Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 6月, 2017 6 次提交
  3. 10 6月, 2017 1 次提交
    • O
      Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow · 70e7af24
      由 Omar Sandoval 提交于 
      btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size() does an unsigned 32-bit multiplication,
which can overflow if num_items >= 4 GB / (nodesize * BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL * 2).
For a nodesize of 16kB, this overflow happens at 16k items. Usually,
num_items is a small constant passed to btrfs_start_transaction(), but
we also use btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size() for metadata reservations
for extent items in btrfs_delalloc_{reserve,release}_metadata().

In drop_outstanding_extents(), num_items is calculated as
inode->reserved_extents - inode->outstanding_extents. The difference
between these two counters is usually small, but if many delalloc
extents are reserved and then the outstanding extents are merged in
btrfs_merge_extent_hook(), the difference can become large enough to
overflow in btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size().

The overflow manifests itself as a leak of a multiple of 4 GB in
delalloc_block_rsv and the metadata bytes_may_use counter. This in turn
can cause early ENOSPC errors. Additionally, these WARN_ONs in
extent-tree.c will be hit when unmounting:

    WARN_ON(fs_info->delalloc_block_rsv.size > 0);
    WARN_ON(fs_info->delalloc_block_rsv.reserved > 0);
    WARN_ON(space_info->bytes_pinned > 0 ||
            space_info->bytes_reserved > 0 ||
            space_info->bytes_may_use > 0);

Fix it by casting nodesize to a u64 so that
btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size() does a full 64-bit multiplication.
While we're here, do the same in btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size(); this
can't overflow with any existing uses, but it's better to be safe here
than have another hard-to-debug problem later on.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      70e7af24
  5. 21 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 18 4月, 2017 6 次提交
  9. 29 3月, 2017 1 次提交
    • G
      btrfs: Change qgroup_meta_rsv to 64bit · ce0dcee6
      由 Goldwyn Rodrigues 提交于 
      Using an int value is causing qg->reserved to become negative and
exclusive -EDQUOT to be reached prematurely.

This affects exclusive qgroups only.

TEST CASE:

DEVICE=/dev/vdb
MOUNTPOINT=/mnt
SUBVOL=$MOUNTPOINT/tmp

umount $SUBVOL
umount $MOUNTPOINT

mkfs.btrfs -f $DEVICE
mount /dev/vdb $MOUNTPOINT
btrfs quota enable $MOUNTPOINT
btrfs subvol create $SUBVOL
umount $MOUNTPOINT
mount /dev/vdb $MOUNTPOINT
mount -o subvol=tmp $DEVICE $SUBVOL
btrfs qgroup limit -e 3G $SUBVOL

btrfs quota rescan /mnt -w

for i in `seq 1 44000`; do
  dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/tmp/test_$i bs=10k count=1
  if [[ $? > 0 ]]; then
     btrfs qgroup show -pcref $SUBVOL
     exit 1
  fi
done
Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
[ add reproducer to changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      ce0dcee6
  11. 02 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  13. 28 2月, 2017 14 次提交
  15. 25 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  17. 17 2月, 2017 4 次提交
  19. 14 2月, 2017 4 次提交
  21. 10 12月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      fs: try to clone files first in vfs_copy_file_range · a76b5b04
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      A clone is a perfectly fine implementation of a file copy, so most
file systems just implement the copy that way.  Instead of duplicating
this logic move it to the VFS.  Currently btrfs and XFS implement copies
the same way as clones and there is no behavior change for them, cifs
only implements clones and grow support for copy_file_range with this
patch.  NFS implements both, so this will allow copy_file_range to work
on servers that only implement CLONE and be lot more efficient on servers
that implements CLONE and COPY.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      a76b5b04