提交 · 0ec47097434847c0c3a3bb7287feb46386a62720 · openeuler / Kernel

02 12月, 2019 10 次提交

mm/memory_hotplug: remove __online_page_free() and __online_page_increment_counters() · 0ec47097

由 David Hildenbrand 提交于 11月 30, 2019

Let's drop the now unused functions.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190909114830.662-4-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

0ec47097

hv_balloon: use generic_online_page() · 30a9c246

由 David Hildenbrand 提交于 11月 30, 2019

Let's use the generic onlining function - which will now also take care
of calling kernel_map_pages().

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190909114830.662-3-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

30a9c246

mm/memory_hotplug: export generic_online_page() · 18db1491

由 David Hildenbrand 提交于 11月 30, 2019

Patch series "mm/memory_hotplug: Export generic_online_page()".

Let's replace the __online_page...() functions by generic_online_page().
Hyper-V only wants to delay the actual onlining of un-backed pages, so
we can simpy re-use the generic function.

This patch (of 3):

Let's expose generic_online_page() so online_page_callback users can
simply fall back to the generic implementation when actually deciding to
online the pages.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190909114830.662-2-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

18db1491

mm/memory_hotplug.c: add a bounds check to __add_pages() · dca4436d

由 Alastair D'Silva 提交于 11月 30, 2019

On PowerPC, the address ranges allocated to OpenCAPI LPC memory are
allocated from firmware.  These address ranges may be higher than what
older kernels permit, as we increased the maximum permissable address in
commit 4ffe713b ("powerpc/mm: Increase the max addressable memory to
2PB").  It is possible that the addressable range may change again in
the future.

In this scenario, we end up with a bogus section returned from
__section_nr (see the discussion on the thread "mm: Trigger bug on if a
section is not found in __section_nr").

Adding a check here means that we fail early and have an opportunity to
handle the error gracefully, rather than rumbling on and potentially
accessing an incorrect section.

Further discussion is also on the thread ("powerpc: Perform a bounds
check in arch_add_memory")
  http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190827052047.31547-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191001004617.7536-2-alastair@au1.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NAlastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

dca4436d

mm/hotplug: reorder memblock_[free|remove]() calls in try_remove_memory() · 32d1fe8f

由 Anshuman Khandual 提交于 11月 30, 2019

Currently during memory hot add procedure, memory gets into memblock
before calling arch_add_memory() which creates its linear mapping.

  add_memory_resource() {
	..................
	memblock_add_node()
	..................
	arch_add_memory()
	..................
  }

But during memory hot remove procedure, removal from memblock happens
first before its linear mapping gets teared down with
arch_remove_memory() which is not consistent.  Resource removal should
happen in reverse order as they were added.  However this does not pose
any problem for now, unless there is an assumption regarding linear
mapping.  One example was a subtle failure on arm64 platform [1].
Though this has now found a different solution.

  try_remove_memory() {
	..................
	memblock_free()
	memblock_remove()
	..................
	arch_remove_memory()
	..................
  }

This changes the sequence of resource removal including memblock and
linear mapping tear down during memory hot remove which will now be the
reverse order in which they were added during memory hot add.  The
changed removal order looks like the following.

  try_remove_memory() {
	..................
	arch_remove_memory()
	..................
	memblock_free()
	memblock_remove()
	..................
  }

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11127623/

Memory hot remove now works on arm64 without this because a recent
commit 60bb462fc7ad ("drivers/base/node.c: simplify
unregister_memory_block_under_nodes()").

This does not fix a serious problem.  It just removes an inconsistency
while freeing resources during memory hot remove which for now does not
pose a real problem.

David mentioned that re-ordering should still make sense for consistency
purpose (removing stuff in the reverse order they were added).  This
patch is now detached from arm64 hot-remove series.

Michal:

: I would just a note that the inconsistency doesn't pose any problem now
: but if somebody makes any assumptions about linear mappings then it could
: get subtly broken like your example for arm64 which has found a different
: solution in the meantime.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1569380273-7708-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.comSigned-off-by: NAnshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

32d1fe8f

mm/memory-failure.c: use page_shift() in add_to_kill() · 75068518

由 Yunfeng Ye 提交于 11月 30, 2019

page_shift() is supported after the commit 94ad9338 ("mm: introduce
page_shift()").

So replace with page_shift() in add_to_kill() for readability.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/543d8bc9-f2e7-3023-7c35-2e7ed67c0e82@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NYunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

75068518

mm, soft-offline: convert parameter to pfn · feec24a6

由 Naoya Horiguchi 提交于 11月 30, 2019

Currently soft_offline_page() receives struct page, and its sibling
memory_failure() receives pfn. This discrepancy looks weird and makes
precheck on pfn validity tricky. So let's align them.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191016234706.GA5493@www9186uo.sakura.ne.jpSigned-off-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Acked-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

feec24a6

mm/memory-failure.c clean up around tk pre-allocation · 996ff7a0

由 Jane Chu 提交于 11月 30, 2019

add_to_kill() expects the first 'tk' to be pre-allocated, it makes
subsequent allocations on need basis, this makes the code a bit
difficult to read.

Move all the allocation internal to add_to_kill() and drop the **tk
argument.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1565112345-28754-2-git-send-email-jane.chu@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NJane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

996ff7a0

memfd: add test for COW on MAP_PRIVATE and F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE mappings · 2e53c4e1

由 Joel Fernandes (Google) 提交于 11月 30, 2019

In this test, the parent and child both have writable private mappings.
The test shows that without the patch in this series, the parent and
child shared the same memory which is incorrect.  In other words, COW
needs to be triggered so any writes to child's copy stays local to the
child.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191107195355.80608-2-joel@joelfernandes.orgSigned-off-by: NJoel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Nicolas Geoffray <ngeoffray@google.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

2e53c4e1

mm, memfd: fix COW issue on MAP_PRIVATE and F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE mappings · 05d35110

由 Nicolas Geoffray 提交于 11月 30, 2019

F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE has unexpected behavior when used with MAP_PRIVATE:
A private mapping created after the memfd file that gets sealed with
F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE loses the copy-on-write at fork behavior, meaning
children and parent share the same memory, even though the mapping is
private.

The reason for this is due to the code below:

  static int shmem_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
  {
        struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(file_inode(file));

        if (info->seals & F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE) {
                /*
                 * New PROT_WRITE and MAP_SHARED mmaps are not allowed when
                 * "future write" seal active.
                 */
                if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) && (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
                        return -EPERM;

                /*
                 * Since the F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seals allow for a MAP_SHARED
                 * read-only mapping, take care to not allow mprotect to revert
                 * protections.
                 */
                vma->vm_flags &= ~(VM_MAYWRITE);
        }
        ...
  }

And for the mm to know if a mapping is copy-on-write:

  static inline bool is_cow_mapping(vm_flags_t flags)
  {
        return (flags & (VM_SHARED | VM_MAYWRITE)) == VM_MAYWRITE;
  }

The patch fixes the issue by making the mprotect revert protection
happen only for shared mappings.  For private mappings, using mprotect
will have no effect on the seal behavior.

The F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE feature was introduced in v5.1 so v5.3.x stable
kernels would need a backport.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: reflow comment, per Christoph]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191107195355.80608-1-joel@joelfernandes.org
Fixes: ab3948f5 ("mm/memfd: add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd")
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Geoffray <ngeoffray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

05d35110

01 12月, 2019 30 次提交

mm/memory.c: fix a huge pud insertion race during faulting · 625110b5

由 Thomas Hellstrom 提交于 11月 30, 2019

A huge pud page can theoretically be faulted in racing with pmd_alloc()
in __handle_mm_fault().  That will lead to pmd_alloc() returning an
invalid pmd pointer.

Fix this by adding a pud_trans_unstable() function similar to
pmd_trans_unstable() and check whether the pud is really stable before
using the pmd pointer.

Race:
  Thread 1:             Thread 2:                 Comment
  create_huge_pud()                               Fallback - not taken.
                        create_huge_pud()         Taken.
  pmd_alloc()                                     Returns an invalid pointer.

This will result in user-visible huge page data corruption.

Note that this was caught during a code audit rather than a real
experienced problem.  It looks to me like the only implementation that
currently creates huge pud pagetable entries is dev_dax_huge_fault()
which doesn't appear to care much about private (COW) mappings or
write-tracking which is, I believe, a prerequisite for create_huge_pud()
falling back on thread 1, but not in thread 2.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191115115808.21181-2-thomas_os@shipmail.org
Fixes: a00cc7d9 ("mm, x86: add support for PUD-sized transparent hugepages")
Signed-off-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

625110b5

mm: move the backup x_devmap() functions to asm-generic/pgtable.h · bf1a12a8

由 Thomas Hellstrom 提交于 11月 30, 2019

The asm-generic/pgtable.h include file appears to be the correct place for
the backup x_devmap() inline functions. Moving them here is also
necessary if we want to include x_devmap() in the [pmd|pud]_unstable
functions. So move the x_devmap() functions to asm-generic/pgtable.h

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191115115808.21181-1-thomas_os@shipmail.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

bf1a12a8

mm/rmap.c: use VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() in __page_check_anon_rmap() · 30c46382

由 Yang Shi 提交于 11月 30, 2019

The __page_check_anon_rmap() just calls two BUG_ON()s protected by
CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, the #ifdef could be eliminated by using VM_BUG_ON_PAGE().

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1573157346-111316-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: NYang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

30c46382

mm/rmap.c: fix outdated comment in page_get_anon_vma() · 091e4299

由 Miles Chen 提交于 11月 30, 2019

Replace DESTROY_BY_RCU with SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU because
SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU has been renamed to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU by commit
5f0d5a3a ("mm: Rename SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU")

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191017093554.22562-1-miles.chen@mediatek.comSigned-off-by: NMiles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

091e4299

asm-generic/mm: stub out p{4,u}d_clear_bad() if __PAGETABLE_P{4,U}D_FOLDED · f2400abc