- 26 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jamal Hadi Salim 提交于
Introduce optional 128-bit action cookie. Like all other cookie schemes in the networking world (eg in protocols like http or existing kernel fib protocol field, etc) the idea is to save user state that when retrieved serves as a correlator. The kernel _should not_ intepret it. The user can store whatever they wish in the 128 bits. Sample exercise(showing variable length use of cookie) .. create an accept action with cookie a1b2c3d4 sudo $TC actions add action ok index 1 cookie a1b2c3d4 .. dump all gact actions.. sudo $TC -s actions ls action gact action order 0: gact action pass random type none pass val 0 index 1 ref 1 bind 0 installed 5 sec used 5 sec Action statistics: Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 cookie a1b2c3d4 .. bind the accept action to a filter.. sudo $TC filter add dev lo parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 \ u32 match ip dst 127.0.0.1/32 flowid 1:1 action gact index 1 ... send some traffic.. $ ping 127.0.0.1 -c 3 PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.027 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.038 ms Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
1) Old code was hard to maintain, due to complex lock chains. (We probably will be able to remove some kfree_rcu() in callers) 2) Using a single timer to update all estimators does not scale. 3) Code was buggy on 32bit kernel (WRITE_ONCE() on 64bit quantity is not supposed to work well) In this rewrite : - I removed the RB tree that had to be scanned in gen_estimator_active(). qdisc dumps should be much faster. - Each estimator has its own timer. - Estimations are maintained in net_rate_estimator structure, instead of dirtying the qdisc. Minor, but part of the simplification. - Reading the estimator uses RCU and a seqcount to provide proper support for 32bit kernels. - We reduce memory need when estimators are not used, since we store a pointer, instead of the bytes/packets counters. - xt_rateest_mt() no longer has to grab a spinlock. (In the future, xt_rateest_tg() could be switched to per cpu counters) Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hadar Hen Zion 提交于
Adding support to a new tc_action_ops. get_dev is a general option which allows to get the underline device when trying to offload a tc rule. In case of mirred action the returned device is the mirred (egress) device. Signed-off-by: NHadar Hen Zion <hadarh@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 10 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
tc_act macro addressed a non existing field, and was not used in the kernel source. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 8月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
As pointed out by Jamal, an action could be shared by multiple filters, so we can't use list to chain them any more after we get rid of the original tc_action. Instead, we could just save pointers to these actions in tcf_exts, since they are refcount'ed, so convert the list to an array of pointers. The "ugly" part is the action API still accepts list as a parameter, I just introduce a helper function to convert the array of pointers to a list, instead of relying on the C99 feature to iterate the array. Fixes: a85a970a ("net_sched: move tc_action into tcf_common") Reported-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Acked-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
struct tcf_exts belongs to filters, should not be visible to plain tc actions. Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Acked-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
It is harmless because all users pass 'a' to this macro. Fixes: 00175aec ("net/sched: Macro instead of CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT ifdef") Cc: Amir Vadai <amir@vadai.me> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Acked-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 7月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
After the previous patch, struct tc_action should be enough to represent the generic tc action, tcf_common is not necessary any more. This patch gets rid of it to make tc action code more readable. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
struct tc_action is confusing, currently we use it for two purposes: 1) Pass in arguments and carry out results from helper functions 2) A generic representation for tc actions The first one is error-prone, since we need to make sure we don't miss anything. This patch aims to get rid of this use, by moving tc_action into tcf_common, so that they are allocated together in hashtable and can be cast'ed easily. And together with the following patch, we could really make tc_action a generic representation for all tc actions and each type of action can inherit from it. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT isn't set 'struct tcf_exts' has no member named 'actions' and we therefore must not access it. Otherwise compilation fails. Fix this by introducing a new macro similar to tc_no_actions(), which always returns 'false' if CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT isn't set. Fixes: 763b4b70 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Add support in matchall mirror TC offloading") Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Acked-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 6月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jamal Hadi Salim 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Acked-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
-
由 Jamal Hadi Salim 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jamal Hadi Salim 提交于
Useful to know when the action was first used for accounting (and debugging) Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
When CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is disabled, we get a new warning in the mlx5 ethernet driver because the tc_for_each_action() loop never references the iterator: mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c: In function 'mlx5e_stats_flower': mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c:431:20: error: unused variable 'a' [-Werror=unused-variable] struct tc_action *a; This changes the dummy tc_for_each_action() macro by adding a cast to void, letting the compiler know that the variable is intentionally declared but not used here. I could not come up with a nicer workaround, but this seems to do the trick. Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: aad7e08d ("net/mlx5e: Hardware offloaded flower filter statistics support") Fixes: 00175aec ("net/sched: Macro instead of CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT ifdef") Acked-By: NAmir Vadai <amir@vadai.me> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Amir Vadai 提交于
Introduce stats_update callback. netdev driver could call it for offloaded actions to update the basic statistics (packets, bytes and last use). Since bstats_update() and bstats_cpu_update() use skb as an argument to get the counters, _bstats_update() and _bstats_cpu_update(), that get bytes and packets as arguments, were added. Signed-off-by: NAmir Vadai <amirva@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
Fixes: ddf97ccd ("net_sched: add network namespace support for tc actions") Reported-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Tested-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Amir Vadai 提交于
Introduce the macros tc_no_actions and tc_for_each_action to make code clearer. Extracted struct tc_action out of the ifdef to make calls to is_tcf_gact_shot() and similar functions valid, even when it is a nop. Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com> Suggested-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NAmir Vadai <amir@vadai.me> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 2月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
Currently tc actions are stored in a per-module hashtable, therefore are visible to all network namespaces. This is probably the last part of the tc subsystem which is not aware of netns now. This patch makes them per-netns, several tc action API's need to be adjusted for this. The tc action API code is ugly due to historical reasons, we need to refactor that code in the future. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Acked-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
We only release the memory of the hashtable itself, not its entries inside. This is not a problem yet since we only call it in module release path, and module is refcount'ed by actions. This would be a problem after we move the per module hinfo into per netns in the latter patch. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Acked-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
tcf_hash_destroy() used once. Make it static. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 31 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Since commit 55334a5d ("net_sched: act: refuse to remove bound action outside"), we end up with a wrong reference count for a tc action. Test case 1: FOO="1,6 0 0 4294967295," BAR="1,6 0 0 4294967294," tc filter add dev foo parent 1: bpf bytecode "$FOO" flowid 1:1 \ action bpf bytecode "$FOO" tc actions show action bpf action order 0: bpf bytecode '1,6 0 0 4294967295' default-action pipe index 1 ref 1 bind 1 tc actions replace action bpf bytecode "$BAR" index 1 tc actions show action bpf action order 0: bpf bytecode '1,6 0 0 4294967294' default-action pipe index 1 ref 2 bind 1 tc actions replace action bpf bytecode "$FOO" index 1 tc actions show action bpf action order 0: bpf bytecode '1,6 0 0 4294967295' default-action pipe index 1 ref 3 bind 1 Test case 2: FOO="1,6 0 0 4294967295," tc filter add dev foo parent 1: bpf bytecode "$FOO" flowid 1:1 action ok tc actions show action gact action order 0: gact action pass random type none pass val 0 index 1 ref 1 bind 1 tc actions add action drop index 1 RTNETLINK answers: File exists [...] tc actions show action gact action order 0: gact action pass random type none pass val 0 index 1 ref 2 bind 1 tc actions add action drop index 1 RTNETLINK answers: File exists [...] tc actions show action gact action order 0: gact action pass random type none pass val 0 index 1 ref 3 bind 1 What happens is that in tcf_hash_check(), we check tcf_common for a given index and increase tcfc_refcnt and conditionally tcfc_bindcnt when we've found an existing action. Now there are the following cases: 1) We do a late binding of an action. In that case, we leave the tcfc_refcnt/tcfc_bindcnt increased and are done with the ->init() handler. This is correctly handeled. 2) We replace the given action, or we try to add one without replacing and find out that the action at a specific index already exists (thus, we go out with error in that case). In case of 2), we have to undo the reference count increase from tcf_hash_check() in the tcf_hash_check() function. Currently, we fail to do so because of the 'tcfc_bindcnt > 0' check which bails out early with an -EPERM error. Now, while commit 55334a5d prevents 'tc actions del action ...' on an already classifier-bound action to drop the reference count (which could then become negative, wrap around etc), this restriction only accounts for invocations outside a specific action's ->init() handler. One possible solution would be to add a flag thus we possibly trigger the -EPERM ony in situations where it is indeed relevant. After the patch, above test cases have correct reference count again. Fixes: 55334a5d ("net_sched: act: refuse to remove bound action outside") Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: NCong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 7月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
Final step for gact RCU operation : 1) Use percpu stats 2) update lastuse only every clock tick to avoid false sharing 3) Remove spinlock acquisition, as it is no longer needed. Since this is the last contended lock in packet RX when tc gact is used, this gives impressive gain. My host with 8 RX queues was handling 5 Mpps before the patch, and more than 11 Mpps after patch. Tested: On receiver : dev=eth0 tc qdisc del dev $dev ingress 2>/dev/null tc qdisc add dev $dev ingress tc filter del dev $dev root pref 10 2>/dev/null tc filter del dev $dev pref 10 2>/dev/null tc filter add dev $dev est 1sec 4sec parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 \ u32 match ip src 7.0.0.0/8 flowid 1:15 action drop Sender sends packets flood from 7/8 network Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
Reuse existing percpu infrastructure John Fastabend added for qdisc. This patch adds a new cpustats parameter to tcf_hash_create() and all actions pass false, meaning this patch should have no effect yet. Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 2月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
When an action is bonnd to a filter, there is no point to remove it outside. Currently we just silently decrease the refcnt, we should reject this explicitly with EPERM. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
For bindcnt and refcnt etc., they are common for all actions, not need to repeat such operations for their own, they can be unified now. Actions just need to do its specific cleanup if needed. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
Now we can totally hide it from modules. tcf_hash_*() API's will operate on struct tc_action, modules don't need to care about the details. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 1月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
So that we will not expose struct tcf_common to modules. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
Every action ops has a pointer to hash info, so we don't need to hard-code it in each module. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
It is not actually implemented. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 14 1月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
It is not necessary at all. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
There is no need to store the index separatedly since tcf_hashinfo is allocated statically too. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 02 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 stephen hemminger 提交于
No need to export functions only used in one file. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Acked-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 19 12月, 2013 5 次提交
-
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
We don't need to maintain our own singly linked list code. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
So that we don't need to play with singly linked list, and since the code is not on hot path, we can use spinlock instead of rwlock. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
It looks weird to store the lock out of the struct but still points to a static variable. Just move them into the struct. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
Currently actions are chained by a singly linked list, therefore it is a bit hard to add and remove a specific entry. Convert it to struct list_head so that in the latter patch we can remove an action without finding its head. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
It is not used. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
There are a mix of function prototypes with and without extern in the kernel sources. Standardize on not using extern for function prototypes. Function prototypes don't need to be written with extern. extern is assumed by the compiler. Its use is as unnecessary as using auto to declare automatic/local variables in a block. Reflow modified prototypes to 80 columns. Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-