Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 1月, 2016 2 次提交
  3. 14 1月, 2016 4 次提交
  5. 13 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 12 1月, 2016 2 次提交
  9. 07 1月, 2016 3 次提交
  11. 06 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 22 12月, 2015 3 次提交
  15. 17 12月, 2015 3 次提交
    • I
      drm/i915: add support for checking RPM atomic sections · 2b19efeb
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      In some cases we want to check whether we hold an RPM wakelock reference
for the whole duration of a sequence. To achieve this add a new RPM
atomic sequence counter that we increment any time the wakelock refcount
drops to zero.  Check whether the sequence number stays the same during
the atomic section and that we hold the wakelock at the beginning of the
section.

Motivated by Chris.

v2-v3:
- unchanged
v4:
- swap the order of atomic_read() and assert_rpm_wakelock_held() in
  assert_rpm_atomic_begin() to avoid race
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v3)
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1450203038-5150-10-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
      2b19efeb
    • I
      drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference · 1f814dac
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      Atm, we assert that the device is not suspended until the point when the
device is truly put to a suspended state. This is fine, but we can catch
more problems if we check that RPM refcount is non-zero. After that one
drops to zero we shouldn't access the device any more, even if the actual
device suspend may be delayed. Change assert_rpm_wakelock_held()
accordingly to check for a non-zero RPM refcount in addition to the
current device-not-suspended check.

For the new asserts to work we need to annotate every place explicitly in
the code where we expect that the device is powered. The places where we
only assume this, but may not hold an RPM reference:
- driver load
  We assume the device to be powered until we enable RPM. Make this
  explicit by taking an RPM reference around the load function.
- system and runtime sudpend/resume handlers
  These handlers are called when the RPM reference becomes 0 and know the
  exact point after which the device can get powered off. Disable the
  RPM-reference-held check for their duration.
- the IRQ, hangcheck and RPS work handlers
  These handlers are flushed in the system/runtime suspend handler
  before the device is powered off, so it's guaranteed that they won't
  run while the device is powered off even though they don't hold any
  RPM reference. Disable the RPM-reference-held check for their duration.

In all these cases we still check that the device is not suspended.
These explicit annotations also have the positive side effect of
documenting our assumptions better.

This caught additional WARNs from the atomic modeset path, those should
be fixed separately.

v2:
- remove the redundant HAS_RUNTIME_PM check (moved to patch 1) (Ville)
v3:
- use a new dedicated RPM wakelock refcount to also catch cases where
  our own RPM get/put functions were not called (Chris)
- assert also that the new RPM wakelock refcount is 0 in the RPM
  suspend handler (Chris)
- change the assert error message to be more meaningful (Chris)
- prevent false assert errors and check that the RPM wakelock is 0 in
  the RPM resume handler too
- prevent false assert errors in the hangcheck work too
- add a device not suspended assert check to the hangcheck work
v4:
- rename disable/enable_rpm_asserts to disable/enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts
  and wakelock_count to wakeref_count
- disable the wakeref asserts in the IRQ handlers and RPS work too
- update/clarify commit message
v5:
- mark places we plan to change to use proper RPM refcounting with
  separate DISABLE/ENABLE_RPM_WAKEREF_ASSERTS aliases (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1450227139-13471-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
      1f814dac
    • I
      drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper · da5827c3
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      As a preparation for follow-up patches add a new helper that checks
whether we hold an RPM reference, since this is what we want most of
the cases. Atm this helper will only check for the HW suspended state, a
follow-up patch will do the actual change to check the refcount instead.
One exception is the forcewake release timer function, where it's
guaranteed that the HW is on even though the RPM refcount drops to zero.
This guarantee is provided by flushing the timer in the runtime suspend
handler. So leave the assert_device_not_suspended check in place there.

Also rename assert_device_suspended for consistency and export these
helpers as a preparation for the follow-up patches.

No functional change.

v3:
- change the assert warning message to be more meaningful (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1450203038-5150-6-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
      da5827c3
  17. 15 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  19. 10 12月, 2015 2 次提交
  21. 07 12月, 2015 2 次提交
  23. 03 12月, 2015 3 次提交
    • P
      drm/i915: introduce intel_fbc_{enable,disable} · d029bcad
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      The goal is to call FBC enable/disable only once per modeset, while
activate/deactivate/update will be called multiple times.

The enable() function will be responsible for deciding if a CRTC will
have FBC on it and then it will "lock" FBC on this CRTC: it won't be
possible to change FBC's CRTC until disable(). With this, all checks
and resource acquisition that only need to be done once per modeset
can be moved from update() to enable(). And then the update(),
activate() and deactivate() code will also get simpler since they
won't need to worry about the CRTC being changed.

The disable() function will do the reverse operation of enable(). One
of its features is that it should only be called while the pipe is
already off. This guarantees that FBC is stopped and nothing is
using the CFB.

With this, the activate() and deactivate() functions just start and
temporarily stop FBC. They are the ones touching the hardware enable
bit, so HW state reflects dev_priv->crtc.active.

The last function remaining is update(). A lot of times I thought
about renaming update() to activate() or try_to_activate() since it's
called when we want to activate FBC. The thing is that update() may
not only decide to activate FBC, but also deactivate or keep it on the
same state, so I'll leave this name for now.

Moving code to enable() and disable() will also help in case we decide
to move FBC to pipe_config or something else later.

The current patch only puts the very basic code on enable() and
disable(). The next commits will take care of moving more stuff from
update() to the new functions.

v2:
  - Rebase.
  - Improve commit message (Chris).
v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.
v4: Rebase again after upstream changes.
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      d029bcad
    • P
      drm/i915: introduce is_active/activate/deactivate to the FBC terminology · 0e631adc
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      The long term goal is to have enable/disable as the higher level
functions and activate/deactivate as the lower level functions, just
like we do for PSR and for the CRTC. This way, we'll run enable and
disable once per modeset, while update, activate and deactivate will
be run many times. With this, we can move the checks and code that
need to run only once per modeset to enable(), making the code simpler
and possibly a little faster.

This patch is just the first step on the conversion: it starts by
converting the current low level functions from enable/disable to
activate/deactivate. This patch by itself has no benefits other than
making review and rebase easier. Please see the next patches for more
details on the conversion.

v2:
  - Rebase.
  - Improve commit message (Chris).
v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      0e631adc
    • P
      drm/i915: pass the crtc as an argument to intel_fbc_update() · 754d1133
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      There's no need to reevaluate the status of every single crtc when a
single crtc changes its state.

With this, we're cutting the case where due to a change in pipe B,
intel_fbc_update() is called, then intel_fbc_find_crtc() concludes FBC
should be enabled on pipe A, then it completely rechecks the state of
pipe A only to conclude FBC should remain enabled on pipe A. If any
change on pipe A triggers a need to recompute whether FBC is valid on
pipe A, then at some point someone is going to call
intel_fbc_update(PIPE_A).

The addition of intel_fbc_deactivate() is necessary so we keep track
of the previously selected CRTC when we do invalidate/flush. We're
also going to continue the enable/disable/activate/deactivate concept
in the next patches.

v2: Rebase.
v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      754d1133
  25. 02 12月, 2015 2 次提交
  27. 01 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  29. 30 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  31. 24 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • L
      drm: Remove unused fbdev_list members · cb119717
      由 Lukas Wunner 提交于 
      I noticed that intel_fbdev->our_mode is unused. Introduced by
79e53945 ("DRM: i915: add mode setting support").

Then I noticed that intel_fbdev->fbdev_list is unused as well.
Introduced by 38651674 ("drm/fb: fix fbdev object model +
cleanup properly.") in i915, nouveau and radeon.

Subsequently cargo culted to amdgpu, ast, cirrus, qxl, udl,
virtio and mgag200.

Already removed from the latter with cc59487a ("drm/mgag200:
'fbdev_list' in 'struct mga_fbdev' is not used").

Remove it from the others.
Signed-off-by: NLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      cb119717
  33. 23 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  35. 18 11月, 2015 7 次提交