Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 05 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  3. 03 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 24 4月, 2015 1 次提交
    • J
      sunrpc: make debugfs file creation failure non-fatal · 3f940098
      由 Jeff Layton 提交于 
      v2: gracefully handle the case where some dentry pointers end up NULL
    and be more dilligent about zeroing out dentry pointers

We currently have a problem that SELinux policy is being enforced when
creating debugfs files. If a debugfs file is created as a side effect of
doing some syscall, then that creation can fail if the SELinux policy
for that process prevents it.

This seems wrong. We don't do that for files under /proc, for instance,
so Bruce has proposed a patch to fix that.

While discussing that patch however, Greg K.H. stated:

    "No kernel code should care / fail if a debugfs function fails, so
     please fix up the sunrpc code first."

This patch converts all of the sunrpc debugfs setup code to be void
return functins, and the callers to not look for errors from those
functions.

This should allow rpc_clnt and rpc_xprt creation to work, even if the
kernel fails to create debugfs files for some reason.

Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: N"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      3f940098
  7. 01 4月, 2015 1 次提交
    • J
      sunrpc: make debugfs file creation failure non-fatal · f9c72d10
      由 Jeff Layton 提交于 
      We currently have a problem that SELinux policy is being enforced when
creating debugfs files. If a debugfs file is created as a side effect of
doing some syscall, then that creation can fail if the SELinux policy
for that process prevents it.

This seems wrong. We don't do that for files under /proc, for instance,
so Bruce has proposed a patch to fix that.

While discussing that patch however, Greg K.H. stated:

    "No kernel code should care / fail if a debugfs function fails, so
     please fix up the sunrpc code first."

This patch converts all of the sunrpc debugfs setup code to be void
return functins, and the callers to not look for errors from those
functions.

This should allow rpc_clnt and rpc_xprt creation to work, even if the
kernel fails to create debugfs files for some reason.

Symptoms were failing krb5 mounts on systems using gss-proxy and
selinux.

Fixes: 388f0c77 "sunrpc: add a debugfs rpc_xprt directory..."
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
      f9c72d10
  9. 09 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 04 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 28 11月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      sunrpc: add debugfs file for displaying client rpc_task queue · b4b9d2cc
      由 Jeff Layton 提交于 
      It's possible to get a dump of the RPC task queue by writing a value to
/proc/sys/sunrpc/rpc_debug. If you write any value to that file, you get
a dump of the RPC client task list into the log buffer. This is a rather
inconvenient interface however, and makes it hard to get immediate info
about the task queue.

Add a new directory hierarchy under debugfs:

    sunrpc/
        rpc_clnt/
            <clientid>/

Within each clientid directory we create a new "tasks" file that will
dump info similar to what shows up in the log buffer, but with a few
small differences -- we avoid printing raw kernel addresses in favor of
symbolic names and the XID is also displayed.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      b4b9d2cc
  15. 25 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 26 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      SUNRPC: Add missing support for RPC_CLNT_CREATE_NO_RETRANS_TIMEOUT · 2aca5b86
      由 Trond Myklebust 提交于 
      The flag RPC_CLNT_CREATE_NO_RETRANS_TIMEOUT was intended introduced in
order to allow NFSv4 clients to disable resend timeouts. Since those
cause the RPC layer to break the connection, they mess up the duplicate
reply caches that remain indexed on the port number in NFSv4..

This patch includes the code that was missing in the original to
set the appropriate flag in struct rpc_clnt, when the caller of
rpc_create() sets RPC_CLNT_CREATE_NO_RETRANS_TIMEOUT.

Fixes: 8a19a0b6 (SUNRPC: Add RPC task and client level options to...)
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      2aca5b86
  19. 25 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      rpc: Add -EPERM processing for xs_udp_send_request() · 3dedbb5c
      由 Jason Baron 提交于 
      If an iptables drop rule is added for an nfs server, the client can end up in
a softlockup. Because of the way that xs_sendpages() is structured, the -EPERM
is ignored since the prior bits of the packet may have been successfully queued
and thus xs_sendpages() returns a non-zero value. Then, xs_udp_send_request()
thinks that because some bits were queued it should return -EAGAIN. We then try
the request again and again, resulting in cpu spinning. Reproducer:

1) open a file on the nfs server '/nfs/foo' (mounted using udp)
2) iptables -A OUTPUT -d <nfs server ip> -j DROP
3) write to /nfs/foo
4) close /nfs/foo
5) iptables -D OUTPUT -d <nfs server ip> -j DROP

The softlockup occurs in step 4 above.

The previous patch, allows xs_sendpages() to return both a sent count and
any error values that may have occurred. Thus, if we get an -EPERM, return
that to the higher level code.

With this patch in place we can successfully abort the above sequence and
avoid the softlockup.

I also tried the above test case on an nfs mount on tcp and although the system
does not softlockup, I still ended up with the 'hung_task' firing after 120
seconds, due to the i/o being stuck. The tcp case appears a bit harder to fix,
since -EPERM appears to get ignored much lower down in the stack and does not
propogate up to xs_sendpages(). This case is not quite as insidious as the
softlockup and it is not addressed here.
Reported-by: NYigong Lou <ylou@akamai.com>
Signed-off-by: NJason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      3dedbb5c
  21. 03 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  23. 01 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  25. 30 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  27. 21 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  29. 20 3月, 2014 2 次提交
  31. 18 3月, 2014 2 次提交
  33. 06 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • W
      sunrpc: Fix infinite loop in RPC state machine · 6ff33b7d
      由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于 
      When a task enters call_refreshresult with status 0 from call_refresh and
!rpcauth_uptodatecred(task) it enters call_refresh again with no rate-limiting
or max number of retries.

Instead of trying forever, make use of the retry path that other errors use.

This only seems to be possible when the crrefresh callback is gss_refresh_null,
which only happens when destroying the context.

To reproduce:

1) mount with sec=krb5 (or sec=sys with krb5 negotiated for non FSID specific
   operations).

2) reboot - the client will be stuck and will need to be hard rebooted

BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [kworker/0:2:46]
Modules linked in: rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsv4 nfs fscache ppdev crc32c_intel aesni_intel aes_x86_64 glue_helper lrw gf128mul ablk_helper cryptd serio_raw i2c_piix4 i2c_core e1000 parport_pc parport shpchp nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry exportfs nfs_acl lockd sunrpc autofs4 mptspi scsi_transport_spi mptscsih mptbase ata_generic floppy
irq event stamp: 195724
hardirqs last  enabled at (195723): [<ffffffff814a925c>] restore_args+0x0/0x30
hardirqs last disabled at (195724): [<ffffffff814b0a6a>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x80
softirqs last  enabled at (195722): [<ffffffff8103f583>] __do_softirq+0x1df/0x276
softirqs last disabled at (195717): [<ffffffff8103f852>] irq_exit+0x53/0x9a
CPU: 0 PID: 46 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 3.13.0-rc3-branch-dros_testing+ #4
Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/31/2013
Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
task: ffff8800799c4260 ti: ffff880079002000 task.ti: ffff880079002000
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa0064fd4>]  [<ffffffffa0064fd4>] __rpc_execute+0x8a/0x362 [sunrpc]
RSP: 0018:ffff880079003d18  EFLAGS: 00000246
RAX: 0000000000000005 RBX: 0000000000000007 RCX: 0000000000000007
RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: ffff88007aecbae8 RDI: ffff8800783d8900
RBP: ffff880079003d78 R08: ffff88006e30e9f8 R09: ffffffffa005a3d7
R10: ffff88006e30e7b0 R11: ffff8800783d8900 R12: ffffffffa006675e
R13: ffff880079003ce8 R14: ffff88006e30e7b0 R15: ffff8800783d8900
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88007f200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f3072333000 CR3: 0000000001a0b000 CR4: 00000000001407f0
Stack:
 ffff880079003d98 0000000000000246 0000000000000000 ffff88007a9a4830
 ffff880000000000 ffffffff81073f47 ffff88007f212b00 ffff8800799c4260
 ffff8800783d8988 ffff88007f212b00 ffffe8ffff604800 0000000000000000
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81073f47>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x145/0x1a1
 [<ffffffffa00652d3>] rpc_async_schedule+0x27/0x32 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffff81052974>] process_one_work+0x211/0x3a5
 [<ffffffff810528d5>] ? process_one_work+0x172/0x3a5
 [<ffffffff81052eeb>] worker_thread+0x134/0x202
 [<ffffffff81052db7>] ? rescuer_thread+0x280/0x280
 [<ffffffff81052db7>] ? rescuer_thread+0x280/0x280
 [<ffffffff810584a0>] kthread+0xc9/0xd1
 [<ffffffff810583d7>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x61/0x61
 [<ffffffff814afd6c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
 [<ffffffff810583d7>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x61/0x61
Code: e8 87 63 fd e0 c6 05 10 dd 01 00 01 48 8b 43 70 4c 8d 6b 70 45 31 e4 a8 02 0f 85 d5 02 00 00 4c 8b 7b 48 48 c7 43 48 00 00 00 00 <4c> 8b 4b 50 4d 85 ff 75 0c 4d 85 c9 4d 89 cf 0f 84 32 01 00 00

And the output of "rpcdebug -m rpc -s all":

RPC:    61 call_refresh (status 0)
RPC:    61 call_refresh (status 0)
RPC:    61 refreshing RPCSEC_GSS cred ffff88007a413cf0
RPC:    61 refreshing RPCSEC_GSS cred ffff88007a413cf0
RPC:    61 call_refreshresult (status 0)
RPC:    61 refreshing RPCSEC_GSS cred ffff88007a413cf0
RPC:    61 call_refreshresult (status 0)
RPC:    61 refreshing RPCSEC_GSS cred ffff88007a413cf0
RPC:    61 call_refresh (status 0)
RPC:    61 call_refreshresult (status 0)
RPC:    61 call_refresh (status 0)
RPC:    61 call_refresh (status 0)
RPC:    61 refreshing RPCSEC_GSS cred ffff88007a413cf0
RPC:    61 call_refreshresult (status 0)
RPC:    61 call_refresh (status 0)
RPC:    61 refreshing RPCSEC_GSS cred ffff88007a413cf0
RPC:    61 call_refresh (status 0)
RPC:    61 refreshing RPCSEC_GSS cred ffff88007a413cf0
RPC:    61 refreshing RPCSEC_GSS cred ffff88007a413cf0
RPC:    61 call_refreshresult (status 0)
RPC:    61 call_refresh (status 0)
RPC:    61 call_refresh (status 0)
RPC:    61 call_refresh (status 0)
RPC:    61 call_refresh (status 0)
RPC:    61 call_refreshresult (status 0)
RPC:    61 refreshing RPCSEC_GSS cred ffff88007a413cf0
Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.37+
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      6ff33b7d
  35. 01 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  37. 13 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  39. 30 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  41. 29 10月, 2013 3 次提交
  43. 02 10月, 2013 4 次提交
  45. 05 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  47. 04 9月, 2013 2 次提交
  49. 03 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  51. 01 9月, 2013 2 次提交
  53. 30 8月, 2013 5 次提交