1. 14 10月, 2016 7 次提交
  2. 12 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 10 10月, 2016 2 次提交
  4. 04 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 21 9月, 2016 3 次提交
  6. 15 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 09 9月, 2016 5 次提交
  8. 27 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 22 8月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Ignore stuck requests when considering hangs · 34730fed
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      If the engine isn't being retired (worker starvation?) then it is
      possible for us to repeatedly observe that between consecutive
      hangchecks the seqno on the ring to be the same and there remain
      unretired requests. Ignore these completely and only regard the engine
      as busy for the purpose of hang detection (not stall detection) if there
      are outstanding breadcrumbs.
      
      In recent history we have looked at using both the request and seqno as
      indication of activity on the engine, but that was reduced to just
      inspecting seqno in commit cffa781e ("drm/i915: Simplify check for
      idleness in hangcheck"). However, in commit dcff85c8 ("drm/i915:
      Enable i915_gem_wait_for_idle() without holding struct_mutex"), I made
      the decision to use the new common lockless function, under the
      assumption that request retirement was more frequent than hangcheck and
      so we would not have a stuck busy check. The flaw there was in
      forgetting that we accumulate the hang score, and so successive checks
      seeing a stuck request, albeit with the GPU advancing elsewhere and so
      not necessary the same stuck request, would eventually trigger the hang.
      
      Fixes: dcff85c8 ("drm/i915: Enable i915_gem_wait_for_idle()...")
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160820145408.32180-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
      34730fed
  10. 10 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 06 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  12. 05 8月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Enable i915_gem_wait_for_idle() without holding struct_mutex · dcff85c8
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      The principal motivation for this was to try and eliminate the
      struct_mutex from i915_gem_suspend - but we still need to hold the mutex
      current for the i915_gem_context_lost(). (The issue there is that there
      may be an indirect lockdep cycle between cpu_hotplug (i.e. suspend) and
      struct_mutex via the stop_machine().) For the moment, enabling last
      request tracking for the engine, allows us to do busyness checking and
      waiting without requiring the struct_mutex - which is useful in its own
      right.
      
      As a side-effect of having a robust means for tracking engine busyness,
      we can replace our other busyness heuristic, that of comparing against
      the last submitted seqno. For paranoid reasons, we have a semi-ordered
      check of that seqno inside the hangchecker, which we can now improve to
      an ordered check of the engine's busyness (removing a locked xchg in the
      process).
      
      v2: Pass along "bool interruptible" as being unlocked we cannot rely on
      i915->mm.interruptible being stable or even under our control.
      v3: Replace check Ironlake i915_gpu_busy() with the common precalculated value
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470388464-28458-6-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      dcff85c8
  13. 03 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  14. 27 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  15. 20 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  16. 15 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  17. 14 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  18. 08 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  19. 06 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  20. 05 7月, 2016 3 次提交
  21. 04 7月, 2016 3 次提交
  22. 02 7月, 2016 1 次提交