1. 10 2月, 2018 1 次提交
    • N
      x86/mm/pti: Fix PTI comment in entry_SYSCALL_64() · 14b1fcc6
      Nadav Amit 提交于
      The comment is confusing since the path is taken when
      CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION=y is disabled (while the comment says it is not
      taken).
      Signed-off-by: NNadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: nadav.amit@gmail.com
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180209170638.15161-1-namit@vmware.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      14b1fcc6
  2. 09 2月, 2018 2 次提交
  3. 06 2月, 2018 3 次提交
  4. 04 2月, 2018 6 次提交
  5. 03 2月, 2018 2 次提交
  6. 02 2月, 2018 2 次提交
  7. 01 2月, 2018 2 次提交
  8. 31 1月, 2018 16 次提交
  9. 30 1月, 2018 6 次提交