- 27 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The 'limit' filter is underdesigned, it should have been a range for [min,max], with some relaxed semantics when one of the bounds is missing. Besides that, using a full u64 for a single value is a waste of bytes. Let's fix both by extending the use of the u64 bytes for the [min,max] range. This can be done in a backward compatible way, the range will be interpreted only if the appropriate flag is set (BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_LIMIT_RANGE). Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 22 10月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I want to set some per transaction flags, so instead of adding yet another int lets just convert the current two int indicators to flags and add a flags field for future use. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Alexandru Moise 提交于
Improve readability by generalizing the profile validity checks. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
btrfs_raid_array[] is used to define all raid attributes, use it to get tolerated_failures in btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(), instead of complex condition in function. It can make code simple and auto-support other possible raid-type in future. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
This array is used to record attributes of each raid type, make it public, and many functions will benifit with this array. For example, num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(), we can avoid complex conditions in this function, and get raid attribute simply by accessing above array. It can also make code logic simple, reduce duplication code, and increase maintainability. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
There are atomic operations that imply the barrier for waitqueue_active mixed in an if-condition. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 08 10月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Convert the simple cases, not all functions provide a way to reach the fs_info. Also skipped debugging messages (print-tree, integrity checker and pr_debug) and messages that are printed from possibly unfinished mount. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 02 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> [reworded subject and changelog] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 01 10月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Originally the message was not in a helper but ended up there. We should print error messages from callers instead. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> [reworded subject and changelog] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
This patch updates and renames btrfs_scratch_superblocks, (which is used by the replace device thread), with those fixes from the scratch superblock code section of btrfs_rm_device(). The fixes are: Scratch all copies of superblock Notify kobject that superblock has been changed Update time on the device So that btrfs_rm_device() can use the function btrfs_scratch_superblocks() instead of its own scratch code. And further replace deivce code which similarly releases device back to the system, will have the fixes from the btrfs device delete. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> [renamed to btrfs_scratch_superblock] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Use btrfs specific error code BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_MISSING_NOT_FOUND instead of -ENOENT. Next this removes the logging when user specifies "missing" and we don't find it in the kernel device list. Logging are for system events not for user input errors. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 29 9月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
btrfs_error() and btrfs_std_error() does the same thing and calls _btrfs_std_error(), so consolidate them together. And the main motivation is that btrfs_error() is closely named with btrfs_err(), one handles error action the other is to log the error, so don't closely name them. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Suggested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
This will return EIO when __bread() fails to read SB, instead of EINVAL. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 01 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in btrfs_balance Code for updating fs_info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in btrfs_balance() lacks raid56 support. Reason: Above code was wroten in 2012-08-01, together with btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures()'s first version. Then, btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures() got updated later to support raid56, but code in btrfs_balance() was not updated together. Fix: Merge above similar code to a common function: btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures() and make it support both case. It can fix this bug with a bonus of cleanup, and make these code never in above no-sync state from now on. Suggested-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 22 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
bio->bi_css and bio->bi_ioc don't exist when block cgroups are not on. This adds an ifdef around them. It's not perfect, but our use of bi_ioc is being removed in the 4.3 merge window. The bi_css usage really should go into bio_clone, but I want to make sure that doesn't introduce problems for other bio_clone use cases. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 20 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
alloc_btrfs_bio relies on GFP_NOFS allocation when committing the transaction but this allocation context is rather weak wrt. reclaim capabilities. The page allocator currently tries hard to not fail these allocations if they are small (<=PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) but it can still fail if the _current_ process is the OOM killer victim. Moreover there is an attempt to move away from the default no-fail behavior and allow these allocation to fail more eagerly. This would lead to: [ 37.928625] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4045 which is clearly undesirable and the nofail behavior should be explicit if the allocation failure cannot be tolerated. Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 14 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kent Overstreet 提交于
Btrfs has been doing bio splitting from btrfs_map_bio(), by checking device limits as well as calling ->merge_bvec_fn() etc. That is not necessary any more, because generic_make_request() is now able to handle arbitrarily sized bios. So clean up unnecessary code paths. Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com> [dpark: add more description in commit message] Signed-off-by: NDongsu Park <dpark@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: NMing Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
- 09 8月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This attaches accounting information to bios as we submit them so the new blkio controllers can throttle on btrfs filesystems. Not much is required, we're just associating bios with blkcgs during clone, calling wbc_init_bio()/wbc_account_io() during writepages submission, and attaching the bios to the current context during direct IO. Finally if we are splitting bios during btrfs_map_bio, this attaches accounting information to the split. The end result is able to throttle nicely on single disk filesystems. A little more work is required for multi-device filesystems. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
Remove chunk_objectid argument from btrfs_relocate_chunk() because it is not necessary, it can also cleanup some code in caller for prepare its value. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
xfstests btrfs/070 sometimes failed. In my test machine, its fail rate is about 30%. In another vm(vmware), its fail rate is about 50%. Reason: btrfs/070 do replace and defrag with fsstress simultaneously, after above operation, checksum error is found by scrub. Actually, it have no relationship with defrag operation, only replace with fsstress can trigger this bug. New data writen to target device have possibility rewrited by old data from source device by replace code in debug, to avoid above problem, we can set target block group to readonly in replace period, so new data requested by other operation will not write to same place with replace code. Before patch(4.1-rc3): 30% failed in 100 xfstests. After patch: 0% failed in 300 xfstests. It also happened in btrfs/071 as it's another scrub with IO load tests. Reported-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 29 7月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
Since we now clean up block groups automatically as they become empty, iterating over block groups is no longer sufficient to discard unused space. This patch iterates over the unused chunk space and discards any regions that are unallocated, regardless of whether they were ever used. This is a change for btrfs but is consistent with other file systems. We do this in a transactionless manner since the discard process can take a substantial amount of time and a transaction would need to be started before the acquisition of the device list lock. That would mean a transaction would be held open across /all/ of the discards collectively. In order to prevent other threads from allocating or freeing chunks, we hold the chunks lock across the search and discard calls. We release it between searches to allow the file system to perform more-or-less normally. Since the running transaction can commit and disappear while we're using the transaction pointer, we take a reference to it and release it after the search. This is safe since it would happen normally at the end of the transaction commit after any locks are released anyway. We also take the commit_root_sem to protect against a transaction starting and committing while we're running. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Currently we have two different ways to signal an I/O error on a BIO: (1) by clearing the BIO_UPTODATE flag (2) by returning a Linux errno value to the bi_end_io callback The first one has the drawback of only communicating a single possible error (-EIO), and the second one has the drawback of not beeing persistent when bios are queued up, and are not passed along from child to parent bio in the ever more popular chaining scenario. Having both mechanisms available has the additional drawback of utterly confusing driver authors and introducing bugs where various I/O submitters only deal with one of them, and the others have to add boilerplate code to deal with both kinds of error returns. So add a new bi_error field to store an errno value directly in struct bio and remove the existing mechanisms to clean all this up. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
- 01 7月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
We have a race between deleting an unused block group and balancing the same block group that leads to an assertion failure/BUG(), producing the following trace: [181631.208236] BTRFS: assertion failed: 0, file: fs/btrfs/volumes.c, line: 2622 [181631.220591] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [181631.222959] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:4062! [181631.223932] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [181631.224566] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse acpi_cpufreq parpor$ [181631.224566] CPU: 8 PID: 17451 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.1.0-rc5-btrfs-next-10+ #1 [181631.224566] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 [181631.224566] task: ffff880127e09590 ti: ffff8800b5824000 task.ti: ffff8800b5824000 [181631.224566] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa03f19f6>] [<ffffffffa03f19f6>] assfail.constprop.50+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs] [181631.224566] RSP: 0018:ffff8800b5827ae8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [181631.224566] RAX: 0000000000000040 RBX: ffff8800109fc218 RCX: ffffffff81095dce [181631.224566] RDX: 0000000000005124 RSI: ffffffff81464819 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [181631.224566] RBP: ffff8800b5827ae8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [181631.224566] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800109fc200 [181631.224566] R13: ffff880020095000 R14: ffff8800b1a13f38 R15: ffff880020095000 [181631.224566] FS: 00007f70ca0b0c80(0000) GS:ffff88013ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [181631.224566] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [181631.224566] CR2: 00007f2872ab6e68 CR3: 00000000a717c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [181631.224566] Stack: [181631.224566] ffff8800b5827ba8 ffffffffa03f3916 ffff8800b5827b38 ffffffffa03d080e [181631.224566] ffffffffa03d1423 ffff880020095000 ffff88001233c000 0000000000000001 [181631.224566] ffff880020095000 ffff8800b1a13f38 0000000a69c00000 0000000000000000 [181631.224566] Call Trace: [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03f3916>] btrfs_remove_chunk+0xa4/0x6bb [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03d080e>] ? join_transaction.isra.8+0xb9/0x3ba [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03d1423>] ? wait_current_trans.isra.13+0x22/0xfc [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03f3fbc>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.29+0x8f/0xa7 [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03f54df>] btrfs_balance+0xaa4/0xc52 [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa03fd388>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x23f/0x2b0 [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffff810872f9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf [181631.224566] [<ffffffffa04019a3>] btrfs_ioctl+0xfe2/0x2220 [btrfs] [181631.224566] [<ffffffff812603ed>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15 [181631.224566] [<ffffffff81084669>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [181631.224566] [<ffffffff81138def>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x834/0xcd2 [181631.224566] [<ffffffff81138def>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x834/0xcd2 [181631.224566] [<ffffffff8103e48c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x211/0x424 [181631.224566] [<ffffffff811755e6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x3c6/0x479 (...) The sequence of steps leading to this are: CPU 0 CPU 1 btrfs_balance() btrfs_relocate_chunk() btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X) btrfs_lookup_block_group(bg X) cleaner_kthread locks fs_info->cleaner_mutex btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() finds bg X, which became unused in the previous transaction checks bg X ->ro == 0, so it proceeds sets bg X ->ro to 1 (btrfs_set_block_group_ro(bg X)) blocks on fs_info->cleaner_mutex btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X) unlocks fs_info->cleaner_mutex acquires fs_info->cleaner_mutex relocate_block_group() --> does nothing, no extents found in the extent tree from bg X unlocks fs_info->cleaner_mutex btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X) returns btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X) extent map not found --> ASSERT(0) Fix this by using a new mutex to make sure these 2 operations, block group relocation and removal, are serialized. This issue is reproducible by running fstests generic/038 (which stresses chunk allocation and automatic removal of unused block groups) together with the following balance loop: while true; do btrfs balance start -dusage=0 <mountpoint> ; done Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
It is introduced by: c404e0dc Btrfs: fix use-after-free in the finishing procedure of the device replace But seems no relationship with that bug, this patch revirt these code block for cleanup. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 19 6月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
This patch will add support to show the replacing target in sysfs during the process of replacement. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
When btrfs on a device is overwritten with a new btrfs (mkfs), the old btrfs instance in the kernel becomes stale. So with this patch, if kernel finds device is overwritten then delete the stale fsid/uuid. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
-
- 10 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
When allocating a new chunk or removing one we need to update num_devs device items and insert or remove a chunk item in the chunk tree, so in the worst case the space needed in the chunk space_info is: btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size(chunk_root, num_devs) + btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(chunk_root, 1) That is, in the worst case we need to cow num_devs paths and cow 1 other path that can result in splitting every node and leaf, and each path consisting of BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1 nodes and 1 leaf. We were requiring some additional chunk_root->nodesize * BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL * num_devs bytes, which were unnecessary since updating the existing device items does not result in splitting the nodes and leaf since after updating them they remain with the same size. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 03 6月, 2015 7 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
Unlike when attempting to allocate a new block group, where we check that we have enough space in the system space_info to update the device items and insert a new chunk item in the chunk tree, we were not checking if the system space_info had enough space for updating the device items and deleting the chunk item in the chunk tree. This often lead to -ENOSPC error when attempting to allocate blocks for the chunk tree (during btree node/leaf COW operations) while updating the device items or deleting the chunk item, which resulted in the current transaction being aborted and turning the filesystem into read-only mode. While running fstests generic/038, which stresses allocation of block groups and removal of unused block groups, with a large scratch device (750Gb) this happened often, despite more than enough unallocated space, and resulted in the following trace: [68663.586604] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1521 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]() [68663.600407] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) (...) [68663.730829] Call Trace: [68663.732585] [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b [68663.734334] [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad [68663.739980] [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb [68663.757153] [<ffffffffa036ca6d>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs] [68663.760925] [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48 [68663.762854] [<ffffffffa03b159d>] ? btrfs_update_device+0x15a/0x16c [btrfs] [68663.764073] [<ffffffffa036ca6d>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs] [68663.765130] [<ffffffffa03b3638>] btrfs_remove_chunk+0x597/0x5ee [btrfs] [68663.765998] [<ffffffffa0384663>] ? btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x245/0x296 [btrfs] [68663.767068] [<ffffffffa0384676>] btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x258/0x296 [btrfs] [68663.768227] [<ffffffff8143527f>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x4c [68663.769081] [<ffffffffa038b109>] cleaner_kthread+0x13d/0x16c [btrfs] [68663.799485] [<ffffffffa038afcc>] ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x28/0x28 [btrfs] [68663.809208] [<ffffffff8105f367>] kthread+0xef/0xf7 [68663.828795] [<ffffffff810e603f>] ? time_hardirqs_on+0x15/0x28 [68663.844942] [<ffffffff8105f278>] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad [68663.846486] [<ffffffff81435a88>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90 [68663.847760] [<ffffffff8105f278>] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad [68663.849503] ---[ end trace 798477c6d6dbaad6 ]--- [68663.850525] BTRFS: error (device sdc) in btrfs_remove_chunk:2652: errno=-28 No space left So fix this by verifying that enough space exists in system space_info, and reserving the space in the chunk block reserve, before attempting to delete the block group and allocate a new system chunk if we don't have enough space to perform the necessary updates and delete in the chunk tree. Like for the block group creation case, we don't error our if we fail to allocate a new system chunk, since we might end up not needing it (no node/leaf splits happen during the COW operations and/or we end up not needing to COW any btree nodes or leafs because they were already COWed in the current transaction and their writeback didn't start yet). Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
With commit 1b984508 ("Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole") introduced in the kernel 4.1 merge window, we end up using part of a device hole for which there are already pending chunks or pinned chunks. Before that commit we didn't use the hole and would just move on to the next hole in the device. However when we adjust the start offset for the chunk allocation and we have pinned chunks, we set it blindly to the end offset of the pinned chunk we are currently processing, which is dangerous because we can have a pending chunk that has a start offset that matches the end offset of our pinned chunk - leading us to a case where we end up getting two pending chunks that start at the same physical device offset, which makes us later abort the current transaction with -EEXIST when finishing the chunk allocation at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(): [194737.659017] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [194737.660192] WARNING: CPU: 15 PID: 31111 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]() [194737.662209] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -17) [194737.663175] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse [194737.674015] CPU: 15 PID: 31111 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G W 4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2 [194737.675986] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 [194737.682999] 0000000000000009 ffff8800564c7a98 ffffffff8142fa46 ffffffff8108b6a2 [194737.684540] ffff8800564c7ae8 ffff8800564c7ad8 ffffffff81045ea5 ffff8800564c7b78 [194737.686017] ffffffffa0383aa7 00000000ffffffef ffff88000c7ba000 ffff8801a1f66f40 [194737.687509] Call Trace: [194737.688068] [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b [194737.689027] [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad [194737.690095] [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb [194737.691198] [<ffffffffa0383aa7>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs] [194737.693789] [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48 [194737.695065] [<ffffffffa0383aa7>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs] [194737.696806] [<ffffffffa039a3bd>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x101/0x130 [btrfs] [194737.698683] [<ffffffffa03aa433>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x366 [btrfs] [194737.700329] [<ffffffffa03aa725>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs] [194737.701924] [<ffffffffa0394b51>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x11f/0x27c [btrfs] [194737.703675] [<ffffffffa03b8ba4>] __btrfs_buffered_write+0x16a/0x4c8 [btrfs] [194737.705417] [<ffffffffa03bb502>] ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x19a/0x431 [btrfs] [194737.707058] [<ffffffffa03bb511>] ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x1a9/0x431 [btrfs] [194737.708560] [<ffffffffa03bb68d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x325/0x431 [btrfs] [194737.710673] [<ffffffff81067d85>] ? get_parent_ip+0xe/0x3e [194737.712076] [<ffffffff811534c3>] new_sync_write+0x7c/0xa0 [194737.713293] [<ffffffff81153b58>] vfs_write+0xb2/0x117 [194737.714443] [<ffffffff81154424>] SyS_pwrite64+0x64/0x82 [194737.715646] [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17 [194737.717175] ---[ end trace f2d5dc04e56d7e48 ]--- [194737.718170] BTRFS: error (device sdc) in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups:9524: errno=-17 Object already exists The -EEXIST failure comes from btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc(), called by btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), when it attempts to insert a duplicated device extent item via btrfs_alloc_dev_extent(). This issue was reproducible with fstests generic/038 running in a loop for several hours (it's very hard to hit) and using MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o discard". Applying Jeff's recent patch titled "btrfs: add missing discards when unpinning extents with -o discard" makes the issue much easier to reproduce (usually within 4 to 5 hours), since it pins chunks for longer periods of time when an unused block group is deleted by the cleaner kthread. Fix this by making sure that we never adjust the start offset to a lower value than it currently has. Fixes: 1b984508 ("Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole" Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Sasha Levin 提交于
__btrfs_close_devices() would call_rcu to free the device, which is racy with list_for_each_entry() accessing the memory to retrieve the next device on the list. Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Report missing device when add is successful, otherwise it would exit as ENOMEM. And add uuid to the report. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function ‘btrfs_create_uuid_tree’: fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3909:3: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 4 has type ‘long int’ [-Wformat=] btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, tree_root, ^ CC [M] fs/btrfs/ioctl.o fs/btrfs/ioctl.c: In function ‘create_subvol’: fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:549:3: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 4 has type ‘long int’ [-Wformat=] btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, PTR_ERR(new_root)); PTR_ERR returns long, but we're really using 'int' for the error codes everywhere so just set and use the local variable. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
When we shrink the usable size of a device (its total_bytes), we go over all the device extent items in the device tree and attempt to relocate the chunk of any device extent that goes beyond the new usable size for the device. We do that after setting the new usable size (total_bytes) in the device object, so that all new allocations (and reallocations) don't use areas of the device that go beyond the new (shorter) size. However we were not considering that before setting the new size in the device, pending chunks might have been created that use device extents that go beyond the new size, and those device extents are not yet in the device tree after we search the device tree - they are still attached to the list of new block group for some ongoing transaction handle, and they are only added to the device tree when the transaction handle is ended (via btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()). So check for pending chunks with device extents that go beyond the new size and if any exists, commit the current transaction and repeat the search in the device tree. Not doing this it would mean we would return success to user space while still having extents that go beyond the new size, and later user space could override those locations on the device while the fs still references them, causing all sorts of corruption and unexpected events. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 27 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-