavior of the client
is preserved, by having it just select the first entry in the list.
Signed-off-by: NTigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
Reviewed-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

The variable `err` is not used anywhere and just returns the
predefined value `0` at the end of the function. Hence, remove the
variable and return 0 explicitly.
Signed-off-by: NAmitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>