Our current global state handling is pretty ad-hoc. Let's try to
make it better by imitating the standard drm core private object
approach.

The reason why we don't want to directly use the private objects
is locking; Each private object has its own lock so if we
introduce any global private objects we get serialized by that
single lock across all pipes. The global state apporoach instead
uses a read/write lock type of approach where each individual
crtc lock counts as a read lock, and grabbing all the crtc locks
allows one write access.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120174728.21095-15-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

Move intel_atomic_state_free() next to its counterpart.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120174728.21095-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

Give the cdclk init/uninit functions a _hw suffix to make
it clear they are about initializing the actual hardware.
I'll be wanting to to add a intel_cdclk_init() which is
purely initializing software structures.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120174728.21095-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

To make life less confusing let's swap() the entire cdclk state
rather than swapping some parts, copying other parts, and leaving
the rest just as is.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120174728.21095-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

Use the same structure to store the cdclk state in both
intel_atomic_state and dev_priv. First step towards proper
old vs. new cdclk states.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120174728.21095-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

Move all the old vs. new state shenanigans
into intel_set_cdclk_{pre,post}_plane_update() so that the caller
doesn't need to know any of it.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120174728.21095-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

I want to have a higher level cdclk state object so let's rename
the current lower level thing to cdclk_config (because I lack
imagination).
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120174728.21095-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

intel_cdclk_needs_cd2x_update() is named rather confusingly.
We don't have to do a cd2x update, rather we are allowed to
do one (as opposed to a full PLL reprogramming with its heavy
handed modeset). So let's rename the function to
intel_cdclk_can_cd2x_update().
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120174728.21095-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

Move the min_cdclk[] and min_voltage_level[] arrays under the
rest of the cdclk state. And while at it provide a simple
helper (intel_cdclk_clear_state()) to clear the state during
the ww_mutex backoff dance.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120174728.21095-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

Move the initial setup of state->{cdclk,min_cdclk[],min_voltage_level[]}
into intel_modeset_calc_cdclk(), and we'll move the counterparts into
intel_cdclk_swap_state(). This encapsulates the cdclk state much better.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120174728.21095-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

The linetime watermarks really have very little in common with the
plane watermarks. It looks to be cleaner to simply track them in
the crtc_state and program them from the normal modeset/fastset
paths.

The only dark cloud comes from the fact that the register is
still supposedly single buffered. So in theory it might still
need some form of two stage programming. Note that even though
HSW/BDWhave two stage programming we never computed any special
intermediate values for the linetime watermarks, and on SKL+
we don't even have the two stage stuff plugged in since everything
else is double buffered. So let's assume it's all fine and
continue doing what we've been doing.

Actually on HSW/BDW the value should not even change without
a full modeset since it doesn't account for pfit downscaling.
Thus only fastboot might be affected. But on SKL+ the pfit
scaling factor is take into consideration so the value may
change during any fastset.

As a bonus we'll plug this thing into the state
checker/dump now.

v2: Rebase due to bigjoiner prep
v2: Only compute ips linetime for IPS capable pipes.
    Bspec says the register values is ignored for other
    pipes, but in fact it can't even be written so the
    state checker becomes unhappy if we don't compute
    it as zero.

Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120174728.21095-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NStanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>

Let's store the normal and IPS linetime watermarks individually,
and while at it we'll pimp the register definitions as well.

v2: Deal with gvt
Reviewed-by: NStanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120174728.21095-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

intel_dp_set_m_n() has a clear place in the DDI DP specific pre-enable
hook.

Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200128162850.8660-3-jani.nikula@intel.com

Enable the dsi transcoder, panel and backlight as part of
encoder->enable and not encoder->pre_enable. We need to have pipe src
size, among other things, set before enabling the transcoder, to avoid
FIFO underruns and possibly other issues.

v2 by Jani:
- Rebase on the crtc enable sequence update

Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200128162850.8660-2-jani.nikula@intel.com

To allow better flexibility for encoder specific code, push
intel_enable_pipe(), lpt_pch_enable() and intel_crtc_vblank_on() down to
the encoders from hsw_crtc_enable().

There's slight duplication, but also more clarity with the reduced
conditional statements.

Cc: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200128162850.8660-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

Avoid releasing the same stolen nodes causing a use-after-free and/or
explosions as the self-checks fail, as __intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb() may be
called multiple times during module unload.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200130135136.1878646-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/652e16e6168691f89b5cb8c91278a0d960f8f1a9.1580149467.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/a58f536d25d9cd6da510da49663508cd264eee0f.1580149467.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/abcb2d44fd4d6e5f995a3520b327f746ae90428a.1580149467.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/939ffbddf2879e21b9e449f1ae0b621640ecf7ff.1580149467.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/41b937d632edb59ca2ddecefd9ac613c2f998d58.1580149467.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/2c6050201849484a7f4681ce6e2f69cb7cb26756.1580149467.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/48b61928049d3be6541a16789622b4479ea26a84.1580149467.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/0c3876a5beb5a33d8ab1c93e98dd16fd75339481.1580149467.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/3a89bf4c8b312c233e6b219e9c73203608c3eaec.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/436e4267529dc11cc7850d0a4f0703caa81b8c80.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/735389bfa1f9c4be8080f3187ea1dbde308d1ce2.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/722f73a4529808ef7dad51c03c0a3775d8c5b052.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b7865c858374e9ab04cf2bc4ceb3d7d89c27db83.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/0af05f6035046a515097da398de8722c0ca23e56.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The aux ch is used for more than DDC, so let's give it a better
name. For maximum ease let's include both the AUX ch identifier
and the port identifier (for cases where the VBT has redefined
the relationship of the two).
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200123154542.12271-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

To make it easier to figure out what caused a particular debug
message let's print out aux->name.

v2: Rebase for drm_err() & co.
    Add some punctuation to the messages (Matt)
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200123154542.12271-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ad357e65ddb85e7341416f0d7890661a3ef99298.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e6238e75f5a4155b1021736937b1fd7a0756a00.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b21dbc3c0f349345619590893c8ab96828c39103.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/efd117ff0a63ef6ec1a4514f2ee133ca33b3f0a0.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/03a907100bf86e877247df804104c50240e3b38c.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/75c2aa6ff0f0aa744de006c0bd6e33fb91b20994.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/d920b55fe225710169349db4819ca29af349e0b4.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().

Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register
accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(),
intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw().

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch:

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- POSTING_READ(REG)
+ intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)

@@
expression REG;
@@
- I915_READ_FW(REG)
+ intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG)

@@
expression REG, OFFSET;
@@
- I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET)
+ intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET)
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/c89e66aaca33a1e26fa1372172be41da0ee1c62f.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com