Upon waiting a request (when asked), we gave that request a small
priority boost, not enough for it to cause preemption, but enough for it
to be scheduled next before all equals. We also used that bit to give
new clients a small priority boost, similar to FQ_CODEL, such that we
favoured short interactive tasks ahead of long running streams.

However, this is causing lots of complications with timeslicing where we
both want to honour the boost and yet ignore it. Those complications
cause unexpected user behaviour (tasks not being timesliced and run
concurrently as epxected), and the easiest way to resolve that is to
remove the boost. Hopefully, we can find a compromise again if we need
to, but in theory timeslicing itself and future more advanced schedulers
should give us the interactivity boost we seek.

Testcase: igt/gem_exec_schedule/lateslice
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200507152338.7452-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The bspec is confusing on the nature of the upper 32bits of the LRC
descriptor. Once upon a time, it said that it uses the upper 32b to
decide if it should perform a lite-restore, and so we must ensure that
each unique context submitted to HW is given a unique CCID [for the
duration of it being on the HW]. Currently, this is achieved by using
a small circular tag, and assigning every context submitted to HW a
new id. However, this tag is being cleared on repinning an inflight
context such that we end up re-using the 0 tag for multiple contexts.

To avoid accidentally clearing the CCID in the upper 32bits of the LRC
descriptor, split the descriptor into two dwords so we can update the
GGTT address separately from the CCID.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1796
Fixes: 2935ed53 ("drm/i915: Remove logical HW ID")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200428184751.11257-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Prefer struct drm_device based logging over struct device based logging.

No functional changes.

Cc: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NWambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200402114819.17232-17-jani.nikula@intel.com

Prefer struct drm_device based logging over struct device based logging.

No functional changes.

Cc: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NWambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200402114819.17232-10-jani.nikula@intel.com

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c:205: warning: Excess function parameter 'supported' description in 'intel_uc_fw_init_early'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c:205: warning: Excess function parameter 'platform' description in 'intel_uc_fw_init_early'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c:205: warning: Excess function parameter 'rev' description in 'intel_uc_fw_init_early'

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_log.c:696: warning: Function parameter or member 'log' not described in 'intel_guc_log_info'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_log.c:696: warning: Excess function parameter 'guc' description in 'intel_guc_log_info'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200330212254.18236-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We report HuC status in debugfs using register read, but
we missed that on Gen11+ HuC uses different register.
Use correct one.

While here, correct placement of the colon.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200330113338.1713-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

There might be many reasons why we failed to successfully
load and authenticate HuC firmware, but today we only use
single error in case of no HuC hardware. Add some more
error codes for most common cases (disabled, not installed,
corrupted or mismatched firmware).
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Ye <tony.ye@intel.com>
Cc: Robert M. Fosha <robert.m.fosha@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200330113302.1670-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

We need to keep the GuC error logs around to debug the load failure,
so we can't clean them in the error unwind, which includes uc_fini().
Moving the cleanup to driver remove ensures that the logs stick around
long enough for us to dump them.

v2: reword commit msg (John)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200326181121.16869-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

uC is a component of the GT, so it makes sense for the uC debugfs files
to be in the GT folder. A subfolder has been used to keep the same
structure we have for the code.

v2: use intel_* prefix (Jani), rebase on new gt_debugfs_register_files,
    fix permissions for writable debugfs files.

v3: Rename files (Michal), remove blank line (Jani), fix sparse warns.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Ye <tony.ye@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> #v2
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200326181121.16869-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

Move the printers to the respective files for clarity. The
guc_load_status debugfs has been squashed in the guc_info one, has
having separate ones wasn't very useful. The HuC debugfs has been
renamed huc_info to match.

v2: keep printing HUC_STATUS2 (Tony), avoid const->non-const
    container_of (Jani)
Suggested-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Ye <tony.ye@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200326181121.16869-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

We currently initialize HuC support based on GuC being enabled in
modparam; this means that huc_is_supported() can return false on HW that
does have a HuC when enable_guc=0. The rationale for this behavior is
that HuC requires GuC for authentication and therefore is not supported
by itself. However, we do not allow defining HuC fw wthout GuC fw and
selecting HuC in modparam implicitly selects GuC as well, so we can't
actually hit a scenario where HuC is selected alone. Therefore, we can
flip the support check to reflect the HW capabilities and fw
availability, which is more intuitive and will make it cleaner to log
HuC the difference between not supported in HW and not selected.

Removing the difference between GuC and HuC also allows us to simplify
the init_early, since we don't need to differentiate the support based
on the type of uC.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200326181121.16869-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

Trying to use i915_request_skip() prior to i915_request_add() causes us
to try and fill the ring upto request->postfix, which has not yet been
set, and so may cause us to memset() past the end of the ring.

Instead of skipping the request immediately, just flag the error on the
request (only accepting the first fatal error we see) and then clear the
request upon submission.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200304121849.2448028-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Update to the latest available TGL HuC, which includes changes required
by the media team.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Ye <tony.ye@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Acked-by: NTony Ye <tony.ye@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200229012042.27487-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

We are quite trigger happy in cleaning up the firmware blobs, as we do
so from several error/fini paths in GuC/HuC/uC code. We do have the
__uc_cleanup_firmwares cleanup function, which unwinds
__uc_fetch_firmwares and is already called both from the error path of
gem_init and from gem_driver_release, so let's stop cleaning up from
all the other paths.

The fact that we're not cleaning the firmware immediately means that
we can't consider firmware availability as an indication of
initialization success. A "LOADABLE" status has been added to
indicate that the initialization was successful, to be used to
selectively load HuC only if HuC init has completed (HuC init failure
is not considered a fatal error).

v2: s/ready_to_load/loadable (Michal), only run guc/huc_fini if the
    fw is in loadable state
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> #v1
Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

Now that we can differentiate wants vs uses GuC/HuC, intel_uc_init is
restricted to running only if we have successfully fetched the required
blob(s) and are committed to using the microcontroller(s).
The only remaining thing that can go wrong in uc_init is the allocation
of GuC/HuC related objects; if we get such a failure better to bail out
immediately instead of wedging later, like we do for e.g.
intel_engines_init, since without objects we can't use the HW, including
not being able to attempt the firmware load.

While at it, remove the unneeded fw_cleanup call (this is handled
outside of gt_init) and add a probe failure injection point for testing.
Also, update the logs for <g/h>uc_init failures to probe_failure() since
they will cause the driver load to fail.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NFernando Pacheco <fernando.pacheco@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

To be able to differentiate the before and after of our commitment to
GuC submission, which will be used in follow-up patches to early set-up
the submission structures.

v2: move functions to guc_submission.h (Michal)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

To be able to setup GuC submission functions during engine init we need
to commit to using GuC as soon as possible.
Currently, the only thing that can stop us from using the
microcontrollers once we've fetched the blobs is a fundamental
error (e.g. OOM); given that if we hit such an error we can't really
fall-back to anything, we can "officialize" the FW fetching completion
as the moment at which we're committing to using GuC.

To better differentiate this case, the uses_guc check, which indicates
that GuC is supported and was selected in modparam, is renamed to
wants_guc and a new uses_guc is introduced to represent the case were
we're committed to using the GuC. Note that uses_guc does still not imply
that the blob is actually loaded on the HW (is_running is the check for
that). Also, since we need to have attempted the fetch for the result
of uses_guc to be meaningful, we need to make sure we've moved away
from INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SELECTED.

All the GuC changes have been mirrored on the HuC for coherency.

v2: split fetch return changes and new macros to their own patches,
    support HuC only if GuC is wanted, improve "used" state
    description (Michal)

v3: s/wants_huc/uses_huc in uc_init_wopcm
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Fernando Pacheco <fernando.pacheco@intel.com> #v1
Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

We want to map uC-level checks to GuC/HuC-level ones. The mapping from
the uC state to the GuC/HuC one follows the same pattern for all the
functions:

 uc_xxx_guc() -> guc_is_yyy()

So we can easily use a macro to autogenerate the functions via macros by
passing in the 2 mapped states.

v2: Split this change to its own patch (Michal)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

In a follow up patch we will rely on the fact that the status always
moves away from "SELECTED" after the fetch is attempted to decide what
to do with the GuC.

v2: Split this change to its own patch (Michal)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

We are sanitizing firmware status and old mmio message, but
we forget to sanitize CT status.

Fixes: e85de177 ("drm/i915/guc: Introduce guc_is_ready")
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200207131938.2787828-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

We already have guc_is_running function, but it only reflects
firmware status, while to fully use GuC we need to know if we've
already established communication with it.

v2: also s/intel_guc_is_running/intel_guc_is_fw_running (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200131153706.109528-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

On Braswell and Broxton (also known as Valleyview and Apollolake), we
need to serialise updates of the GGTT using the big stop_machine()
hammer. This has the side effect of appearing to lockdep as a possible
reclaim (since it uses the cpuhp mutex and that is tainted by per-cpu
allocations). However, we want to use vm->mutex (including ggtt->mutex)
from within the shrinker and so must avoid such possible taints. For this
purpose, we introduced the asynchronous vma binding and we can apply it
to the PIN_GLOBAL so long as take care to add the necessary waits for
the worker afterwards.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/211Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200130181710.2030251-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We should never BUG_ON on any corruption in CTB descriptor as
data there can be also modified by the GuC. Instead we can
use flag "is_in_error" to indicate that we will not process
any further messages over this CTB (until reset).
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120191817.50164-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

As we now have "ct" available almost in all functions we can
start using dev variants of logs also for debug.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-6-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

As we now have "ct" available in ct_read function we can switch
from generic DRM_ERROR to our custom CT_ERROR.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPiotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Since we only have one RECV buffer we don't need to explicitly pass
it to the read function.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Since we only have one SEND buffer we don't need to explicitly pass
it to the write function.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

We should never BUG_ON on any corruption in CTB descriptor as
data there can be also modified by the GuC. Instead we can
use flag "is_in_error" to indicate that we will not process
any further messages over this CTB (until reset). While here
move descriptor error reporting to the function that actually
touches that descriptor.

Note that unexpected content of the specific CT messages, that
still complies with generic CT message format, shall not trigger
disabling whole CTB, as that might just indicate new unsupported
message types.

v2: drop redundant message (Daniele)
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

While we have function that returns "next fence" that can be used
by new CT request, we internally store value of the last used fence.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200111231114.59208-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Update GuC CTB action helpers to benefit from new CT_ERROR macro.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200111231114.59208-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

We should start using dev variants of error logging and
to simplify that introduce helper macro that will do any
necessary conversions to obtain pointer to device struct.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200111231114.59208-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

We need CT message size in bytes so just use that in helper var.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200111231114.59208-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

uC sanitization is only meaningful if we are running with uC present
or enabled. Make this function part of the uc_ops.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

uC preparation and cleanup steps are only meaningful if we are
running with uC enabled. Make these functions part of the uc_ops.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Firmware fetching and cleanup steps are only meaningful if we are
running with uC enabled. Make these functions part of the uc_ops.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Instead of spreading multiple conditionals across the uC code
to find out current mode of uC operation, start using predefined
set of function pointers that reflect that mode.

Begin with pair of init_hw/fini_hw functions that are responsible
for uC hardware initialization and cleanup.

v2: drop ops_none, use macro to generate ops helpers
v3: reuse __uc_check_hw to avoid redundant comment
v4: forward declare ops struct vs functions
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

I implemented a small build rule in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
without relying on the special header-test-y syntax that was removed in
commit fcbb8461 ("kbuild: remove header compile test").

I excluded some headers from the test coverage. I hope somebody
intrested can take a closer look at them.

Dummy subdir Makefiles can be removed altogether as single target build
use case is now covered by commit 394053f4 ("kbuild: make single
targets work more correctly").

v2 by Jani:
- add selftests/i915_perf_selftests.h to no-header-test
- add .gitignore for *.hdrtest

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191219155652.2666-3-jani.nikula@intel.com

Begin pulling the GT setup underneath a single GT umbrella; let intel_gt
take ownership of its engines! As hinted, the complication is the
lifetime of the probed engine versus the active lifetime of the GT
backends. We need to detect the engine layout early and keep it until
the end so that we can sanitize state on takeover and release.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Acked-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191222120752.1368352-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Keep the intel_context as being the primary state for i915_request, with
the GEM context a backpointer from the low level state for the rarer
cases we need client information. Our goal is to remove such references
to clients from the backend, and leave the HW submission agnostic to
client interfaces and self-contained.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191220101230.256839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The Gen11+ and the legacy function differ in the register and value
written to interrupt the GuC. However, while on older gen the value
matches a bit on the register, on Gen11+ the value is a SW defined
payload that is sent to the FW. Since the FW behaves the same no matter
what value we pass to it, we can just write the same thing on all gens
and get rid of the function pointer by saving the register offset.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com