- 28 9月, 2016 16 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we're replacing an old stateid which has a different 'other' field, then we probably need to free the old stateid. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The actual stateid used in the READ or WRITE can represent a delegation, a lock or a stateid, so it is useful to pass it as an argument to the exception handler when an expired/revoked response is received from the server. It also ensures that we don't re-label the state as needing recovery if that has already occurred. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Handle revoked open/lock/delegation stateids when LAYOUTGET tells us the state was revoked. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server tells us our stateid has expired, then handle that as if it was revoked. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server tells us our stateid has expired, then handle that as if it was revoked. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If a server returns NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED, NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED or NFS4ERR_EXPIRED on a call to close, open_downgrade, delegreturn, or locku, we should call FREE_STATEID before attempting to recover. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Nothing should need to be serialised with FREE_STATEID on the client, so let's make the RPC call always asynchronous. Also constify the stateid argument. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Right now, we're only running TEST/FREE_STATEID on the locks if the open stateid recovery succeeds. The protocol requires us to always do so. The fix would be to move the call to TEST/FREE_STATEID and do it before we attempt open recovery. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In some cases (e.g. when the SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_ALL_STATE_REVOKED sequence flag is set) we may already know that the stateid was revoked and that the only valid operation we can call is FREE_STATEID. In those cases, allow the stateid to carry the information in the type field, so that we skip the redundant call to TEST_STATEID. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure we don't spam the server with test_stateid() calls for delegations that have already been checked. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
According to RFC5661, if any of the SEQUENCE status bits SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_ALL_STATE_REVOKED, SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_SOME_STATE_REVOKED, SEQ4_STATUS_ADMIN_STATE_REVOKED, or SEQ4_STATUS_RECALLABLE_STATE_REVOKED are set, then we need to use TEST_STATEID to figure out which stateids have been revoked, so we can acknowledge the loss of state using FREE_STATEID. While we already do this for open and lock state, we have not been doing so for all the delegations. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Allow the callers of nfs_remove_bad_delegation() to specify the stateid that needs to be marked as bad. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In NFSv4.1 and newer, if the server decides to revoke some or all of the protocol state, the client is required to iterate through all the stateids that it holds and call TEST_STATEID to determine which stateids still correspond to valid state, and then call FREE_STATEID on the others. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server crashes while we're testing stateids for validity, then we want to initiate session recovery. Usually, we will be calling from a state manager thread, though, so we don't really want to wait. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the delegation has been marked as revoked, we don't have to test it, because we should already have called FREE_STATEID on it. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOlek Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
As described in RFC5661, section 18.46, some of the status flags exist in order to tell the client when it needs to acknowledge the existence of revoked state on the server and/or to recover state. Those flags will then remain set until the recovery procedure is done. In order to avoid looping, the client therefore needs to ignore those particular flags while recovering. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 23 9月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Add a waitqueue head to the client structure. Have clients set a wait on that queue prior to requesting a lock from the server. If the lock is blocked, then we can use that to wait for wakeups. Note that we do need to do this "manually" since we need to set the wait on the waitqueue prior to requesting the lock, but requesting a lock can involve activities that can block. However, only do that for NFSv4.1 locks, either by compiling out all of the waitqueue handling when CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 is disabled, or skipping all of it at runtime if we're dealing with v4.0, or v4.1 servers that don't send lock callbacks. Note too that even when we expect to get a lock callback, RFC5661 section 20.11.4 is pretty clear that we still need to poll for them, so we do still sleep on a timeout. We do however always poll at the longest interval in that case. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> [Anna: nfs4_retry_setlk() "status" should default to -ERESTARTSYS] Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
This also consolidates the waiting logic into a single function, instead of having it spread across two like it is now. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
We need to have this info set up before adding the waiter to the waitqueue, so move this out of the _nfs4_proc_setlk and into the caller. That's more efficient anyway since we don't need to do this more than once if we end up waiting on the lock. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
We want to handle the two cases differently, such that we poll more aggressively when we don't expect a callback. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
We actually want to use TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE sleeps when we're in the process of polling for a NFSv4 lock. If there is a signal pending when the task wakes up, then we'll be returning an error anyway. So, we might as well wake up immediately for non-fatal signals as well. That allows us to return to userland more quickly in that case, but won't change the error that userland sees. Also, there is no need to use the *_unsafe sleep variants here, as no vfs-layer locks should be held at this point. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 20 9月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Currently, the layout driver selection code always chooses the first one from the list. That's not really ideal however, as the server can send the list of layout types in any order that it likes. It's up to the client to select the best one for its needs. This patch adds an ordered list of preferred driver types and has the selection code sort the list of available layout drivers according to it. Any unrecognized layout type is sorted to the end of the list. For now, the order of preference is hardcoded, but it should be possible to make this configurable in the future. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Try all multipath addresses for a data server. The first address that successfully connects and creates a session is the DS mount address. All subsequent addresses are tested for session trunking and added as aliases. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Use an async exchange id call to test for session trunking To conform with RFC 5661 section 18.35.4, the Non-Update on Existing Clientid case, save the exchange id verifier in cl_confirm and use it for the session trunking exhange id test. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Testing an rpc_xprt for session trunking should not delay application progress over already established transports. Setup exchange_id to be able to be an async call to test an rpc_xprt for session trunking use. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add support for the kernel parameter nfs.callback_nr_threads to set the number of threads that will be assigned to the callback channel. Add support for the kernel parameter nfs.nfs.max_session_cb_slots to set the maximum size of the callback channel slot table. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 12 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that we conform to the algorithm described in RFC5661, section 18.36.4 for when to bump the sequence id. In essence we do it for all cases except when the RPC call timed out, or in case of the server returning NFS4ERR_DELAY or NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 04 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server fails to set lrp->res.lrs_present in the LAYOUTRETURN reply, then that means it believes the client holds no more layout state for that file, and that the layout stateid is now invalid. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 29 8月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Defer freeing the slot until after we have processed the results from OPEN and LAYOUTGET. This means that the server can rely on the mechanism in RFC5661 Section 2.10.6.3 to ensure that replies to an OPEN or LAYOUTGET/RETURN RPC call don't race with the callbacks that apply to them. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
For operations like OPEN or LAYOUTGET, which return recallable state (i.e. delegations and layouts) we want to enable the mechanism for resolving recall races in RFC5661 Section 2.10.6.3. To do so, we will want to defer bumping the slot's sequence number until we have finished processing the RPC results. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If CB_SEQUENCE tells us that the processing of this request depends on the completion of one or more referring triples (see RFC 5661 Section 2.10.6.3), delay the callback processing until after the RPC requests being referred to have completed. If we end up delaying for more than 1/2 second, then fall back to returning NFS4ERR_DELAY in reply to the callback. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 06 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Make a helper function nfs4_set_lease_period() and have nfs41_setup_state_renewal() and nfs4_do_fsinfo() use it. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 26 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Use the minor version ops cached in struct nfs_client instead of looking them up again. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 25 7月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Make it static Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
That's already being taken care of in pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure nfs42_layoutstat_done() layoutget don't open code layout stateid invalidation. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the layout was completely returned, then ignore the returned layout stateid. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 21 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 20 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We want to recover the open stateid if there is no layout stateid and/or the stateid argument matches an open stateid. Otherwise throw out the existing layout and recover from scratch, as the layout stateid is bad. Fixes: 183d9e7b ("pnfs: rework LAYOUTGET retry handling") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7 Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
-