- 02 7月, 2013 17 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
My recent truncate patch uncovered this bug, but I can reproduce it without the truncate patch. If you mount with -o compress-force, do a direct write to some area, do a buffered write to some other area, and then do a direct read you will get the wrong data for where you did the buffered write. This is because the generic direct io helpers only call filemap_write_and_wait once, and for compression we need it twice. So to be safe add the btrfs_wait_ordered_range to the start of the direct io function to make sure any compressed writes have truly been written. This patch makes xfstests 130 pass when you mount with -o compress-force=lzo. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
There is another bug in the tree mod log stuff in that we're calling tree_mod_log_free_eb every single time a block is cow'ed. The problem with this is that if this block is shared by multiple snapshots we will call this multiple times per block, so if we go to rewind the mod log for this block we'll BUG_ON() in __tree_mod_log_rewind because we try to rewind a free twice. We only want to call tree_mod_log_free_eb if we are actually freeing the block. With this patch I no longer hit the panic in __tree_mod_log_rewind. Thanks, Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We need to hold the tree mod log lock in __tree_mod_log_rewind since we walk forward in the tree mod entries, otherwise we'll end up with random entries and trip the BUG_ON() at the front of __tree_mod_log_rewind. This fixes the panics people were seeing when running find /whatever -type f -exec btrfs fi defrag {} \; Thansk, Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I missed fixing the backref stuff when I introduced the skinny metadata. If you try and do things like snapshot aware defrag with skinny metadata you are going to see tons of warnings related to the backref count being less than 0. This is because the delayed refs will be found for stuff just fine, but it won't find the skinny metadata extent refs. With this patch I'm not seeing warnings anymore. Thanks, Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Several users reported this crash of NULL pointer or general protection, the story is that we add a rbtree for speedup ulist iteration, and we use krealloc() to address ulist growth, and krealloc() use memcpy to copy old data to new memory area, so it's OK for an array as it doesn't use pointers while it's not OK for a rbtree as it uses pointers. So krealloc() will mess up our rbtree and it ends up with crash. Reviewed-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
- It makes no sense that we deal with a inode in the dead tree. - fix the race between dio and page copy by waiting the dio completion - avoid the page copy vs truncate/punch hole - check if the page is in the page cache or not Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
- It make no sense that we continue to do something after the error happened, just go back with this patch. - remove some check of copy_nocow_pages_for_inode(), such as page check after write, inode check in the end of the function, because we are sure they exist. - remove the unnecessary goto in the return value check of the write Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We get oops while running btrfs replace start test, ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:608! [SNIP] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa04b36c7>] copy_nocow_pages_for_inode+0x217/0x3f0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04b34b0>] ? scrub_print_warning_inode+0x230/0x230 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04b34b0>] ? scrub_print_warning_inode+0x230/0x230 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04bb8ce>] iterate_extent_inodes+0x1ae/0x300 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04bbab2>] iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x92/0xb0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04b34b0>] ? scrub_print_warning_inode+0x230/0x230 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04b3b07>] copy_nocow_pages_worker+0x97/0x150 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa048eed4>] worker_loop+0x134/0x540 [btrfs] [<ffffffff816274ea>] ? __schedule+0x3ca/0x7f0 [<ffffffffa048eda0>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x300/0x300 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8106f2f0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0 [<ffffffff8106f230>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x80/0x80 [<ffffffff8163181c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [<ffffffff8106f230>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x80/0x80 [SNIP] RIP [<ffffffff8111f4c5>] unlock_page+0x35/0x40 RSP <ffff88010316bb98> ---[ end trace 421e79ad0dd72c7d ]--- it is because we forgot to lock the page again after we read data to the page. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NLin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
When adjusting the enospc rules for relocation I ran into a deadlock because we were relocating the only system chunk and that forced us to try and allocate a new system chunk while holding locks in the chunk tree, which caused us to deadlock. To fix this I've moved all of the dev extent addition and chunk addition out to the delayed chunk completion stuff. We still keep the in-memory stuff which makes sure everything is consistent. One change I had to make was to search the commit root of the device tree to find a free dev extent, and hold onto any chunk em's that we allocated in that transaction so we do not allocate the same dev extent twice. This has the side effect of fixing a bug with balance that has been there ever since balance existed. Basically you can free a block group and it's dev extent and then immediately allocate that dev extent for a new block group and write stuff to that dev extent, all within the same transaction. So if you happen to crash during a balance you could come back to a completely broken file system. This patch should keep these sort of things from happening in the future since we won't be able to allocate free'd dev extents until after the transaction commits. This has passed all of the xfstests and my super annoying stress test followed by a balance. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I hit a weird problem were my root item had been deleted but the orphan item had not. This isn't necessarily a problem, but it keeps the file system from being mounted. To fix this we just need to axe the orphan item if we can't find the fs root when we're putting them altogether. With this patch I was able to successfully mount my file system. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Now reading the data from the target device of the replace operation is allowed, so the mirror number that is greater than the stripes number of a chunk is valid, we will tune it when we find there is no target device later. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Using the structure btrfs_sector_sum to keep the checksum value is unnecessary, because the extents that btrfs_sector_sum points to are continuous, we can find out the expected checksums by btrfs_ordered_sum's bytenr and the offset, so we can remove btrfs_sector_sum's bytenr. After removing bytenr, there is only one member in the structure, so it makes no sense to keep the structure, just remove it, and use a u32 array to store the checksum value. By this change, we don't use the while loop to get the checksums one by one. Now, we can get several checksum value at one time, it improved the performance by ~74% on my SSD (31MB/s -> 54MB/s). test command: # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/file0 bs=1M count=1024 oflag=sync Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We always just try and reserve data space when we write, but if we are out of space but have prealloc'ed extents we should still successfully write. This patch will try and see if we can write to prealloc'ed space and if we can go ahead and allow the write to continue. With this patch we now pass xfstests generic/274. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
try_to_writeback_inodes_sb_nr returns 1 if writeback is already underway, which is completely fraking useless for us as we need to make sure pages are actually written before we go and check if there are ordered extents. So replace this with an open coding of try_to_writeback_inodes_sb_nr minus the writeback underway check so that we are sure to actually have flushed some dirty pages out and will have ordered extents to use. With this patch xfstests generic/273 now passes. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
There are all of these checks in the ENOSPC code to see if committing the transaction would free up enough space to make the allocation. This is because early on we just committed the transaction and hoped and prayed, which resulted in cases where it took _forever_ to get an ENOSPC when we really were out of space. So we check space_info->bytes_pinned, except this isn't completely true because it doesn't account for space we may free but are stuck in delayed refs. So tests like xfstests 226 would fail because we wouldn't commit the transaction to free up the data space. So instead add a percpu counter that will be a little fuzzier, it will add bytes as soon as we try to free up the space, and remove any space it doesn't actually free up when we get around to doing the actual free. We then 0 out this counter every transaction period so we have a better idea of how much space we will actually free up by committing this transaction. With this patch we now pass xfstests 226. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have an optimization that will go ahead and cache no acls on an inode if there are no xattrs on the inode. This saves us a lookup later to check the acls for writes or any other access. The problem is I use selinux so I always have an xattr on inodes, so make this test a little smarter and check for the actual acl hash on the key and if it isn't there then we still get to cache no acl which makes everybody who uses selinux a little happier. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 01 7月, 2013 13 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This has plagued us forever and I'm so over working around it. When we truncate down to a non-page aligned offset we will call btrfs_truncate_page to zero out the end of the page and write it back to disk, this will keep us from exposing stale data if we truncate back up from that point. The problem with this is it requires data space to do this, and people don't really expect to get ENOSPC from truncate() for these sort of things. This also tends to bite the orphan cleanup stuff too which keeps people from mounting. To get around this we can just move this into btrfs_cont_expand() to make sure if we are truncating up from a non-page size aligned i_size we will zero out the rest of this page so that we don't expose stale data. This will give ENOSPC if you try to truncate() up or if you try to write past the end of isize, which is much more reasonable. This fixes xfstests generic/083 failing to mount because of the orphan cleanup failing. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This patch does two things. First we no longer explicitly read in the blocks we're trying to readahead. For things like balance_level we may never actually use the blocks so this just adds uneeded latency, and balance_level and split_node will both read in the blocks they care about explicitly so if the blocks need to be waited on it will be done there. Secondly we no longer drop the path if we do readahead, we just set the path blocking before we call reada_for_balance() and then we're good to go. Hopefully this will cut down on the number of re-searches. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This patch does two things, first it only does one call to btrfs_buffer_uptodate() with the gen specified instead of once with 0 and then again with gen specified. The other thing is to call btrfs_read_buffer() on the buffer we've found instead of dropping it and then calling read_tree_block(). This will keep us from doing yet another radix tree lookup for a buffer we've already found. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
A user reported a deadlock where the async submit thread was blocked on the lock_extent() lock, and then everybody behind him was locked on the page lock for the page he was holding. Looking at the code I noticed we do not unlock the extent range when we get ENOSPC and goto retry. This is bad because we immediately try to lock that range again to do the cow, which will cause a deadlock. Fix this by unlocking the range. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Sheng-Hui 提交于
The comment is for btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier, not for btrfs_attach_transaction. Fix the typo. Signed-off-by: NWang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We unconditionally search for the EXTENT_ITEM_KEY for metadata during balance, and then check the key that we found to see if it is actually a METADATA_ITEM_KEY, but this doesn't work right because METADATA is a higher key value, so if what we are looking for happens to be the first item in the leaf the search will dump us out at the previous leaf, and we won't find our item. So instead do what we do everywhere else, search for the skinny extent first and if we don't find it go back and re-search for the extent item. This patch fixes the panic I was hitting when balancing a large file system with skinny extents. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Looking into this backref problem I noticed we're using a macro to what turns out to essentially be a NULL check to see if we need to search the commit root. I'm killing this, let's just do what everybody else does and checks if trans == NULL. I've also made it so we pass in the path to __resolve_indirect_refs which will have the search_commit_root flag set properly already and that way we can avoid allocating another path when we have a perfectly good one to use. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
A user reported scrub taking up an unreasonable amount of ram as it ran. This is because we lookup the csums for the extent we're scrubbing but don't free it up until after we're done with the scrub, which means we can take up a whole lot of ram. This patch fixes this by dropping the csums once we're done with the extent we've scrubbed. The user reported this to fix their problem. Thanks, Reported-and-tested-by: NRemco Hosman <remco@hosman.xs4all.nl> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Dave has this fs_mark script that can make btrfs abort with sufficient amount of ram. This is because with more ram we can keep more dirty metadata in cache which in a round about way makes for many more pending delayed refs. What happens is we end up not throttling the transaction enough so when we go to commit the transaction when we've completely filled the file system we'll abort() because we use all of the space in the global reserve and we still have delayed refs to run. To fix this we need to make the delayed ref flushing and the transaction throttling dependant upon the number of delayed refs that we have instead of how much reserved space is left in the global reserve. With this patch we not only stop aborting transactions but we also get a smoother run speed with fs_mark and it makes us about 10% faster. Thanks, Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I hit a hang when run_delayed_refs returned an error in the beginning of btrfs_commit_transaction. If we decide we need to commit the transaction in btrfs_end_transaction we'll set BLOCKED and start to commit, but if we get an error this early on we'll just exit without committing. This is fine, except that anybody else who tried to start a transaction will sit in wait_current_trans() since we're set to BLOCKED and we never set it to something else and woke people up. To fix this we want to check for trans->aborted everywhere we wait for the transaction state to change, and make btrfs_abort_transaction() wake up any waiters there may be. All the callers will notice that the transaction has aborted and exit out properly. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I hit a deadlock because we aborted when flushing delayed refs but didn't wake any of the other flushers up and so everybody was just sleeping forever. This should fix the problem. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Jie Liu 提交于
Fix the code comments for lzo compression workspace. The buf item is used to store the decompressed data and cbuf is used to store the compressed data. Signed-off-by: NJie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Balance will create reloc_root for each fs root, and it's going to record last_snapshot to filter shared blocks. The side effect of setting last_snapshot is to break nocow attributes of files. Since the extents are not shared by the relocation tree after the balance, we can recover the old last_snapshot safely if no one snapshoted the source tree. We fix the above problem by this way. Reported-by: NKyle Gates <kylegates@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 14 6月, 2013 10 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
With non-mixed block groups we replay the logs before we're allowed to do any writes, so we get away with not pinning/removing the data extents until right when we replay them. However with mixed block groups we allocate out of the same pool, so we could easily allocate a metadata block that was logged in our tree log. To deal with this we just need to notice that we have mixed block groups and do the normal excluding/removal dance during the pin stage of the log replay and that way we don't allocate metadata blocks from areas we have logged data extents. With this patch we now pass xfstests generic/311 with mixed block groups turned on. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
When we cross into a different subvol when doing a lookup we will run the orhpan cleanup. If this fails however we do not drop the ref to the inode we were looking up before we return an error, which leads to busy inodes on umount. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
There are some error cases that we don't do an iput() on our inode, fix this. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
When testing a corrupted fs I noticed I was getting sleep while atomic errors when the transaction aborted. This is because btrfs_pin_extent may need to allocate memory and we are calling this under the spin lock. Fix this by moving it out and doing the pin after dropping the spin lock but before dropping the mutex, the same way it works when delayed refs run normally. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Thomas Meyer 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Thomas Meyer 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When called during mount, we cannot start the rescan worker thread until open_ctree is done. This commit restuctures the qgroup rescan internals to enable a clean deferral of the rescan resume operation. First of all, the struct qgroup_rescan is removed, saving us a malloc and some initialization synchronizations problems. Its only element (the worker struct) now lives within fs_info just as the rest of the rescan code. Then setting up a rescan worker is split into several reusable stages. Currently we have three different rescan startup scenarios: (A) rescan ioctl (B) rescan resume by mount (C) rescan by quota enable Each case needs its own combination of the four following steps: (1) set the progress [A, C: zero; B: state of umount] (2) commit the transaction [A] (3) set the counters [A, C: zero; B: state of umount] (4) start worker [A, B, C] qgroup_rescan_init does step (1). There's no extra function added to commit a transaction, we've got that already. qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking does step (3). Step (4) is nothing more than a call to the generic btrfs_queue_worker. We also get rid of a double check for the rescan progress during btrfs_qgroup_account_ref, which is no longer required due to having step 2 from the list above. As a side effect, this commit prepares to move the rescan start code from btrfs_run_qgroups (which is run during commit) to a less time critical section. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When btrfs_read_qgroup_config or btrfs_quota_enable return non-zero, we've already freed the fs_info->qgroup_ulist. The final btrfs_free_qgroup_config called from quota_disable makes another ulist_free(fs_info->qgroup_ulist) call. We set fs_info->qgroup_ulist to NULL on the mentioned error paths, turning the ulist_free in btrfs_free_qgroup_config into a noop. Cc: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Commit 5b7c665e introduced fs_info->qgroup_ulist, that is allocated during btrfs_read_qgroup_config and meant to be used later by the qgroup accounting code. However, it is always freed before btrfs_read_qgroup_config returns, becuase the commit mentioned above adds a check for (ret), where a check for (ret < 0) would have been the right choice. This commit fixes the check. Cc: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Dave pointed out a problem where if you filled up a file system as much as possible you couldn't remove any files. The whole unlink reservation thing is convoluted because it tries to guess if it's going to add space to unlink something or not, and has all these odd uncommented cases where it simply does not try. So to fix this I've added a way to conditionally steal from the global reserve if we can't make our normal reservation. If we have more than half the space in the global reserve free we will go ahead and steal from the global reserve. With this patch Dave's reproducer now works and I can rm all the files on the file system. Thanks, Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-