- 10 6月, 2016 19 次提交
-
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's enable intervention bypass only if the facility is acutally available. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
If guest-storage-limit-suppression is not available, we would for now have a valid guest address space with size 0. So let's simply set the origin to 0 and the limit to hamax. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's not provide the device attribute for cmma enabling and clearing if the hardware doesn't support it. This also helps getting rid of the undocumented return value "-EINVAL" in case CMMA is not available when trying to enable it. Also properly document the meaning of -EINVAL for CMMA clearing. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Now that we can detect if collaborative-memory-management interpretation is available, replace the heuristic by a real hardware detection. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Without guest-PER enhancement, we can't provide any debugging support. Therefore act like kernel support is missing. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Without that facility, we may only use scaol. So fallback to DMA allocation in that case, so we won't overwrite random memory via the SIE. Also disallow ESCA, so we don't have to handle that allocation case. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We have certain instructions that indicate available subfunctions via a query subfunction (crypto functions and ptff), or via a test bit function (plo). By exposing these "subfunction blocks" to user space, we allow user space to 1) query available subfunctions and make sure subfunctions won't get lost during migration - e.g. properly indicate them via a CPU model 2) change the subfunctions to be reported to the guest (even adding unavailable ones) This mechanism works just like the way we indicate the stfl(e) list to user space. This way, user space could even emulate some subfunctions in QEMU in the future. If this is ever applicable, we have to make sure later on, that unsupported subfunctions result in an intercept to QEMU. Please note that support to indicate them to the guest is still missing and requires hardware support. Usually, the IBC takes already care of these subfunctions for migration safety. QEMU should make sure to always set these bits properly according to the machine generation to be emulated. Available subfunctions are only valid in combination with STFLE bits retrieved via KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE and enabled via KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR. If the applicable bits are available, the indicated subfunctions are guaranteed to be correct. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's use our new function for preparing translation exceptions. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's use our new function for preparing translation exceptions. As we will need the correct ar, let's pass that to guest_page_range(). This will also make sure that the guest address is stored in the tec for applicable excptions. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's use our new function for preparing translation exceptions. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's use our new function for preparing translation exceptions. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's provide a function trans_exc() that can be used for handling preparation of translation exceptions on a central basis. We will use that function to replace existing code in gaccess. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Let's pass the effective guest address to get_vcpu_asce(), so we can properly set the guest address in case we inject an ALC protection exception. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
ESOP guarantees that during a protection exception, bit 61 of real location 168-175 will only be set to 1 if it was because of ALCP or DATP. If the exception is due to LAP or KCP, the bit will always be set to 0. The old SOP definition allowed bit 61 to be unpredictable in case of LAP or KCP in some conditions. So ESOP replaces this unpredictability by a guarantee. Therefore, we can directly forward ESOP if it is available on our machine. We don't have to do anything when ESOP is disabled - the guest will simply expect unpredictable values. Our guest access functions are already handling ESOP properly. Please note that future functionality in KVM will require knowledge about ESOP being enabled for a guest or not. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
For now, we only have an interface to query and configure facilities indicated via STFL(E). However, we also have features indicated via SCLP, that have to be indicated to the guest by user space and usually require KVM support. This patch allows user space to query and configure available cpu features for the guest. Please note that disabling a feature doesn't necessarily mean that it is completely disabled (e.g. ESOP is mostly handled by the SIE). We will try our best to disable it. Most features (e.g. SCLP) can't directly be forwarded, as most of them need in addition to hardware support, support in KVM. As we later on want to turn these features in KVM explicitly on/off (to simulate different behavior), we have to filter all features provided by the hardware and make them configurable. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 Alexander Yarygin 提交于
We have a table of mnemonic names for intercepted program interruptions, let's print readable name of the interruption in the kvm_s390_intercept_prog trace event. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NCornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 Janosch Frank 提交于
Store hypervisor information is a valid instruction not only in supervisor state but also in problem state, i.e. the guest's userspace. Its execution is not only computational and memory intensive, but also has to get hold of the ipte lock to write to the guest's memory. This lock is not intended to be held often and long, especially not from the untrusted guest userspace. Therefore we apply rate limiting of sthyi executions per VM. Signed-off-by: NJanosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 Janosch Frank 提交于
Store Hypervisor Information is an emulated z/VM instruction that provides a guest with basic information about the layers it is running on. This includes information about the cpu configuration of both the machine and the lpar, as well as their names, machine model and machine type. This information enables an application to determine the maximum capacity of CPs and IFLs available to software. The instruction is available whenever the facility bit 74 is set, otherwise executing it results in an operation exception. It is important to check the validity flags in the sections before using data from any structure member. It is not guaranteed that all members will be valid on all machines / machine configurations. Signed-off-by: NJanosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 Janosch Frank 提交于
This commit introduces code that handles operation exception interceptions. With this handler we can emulate instructions by using illegal opcodes. Signed-off-by: NJanosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
- 13 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christian Borntraeger 提交于
Some wakeups should not be considered a sucessful poll. For example on s390 I/O interrupts are usually floating, which means that _ALL_ CPUs would be considered runnable - letting all vCPUs poll all the time for transactional like workload, even if one vCPU would be enough. This can result in huge CPU usage for large guests. This patch lets architectures provide a way to qualify wakeups if they should be considered a good/bad wakeups in regard to polls. For s390 the implementation will fence of halt polling for anything but known good, single vCPU events. The s390 implementation for floating interrupts does a wakeup for one vCPU, but the interrupt will be delivered by whatever CPU checks first for a pending interrupt. We prefer the woken up CPU by marking the poll of this CPU as "good" poll. This code will also mark several other wakeup reasons like IPI or expired timers as "good". This will of course also mark some events as not sucessful. As KVM on z runs always as a 2nd level hypervisor, we prefer to not poll, unless we are really sure, though. This patch successfully limits the CPU usage for cases like uperf 1byte transactional ping pong workload or wakeup heavy workload like OLTP while still providing a proper speedup. This also introduced a new vcpu stat "halt_poll_no_tuning" that marks wakeups that are considered not good for polling. Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> (for an earlier version) Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> [Rename config symbol. - Paolo] Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 09 5月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Yarygin 提交于
When a guest is initializing, KVM provides facility bits that can be successfully used by the guest. It's done by applying kvm_s390_fac_list_mask mask on host facility bits stored by the STFLE instruction. Facility bits can be one of two kinds: it's either a hypervisor managed bit or non-hypervisor managed. The hardware provides information which bits need special handling. Let's automatically passthrough to guests new facility bits, that don't require hypervisor support. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 Alexander Yarygin 提交于
Some facility bits are in a range that is defined to be "ok for guests without any necessary hypervisor changes". Enable those bits. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Some hardware variants will round the ibc value up/down themselves, others will report a validity intercept. Let's always round it up/down. This patch will also make sure that the ibc is set to 0 in case we don't have ibc support (lowest_ibc == 0). Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We only have one cpuid for all VCPUs, so let's directly use the one in the cpu model. Also always store it directly as u64, no need for struct cpuid. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
If we don't have SIGP SENSE RUNNING STATUS enabled for the guest, let's not enable interpretation so we can correctly report an invalid order. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Only enable PFMF interpretation if the necessary facility (EDAT1) is available, otherwise the pfmf handler in priv.c will inject an exception Reviewed-by: NDominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
- 04 5月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
While we can not fully fence of the Nonquiescing Key-Setting facility, we should as try our best to hide it. Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We should never inject an exception after we manually rewound the PSW (to retry the ESSA instruction in this case). This will mess up the PSW. So this never worked and therefore never really triggered. Looking at the details, we don't even have to perform any validity checks. 1. Bits 52-63 of an entry are stored as 0 by the hardware. 2. We are dealing with absolute addresses but only check for the prefix starting at address 0. This isn't correct and doesn't make much sense, cpus could still zap the prefix of other cpus. But as prefix pages cannot be swapped out without a notifier being called for the affected VCPU, a zap can never remove a protected prefix. Reviewed-by: NDominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
- 20 4月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Halil Pasic 提交于
Introduce a FLIC operation for clearing I/O interrupts for a subchannel. Rationale: According to the platform specification, pending I/O interruption requests have to be revoked in certain situations. For instance, according to the Principles of Operation (page 17-27), a subchannel put into the installed parameters initialized state is in the same state as after an I/O system reset (just parameters possibly changed). This implies that any I/O interrupts for that subchannel are no longer pending (as I/O system resets clear I/O interrupts). Therefore, we need an interface to clear pending I/O interrupts. Signed-off-by: NHalil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NCornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
-
由 Halil Pasic 提交于
HAS_ATTR is useful for determining the supported attributes; let's implement it. Signed-off-by: NHalil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NCornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
-
- 08 3月, 2016 10 次提交
-
-
由 Adam Buchbinder 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAdam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
-
由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于
The pgtable.c file is quite big, before it grows any larger split it into pgtable.c, pgalloc.c and gmap.c. In addition move the gmap related header definitions into the new gmap.h header and all of the pgste helpers from pgtable.h to pgtable.c. Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
-
由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于
The code in the various ptep_xxx functions has grown quite large, consolidate them to four out-of-line functions: ptep_xchg_direct to exchange a pte with another with immediate flushing ptep_xchg_lazy to exchange a pte with another in a batched update ptep_modify_prot_start to begin a protection flags update ptep_modify_prot_commit to commit a protection flags update Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We can fit the 2k for the STFLE interpretation and the crypto control block into one DMA page. As we now only have to allocate one DMA page, we can clean up the code a bit. As a nice side effect, this also fixes a problem with crycbd alignment in case special allocation debug options are enabled, debugged by Sascha Silbe. Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NDominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NCornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Not setting the facility list designation disables STFLE interpretation, this is what we want if the guest was told to not have it. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
When the VCPU cpu timer expires, we have to wake up just like when the ckc triggers. For now, setting up a cpu timer in the guest and going into enabled wait will never lead to a wakeup. This patch fixes this problem. Just as for the ckc, we have to take care of waking up too early. We have to recalculate the sleep time and go back to sleep. Please note that the timer callback calls kvm_s390_get_cpu_timer() from interrupt context. As the timer is canceled when leaving handle_wait(), and we don't do any VCPU cpu timer writes/updates in that function, we can be sure that we will never try to read the VCPU cpu timer from the same cpu that is currentyl updating the timer (deadlock). Reported-by: NSascha Silbe <silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NSascha Silbe <silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
The cpu timer is a mean to measure task execution time. We want to account everything for a VCPU for which it is responsible. Therefore, if the VCPU wants to sleep, it shall be accounted for it. We can easily get this done by not disabling cpu timer accounting when scheduled out while sleeping because of enabled wait. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
For now, only the owning VCPU thread (that has loaded the VCPU) can get a consistent cpu timer value when calculating the delta. However, other threads might also be interested in a more recent, consistent value. Of special interest will be the timer callback of a VCPU that executes without having the VCPU loaded and could run in parallel with the VCPU thread. The cpu timer has a nice property: it is only updated by the owning VCPU thread. And speaking about accounting, a consistent value can only be calculated by looking at cputm_start and the cpu timer itself in one shot, otherwise the result might be wrong. As we only have one writing thread at a time (owning VCPU thread), we can use a seqcount instead of a seqlock and retry if the VCPU refreshed its cpu timer. This avoids any heavy locking and only introduces a counter update/check plus a handful of smp_wmb(). The owning VCPU thread should never have to retry on reads, and also for other threads this might be a very rare scenario. Please note that we have to use the raw_* variants for locking the seqcount as lockdep will produce false warnings otherwise. The rq->lock held during vcpu_load/put is also acquired from hardirq context. Lockdep cannot know that we avoid potential deadlocks by disabling preemption and thereby disable concurrent write locking attempts (via vcpu_put/load). Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
Architecturally we should only provide steal time if we are scheduled away, and not if the host interprets a guest exit. We have to step the guest CPU timer in these cases. In the first shot, we will step the VCPU timer only during the kvm_run ioctl. Therefore all time spent e.g. in interception handlers or on irq delivery will be accounted for that VCPU. We have to take care of a few special cases: - Other VCPUs can test for pending irqs. We can only report a consistent value for the VCPU thread itself when adding the delta. - We have to take care of STP sync, therefore we have to extend kvm_clock_sync() and disable preemption accordingly - During any call to disable/enable/start/stop we could get premeempted and therefore get start/stop calls. Therefore we have to make sure we don't get into an inconsistent state. Whenever a VCPU is scheduled out, sleeping, in user space or just about to enter the SIE, the guest cpu timer isn't stepped. Please note that all primitives are prepared to be called from both environments (cpu timer accounting enabled or not), although not completely used in this patch yet (e.g. kvm_s390_set_cpu_timer() will never be called while cpu timer accounting is enabled). Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-
由 David Hildenbrand 提交于
We want to manually step the cpu timer in certain scenarios in the future. Let's abstract any access to the cpu timer, so we can hide the complexity internally. Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-